GP Philosopher

102.7K posts

GP Philosopher banner
GP Philosopher

GP Philosopher

@GPPhilosopher

Gandhi once said..., First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win.

Joined Temmuz 2013
645 Following870 Followers
GP Philosopher retweeted
GP Philosopher retweeted
Arno Wellens
Arno Wellens@arnowellens·
Deze gozer wil alle gesprekken van iedereen opslaan, zodat iedereen per definitie altijd verdacht is; ook zonder redelijke verdenking wordt er een opsporingshandeling tegen je ingesteld. Wat een ziekelijk en gevaarlijk wereldbeeld.
Nieuws van de Dag@Nieuwsvandedag_

'Volgens mij woon je in het verkeerde land.' Marianne Zwagerman belandt in een felle discussie met Pieter Cobelens. De columniste is bang dat de overheid burgers op grote schaal in de gaten wil houden. 'Weet je wat jouw probleem is...?' #nieuwsvandedag

Nederlands
60
193
801
8.8K
GP Philosopher
GP Philosopher@GPPhilosopher·
@mariannezw Wat je twee weken geleden en vorige week met @fvdemocratie deed vind ik absoluut niet kunnen. Maar wat je nu met die griezel van een Cobelens doet, echt van mij mag je een lindje. Echt Top @mariannezw !!! Love you! 😘👍 x.com/Nieuwsvandedag…
Nieuws van de Dag@Nieuwsvandedag_

'Volgens mij woon je in het verkeerde land.' Marianne Zwagerman belandt in een felle discussie met Pieter Cobelens. De columniste is bang dat de overheid burgers op grote schaal in de gaten wil houden. 'Weet je wat jouw probleem is...?' #nieuwsvandedag

Nederlands
0
0
1
340
GP Philosopher retweeted
WillDoFreedom.com
WillDoFreedom.com@dancalegria·
@Nieuwsvandedag_ Hulde voor @mariannezw die eindelijk een keer deze discussie aan gaat. Pieter laat zijn masker vallen. Dit soort lieden zijn het grootste gevaar voor de democratie. Iedereen afluisteren, want het zou wel eens nuttig kunnen zijn. Griezels, geen ander woord voor
Nederlands
34
193
1.1K
12.7K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Marc van der Vegt
Marc van der Vegt@VegtDoor·
Pieter Cobelens, sinds 2011 ex-MIVD. Is gepensioneerd. Toch weet hij blijkbaar precies hoe de inlichtingendiensten tegenwoordig werken en al minstens sinds 2014 wetteloos en dus niet-rechtsstatelijk handelen. Hij vindt dat prima. Wilt u meer of minder Cobelens’?
Nieuws van de Dag@Nieuwsvandedag_

'Volgens mij woon je in het verkeerde land.' Marianne Zwagerman belandt in een felle discussie met Pieter Cobelens. De columniste is bang dat de overheid burgers op grote schaal in de gaten wil houden. 'Weet je wat jouw probleem is...?' #nieuwsvandedag

Nederlands
45
77
275
6.2K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Nieuws van de Dag
Nieuws van de Dag@Nieuwsvandedag_·
'Volgens mij woon je in het verkeerde land.' Marianne Zwagerman belandt in een felle discussie met Pieter Cobelens. De columniste is bang dat de overheid burgers op grote schaal in de gaten wil houden. 'Weet je wat jouw probleem is...?' #nieuwsvandedag
Nederlands
465
221
872
190.8K
GP Philosopher retweeted
De Nieuwe Wereld
De Nieuwe Wereld@De_NieuweWereld·
600 miljoen euro voor het opnemen van aardbevingsschade… Terwijl bewoners wachten, wordt er flink verdiend. Hoe zit dit? 👉 Bekijk de laatste uitzending van “Nieuws van de Week” youtu.be/tYjX7rss4qM?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
Nederlands
34
216
471
14.4K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Pieter Omtzigt
Pieter Omtzigt@PieterOmtzigt·
De stiekeme invoering van een sociaal minimumstelsel - hoewel de premies fors verhoogd worden en er elk jaar meer dan 10 miljard(!) overblijft in de sociale fondsen, komt de uitkering straks niet meer boven het sociaal minimum uit - wb-nsc.nl/artikelen/de-s…
Nederlands
98
471
927
50.7K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Dr. Dawn Michael
Dr. Dawn Michael@DawnsMission·
Bill Gates turned $55 million into $1.1 billion on one stock. Months before COVID was heard of, he quietly poured it into German biotech BioNTech. Pandemic hits. BioNTech partners with Pfizer on the world’s first mRNA vaccine. Stock explodes. He knew!
English
277
5.7K
17K
264.8K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Willem Middelkoop
Willem Middelkoop@wmiddelkoop·
‘A center of student opposition to the Iranian gov And Trump just bombed it’
English
0
19
66
7.3K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Pepijn van Houwelingen
Pepijn van Houwelingen@PvanHouwelingen·
Exact tien jaar geleden ging Nederland naar de stembus en bijna twee derde stemde tegen het EU-associatieverdrag met Oekraïne onder andere omdat gevreesd werd dat dit verdrag zou kunnen leiden tot oorlog met Rusland. De uitslag werd genegeerd. Het referendum werd afgeschaft.
Pepijn van Houwelingen tweet media
Nederlands
140
1.4K
3.4K
56.4K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Anthony Aguilar
Anthony Aguilar@AnthonyAgu88102·
Thoughts from a retired Special Operations Officer. Though I am not an aircraft surgeon, nor a Coniurationis Fautor, I have some thoughts that may be on interest, presented in three points, a conclusion, and a hypothesis, regarding the US rescue operation in Iran, with consideration to the photos of the aircraft used. I have flown on the C-130H and the MC-130J in training and in combat, to include static line airborne operations, Military Freefall (HALO) operations, and combat infiltration and exfiltration in austere environs, such as the Kobani Landing Zone (KLZ) in Northeast Syria during Operation Inherent Resolve. Point one: it is important to note that the aircraft used in this operation were NOT the standard C-130 Hercules model, which have 4-blade, steel propellers (see picture #2). The fixed-wing aircraft used were the MC-130J, Commando II, operated by the U.S. Air Force Special Operations Command for clandestine operations. The MC-130J uses six-bladed Dowty R391 composite propellers (see picture #1). These blades are constructed from composite materials, specifically featuring a carbon fiber structure rather than the metal (aluminum) used on older C-130 models. Point two: carbon fiber does not melt in the traditional sense, as it does not turn into a liquid. However, the resin matrix holding the fibers does melt and become viscous. Point three: Steel/aluminum blades snap and break. MC-130J R391 blades shatter and can melt. The images we see from the destroyed aircraft (picture #6) show 6 blades. Therefore, these are the MC-130J Dowty blades (they can melt). And as you can see in picture 4 and 5, when not melted, but rather broken, they shred and snap. They do not bend. As you can see from the steel/aluminum variant on the C-130H model, the blades snap and break and bend, they do not shatter or melt. Conclusion: To declare that the aircraft "definitely" were shot down based on the "bent" propellers is false. Could the aircraft have been shot down? Yes. Could the aircraft have been shot down AND the blades melted in the extreme heat of the fire from the BIP (blown in place)? Yes. Both can be true. But it can also be true that the aircraft was not shot down, nor crash landed, and the propellers do indicate burning and melting, not a crash. Hypothesis: The rescue operation expanded to become the desired Delta Force, JSOC, SOF, ST-6 high-risk operation to ALSO seize the uranium in Iran; hence the need for so many operators, support, aircraft, etc. This WAS intended to be that operation. It failed. So what happened to the aircraft. I do not believe that they were "stuck". I have seen MC-130Js plow through dirt, mud, snow, gravel, etc. I doubt they were stuck. It is more likely that the aircraft took hits upon entry and also likely took hits and damage while on the ground at the hasty FARP at the old airfield in Isfahan, "conveniently" close to where the suspected uranium may have been stored. Lesson: A ground war into Iran will be very costly and will be a tactical, operational, and strategic failure (Clausewitz).
Anthony Aguilar tweet mediaAnthony Aguilar tweet mediaAnthony Aguilar tweet media
English
309
2K
7.3K
721.7K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Ferdinand Meeus
Ferdinand Meeus@fmeeus1·
Theorie alarmerende opwarming door CO2 nu definitief weerlegd door de feiten. Boomstronk gevonden op 2060 meter hoogte onder terugtrekkende gletsjer in Oostenrijkse Alpen , ouderdom 6000 jaar. Beste bewijs dat het toen (zonder menselijke CO2 uitstoot) veel warmer was dan nu. Er groeien vandaag geen bomen op die hoogte in de Alpen. Tja (ongemakkelijke) feiten. wattsupwiththat.com/2026/04/06/an-… via @wattsupwiththat
Nederlands
26
283
621
6.3K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Arno Wellens
Arno Wellens@arnowellens·
Het Nederlands parlement stemde tegen. Toch gaat het door, want het WEF wil het. Dan is Nederland niet langer er parlementaire democratie, aangezien het om zo’n belangrijk onderwerp als je paspoort en eigendomsrecht gaat.
Digital EU 🇪🇺@DigitalEU

The EU Digital Identity Wallet is coming soon! But there are common misconceptions... The wallet will be: ✅Interoperable ✅Voluntary ✅Safe and secure Discover more about this initiative which will come to life in 2026: link.europa.eu/XDjrFX

Nederlands
43
435
992
21.1K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Nury Vittachi
Nury Vittachi@NuryVittachi·
REVEALED: Israeli spy agency Mossad sold Donald Trump a plot to instantly take out Iran—but it had one fatal flaw. And that one little mistake has put the United States firmly in the crosshairs of a war it cannot win—and is creating global panic over oil prices. . The top secret dossier, sold to the US by Mossad director David Barnea had a clear argument, that we can summarize as a four part narrative. One: A network of fake “Iranian NGOs” in the west would circulate a story that Iran had massacred 30,000 or more peaceful protesters, The story would be spread in order to manufacture consent for the west to launch a war against Iran. Two: The Americans would demand to have negotiations with the Iranians to distract them, by having them focusing on peace plans. Three: During this distraction, the US and Israeli air forces would then launch an attack that would take out the entire government of Iran, leaving all seats of power empty—including the peace negotiators. Four: Radical extreme opposition members in Iran, cultivated by Mossad, the CIA, and the NED, would then take control of the country—and install US puppet Reza Pahlavi as a proxy for Washington and Tel Aviv. . IT WORKED. AT FIRST And you know what? Every part of that plan worked perfectly. Except there was one key detail they had got wrong. And that brought the whole edifice crashing down. . ONE: DEMONIZING IRAN The story really starts in January. Mossad and the CIA worked with radical opposition members in Iran to launch a coup at the start of January in which armed men destroyed 700 shops, 305 ambulances and buses, 414 civil service buildings and 750 banks. [SEE VIDEO] They attacked 350 mosques, which is very strange for supposedly Muslim rioters– but they attacked not one synagogue. This was a major insurrection in which people on all sides lost their lives, with more than 3,000 dead after the coup was put down. But this armed coup was repackaged by fake NGOs in the west as a massacre of at least 30,000 peaceful protesters - or maybe 50,000 or 70,000 - by “the regime”. Mossad wanted the fake number to be more than the actual number of people the IDF killed in Gaza. This part worked perfectly. Here’s Time magazine [video] reporting that 30,000 died. Most of the western media supported this. Not one of them reported that the funding for these NGOs could be traced back to western political propaganda groups such as the NED, a CIA spin-off group. . TWO: FAKE PEACE NEGOTIATIONS Part Two of the plan also went better than they could have hoped for. The Americans not only successfully held "peace negotiations", but the Iranians actually made multiple concessions, giving Washington virtually everything it wanted. So the Americans could simply have proceeded with those and got what they wanted anyway. But the US and Israel decided to go ahead with Part Three anyway. (More 'fun'?) . THREE: KILLING GOVERNMENT LEADERS And you know what? That also worked perfectly, from beginning to end – in a surprise, unprovoked attack, the US and Israel killed not just the leader, but 40 members of the Iranian government. Now just imagine the outrage if any country took out the entire government of the UK or Germany or Canada or Australia. The world’s media would be writing editorials about it for years, literally years. . FOUR: THE PUPPET The Mossad-CIA plot was going exactly as planned. All they needed to do was achieve part four: the transfer of power to a US Juan Guaidó figure—a man already selected and waiting in the wings. The western media found supporters of the opposition in Iran to film expressing happiness, and tried to pretend that this was “all” the Iranians. But this was clearly not true. The vast majority of Iranians, including people involved in the violent protest of January, were horrified. . FATAL FLAW Now here’s where the fatal error showed up. Mossad’s plan failed to take into account one thing. There had been a change of attitude last year. Between June the 13th and the 24th of 2025, Israel attacked Iran, killing nuclear scientists, politicians and civilians, as well as members of the armed forces. That was also, clearly an illegal, unprovoked attack. No western leader cared—but the people of Iran, all the political parties, did care. They were outraged. Why are Israel and the United States allowed to just murder people in other countries and get away it? Support for the Iranian government rose dramatically. Mossad assumed that because their contacts, the extreme radical members of the opposition groups, still opposed the government, that many Iranians did. But that just was not true. The Iranians in general had become far more supportive of their government, and opposed to the US and Israel, than Mossad believed. . IRANIANS UNITED Donald Trump told the Iranian people that it was now over to you – signalling that part four should go ahead: a takeover by people allied to Washington and Tel Aviv. But it didn’t happen. So part four of the plan did not work. The Iranians drew together and fought back. Under United Nations law, they had full legal rights to respond to an illegal attack. They made defensive forays to take out the military bases around the gulf which were attacking them, and they closed the Strait of Hormuz. Trump was horrified and furious – not with the Iranians but with Netanyahu and Barnea, the Mossad chief. And this explains why he kept making contradictory statements – he kept saying things that implied the war would be over very quickly, as the original plan said, while also acknowledging that the opposite was true. Remember how he used the phrase “short term excursion”. He also said the war would last four days only. And he also said the war was “already over”. And so on. So we can see that the plan, as sold to him, was a quick in-and-out operation, just as it had been in Venezuela – so that was what he had in his head. . IF YOU SHOOT THE KING… Netanyahu, deeply embarrassed to have helped sell a war to Trump that had spiralled out of control, went into hiding—he was so deep undercover that rumours circulated that said he was dead. For Mossad and the CIA, the plot failed. There’s an ancient saying that all plotters know. “If you are going to shoot at the king, you better kill the king.” What the US and Israel did was shoot the leadership of Iran. But they failed to kill the leadership of Iran. So now they are in trouble. And you know what? I don’t think there is any sympathy for them.
English
184
1.9K
4.3K
325.8K
GP Philosopher retweeted
Jaap
Jaap@JaapTbm1·
Het feit dat hier in Nederland nog niet de pleuris over is uitgebroken spreekt boekdelen. Onbegrijpelijk.
Jaap tweet media
Nederlands
50
409
898
15.1K
GP Philosopher retweeted
ockhams-scheermes
ockhams-scheermes@ockhams·
#GretaThunberg 17 jaar, geen diploma, leest voor van script, krijgt 24/7 media aandacht Dr Judith Curry: klimaatwetenschapper, 140 papers en boeken, spreekt Greta tegen, zegt geen #klimaat probleem. Krijgt NUL media aandacht. Zo werkt media bias en #fakenews
ockhams-scheermes tweet media
Nederlands
329
5.8K
9.7K
0
GP Philosopher retweeted
Jan B. Hommel
Jan B. Hommel@BumblebeeJoe·
De @SPnl met deze uit de kluiten gewassen kleuter @jimmydijk heeft mijn krediet voorgoed verloren. Grote waffel als het niets kost, maar tijdens de #coronocrisis was de SP gewoon het schoothondje van de macht. En dat hun eigen achterban daar de dupe van werd, dat vond Jimmy helemaal niet erg. Nooit meer SP. Terwijl ik voor 2020 altijd op die partij stemde. Echt nooit meer.
Nederlands
12
24
215
2.4K