Nicholas Grant

224 posts

Nicholas Grant banner
Nicholas Grant

Nicholas Grant

@FullyKnownExp

Austin, TX Joined Şubat 2023
35 Following2.3K Followers
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
Well, said. I'm not against cold approach, but I'm very much for men learning to inhabit the physical and tonal awareness necessary to interpret these signals for a warm approach. This happened the other night actually. hanging with friends and one of the new girls looked at an acquaintance and said, 'i'm mad you stopped asking me questions'. He got all tiffy, like 'why are you mad at me?? I'm just talking'. I grabbed him and told him, 'you know she just told you she likes you right!?' She looked at me, blushed, and giggled with her girlfriend. He reacted with 'ohhhhhh' and a smile. They had a nice long talk after that :) I swear to God most men don't need any technical coaching, they just need a little awareness training. A little sending and receiving language of the tone and body as it were
Devon Eriksen@Devon_Eriksen_

No. This is not actually a choice that women need to make. Almost everyone is confused about this, because the actual, functional mating customs of civilized humanity were almost entirely lost in the baby boomer great reset. In civilized humans, courtship between the sexes is initiated by the female. This is why civilized men hate cold approaching, and only r-selecting knuckledraggers are comfortable with the practice... along with men who have killed off their natural distaste for it because they had to learn it out of sheer necessity. Women generally hate this idea, because they don't like cold approaching, either. But I did not say cold approach. I said "initiate". What a woman is supposed to do, according the customs of actual civilization with functional mating rituals, is see a man she thinks she might like, and covertly signal an invitation to approach. This invitation is the first measure of a graceful social dance, where the steps are known to both partners. The signal is to be clear enough that the man understands its intent, but subtle enough that it can be plausibly denied if he proves to be distasteful on closer examination. It is then the man's responsibility to overtly approach and court. But this is not a cold approach, because he knows he has been invited. His responsibility is to not screw up a good beginning. Thus, no one is cold approaching. Look at the cartoon. You've seen it before. And this indeed how it works... but only in a broken culture. Because when both sexes understand their roles, the difference between the top and bottom panels isn't whether the man is objectively attractive or not, but whether Susan dropped a hint. The reason things work this way now is that Susan was brought up without the slightest inkling of what she was supposed to do. In fact, if you told her now that she's supposed to know how to accidentally drop a handkerchief, she'd probably resent the implication that she has any duties or bears any responsibility for doing anything at all. But power and responsibility together in both directions. If women have no responsibility to invite an approach, then they have no power to control who approaches them. And this is a power they desperately want. This is the true reason why they complain about how being approached is "creepy". They have an instinctive sense that men they don't want are not supposed to make a pass, but they have no idea how this is supposed to not happen. So they try to leave it to men to work out. And men, like women, and like every other carbon-based life form on the planet, are noted for their inability to read minds. There is no individual solution to a broken collective. Dire misunderstandings between men and women trying to find mates are simply one more symptom of the disease that caused the late twentieth century West to try to wipe the cultural slate clean, and reinvent all social customs from an undifferentiated soup of naive postwar liberalism. An individual woman who learns to drop a hint — and more importantly, understands that she should — is still powerless to force men around her to learn to pick one up, or to refrain from being a sex pest when she doesn't drop one. An individual man who learns to spot a hint is still powerless to read the minds of women who don't even know they are supposed to drop one, much less how. Humans, unlike almost all other animals, are not creatures of instinct alone. We are evolved to develop and use rituals. And thus we need to have those rituals, and to transmit them to the next generation. Or we will not thrive. Did every culture have a genteel lexicon of hints and winks and dropped handkerchiefs and how to hold a lace fan? Of course not. Mongol horse archers would think this was all effete nonsense. But Mongol horse archers never invented the radio or the airplane or machine tools or the air conditioner, either. So who cares what they would have thought? We had a way of courting. It was a dance, not a war. It worked. People were happy with it. Then some hippies decided it didn't work with their abstract and stupid philosophy. So it all had to go. And now even conservatives don't always remember what it is we're supposed to be conserving.

English
3
1
33
2.6K
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
When do you trust emotions, feelings, and impulses? I do NOT trust an emotion in myself or anyone else if I only feel it in my face and neck. These ones tend to be highly manipulative (think crocodile tears) I DO trust an emotion if I feel it in my back or all the way down to my toes. Think anxiety that flushed your face vs. fear that made the hair on the back of your neck stand up I do NOT trust feelings inspired by an all good or all bad story. Feel the isolation when you think (she's so cold when I'm being vulnerable) I DO trust feelings when I can still hold complexity. Feel the curiosity and discernment when you think (She's closed off. I wonder what her motivations are. I know I usually close off when I'm scared and protecting something. She could also be hiding something dangerous to me. let's find out)
English
2
1
26
905
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
We'll be doing a little group web coaching again next month working with attachment issues for you avoidant guys, clear intentions and self belief for you anxious gentlemen, and deepening subtle communication skills for any of you guys who already have a good baseline and want to play on a deeper level Link below, see you there 👌
English
1
0
4
485
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
If you ever get stuck in those loops where you keep thinking of every reason you're broken, stuck, pitiful, and worthless... your not and, those thoughts can plague the best of us, even guys like my friend Dave, who's got mountains of external success to prove otherwise. whoever you are, however deep your hole of despair is, the journey out of that hole is still the same one foot in front of the other. here's a short story of Dave sinking into self pity, and walking himself back out with the help of a close friend.
Limitless Brave@LimitlessBrave

Loneliness Pity Party 😢

English
0
1
7
755
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
everything in service, and served with discernment, intent, and absolute responsibility more and more i find myself asking how I can best serve home, friends, clients, community, earth, body, and even the future lovers, children, self, and community I haven't met yet and, every step in that direction has led to vastly more fulfillment than any step I ever took in the "how do I get people to understand me, see me, acknowledge me, or value me" direction
English
0
0
15
774
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
one of the coolest things we added to our process this quarter is an anti-vision. Basically, tell me how your business meeting or date is going to fail miserably. it's great. once you say it out loud, you almost can't help but have a laugh and the fear/anxiety just slips away
English
4
0
24
1K
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
so good leadership can be seen in this sense as head servant of your mutual goals
English
0
0
9
901
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
in a typical male female relationship, us men will actually receive her frame into our own. you receive her needs, wants, desires and the energy that comes with. then, direct within your own frame. rather than one or the other. not competition, but inclusion. same with leadership. rather than a battle of who wins (though some contexts, like war, and competition for limited resources, this will be the case), cooperatively, the leader will be the one who can include everyone else's frame within their own
English
1
0
14
1.1K
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
"frame control" is not quite what's going on in a really juicy cooperative relationship. it's more like, do your frames match enough that one person's frame can rest inside the other's in any given context
English
1
0
14
1.1K
vincent
vincent@vincent_yc_li·
so the reason why i haven't been tweeting anything is because the jungian cognitive functions have taken over my life but it's such a complex system & requires so much actual training for pattern matching that despite obsession i've only barely gotten a surface level grip on it
English
2
0
8
382
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
when you respect yourself so hard that you walk away hard 💪🍆
English
1
0
17
1.2K
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
Gentlemen, defend your peace - within and without. In sanctity and sanctuary, your creativity fires up. Everything you need to build your best life, future, and legacy flows from that placid ground
English
0
0
11
1.2K
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
some of these guys out here, valuing their seed so low they'll literally pay to give it away. You gotta value that dick like it's a solid bar of diamond studded gold. Don't give it away for anything less than your best life my friends
English
0
0
8
1.4K
Nicholas Grant
Nicholas Grant@FullyKnownExp·
I really like the vasocomputation model. Every time I experiment with applying the model to my embodied experience, it fits very well, and I don't know if I understand yet how agency works into the model. One of the experiments I've been running the last few days is this global (large muscle groups) tensing vs. release. tensing feels desperate, fragile, and cold. like a last ditch cling. hold on for dear life. reactive. release feels better, smoother, and has an implied safety to it. in order to release I have to assume I have everything I need, which is great but I find myself missing a sense of agency. Going back to tensing doesn't really get it, but filling the muscles with intention and blood pressure starts to give me the sense of stability, power, and agency I had hoped for using the tensing > latching strategy, while also keeping the body tone soft, fluid, warm and adaptable (which, unsurprisingly, directly mirrors my mental process) anybody else playing with this? any thoughts?
English
4
0
20
2.7K