Inspect 2 Revolt🩸🩸🩸

Note that Proposal 1743 does not use Cycle Keyword

Please note that this guy has new proposal #1733

Please note that Prop 1647 is linked to several fraudulent proposals

@Revoltman09 Multiple fraudulent addresses associated with you and the 1623 proposal were transferred to the same account .This is not conclusive evidence, as it could also be the address of the exchange, but it is certain that you are associated with several other fraudulent addressses

@Revoltman09 Okay, I've turned on the permissions

Hi @Revoltman09 ，I have a question about your Prop 1647. You said that your proposal did not pass last month because of the Alleychatt68 bad faith vote, so you are now re-initiating it.

Note that the evidence used in Proposal 1623 is from Proposal 948

@Revolt2Vibe @VentureAnticap Okay, I'll double check.

@VentureAnticap This was definitely a previous proposal... @Inspect2Revolt can you recall which one this was? $RVLT #revolt2earn

@PinkCowTokyo These three people have proposals for almost every round, and I have questioned them publicly before, and they have given answers, and I have found no evidence to prove that they have problems

@Inspect2Revolt Thank you so much for all your hard work! I will vote soon. The one thing I noticed was 1603, 1604, 1605 had 3 different people but they were showing putting stickers/flyers in the same locations and mailboxes. Is this just me seeing that?

Please note that Proposal 1591 has a transaction history with the user in the following incident.

@PinkCowTokyo After investigating all the proposals for this period, no anomalies were found

@Inspect2Revolt I am ready to vote but want to cross check against your findings first 😊 Where can I find the cycle 19 reviews? Thank you for all your work! Hugely appreciated! 🙏❤️

We won the war！！！ 🔥🔥CULT X RVLT🔥🔥

@PinkCowTokyo @Cryptofairy5 I do have a list here, but it is difficult to verify due to the inability of social accounts. The chain address is easy to create a new one. It is very difficult to get whether the user is reliable from my list alone.

@Cryptofairy5 @Inspect2Revolt I follow quite a lot of people in the community but they don't seem to see/like my tweets very often so I don't think they are seeing if I post here. At least if @Inspect2Revolt has a list we can all check each time I can post more about that?

The votes are getting closer☠️☠️☠️

@branditmanaged @PeeCowYay There are rewards for being chosen as a cultmander

@Inspect2Revolt @PeeCowYay If I recall correct, you have to vote to earn the extra.

Robbers are sacking our treasury and already have half of our votes in a short time

@branditmanaged @PeeCowYay Many people join CULTMANDER just to get a little more yield, which has nothing to do with whether he votes or not per se. If we could reward active users according to whether they actually vote or not, maybe we could attract real participants

@PeeCowYay @Inspect2Revolt Real democracy is hard. Sometimes you have to accept the result of a failure to vote. 500 holders are meant to vote. That’s a total of $62,750-worth to win a full vote. Don’t blame the system because some are lazy; blame the lazy for not bothering to vote.