Guccifer 2.0 - Game Over

@KirstieMAllsopp That's a textbook straw man. Nobody said they weren't concerned about children. The question was whether the loss of privacy and anonymity for millions of adults is a proportionate price to pay.

So you aren’t worried about the kids, you’re just worried you’ll be questioned regarding what you want to see on the internet?

It shouldn't matter who you are or what your ideology is to understand how dangerous these laws are that require the submission of state ID to use social media. "Protecting children" is the bullshit pretense. The real outcome is tracking everyone's views and online behavior:

@foreignagentint He also fabricated evidence to associate himself with DCLeaks but got caught. 😉

Regrettably, if Mr Dmitriev had just done some cursory background checks, he'd know John Dougans AI websites are one of the main reasons the West succeeded in dismissing valid claims as RU propaganda. nytimes.com/2024/05/29/bus…

Well, yes, I figured that goes without saying. ;) One day after WAPO was pushing out a story attributing targeting of Trump opposition research to Russian intelligence the GRU supposedly sprung into action with a fake persona that shoved a heavily contaminated copy of Trump opposition research in journalists faces, visibly hiding behind a Russian VPN service when making those communications. It contaminated all 10 of the documents it released that day with Russian breadcrumbs in one form or another, dropped a Russian smiley in it's first blog post and carried out searches through a Moscow based proxy for terms it would later use on it's blog (and sought translations that could be handled internally at the GRU). I'm also well aware that Guccifer 2.0 re-used the contaminated document framework from the first fabrication as the starting point for it's second and third fabrications and that the process did little more than instantly russify some content that the operation released. For these and many other reasons, I remain sceptical of the GRU attribution.

@with_integrity @jaraparilla This Bamford article has it being a (Russian) hack, and Guccifer 2.0 being the main protagonist in the hack. (There are all sorts of other political claims re: Roger Stone on top of all this, but I'll keep this relevant to your work) I thought that clashed with your analysis

James Bamford notes critical Reagan admin role in growth of unchecked NSA: exposefacts.org/bamford-story-… Remember who was VP back then? Bush 41.

I've seen this and don't really have a strong opinion on it. On the technical evidence on Russiagate - It was noted that Guccifer 2.0's GMX email address was tied to an Israeli mobile number and analysis of the ops activity revealed that the the op seemed to like taking Saturdays off. However, beyond that, I don't recall seeing anything suggesting Israeli origin in the technical evidence. SCO Mueller was apparently aware of Stone dealings with Israelis but didn't pursue it. x.com/ClimateAudit/s…

@jaraparilla @with_integrity Its been a while now but this article doesn't add up to me on a number of levels. Did you see it, or have an opinion on it?

@waldogerard @CynicalPublius I have seen mutliple people refer to their credentials and then peddle distortions, lies and logical fallacies. That's where I draw the line.

@CynicalPublius Just curious: Where do you personally draw the line between credentialism and someone explaining that they have a background which gives them knowledge on a certain topic?

The reason I despise credentialism so much is because I have the credentials myself, I know how hollow they are, and I understand that more often than not credentials are used as an appeal to authority when logic and facts do not suffice.

As high-profile websites vanish, it’s a reminder that the web has no built-in archival layer. But some publishers are now blocking the Wayback Machine. What’s at stake if the web stops being archived? Our new FAQ explains: preserving the public record matters. 🌐📚 help.archive.org/help/faq-publi…

That @seanspicer and Trump should have so little understanding of Russiagate hoax that Spicer falsely names and blames Sergei Millian - and Trump endorses this falsehood - is, unfortunately, all too typical of Trump and Trump administration response to the Russia collusion hoax. Almost total lack of concern for its impact on anybody other than Trump or for its impact on international relations. And, after attention on Trump himself subsided, they had almost total incompetence and disinterest in releasing unredacted Russiagate documents that would assist victims other than Trump or unveil the operation of the hoax during the Trump 45 administration itself.

we know (with high confidence) that, in 2016, CIA was running two high-level FSB (Russian intelligence agency) officials as agents (Mikhailov and Dokuchaev). Does the news that SPLC was running false flags make you more suspicious or less suspicious of the DNC hack operation? Isn't it time/long overdue that Tulsi Gabbard declassifies and releases the technical data associated with the DNC and related hacks?

@syorkr1 @Ty_Clevenger If you mean theory for the even second rounding pattern, I think it's possible that WikiLeaks could receive files in a zip file, extract them on Linux using unzip and end up with the timestamps rounding in the manner observed.

@with_integrity @Ty_Clevenger So what is your theory ?

Seth Rich is mentioned in video excerpts posted by President Trump on Saturday. Starts around the 4:17 mark, immediately after former NSA Technical Director explains why the DNC emails published by Wikileaks must have come from an internal source, i.e., someone like Seth Rich. Here's hoping @realDonaldTrump will light a fire under @DAGToddBlanche and @FBI director @Kash_Patel to release data from Seth's computers as ordered by a federal judge. @realDonaldTrump/posts/116423801851760712" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTru…

@UndeadFoia’s unrelenting fight to obtain and expose this information (in addition to what he has already successfully exposed) is an example of three things: (i) what regular people in the Alt Media can accomplish with great effort; (Ii) what the MSM doesn’t even try to do (quite the contrary, they cover up for powerful interests); and (iii) the embarrassing weakness and lethargy of Horowitz, Durham and Congress.

@thekitze Vibe-coding with ChatGPT is like asking a golden retriever to proofread your will. Enthusiastic, eager to please, but immediately confused about what you've just asked it to do.

when you are vibe coding and you finally try the app after an hour

“hE iNDiCtEd tWeNtY fIvE rUsSiAnS” What these leftist frauds never tell their viewers is that Mueller, really Andrew Weissmann, never expected any of the defendants to show up in court. They were in Russia and had no reason to appear, so the whole thing was treated like a free play, a chance to smear Trump with insinuations no one would challenge. But they miscalculated. One of the defendants did show up and started pushing back, and suddenly the whole strategy fell apart. At that point, the DOJ had to beat a retreat from a case so flimsy it couldn’t withstand even minimal scrutiny, because it was never real, just a hollow accusation dressed up for headlines.

The Mueller Special Counsel's Office brought two indictments that went into great detail about the supposed Russian "interference" in the 2016 election. Both were long "speaking indictments" laying out the ALLEGATIONS made by the Mueller prosecutors. Those allegations were dutifully reported by the press and Dems as "Facts" -- something they continue to do to this day. The Mueller SCO those documents publicly, with all the names of Russian defendants there for everyone to see, guaranteeing that none of those people would 1) travel to the US or 2) travel to any country that might extradict them to the U.S. They could have kept them sealed until they had an opportunity to arrest the named defendants -- many of whom had lived in the U.S. at one time or another. But instead the Mueller SCO had grand press conferences where they treated the ALLEGATIONS as fact. But then a strange thing happened. One company named in one of the indictments had a US law firm appear on its behalf. With the Law Firm standing in as a Corporate Reprensentative -- as is allowed by law -- the Russian company pled "Not Guilty" and announced "Game On". The Mueller SCO resisted having to prosecute the case on a variety of grounds -- losing each time. The Mueller SCO then closed up shop and handed the burning bag of dog poop to the U.S. Attorney for DC. Within months the U.S. Attorney dismissed the case. What I typed above is the ENTIRETY of what the Mueller SCO "proved" about Russian "collusion" in the 2016 election -- exactly nothing.

@piersmorgan Cover-ups and framing innocent people isn't public service, it's public disservice - this record started before Russiagate was even a thing.

Agreed. President Trump should stay away from his phone when people he doesn’t like die. RIP Robert Mueller, and thank you for your service.

Under Mueller the FBI had to pay Dr. Steven Hatfill $5.8 million for basically framing him in the anthrax case. Mueller was a modern day Beria. He would find a suspect and reverse engineer the crime. And RussiaGate “One of the worst” is a far a better way to describe him.

On Robert Mueller: The FBI framed 4 men for murder in the 60s When the cover-up was discovered, Director Mueller was asked for the FBI position on their convictions Mueller's FBI lied about the evidence, denied the mens' innocence & only conceded they could have a new trial

@UndeadFoia @FBIDirectorKash Hey @FBIDirectorKash, Why did the DNC, CrowdStrike, DOJ and your agency all miss out the first week of activity (exportation to EML) directly relating to the emails WikiLeaks published? This has been known about for years but I'm yet to see your agency address it.

There are still 12 men indicted by Mueller for hacking the DNC based on evidence apparently produced to Mueller by the same cyber researchers associated with the Alfa Bank hoax. And @FBIDirectorKash hasn't made any of it public.