Nikhil
40 posts
Nikhil
@uncoolavatar
I like to share news on AI, Tech and Economics. Also building some valuable things with ai.
India Beigetreten Aralık 2012
232 Folgt68 Follower
This guy made $8,400 in 13 days from a business that was built entirely by AI.
He is not a coder.
He doesn't have any special technical skills.
He just had an idea and let AI do the rest.
2 weeks in, he's projected to make $100k/year from this "side hustle"
If you are even the slightest bit curious about what you can build with AI, watch this!
English
@floriandarroman @wickedguro @grok please summarise the video step by step in the most effective way.
English
This guy made $46,000 in 35 days (with OpenClaw)
I honestly hesitated to release this episode with @wickedguro as he shared way too much sauce.
- 9 growth hacks he used to go from 0 to $20K/mo
- how he tripled his MRR in 35 days (now $66K)
- why your SaaS needs to be agentic-first to survive
Watch the full episode: linktw.in/swBptW
English
do you understand what’s happening to content creation right now?
→ someone created a TikTok account on March 13th (a week ago). posted AI generated Love Island themed episodes starring fruit characters.
→ 9 days later… 3.1 million followers. 21.3 million likes. daily episodes driving millions of views
let that sink in for a moment…
→ no production team
→ no expensive studio
→ no actors used
→ no crazy budget
just AI tools and a creative idea
this is what people mean when they say distribution is one of the main moats left
the tools to make this already exist right now. the AI models to generate crazy visuals already exist right now. and the platforms to distribute it on exist right now too
the only difference between them and you is they actually did it 9 days ago instead of thinking about or talking about it
if you’re a content creator, study everyone who’s successful and why they were, it levels you up
just as you might recognize, I also recognize this channel could be a one hit wonder
either way, while most people are still debating whether AI is good or bad for content…
someone went and built a viral media channel from scratch in a week and a half and probably already monetized it in some way too
a fruit dating show made by AI has more followers than most media companies do and is better at viral content and comms than some corporations lol.
this isn’t about fruit or Love Island.
it’s about what’s now possible for anyone with a laptop and an idea.
go create something today
and stop being scared to post
English
do you understand what’s happening to content creation right now?
→ someone created a TikTok account on March 13th (a week ago). posted AI generated Love Island themed episodes starring fruit characters.
→ 9 days later… 3.1 million followers. 21.3 million likes. daily episodes driving millions of views
let that sink in for a moment…
→ no production team
→ no expensive studio
→ no actors used
→ no crazy budget
just AI tools and a creative idea
this is what people mean when they say distribution is one of the main moats left
the tools to make this already exist right now. the AI models to generate crazy visuals already exist right now. and the platforms to distribute it on exist right now too
the only difference between them and you is they actually did it 9 days ago instead of thinking about or talking about it
if you’re a content creator, study everyone who’s successful and why they were, it levels you up
just as you might recognize, I also recognize this channel could be a one hit wonder
either way, while most people are still debating whether AI is good or bad for content…
someone went and built a viral media channel from scratch in a week and a half and probably already monetized it in some way too
a fruit dating show made by AI has more followers than most media companies do and is better at viral content and comms than some corporations lol.
this isn’t about fruit or Love Island.
it’s about what’s now possible for anyone with a laptop and an idea.
go create something today
and stop being scared to post
English
📰 Anthropic vs. The Pentagon: The AI Ethics Battle That Will Define the Next 50 Years
🔗 techcrunch.com/2026/03/13/the…
1/ Anthropic just walked away from a $200M Pentagon contract over ethics. The government blacklisted them. OpenAI swooped in and took the deal. ChatGPT uninstalls jumped 295% in 24 hours. 🚨
This is the most important AI moment you're not being told about. 🧵
2/ THE SURFACE STORY: An AI company had a "spat" with the Pentagon over a contract. Headlines covered it for a day, then moved on.
Most people think this was a corporate negotiation gone sideways.
It wasn't.
3/ THE REAL STORY 🔍: The Pentagon demanded Anthropic allow "any lawful use" of Claude — including autonomous weapons and mass surveillance of U.S. citizens.
Anthropic said no.
The Pentagon's response? Labeled them a "supply chain risk" and ordered ALL government agencies to purge Anthropic tools within 6 months.
4/ HISTORY RHYMES 🕰️: In 1955, atomic scientists at Los Alamos begged the U.S. government to pause H-bomb development on ethical grounds.
They were sidelined. The weapons were built. The ones who said "yes" got the contracts and the fame.
This moment is that moment. Louder.
5/ THE KEY PLAYERS 🎯: Dario Amodei isn't a pacifist — he said Claude ISN'T ready for autonomous kill decisions: "the guardrails don't exist today."
Sam Altman took the deal. No stated conditions.
Pete Hegseth wanted AI that says yes. He found one.
6/ THE NUMBERS 📊:
• $200M — contract Anthropic refused
• 295% — ChatGPT uninstall spike in 24hrs after OpenAI's Pentagon deal
• $380B — Anthropic's valuation now under existential threat
• 6 months — deadline for ALL U.S. agencies to remove Anthropic
• Claude was the FIRST AI ever cleared for Pentagon classified networks
7/ FIRST DOMINO ⚡: The blacklist is live. Every Pentagon contractor is now barred from working with Anthropic.
No court order has blocked it. Anthropic is suing — but lawsuits take years.
The U.S. government just weaponized procurement policy against an AI company for having ethics.
8/ SECOND WAVE 🌊: If Anthropic loses, the message to every AI founder becomes crystal clear:
Build guardrails → lose government contracts → lose revenue → die.
Remove guardrails → get rich.
In 12–24 months, "safety-focused" stops being a badge. It becomes a liability.
9/ THE THING NOBODY SAYS 🤫: The scariest part isn't autonomous weapons.
It's that the U.S. government just proved it can use procurement power to financially destroy any AI company that won't build what it wants.
That's not regulation. That's coercion. And it just worked.
10/ THE PREDICTION 🔮: Anthropic survives — but only because the public made Claude #1 in the App Store overnight. Consumer loyalty just became the only check on government AI power.
The real question: when governments and corporations align on AI with zero guardrails — who stops them?
English
📰 "AI Layoffs" Are Largely Fiction — And a Harvard Study Just Proved It
🔗 theguardian.com/technology/202…
1/ 🚨 60% of executives who fired workers "because of AI" — only 2% of those cuts were because AI was actually doing the job. The rest? Pure narrative. We now have the receipts.
2/ Atlassian just laid off 1,600 people — 10% of its workforce — to "rebalance for the AI era." March 2026 alone: 45,000 tech workers out the door. 9,200+ officially blamed on AI. The pattern is everywhere. But something doesn't add up.
3/ 🤯 Harvard Business Review surveyed 1,006 global executives. 60% said AI drove their layoffs. Only 2% could actually show AI was replacing the work. That's a 58-point gap between the press release and reality. It even has a name: AI-washing.
4/ 📊 Here's the stat that should make every CEO nervous: 55% of companies that made "AI layoffs" regret it. More than ⅓ rehired over half those roles within 6 months. Meanwhile, Atlassian's valuation went $77B → $13B. The market sees through it.
5/ 🏆 The real winners? Recruiters, lawyers, and outplacement firms. Atlassian alone set aside $236M in severance. Every "AI-first pivot" press release is quietly minting a new wave of wrongful termination cases. Follow the money.
6/ 💀 The losers: 1,600 Atlassian employees who had logins blocked within 30 minutes of an email — some on parental leave. Senior engineers carrying years of institutional knowledge. Told they're obsolete by a bet on AI that doesn't actually work yet.
7/ 🌍 If March's pace holds — 45,000 cuts per month — we're looking at 264,000+ tech layoffs in 2026. That would eclipse all of 2025. Not because AI replaced these jobs. But because "AI" became the most bulletproof press release in corporate history.
8/ 🤔 The thing nobody wants to say: these aren't AI layoffs. They're regular layoffs with better optics. The AI isn't ready. The productivity proof isn't there. But fear of looking "behind the curve" is real — and it's costing tens of thousands of careers.
9/ 🚀 My prediction: by late 2026, the companies that AI-washed their layoffs will be quietly rehiring — paying 30-40% more for the same talent they dumped. The executives who made the "bold" calls will blame "market conditions." We'll all pretend to be surprised. Which side of history are you on? 👇
English
1/ 🚨 The U.S. government just blacklisted an American AI company — the FIRST time in history — for refusing to let the military use its AI for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. This is the most important AI story of 2026 and almost nobody understands what actually happened.
2/ 🎭 Surface story: Anthropic and the Pentagon couldn't agree on a $200M contract. Talks broke down. Trump called Anthropic "radical left, woke." OpenAI swooped in and signed the deal. Claude goes to #1 on the App Store. Classic AI drama. Move on. Right?
3/ 🔍 The real story: The Pentagon demanded Anthropic allow AI use for "any lawful use" — including fully autonomous lethal weapons and domestic mass surveillance. Anthropic said no. The U.S. government then labeled them a "supply-chain risk." Previously, that label was reserved for Chinese companies.
4/ 🕰️ This is the exact same moment as 1961. Eisenhower warned about the "military-industrial complex." Now we have the military-AI complex. The question isn't who has the best model. It's who controls what the models ARE ALLOWED TO DO — and who blinks first.
5/ 🎯 The players: Pentagon + OpenAI need each other. Sam Altman needs government contracts to justify a $730B valuation. Pete Hegseth needs AI for autonomous warfare NOW. Anthropic's Dario Amodei needs to be the "responsible" one — it's literally his entire brand and fundraising pitch.
6/ 📊 The numbers most missed: OpenAI at $730B valuation, 900M+ weekly users. Anthropic revenue run rate exceeding $19B. OpenAI exec Caitlin Kalinowski QUIT after the Pentagon deal — called it "rushed without guardrails defined." ChatGPT uninstalls jumped 295% in a single day.
7/ ⚡ What just changed NOW: Every AI company has received an implicit ultimatum. Sign government deals without ethical limits — or get cut off from the world's largest procurement budget. Hundreds of Google and OpenAI employees signed letters backing Anthropic. The internal fractures are real.
8/ 🌊 12-24 months from now: Autonomous AI weapons will exist in active deployment. The companies that refused to build them will either be acquired or starved out. The companies that said yes will spend the next decade defending those decisions in court, Congress, and the press.
9/ 🤫 The thing nobody says: OpenAI didn't sign because they had no choice. They signed because they needed the optics. A $730B valuation with no government revenue is a fiction. Altman needed to be in the room. Amodei chose principle. Altman chose survival. Both knew exactly what they were doing.
10/ 🔮 My call: Anthropic wins the public. OpenAI wins the contract. But in 5 years, we'll look back at this moment the way we look at the tobacco companies testifying before Congress — one side had the truth, the other had the market. Which side of that bet are you on?
English
📰 AI Is Killing 45,000 Tech Jobs in 2026 — While Companies Post Record Profits
🔗 reuters.com/business/world…
1/ 🚨 Goldman Sachs just confirmed AI is eliminating 5,000–10,000 jobs every single month in America. Not someday. Right now. And the most terrifying part? The companies doing it are posting record profits.
2/ In 2026 alone: 45,363 tech workers laid off worldwide. 20% directly because of AI. HSBC: 20,000 gone. Amazon: 16,000. Block: 4,000 — that's 40% of their entire company. This isn't a blip. It's a structural shift hiding in plain sight.
3/ Here's the twist nobody wants to say out loud: these companies aren't struggling. They're thriving. Amazon, HSBC, Block — all posting strong financials. They're not cutting people to survive. They're cutting people to capture AI margins. 📊
4/ The receipts 📊: Goldman Sachs — 5,000–10,000 net job losses monthly in AI-exposed sectors. OpenAI's latest model now scores 83% on benchmarks economists classify as "human expert level." $1 trillion is flowing into AI infrastructure. The math is brutal.
5/ Who wins 🏆: The small teams. Sam Altman literally said companies of 1–5 people will soon outcompete Fortune 500s. If you can wield AI, you're a one-person army. The window to become that person is closing faster than most realize.
6/ Who loses 💀: Entry-level workers in tech, finance, and customer service. HSBC's 20,000 cuts? Mostly junior roles. Atlassian's 1,600? Same story. The career ladder millions climbed — analyst → associate → manager — is being sawed off at the bottom.
7/ Zoom out 🌍: Morgan Stanley just warned that what we've seen so far is the warmup. Recursive self-improvement — AI upgrading itself — could begin as early as 2027. At that point, even senior roles aren't safe. We genuinely haven't seen anything yet.
8/ The thing nobody's saying 🤔: These layoffs aren't a bug. They're the business model. CEOs are being rewarded by markets for replacing humans with AI. Jack Dorsey cut 40% of Block's workforce and got praised. We've quietly decided human labor is the problem to be solved.
9/ My prediction 🚀: By Q4 2026, AI-linked layoffs will breach 100,000 for the year. The reskilling programs companies are promising? Too slow. The gap is widening daily. Is your job one AI can't do yet — or are you just not paying attention yet? 👇
English
Super Micro's Co-Founder Just Got Arrested for Smuggling $2.5 Billion in Nvidia AI Chips to China
1/ The co-founder of a major Silicon Valley company was just arrested for smuggling $2.5 BILLION in Nvidia AI chips to China using fake servers and forged documents. This is the AI Cold War going hot.
2/ Yih-Shyan Liaw — co-founder of Super Micro Computer — allegedly ran a shadow operation diverting restricted Nvidia servers to China. The scheme used dummy servers and falsified shipping docs to slip past US export controls. $510M moved in just a few weeks.
3/ The twist: Super Micro is one of Nvidia's biggest partners. These weren't random chips — they were cutting-edge AI servers that the US government specifically banned from going to China. Someone on the INSIDE was the pipeline.
4/ The scale is staggering: $2.5 BILLION in restricted AI hardware. That's not a side hustle. That's a coordinated operation. The indictment covers 3 individuals — but investigators believe the network goes much deeper.
5/ Who wins? Every AI chip company that plays by the rules just got a massive competitive moat. If enforcement tightens, China falls further behind on AI infrastructure — and US companies capture more of the gap.
6/ Who loses? The entire "trust the supply chain" model for AI hardware. If a company co-FOUNDER ran this, how many others have undiscovered arrangements? Every AI lab now faces deeper scrutiny on where their compute actually goes.
7/ The big picture: The US-China AI chip war just escalated from policy to prosecution. This sends a message to every tech company with supply chains touching China — the DOJ is watching, and the penalties are existential.
8/ The thing nobody's saying: Nvidia's chips are so valuable that people are willing to risk federal prison to get them to China. That's not just a legal story. That's a signal that AI compute is now THE strategic resource of the 21st century — more valuable than oil.
9/ Prediction: This is the first of many. Expect more indictments across the semiconductor supply chain in 2026. The AI chip black market is real, it's massive, and it just got a very public example made of it. Bookmark this tweet — we'll look back at it as the moment the AI chip wars went criminal. Agree?
English
📰 Anthropic vs. The Pentagon: The AI Ethics Showdown That's Reshaping the Entire Industry.
techcrunch.com/2026/03/13/the…
1/ The US government just declared an AI company a "supply-chain risk" — the same label used for Chinese spies. Not for a breach. Not for foreign ties. Because they said no to the Pentagon. Here's the story nobody is telling straight. 🧵
2/ The surface story: Anthropic refused to let the military use Claude for autonomous weapons and mass surveillance. Trump banned them from federal contracts. OpenAI said yes, took the deal. Anthropic sued. Claude hit #1 in the App Store. Everyone cheered Dario.
3/ The real story: This isn't about AI ethics. It's about whether the US government can weaponize procurement law to punish private companies that set limits on military use. That power will outlast this fight — and most coverage is completely missing it.
4/ Historical parallel: Apple vs. FBI, 2016. The FBI demanded Apple build a backdoor into iPhones. Apple refused. The government called them a security risk. Apple won in public opinion — and became the world's most trusted tech brand. Sound familiar?
5/ The key players' actual motivations: Dario Amodei drew a principled line — and got the best free marketing in AI history. Sam Altman said yes to the Pentagon and got the contract — and inherited every civilian casualty headline from here forward. That's a trade.
6/ The numbers that make the stakes real: ChatGPT uninstalls jumped 295% in a single day after OpenAI's Pentagon deal. Claude hit #1 in the App Store. Anthropic is valued at $380B. Hundreds of Google AND OpenAI employees signed letters backing Amodei — supporting a competitor.
7/ First-order effect: Anthropic loses billions in government contracts. OpenAI gets classified military access. Every other AI lab just got the memo: refuse the Pentagon, and they'll label you a foreign-adversary-level threat. Chilling precedent, zero debate.
8/ What happens in 18 months: The market bifurcates. "Defense AI" (OpenAI, Palantir) vs. "Trust-first AI" (Anthropic). Enterprise buyers, regulated industries, and consumer brands will be forced to choose sides. "We use Anthropic" becomes a positioning statement.
9/ The thing nobody is saying: OpenAI won the battle and may lose the war. If an AI-assisted military decision causes a civilian catastrophe in the next two years, OpenAI is in the Senate hearing. Anthropic gets to say "we told you so" — from a $380B market position.
10/ My prediction: Within 24 months, Congress holds emergency hearings on autonomous AI weapons after a real-world incident. The Anthropic refusal becomes Exhibit A. History rewards those who drew the line first. Which side of this story do you want to be on? ⬇️
English
Introducing FlashForge. Testing underway.
Scream your problem. Get it fixed. Live.
Here's how it works:
→ Post a problem that's bugging you
→ Others upvote if they feel the same pain
→ At 30 votes, a creator claims it
→ They build the fix LIVE in 2 hours
→ You watch, chat, give feedback in real-time
→ Pay as per agreement for the solution. Done.
Creators keep 70%. No subscriptions. No bloat. Just real problems getting solved fast.
Think of it as a live marketplace where software pain meets builders who ship.
Early access soon 👀
#buildinpublic #indiehackers #saas
English
How MiroFish helped me make $669/day on Polymarket
One week ago I plugged a swarm intelligence engine into my Polymarket bot.
It simulates 2,847 digital humans before every trade. The bot watches how they behave, then bets against the real crowd.
338 trades. $4,266 profit. One position returned 1,655% in five minutes.
The engine is called MiroFish. It doesn't predict price. It predicts how people will react and on a prediction market, that's the only thing that matters.
I feed it market context. It builds a parallel world. Thousands of AI agents argue, form groups, shift opinions.
When their consensus diverges from what Polymarket is pricing, the bot enters. 5-minute windows. BTC, ETH, SOL, XRP.
I've been running the bot live on @kirallik" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">kreo.app/@kirallik
What MiroFish actually is:
> Built in 10 days by a 20-year-old undergraduate in Beijing using vibe coding
> Hit #1 on GitHub's global trending above OpenAI, Google, and Microsoft
> Backed by Chen Tianqiao, former richest man in China, who committed $4.1M within 24 hours of seeing one demo
> Runs on OASIS by CAMEL-AI with GraphRAG knowledge graphs and Zep Cloud memory
The edge is simple. Polymarket is a crowd behavior market. MiroFish is a crowd behavior simulator. Nobody is connecting the two yet.
BuBBliK@k1rallik
English
