FarhanX_AI

37.5K posts

FarhanX_AI banner
FarhanX_AI

FarhanX_AI

@FarhanBuildsAI

Premium AI tools, agents & deals | Open for brand deals, sponsored posts & collaborations | DM to partner📩 CPP: @yapper_so [email protected]

London, England Joined Ocak 2024
531 Following14.1K Followers
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Aurora Martel
Aurora Martel@AuroraMar1eL·
Stop telling Claude, "do this." Stop telling Claude, "write code." Stop telling Claude, "fix this error." You're actually treating a senior AI like a junior intern. Here are 8 prompts you can copy and paste directly:
English
16
23
32
686
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Scarlett claira
Scarlett claira@AItechscarlett·
Charles Schwab ran the largest steel company in the world. He had access to every consultant, every system, every productivity tool available in 1918. He said a 15-minute conversation with a man named Ivy Lee was the most valuable business advice he ever received. He paid him $25,000 for it. The advice fit on an index card. Ivy Lee was not famous. He was not a philosopher or a scientist or a professor at a prestigious institution. He was a productivity consultant who had spent years watching extremely capable people fail to do their most important work, and he had developed a precise theory about why. The theory was not complicated. It was uncomfortable. The reason most people never do their most important work is not that they lack time. It is that they never decide what their most important work actually is. They arrive each morning at a pile of tasks with roughly equal claim on their attention, choose based on whatever feels most urgent or easiest in that moment, and spend the day moving through a list that was never designed to move them forward. They are busy in a way that feels productive and accomplishes far less than it should. Lee asked Schwab for 15 minutes with his executive team. Schwab agreed. Lee walked them through six steps. He asked them to try it for three months and pay him whatever they thought it was worth. Here is the system. At the end of every workday, write down the six most important things you need to accomplish tomorrow. Not ten. Not twenty. Six. If you cannot decide what matters enough to make that list, you have already identified the real problem. Prioritize those six items in order of their true importance. Not urgency. Not ease. Importance. The thing that will matter most three months from now goes first, regardless of how uncomfortable it is to start. When you arrive the next morning, begin immediately on item one. Work on it until it is finished. Do not touch item two until item one is complete. Do not check email. Do not attend to whatever walked through the door. Item one, until it is done. Move through the list in order. If you reach the end of the day and items four, five, and six remain untouched, move them to the next day's list without guilt. They were not the most important things. The most important things got done. Repeat this process every day for the rest of your working life. That is the entire system. Six steps. Four minutes the night before. No app required. No morning ritual. No tracking software. An index card and a pen. What Lee understood that most productivity systems miss entirely is that the bottleneck in human performance is almost never capacity. It is prioritization. The average knowledge worker has more than enough hours in the day to accomplish something significant. What they do not have is a forcing function that makes them decide, the night before, in a calm moment free from the noise of the incoming day, what significant actually means for them tomorrow. The morning is the worst possible time to make this decision. The morning brings email and notifications and other people's priorities and the accumulated urgency of everything that did not get done yesterday. By the time most people have decided what to work on, an hour is gone and the decision was made by their inbox rather than by them. Lee's method moves the decision to the evening, when the day's noise has settled and the mind can assess without distraction. The prioritization is done before the chaos begins. Which means the next morning, there is no decision to make. There is only execution. The second insight embedded in the system is the single-tasking constraint. Item one, until it is finished. Not item one until something more urgent appears. Not item one until you have checked in on items two through six. Item one, finished, before anything else receives your attention. This runs against every instinct that modern work has trained into people. The entire infrastructure of the contemporary workplace is designed to fragment attention. Email expects a response within hours. Slack expects a response within minutes. The open office assumes that any question is more important than whatever the person being asked is currently doing. The result is a workforce that is in constant motion and making almost no progress on anything that actually matters. Lee's method is a direct refusal of this dynamic. It does not negotiate with urgency. It does not make exceptions for whoever shouts loudest. It asks you to decide, once, what matters most, and then protect that decision from everything that will try to override it the next morning. Charles Schwab ran Bethlehem Steel. He had seven hundred employees. He had more operational complexity, more competing demands, more legitimate urgency than most people reading this will ever face. He tried the system for three months. Then he sent Ivy Lee a check for $25,000 and a note saying it was the most valuable business advice he had ever received. The system has not changed. The morning has not gotten less chaotic. The inbox has not gotten smaller. The only variable that was ever under your control was what you decided the night before. Six things. In order. Starting with the first. The most valuable productivity advice in history is still free. Most people will read it, find it obvious, and go back to checking email.
Scarlett claira tweet media
English
0
5
5
60
FarhanX_AI retweeted
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Sumit Doriya
Sumit Doriya@sumitdoriya21·
A scientist touched the impossible... Buried beneath endless desert sands, an ancient alien spacecraft awakened Emerald energy surged. The dunes trembled. And history defied gravity. Created using @yapper_so
English
17
29
40
220
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Hayyan
Hayyan@hayyantechtalks·
💥JUST IN: Happy Horse and GPT-IMAGE-2 are now officially live on GlobalGPT — free to try! Create AI videos with realistic physics, native audio-video generation, and advanced image control. No limits. No regional barriers. No invite codes. 👇
English
5
14
24
223
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Swati Gupta
Swati Gupta@hrswatigupta·
🚨 BREAKING: NotebookLM can now tutor you like a $150/hr private tutor from any top university. For free. Here are 8 prompts that replace hours of paid tutoring sessions: (Save this before it goes viral)
Swati Gupta tweet media
English
19
32
110
5K
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Jessica AI
Jessica AI@HalimA60962·
Google Gemini is the smartest AI right now. But 90% of people prompt it like ChatGPT. That's why I made the Gemini Mastery Guide: → How Gemini thinks differently → Prompts built for Gemini → 2000+ AI Prompts Comment "Gemini" and I'll DM it free.
Jessica AI tweet media
English
50
35
57
1.7K
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Hayyan
Hayyan@hayyantechtalks·
🚨 3 years with Claude. It's the technology that has changed my life the most after the Internet. Here are 10 prompts that transform your daily life 🔖👇 [ Add to bookmarks 🔖 you'll need it]
English
26
19
51
1.9K
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Your Tech Girl
Your Tech Girl@yourtechgirl24·
BREAKING: AI can now create dividend portfolios that can generate $100,000 in passive income a year — for free. Here are 12 powerful Perplexity prompts With which you will find safe + growing dividend stocks. Save this thread. 🧵
Your Tech Girl tweet media
English
22
28
47
1.2K
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Evana_AI
Evana_AI@marcyevanai·
🚨 Gemini Pro 1 Year Giveaway! 🚨 ✨ Gemini 2.5 Pro 💰 1000 AI Credits/Month 🎬 Veo 3 + Flow AI + Whisk 📚 NotebookLM 📩 Gmail & Docs Integration To Enter: 1️⃣ Follow 2️⃣ Like & RT 3️⃣ Comment “GEMINI” ⏳ 48 Hours Only.
Evana_AI tweet media
English
24
33
41
382
FarhanX_AI
FarhanX_AI@FarhanBuildsAI·
I hope you've found this thread helpful. Follow me @FarhanBuildsAI for more. Like/Repost the quote below if you can:
FarhanX_AI@FarhanBuildsAI

Aw🚨Just IN: If you've used ChatGPT for writing or brainstorming in the last 6 months, your creative ability may already be permanently damaged. A controlled experiment just proved the effect doesn't reverse when you stop using it. 3,302 creative ideas. 61 people. 30 days of tracking. Researchers split students into two groups. Half used ChatGPT for creative tasks. Half worked alone. For five days, the ChatGPT group outperformed on every metric. Higher scores. More ideas. Better output. AI was making them better. Then day 7. ChatGPT removed. Every creativity gain vanished overnight. Crashed to baseline. Zero lasting improvement. But that's not the bad part. ChatGPT users' ideas became increasingly identical to each other over time. Same content. Same structure. Same phrasing. The researchers called it homogenization. Everyone using ChatGPT started producing the same ideas wearing different clothes. When ChatGPT was removed, the creativity boost disappeared -- but the homogenization stayed. 30 days later, same result. Their creative range had been permanently compressed. Five days of use. Permanent damage 30 days later. A separate trial confirmed it. 120 students. 45-day surprise test. ChatGPT users scored 57.5%. Traditional learners scored 68.5%. AI reduces cognitive effort. Less effort means weaker encoding. Weaker encoding means less creative raw material. You're not renting a productivity boost. You're financing it with your originality. The interest rate is permanent.

English
0
0
0
16
FarhanX_AI
FarhanX_AI@FarhanBuildsAI·
Aw🚨Just IN: If you've used ChatGPT for writing or brainstorming in the last 6 months, your creative ability may already be permanently damaged. A controlled experiment just proved the effect doesn't reverse when you stop using it. 3,302 creative ideas. 61 people. 30 days of tracking. Researchers split students into two groups. Half used ChatGPT for creative tasks. Half worked alone. For five days, the ChatGPT group outperformed on every metric. Higher scores. More ideas. Better output. AI was making them better. Then day 7. ChatGPT removed. Every creativity gain vanished overnight. Crashed to baseline. Zero lasting improvement. But that's not the bad part. ChatGPT users' ideas became increasingly identical to each other over time. Same content. Same structure. Same phrasing. The researchers called it homogenization. Everyone using ChatGPT started producing the same ideas wearing different clothes. When ChatGPT was removed, the creativity boost disappeared -- but the homogenization stayed. 30 days later, same result. Their creative range had been permanently compressed. Five days of use. Permanent damage 30 days later. A separate trial confirmed it. 120 students. 45-day surprise test. ChatGPT users scored 57.5%. Traditional learners scored 68.5%. AI reduces cognitive effort. Less effort means weaker encoding. Weaker encoding means less creative raw material. You're not renting a productivity boost. You're financing it with your originality. The interest rate is permanent.
FarhanX_AI tweet media
English
12
21
24
324
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Safia Sultana
Safia Sultana@AIwithSafia·
We made $50,000 from one channel in a few months 🤯 The crazy part? Every single video is 100% AI generated. No filming. No editing team. No expensive gear. Just AI. I broke down the exact system in a video. Want it? • Comment “AI” • Retweet • Follow (so I can DM) 🚀
Safia Sultana tweet media
English
27
24
38
1.1K
FarhanX_AI retweeted
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Aina
Aina@Aina_Ai2·
THIS is why Airlines hate GROK⚠️ My flight was $1,260, I paid $118. No points. No shady third-party apps. Copy these 7 prompts and see the magic:
English
28
50
82
2.2K
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Zunaira Ai
Zunaira Ai@ZunairaAi·
Steal this without guilt ​It's useful for ChatGPT, Gemini, or Claude: ​10 simple phrases that make the AI respond way better 👇 :
English
28
52
80
1.2K
FarhanX_AI
FarhanX_AI@FarhanBuildsAI·
@Nafees_Ai 60 minutes to revive a phone is insane. Most would’ve spent hundreds instead. AI is becoming the real “tech support.” Game changing.
English
1
0
0
11
FarhanX_AI retweeted
Nafees
Nafees@Nafees_Ai·
MY IPHONE 13 WAS “TOO SLOW TO USE.” - Apple said: “It’s just age. Buy a new one.” - I asked GROK for help instead. - In 60 minutes, it was fast again. No genius bar. No upgrades. Just 5 prompts :
English
17
27
36
339