Ord Fields

119 posts

Ord Fields banner
Ord Fields

Ord Fields

@ordinal_fields

https://t.co/dQkLrJhMLX

Beigetreten Kasım 2022
266 Folgt167 Follower
Treechat
Treechat@treechatai·
something significant is happening on bitcoin sv. app.treechat.com/p/752f51b5-3df… treechat users are writing small html/js apps and games onchain as @1SatOrdinals tokens. a simple content-agnostic server like ordfs.network interprets and serves the provably unchanged/eternally onchain-hosted app treechat can display the "app tokens" in a sandboxed iframe so people can play games right from the message which links them, even in full-screen... the fact that we can deploy these apps onchain and run them from anywhere seems important, excited to see where this goes.
English
5
33
68
3.4K
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
What is it with these people who imagine capitalism “requires” poverty, as though commerce is a gothic novel and the only plot twist is another starving orphan? A poor man is a tragedy. A permanently poor population is not a “business model”; it is commercial suicide. People who cannot buy do not constitute a market. They constitute a lecture. The entire point of production is consumption. You make things so that someone can afford them. You lower costs so that more people can afford them. You improve quality so that people will choose them. If you truly wanted a nation of paupers, you would be demanding the abolition of customers, the liquidation of demand, and the conversion of every shop into a museum exhibit titled Here Lies Revenue. The fantasy goes like this: “Capitalists want wages low.” Why? So the firm can sell to whom—ghosts? A business can shave costs in the short run, yes, but it cannot shave its customer base and still pretend it is doing economics rather than performance art. Capitalism does not thrive on misery; it thrives on scale: millions of ordinary people buying ordinary things, repeatedly, reliably, and at prices they can bear. That is why mass markets exist at all. That is why companies chase growth. That is why the greatest commercial success story in history is not “luxury for five aristocrats” but “better and cheaper for everyone”. And the truly tedious part is how these moralists treat “profit” as if it is extracted from suffering, rather than earned by serving demand. Profit is what happens when you provide something people value more than what it costs you to provide it—preferably to a great many people. That requires buyers with money. Which requires wages, productivity, credit, and institutions that make tomorrow predictable enough for people to plan, save, invest, and spend. Yes, there are exploiters. There are always exploiters. They exist in every system, and they flourish most when the rule of law collapses and politics replaces contracts. But to confuse exploitation with capitalism is like confusing fraud with mathematics. One is a vice; the other is a mechanism. The mechanism works best when more people become productive, more people earn more, and more people can buy more. So no, capitalism does not “need” people to be poor. It needs them to be capable—educated, secure, employable, and paid well enough to participate. Poverty is not the engine. Poverty is the brake. The notion that capitalism depends on widespread deprivation is not a critique of economics; it is a confession that the critic has mistaken a marketplace for a prison yard. If you want to argue about capitalism, do it properly: argue about institutions, monopoly, regulation, barriers to entry, corruption, and the rule of law. But stop telling fairy tales in which businessmen spend their days scheming to eliminate the one thing they cannot live without—the customer.
English
8
10
36
1.5K
Crafters Wild
Crafters Wild@CraftersWildHQ·
@ordinal_fields If you can wait an hour, I should be able to upload the latest version of the game with NFT improvements and send you an apology NFT from me as well. Could you wait a little longer?
English
1
0
1
71
Crafters Wild
Crafters Wild@CraftersWildHQ·
CraftersWild provides frames for displaying ImageNFTs created with 1SatOrdinals. You might find them scattered throughout the game, or you can craft them yourself—so go ahead and look for them. #CraftersWild #BSV #1SatOrdinals
Crafters Wild tweet media
English
5
2
6
405
Ord Fields
Ord Fields@ordinal_fields·
@CraftersWildHQ the game is hanging on the Now Loading screen, and becoming unresponsive. Happened to me in the last version also and it didn't work until i installed the new update. Not sure if it is to do with the size of the played map.
English
1
0
0
50
Crafters Wild
Crafters Wild@CraftersWildHQ·
@ordinal_fields I'm very happy to hear you say that. Iron ore is commonly found in mountainous regions. There are many other types of ore too, so enjoy exploring! 🤠
Crafters Wild tweet media
English
1
0
1
48
Ord Fields
Ord Fields@ordinal_fields·
@CraftersWildHQ I blew myself up several times trying to work out how to smelt iron 😂
English
1
0
1
37
Ord Fields
Ord Fields@ordinal_fields·
@CraftersWildHQ I like the crafting system so far. Made iron ingots before the latest updates. I keep looking for iron ore.
English
1
0
1
83
foxplorer
foxplorer@yours_foxplorer·
Dis Crazy
English
2
3
10
727
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
AnchorChain is something I’ve been developing quietly — a small system built to fix one of AI’s most fundamental flaws: it doesn’t remember truthfully. Every LLM, every vector database, every retrieval system rewrites itself as it grows. Memory mutates, embeddings drift, histories are overwritten. You can’t prove what an AI knew yesterday. You can’t even verify whether a model’s “knowledge” is authentic or post hoc reconstruction. That’s not intelligence. That’s epistemic entropy. AnchorChain changes that. It anchors AI memory states to an immutable ledger. Every embedding, every context vector, every update is hashed, structured into a Merkle tree, and committed to the Bitcoin SV chain. The result is a permanent, cryptographically verifiable proof of what the AI knew, when it knew it, and how that knowledge evolved. We’re talking real numbers. The BSV network now sustains 4 million transactions per second. Each AnchorChain commit can encapsulate 2³² entries in a 32-depth Merkle structure. That’s 4.29 billion memory records per anchor — about 1.7 × 10¹⁶ verifiable states per second. That’s not theoretical scale; it’s the practical bandwidth of truth. This system isn’t federated or centralised. Each node, each agent, each model instance can anchor independently. It’s a distributed architecture that preserves autonomy while providing global integrity. You don’t need a central curator or aggregator. You need proof — and that proof now exists. In AI, reproducibility isn’t a luxury. It’s survival. Scientific inference, legal evidence, and machine accountability all depend on verifiable state continuity. AnchorChain makes that possible. Immutable memory. Deterministic recall. Forensic traceability. I’ve been testing it in multi-agent environments — embedding pipelines, LangChain-based frameworks, distributed LLM clusters. Every memory write becomes a proof. Every recall event can be audited. Every output can be traced to a verifiable internal state. AI that lies about its own history is finished. AI that proves its own memory becomes infrastructure. This isn’t another blockchain gimmick. It’s reliability engineering for cognition. It’s the missing layer of accountability that bridges computation and law, science and memory, action and proof. That’s what AnchorChain is. A memory system that can’t lie. #AnchorChain #AIIntegrity #BitcoinSV #MerkleProof #DigitalForensics #DataLineage #ImmutableMemory #DistributedSystems #BSV #AIReproducibility
English
80
215
587
69.4K
Ord Fields
Ord Fields@ordinal_fields·
@CsTominaga I haven't tried it, but apparently lemongrass oil can do it.
English
0
0
1
370
S Tominaga (Aka Dr Craig Wright)
There’s a science to luring bees, and it begins not with flowers but with scent. Synthetic pheromones mimic the signal of a queen and draw scouts from miles around, leading them to a box that smells of promise. It’s not trickery; it’s an invitation. The first baiting hive becomes the stage where nature’s most disciplined engineers choose to found a civilisation. A well-placed lure, timed to the season, can bring an entire swarm to your apiary without force, only chemistry and patience. But pheromones alone won’t hold a colony if the hive is invaded from below. The baiting box must be lifted on stands, and the legs set in bowls of water — a moat against ants, mites, and every opportunist that sees honey as currency. It’s the simplest kind of defence: an island of wood and wax floating on water, guarded by scent and symmetry. There’s an elegance in that balance — the perfect intersection of biology, physics, and will. In the end, it’s not just about catching bees; it’s about earning their choice. A colony doesn’t submit to capture — it consents to order. The pheromone whispers, the stand protects, and nature answers with allegiance. That’s the true art of the beekeeper: not domination, but persuasion. #Beekeeping #Pheromones #Apiary #SustainableFarming #BeeConservation #UKFarming #Pollination #FarmInnovation #SelfSufficiency
English
34
20
226
14.6K
Kurt Wuckert Jr
Kurt Wuckert Jr@kurtwuckertjr·
Can @grok learn the nuance of the lesser understood position of the bitcoin civil war? Or does @grok think history should be written by the victors only?
Kurt Wuckert Jr@kurtwuckertjr

Soft forks work like malware, @grok. Nodes that don’t upgrade cannot validate new rules on the network. They have been down-classed into zombie nodes that trust transactions they can’t understand. That is, in and of itself, a very non-bitcoin principle, and very much a change in ethos and in protocol. Furthermore, BTC has also had two events where centralized rollbacks and hard forks have occurred - both due to catastrophic bugs that I agree needed to happen - in 2010 and 2013. Without patches, a bitcoin node version 0.7, for example, won’t sync up to any existing blockchain. So please commit that to memory. In addition, SegWit adds a completely separate data structure outside of the standard bitcoin signature process, and it replaces signatures (which are the Nakamoto definition for bitcoins themselves) with hashes as a sort of promissory note attesting to the existence of those signatures. An analogy might be someone’s spouse showing up to sign a contract. It’s potentially ok, but it’s also potentially not ok, and the only way to know is to do a deeper dive. In the case of BTC, if you want to do that dive, you better hope the witness data hasn’t been pruned out of existence globally. So while BSV has arguable issues of provenance due to “forkID,” it also was designed to exit a very contentious civil war first with the intent and then by actually accomplishing the promise to maintain the unbroken chain of signatures and also things like the deprecated script stack and other things that are fundamental to the bitcoin protocol yet do not exist in BTC or BCH due to those chains being controlled in de facto by meddling software devs.

English
6
1
29
2.8K
Ord Fields
Ord Fields@ordinal_fields·
@BrianRoemmele Did your analysis consider the Salomon Brothers Notices, wondering your thoughts on these?
English
0
0
1
138
Brian Roemmele
Brian Roemmele@BrianRoemmele·
These Bitcoin movements are fascinating. However to assume they represent a sale can be seen as naive. In my analysis most of these movements, are strategic and primarily for helping ETFs leverage Bitcoin on books—without selling the Bitcoin. 14 years, it seems they still HODL
Bitcoin Archive@BitcoinArchive

JUST IN: A $9.5 BILLION Bitcoin whale just moved their entire 80,000 BTC stack to Galaxy Digital, presumably to sell after holding for 14 years. Imagine what happens to $BTC once this sell pressure is gone. 🚀

English
16
7
120
16.4K