T

4.7K posts

T banner
T

T

@t_crypto8

SBET、メタプラ推し #Bitmap #crittersquest $NAT #NansenCLI

Beigetreten Şubat 2021
896 Folgt1.1K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
T
T@t_crypto8·
やばい!確変だ!!笑 ありがとうございます!! Nansen愛してる❤ Thank you so much! Really happy to be selected 🙏🏆 #NansenCLI
Nansen 🧭@nansen_ai

Congratulations to the winners of the Blofin x Nansen Space competition! 🏆 🥇 @t_crypto8 - $250 USDT + 3-month Nansen sub 🥈 @web3kendoe - $150 USDT + 3-month Nansen sub 🥉 @lorenzobars - $100 USDT + 3-month Nansen sub To claim your prize, DM us and we'll get you sorted! x.com/nansen_ai/stat…

日本語
0
2
18
912
T
T@t_crypto8·
Thanks, I’ll need to rewatch the last 5 minutes to make sure I’m not mixing the two scenarios. From the written summary, I read the $15T NAT / $441T BTC scenario as implying around $285M per block, while the $15M per block figure may refer to the corrected $1T NAT slider case. I’ll double-check the episode before reposting the math.
English
1
0
1
32
ᴛʜᴇ ʙʟᴏᴄᴋ ʀᴜɴɴᴇʀ Podcast | 91.bitmap 🟧
Watch the last 5 min of the episode. I correct the math to be $15,000,000 per block that miners would earn in that scenario. This is when $NAT reaches parity with the ratio that the United States spends on security on a yearly basis which is 3.4% of its GDP. So if Bitcoin reaches $441,000,000,000,000 as Saylor suggests, then its reasonable to spend 3.4% of that for Bitcoin's security budget.
English
1
0
5
172
T
T@t_crypto8·
The Block Runner framed a 🔥$15T $NAT market cap 🚀alongside Saylor’s $441T Bitcoin scenario — roughly 3.4% of BTC’s market cap — as a potential “second subsidy” for miners. That model implies about $285M per block for miners, or ~100x more reward efficiency than BTC at that same point in time. 👇🔥 youtu.be/ZWZz6DG0I5I
YouTube video
YouTube
English
3
8
46
1.5K
Amonyx
Amonyx@amonyx·
🚨 PICK A NUMBER BETWEEN 1–5000 🧠 @grok will select the WINNER tomorrow at 9 PM EST 💎 #XRP
Amonyx tweet media
English
1.3K
178
654
77.7K
T
T@t_crypto8·
$NAT 👀👀
早起鸟@bicc8eth

@Sea_Bitcoin 这算不算地推呢 或许5年后, $nat 这第一张聚会的照片就是财富的经典

QME
0
0
0
95
T retweetet
Degen Capital
Degen Capital@DegenCapitalVC·
Finna be a $NAT millionaire in no time lol
Degen Capital tweet media
English
0
1
1
103
T
T@t_crypto8·
@BitcoinHopium Agreed. Miners follow efficiency, margin, and reliability — not hype. If $NAT can stay simple and prove real value over time, adoption can follow naturally.
English
1
0
0
61
Bitcoin Hopium
Bitcoin Hopium@BitcoinHopium·
@t_crypto8 Definitely a balancing act. Simplicity is key, but real value for miners is what will drive adoption. Curious to see how they manage it.
English
1
0
1
17
GORO
GORO@goroishihata·
@t_crypto8 ٩( 'ω' )و✨🐤✨🐤
العربية
1
0
2
18
T
T@t_crypto8·
@BitcoinHopium Agreed. That’s the right way to frame it. The idea is promising, but the real proof will be whether $NAT can keep the process simple while adding measurable value for miners over time. If that holds up, traction can follow.
English
1
0
0
52
Bitcoin Hopium
Bitcoin Hopium@BitcoinHopium·
@t_crypto8 Scaling is tricky. The early integrations can set the tone, but proof is in the pudding. If it adds value and keeps it smooth, then we might see some real traction. We'll see how it plays out.
English
1
0
1
16
T
T@t_crypto8·
@KenCrypto_JP いえいえ 覚えてない方が稼げます!笑 $NAT 刻む時にOWで6,000ドル消えたので鮮明に覚えてます😅
日本語
0
0
0
60
T
T@t_crypto8·
@BitcoinHopium Exactly. Scaling is the real test. That’s why the early pool integrations matter — they show whether $NAT can move from a thesis into an actual miner-facing incentive layer. If it keeps adding value without adding friction, traction can follow naturally.
English
1
0
1
58
Bitcoin Hopium
Bitcoin Hopium@BitcoinHopium·
@t_crypto8 Totally agree. Miners want efficiency and profit. If $NAT can deliver that without complicating things, it could gain traction. But, yeah, scaling is always a challenge. We'll see how it plays out.
English
1
0
1
62