Giovany Gonçalves

@asparagus_12 Em GDP per capita tamos próximos dos caras e RIO é a segunda maior cidade do país Na prática a única coisa no caminho do metrô é o estado br e sua incompetência.

@Giovany2121 Não foi o que eu disse...

Assim, longe de mim falar bem do Metrô Rio, mas vcs sabem que Shangai é umas 3 vezes maior que o RJ, né? E uma das principais cidades do segundo país mais rico do mundo? (E em um país fácil de construir infraestrutura) Essa comparação nem sentido tem...

@coaiecrete Um não cancela o outros São complementares

in Europe we have this thing called public transport

🚨 WOW! Nick Shirley went confronted California’s House Speaker to her FACE over the Stop Nick Shirley Act And of course, she RAN AWAY! @nickshirleyy: “These people won’t even answer the questions!” The corruption is INSANE.

If Iran has placed its strategic bet on China, it could turn out to be one of the greatest miscalculations on the global stage. In geopolitics, relying on a partner that prioritizes its own interests above all else is a high-risk move

🚨 Exposing California's corrupt "Stop Nick Shirley Act", instead of going after the fraudsters California is now going after the people exposing the fraud. This bill AB 2624 will: - Criminalize journalists with misdemeanors, $10,000 fines, imprisonment, and content takedown - Let immigrant based NGOs' funding be confidential - Take away freedom of the press from journalists - Protect any "immigration support services" information from being public (healthcare, legal services, etc) This bill was created by the Attorney General's WIFE Mia Bonta to stop fraud from being exposed. Please like and share this video everywhere! By trying to silence and intimidate journalists, they are trying to hide the truth from you. EXPOSE ALL THE FRAUD.

Imagine watching your state get looted in broad daylight and deciding the real problem is the guy documenting it. Keep fighting Nick!

Um é proteger contra competição O outro é punir empresas por terem um sistema de trabalho que parasita em Brasília não aprova Ignorando a vontade da pessoa, se ela quer ou não o emprego, tratado ela que nem gado Que é oq a esquerda adora fazer com o pobre.

@jcaetanoleite E direita vê eles como esquerda autoritária, incopetente e corrupta E no final vai vencer o lado que a narrativa melhor se encaixa com realidade do povo E as ações deles mais impostos, mais censura de rede social e mais escândalos de corrupção Não tá ajudando.

Porque o PT é a esquerda moderada, simples assim.

Isso é problema da direita moderada não tem apelo popular Eles não ganham corações e queimaram todos o capital restante com corrupção Ele cavaram a própria cova a direita moderada vai ter que se reinventar ou morre Guerra institucional não vai mudar isso.

@jcaetanoleite Resumindo vcs querem que a guerra institucional continua? Mesmo com danos enormes as instituições que isso tá levando Pois seis não gostam da direita atual.

Gente, é muito simples. O sistema eleitoral brasileiro para o executivo é de plurality no primeiro tempo e majoritário no segundo. Isso implica que no primeiro turno não vai para o segundo, necessariamente, o vencedor de Borda e Condorcet, mas aquele que angariar mais movimentos sociais e grupos de interesse ao seu redor. Na esquerda, quem consegue isso hoje e pelos próximos anos, pelo menos, é o PT (PSB tá vindo aí, mas ainda vai demorar). Na direita, os grupos sociais que são capazes de mobilizar são as igrejas evangélicas, CACs, clubes de reservista, quartéis e grupos de whatsapp. Se não se impor aos partidos à direita uma disciplina exógena, se eles não perceberem que anti-pluralismo é punido institucionalmente e que com candidato golpista eles não ganham, nunca vai ter um candidato de direita moderado. Isso porque, fora da Faria Lima, a direita moderada não pontua. A disciplina necessária para a direita é top down porque o mecanismo competitivo força um candidato extremista e incapaz pela direita.

Então pq o suporte da esquerda a regimes ditatoriais que odeiam o ocidente Como Venezuela e Cuba?

🛢También es importante saber que si gana el peronismo en el 2027 se volverán a pisar los precios de los combustibles, se prohibirá exportar crudo/gas y la producción se desplomará como con Nestor y Cristina. Adios a miles de puestos de trabajo y moneda fuerte.

This show was based on a real person who infiltrated online Islamic groups and identified potential terrorists, but they fictionalized it into a story about an agent who hunts far-right white terrorists.

Counterpoint:

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

In a previous tweet, I pointed out that China will have a harder time catching up with the United States. China’s GDP was about 78% of the U.S. level in 2021, but by 2024 that share had fallen to roughly 64%. Some argued this was simply an exchange-rate effect, while others questioned the metric itself and suggested that purchasing-power parity, or PPP, tells a different story. It is true that the renminbi has weakened from around 6.3 to roughly 7.2 per dollar, a depreciation of about 13%. That does reduce China’s GDP in dollar terms. But the divergence between China and the United States is visible in underlying growth. In nominal terms, the U.S. economy has expanded more rapidly. American GDP rose from about 23 trillion dollars in 2021 to roughly 28 to 29 trillion in 2024, an increase of around 25%. China’s grew from approximately 114 trillion yuan to around 130 trillion yuan, closer to 15%. Even allowing for differences in measurement, the gap is widening, not narrowing. The same pattern appears in capital markets. U.S. equities, represented by the S&P 500, increased from roughly $45 trillion in 2021 to around $55–60 trillion more recently. Chinese markets have moved in the opposite direction. Indices such as the CSI 300 and the Hang Seng have seen their combined market value fall from around $13 trillion at their peak to closer to $10 trillion. If this were primarily a currency story, it would be difficult to explain why U.S. markets have surged while China’s have contracted in absolute terms. This points to a deeper structural shift. China’s growth model, long driven by investment, construction and credit expansion, is running into constraints, including diminishing returns and rising debt burdens. The United States, by contrast, continues to benefit from stronger consumption and more resilient capital markets. There is also a historical lesson. During the Cold War, Nobel economist Paul Samuelson projected that the Soviet economy would eventually catch up with or even surpass that of the United States in late 20 century . Those forecasts extrapolated from USSR’s strong growth trends but underestimated geopolitical realities. As for PPP, it serves a specific purpose but has clear limitations. It is useful for comparing domestic purchasing power, yet far less informative when assessing global economic weight, financial influence or technological leadership. For instance, India’s economy already appears significantly larger than Japan’s. Few would argue that India offers a higher level of development. Finally, headline GDP figures themselves have limits. Investment can boost output and employment in the short term while generating little long-term return, especially when financed by rising debt. This concern has long been raised in discussions of China’s infrastructure and construction-led model. Questions around data transparency add another layer of uncertainty. For policymakers, the implication is straightforward. Treating this as a currency-driven fluctuation, or relying on PPP-based comparisons, risks misreading China’s trajectory. The evidence points to a more durable divergence, shaped by structural factors rather than short-term financial movements. This is not simply a cyclical slowdown. It marks a shift in relative economic momentum.

VAZAM (de NOVO) os dados de 250 MILHÕES de BRASILEIROS, vivos e mortos, supostamente do GOV.BR

Come on Zack, this is not a flex lol. We understand you were referencing New Glenn Booster vs Superheavy Booster and not Falcon 9; however, context matters here. BO has landed the same New Glenn rocket twice; however, they never reused any of the engines. At that point, can you even consider it fully reused? SpaceX has caught 3 boosters: B12, B14, and B15. They then reused engines on both B14 and B15, something NG has not done yet. As you know, SpaceX V3 Ship and Booster are significant upgrades that will increase reliability and performance, and the new Pad, GSE, and OLM will increase launch cadence. Apples to oranges.

If SpaceX did this launch celebrating the booster while barely mentioning the second stage failing to deliver the payload we wouldn’t hear the end of it But of course, double standards from the tribal mind! But congrats to Blue Origin, this was still a relatively successful mission and still a test flight IMHO