Maximusure

17.3K posts

Maximusure banner
Maximusure

Maximusure

@MaximuSure

🔛 Cutting the BS out of everything 🤔 Fact Finder - Writer - Disrupter - Follow The Evidence - Hack - Anonymous - Official X Account.

Joined Ekim 2023
95 Following1.7K Followers
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
The claim that Islam disrespects Jesus and Mary by mentioning them in the Quran is a selective and dishonest reading that ignores context, while cherry picking verses to paint a caricature. Naming a chapter Surah Maryam highlights Mary's unique honor in Islam she is the only woman named in the entire Quran, praised for her chastity, devotion, and miraculous birth of Jesus (a virgin birth affirmed in the Quran, something the Bible doesn't detail as explicitly). Surahs like Al-Baqarah (The Cow), An-Nahl (The Bees), or An-Naml (The Ants) are named after incidents, animals, or stories that serve as lessons or signs of God's creation not because cows, bees, or ants are "revered" figures. The naming convention reflects thematic content, not equivalent "respect" levels. Trying to equate them is a false equivalence meant to mock rather than engage seriously. The "sister of Aaron" line in Quran 19:28 isn't historical confusion or illiteracy it's an idiomatic Arabic expression (common in Semitic cultures) calling someone by a pious ancestor's name to denote lineage or honor. Mary was from a priestly family descended from Aaron (like how Elizabeth in Luke 1:5 is "of the daughters of Aaron"). Authentic hadith (Sahih Muslim) record the Prophet explaining exactly this: people were named after righteous figures of the past, just as one might call someone "brother of Tamim" to denote tribal affiliation. Classical scholars like Ibn Kathir affirm this as honorific, not literal siblinghood. The charge of mixing up Mary with Miriam ignores both linguistic custom and the Quran's own awareness of chronology elsewhere. Islam affirms Jesus (Isa) as a major prophet, born of a virgin, performer of miracles (including speaking as an infant and healing the blind/lepers by God's permission), the Messiah, and one who will return. It doesn't "strip" him it rejects later Christian doctrines (Trinity, divinity, vicarious atonement) that developed centuries after Jesus and aren't in his own reported words. Quran 5:116 addresses a hypothetical where God asks Jesus if he told people to worship him and Mary as gods Jesus denies it, showing the critique targets perceived excesses in some Christian practice, not Jesus himself. On the crucifixion (4:157): Islam denies Jesus died on the cross, saying "they did not kill him, nor crucify him, but it was made to appear so to them." The majority view involves divine intervention (appearance/substitution theory), but the core point is God saved Jesus from death and humiliation at the hands of his enemies hardly portraying him as a "weakling." The "deceiver" jab at Allah (from 3:54, where God is "best of planners") refers to outmaneuvering plots against prophets, not tricking millions for fun. The hadith about Jesus' return (Sahih Bukhari, etc.) describe him descending as a just ruler to "break the cross" (refute false doctrines built around it), "kill the pigs" (end consumption of what is forbidden in original monotheistic law), abolish jizyah (as universal justice prevails), and implement truth. Muslims see this as Jesus confirming Islam's message and correcting deviationsnot "destroying Christianity" out of spite, but fulfilling prophecy by uniting believers under pure monotheism. Calling it "disgusting" is just emotional rhetoric; it's no more offensive than Christian eschatology where Jesus returns to judge and defeat falsehood. In short: Islam honors Jesus and Mary far more than many realize virgin birth, miracles, messiahship, end times role while rejecting post Jesus theological additions. Your post relies on misrepresentation, outdated polemic, and ignoring Islamic exegesis to score cheap points. If the goal is honest dialogue, engage the actual sources instead of straw-manning them.
English
0
0
0
54
Dan Burmawi
Dan Burmawi@DanBurmawy·
Muslims love to parade the Quran’s mentions of Jesus and Mary as if it’s some grand gesture of respect. They claim that because the Quran has a chapter named after Mary (Surah Maryam), this proves Islam respects her. But if simply naming a chapter after something is an act of reverence, then what does it mean that the Quran also has chapters named after cows (Surah Al-Baqarah), ants (Surah An-Naml), and bees (Surah An-Nahl)? Are those sacred too? The Quran mentions Mary more than Muhammad’s own mother, yet it does so only to affirm Islam’s false narrative. The Quran confuses Mary, the mother of Jesus, with Miriam, the sister of Moses (Quran 19:28), proving its author was historically and theologically illiterate. The Quran strips Jesus of everything that makes Him the cornerstone of Christianity. It denies His divinity (Quran 5:116), denies His Sonship (Quran 19:35), and denies His redemptive death on the cross (Quran 4:157). Instead of being the Messiah who sacrificed Himself out of love, the Quran portrays Him as a weakling who needed Allah to deceive people in His place. Jesus doesn’t willingly sacrifice Himself for humanity’s sins. Instead, Allah supposedly tricked people into killing someone else in Jesus’ place (Quran 4:157). It also makes Allah the greatest deceiver (a title given to him in Quran 3:54), suggesting that millions of people were deliberately misled into believing in a false crucifixion. Islam acknowledges Jesus existed, but only to redefine Him. Islam claims He was a prophet, but only to reduce Him below Muhammad. Islam denies His crucifixion and resurrection, because if those were true, Muhammad would be irrelevant. Perhaps the most disgusting insult Islam directs at Jesus is the claim that He will return at the end of time, not to bring salvation, but to break the cross, kill pigs, enforce sharia law, and destroy Christianity.
English
22
62
188
4.9K
Kate from Kharkiv
Kate from Kharkiv@BohuslavskaKate·
Hegseth: "We're still dealing with the environment Joe Biden created—depleting our stockpiles and sending them to Ukraine instead of our own military. Every time we face a challenge, it traces back to 'Well, sent it to Ukraine.'" It looks like they’re just going to blame Ukraine whenever anything goes wrong now, doesn’t it? It’s depressing to watch because while this administration will eventually leave office, a segment of Americans will keep hating Ukraine without even remembering why.
English
1.4K
1.4K
7.5K
445.1K
Rep. Jim McGovern
Rep. Jim McGovern@RepMcGovern·
In just 19 days, Trump has already wasted $25 BILLION on his reckless war of choice with Iran. That’s enough to fund the State Department for half a year. He chooses bombs over diplomacy. Disgusting & just plain stupid.
English
175
259
598
9.4K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
Say no to war!
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
1
17
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
Jesus wouldn’t need swords, arrows, or a horde of screaming warriors to obliterate Genghis Khan. The bloodthirsty butcher who stacked pyramids of skulls and bathed the steppe in the blood of innocents would shatter like cheap glass under the gaze of the Lamb. With words sharper than any Mongol blade “Love your enemies” and “What does it profit a man to gain the whole world and lose his soul?” Jesus would eviscerate the Khan’s black heart, exposing his empire of rape, slaughter, and dust as the fever dream of a soulless demon. The conqueror who thought himself a god would drop to his knees, broken by mercy he despised and truth he couldn’t escape, his evil legacy rotting in hell while the true King of Kings reigns eternal. That’s how Good defeats Evil: not by becoming the monster, but by making the monster confront the abyss staring back.and then casting it into the fire. Genghis was a plague on humanity; Jesus is its salvation, and that savage would have been nothing but another footstool under the foot of the Messiah.
English
0
0
0
4
ELIZABETH LANE
ELIZABETH LANE@imelizabethlane·
“Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good. “
English
51
53
222
6.9K
Dr Taylor Marshall™️
Dr Taylor Marshall™️@TaylorRMarshall·
Jesus Christ defeated death by rising from the dead. Death defeated Genghis Khan.
English
74
236
2.2K
20.4K
Operation Heal America
Operation Heal America@OperHealAmerica·
Lord Jesus, we pray a hedge of protection and wall of fire around our troops, Israel, and the Iranian people during Operation Epic Fury. Protect them from every evil, cover them with your blood, and fulfill your divine purpose in their lives! Help us to put your glory on display in such a way that those of all nations will come to know you and declare, “Surely He must be the Son of God!” In Your Mighty And Matchless Name—the name above every Name, Jesus, we pray, Amen!”🙏🕊️🇺🇸🇮🇱🇮🇷
Operation Heal America tweet media
English
128
256
717
5.7K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
Stop trying to water down what he said. Netanyahu's recent invocation of historian Will Durant's insight that history favors the strong and does not prefer Jesus Christ over Genghis Khan lays bare a stark realpolitik: morality without power is often futile against ruthless adversaries. Durant described reality, not prescribed nihilism. He chronicled how civilizations rise above brute force through ideas, laws, and shared values, not by embracing "survival defines good." Saying "Jesus has no advantage over Genghis Khan if you're strong/ruthless enough" isn't profound wisdom it's a dangerous slide. It frames evil's victory as inevitable unless met with superior brutality, sidelining the very moral framework that sustains alliances and long-term legitimacy. Power matters and ideals alone invite slaughter. But power divorced from ideals becomes another Khan: empires that conquer, terrorize, and collapse because they offer nothing beyond dominance. History doesn't just reward survivors; it exposes what they built. This isn't anti pacifism realism; it's flirting with the abyss while calling it strategy. True strength pairs force with principles that outlast empires. Anything less risks becoming the monster you fight.
English
0
0
0
32
Conservative Momma
Conservative Momma@conmomma·
Netanyahu is quoting Durant here and says “it’s unfortunate.” The goal of this clip being circulated is to enrage Christians, which is funny because if you are a Christian this shouldn’t enrage you at all- rage is not a fruit of the Holy Spirit. In fact, this should invoke you to WANT to share Jesus with the lost even more. To let others know the truth -that ruthlessness evil actually loses when all is said and done, because its price is the soul. Jesus’s message is all about eternity. As Christians we live with and for eternal purpose.
Clash Report@clashreport

Netanyahu: It is not enough to be moral. It is not enough to be just. "Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. If you are strong enough, ruthless enough, and powerful enough, evil will overcome good."

English
50
44
181
9.1K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
Netanyahu didn't "quote a historian." He stood at a podium today and said, flat out: "It is not enough to be moral. It is not enough to be just. Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan... if you are strong enough, ruthless enough... evil will overcome good." That's not some profound Durant seminar. That's a leader of a nuclear democracy telling the world morality is optional unless backed by superior firepower. You can wrap it in "existential survival against genocidal fanatics" all you want. But invoking "evil overcomes good if stronger" as your philosophical north star while claiming the moral high ground is the kind of Orwellian flip that makes actual Machiavellians blush. If survival alone defines good, then congratulations: your enemies' caliphate dreams are just as "valid" if they win.
English
0
0
2
140
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
Oh, look another keyboard warrior who just discovered Will Durant and thinks she's unlocked the cheat code to geopolitics. "Nature and history define good as that which survives." Congrats, genius. That's not "unflinching realism"; that's 8th-grade social Darwinism with a history degree. Durant wasn't handing you a license to cosplay Genghis Khan with F 35s. He was describing the brutal ledger, not prescribing "be ruthless or die" as Israel's foreign policy TED Talk. The man spent his life chronicling how civilization claws its way above the Khans through law, art, reason, and yes, the very moral ideals you dismiss as "suicide pacts." He wasn't your based red-pill uncle; he was a humanist who saw progress despite the blood. Netanyahu didn't "quote a historian." He stood at a podium today and said, flat out: "It is not enough to be moral. It is not enough to be just. Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan... if you are strong enough, ruthless enough... evil will overcome good." That's not some profound Durant seminar. That's a leader of a nuclear democracy telling the world morality is optional unless backed by superior firepower. You can wrap it in "existential survival against genocidal fanatics" all you want. But invoking "evil overcomes good if stronger" as your philosophical north star while claiming the moral high ground is the kind of Orwellian flip that makes actual Machiavellians blush. If survival alone defines good, then congratulations: your enemies' caliphate dreams are just as "valid" if they win. And spare me the "surgical strike at the Christian id" victimology. Christians aren't "fragile egos" for noticing their founder the guy whose core teaching was love your enemy and turn the other cheek being explicitly sidelined as irrelevant next to a Mongol butcher. Yeah, Christianity rode empires and swords after Constantine; empires do that. But pretending that validates equating Christ with Khan is like saying "the Inquisition proves Jesus wanted torture." No. Your "Christianity survived by the sword" gotcha is sophomore-level gotcha history that ignores why the faith spread in the first place: an idea that outlasted emperors precisely because it wasn't pure Khan-ism. The real manipulation here? This post itself. You scream "decontextualized outrage" while surgically omitting that Netanyahu's clip isn't some abstract philosophy seminar it's a wartime presser where he's justifying endless ruthlessness. You call critics "grifters trafficking sacred triggers" while your entire screed is nothing but tribal rage bait: "Fuck your outrage. Fuck selective bullshit. Read Durant or fuck off." Pot, meet kettle covered in blood-soaked pages. If nuance doesn't farm engagement, neither does your all-caps profanity parade. Here's the adult truth you can't handle: Yes, ideals without power are suicide pacts. Hamas proves it. But power without ideals is just another Khan another empire that rises, slaughters, and eventually rots because it has no "why" beyond survival. Durant knew that. History's indifferent gods don't crown saints, sure. But humans built cathedrals, laws, and alliances precisely to defy that indifference. Israel survives not because it went full Genghis (it didn't), but because it pairs steel with a story that resonates beyond raw force alliances rooted in shared values, not "we're stronger, deal with it." Your "modern jihadist hordes" boogeyman is real. Your solution ditch the sermons, embrace the ledger is the nihilism that turns defenders into the very monsters they fight. Grow the fuck up yourself. Read the full Durant, not the cherry-picked survivor porn. Study power and the civilizations that transcended it. And spare us the cartoon villain framing of anyone who calls this what it is: a leader flirting with the abyss while pretending it's wisdom. Fuck your selective realism. History doesn't just reward survivors. It judges what they built with the power they stole.
English
1
0
5
192
LHGrey™️
LHGrey™️@grey4626·
You clip-chopping, context-murdering fucking pricks... this is peak intellectual dishonesty, the kind that would make Machiavelli blush and Goebbels nod in professional approval. Netanyahu didn’t pull some anti-Christ soliloquy out of his ass. He was quoting Will Durant...the towering American historian, that Christian humanist who spent a lifetime dissecting civilization in The Story of Civilization and The Lessons of History. Durant observed the brutal ledger of history with merciless clarity: “Nature and history do not agree with our conceptions of good and bad; they define good as that which survives, and bad as that which goes under; and the universe has no prejudice in favor of Christ as against Genghis Khan.” That’s not blasphemy; that’s unflinching realism, forged in the blood-soaked pages of every empire that rose and every prophet who fell. Netanyahu, staring down genocidal fanatics who rape, behead, and hide behind their own civilians, was driving home the philosophical truth that ideals without iron are suicide pacts. Your precious moral posturing means jack shit if you lack the power to enforce it. Evil doesn’t yield to sermons...it yields to superior force. History’s classroom is soaked in the blood of the unprepared. This clip is pure venomous manipulation: a surgical strike at the Christian id, engineered to bypass reason and ignite tribal outrage. “How dare he say that about Jesus!” they say, conveniently forgetting the historian’s name, the strategic context of existential survival, and the fact that Christianity itself survived not merely by turning the other cheek but by becoming the faith of empires that knew precisely when to wield the sword of Constantine. Selective amnesia, fragile egos, and algorithmic rage-bait at its finest...classic playbook for grifters who traffic in sacred triggers because nuance doesn’t farm engagement. Will Durant understood the tragedy of the human condition: nature and history are indifferent gods that crown survivors, not saints. In a world crawling with modern Genghis Khans...jihadist hordes dreaming of caliphates...the Jewish state doesn’t have the luxury of naive pacifism. Fuck your decontextualized outrage. Fuck the dishonest framing that turns a profound historical insight into cartoon villainy. Grow the fuck up. Read Durant. Study power. And truly, fuck off with this selective fucking bullshit. 💀
Disclose.tv@disclosetv

NOW - Netanyahu: "Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good."

English
126
422
1.4K
52.2K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@jacksonhinklle Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸
Jackson Hinkle 🇺🇸@jacksonhinklle·
🚨🇮🇱 Netanyahu: "Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good." He is actually the antichrist...
English
638
2.1K
8.3K
318.1K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@kangminlee Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@ksorbs Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
4
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@Megatron_ron Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
5
Megatron
Megatron@Megatron_ron·
NEW: 🇮🇱Netanyahu: “Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good.”
English
175
137
599
64.5K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@anyaparampil Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@consciousphilos Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
Subboor Ahmad
Subboor Ahmad@SubboorAhmad·
This Zionist just tried to argue Genghis Khan is a better example than the Prophet Jesus (peace be upon him). Zionists are satanic lunatics!
English
81
435
2.2K
35.2K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@IslanderWORLD Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
1
THE ISLANDER
THE ISLANDER@IslanderWORLD·
🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 “It is not enough to be moral. It is not enough to be just. Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. If you are strong enough, ruthless enough, and powerful enough, evil will overcome good.” The mask is off. This is the operating system of the Third Temple cult project and now you understand why American Zionist Christians (theological oxymoron) funding it are committing the greatest theological betrayal in history, if they want to claim to be Christians. The Third Temple that Christian Zionists are sending money and casting votes to build? Christ already built it. And hint for Ted Cruz: it’s not made of stone or bricks and mortar. John 2:19 Jesus says “destroy this temple and in three days I will raise it up.” John clarifies explicitly: he was speaking of his body. The resurrection is the Third Temple. The veil tore from top to bottom at the crucifixion not symbolically, as a theological declaration that the entire system was finished and fulfilled. The Letter to the Hebrews spends thirteen chapters making one argument: every element of Temple worship... the priesthood, the sacrifice, the Holy of Holies, the ark — was a shadow pointing forward to Christ. Paul tells the Corinthians twice: you are the temple of the Holy Spirit. Not a building. Not a geography. You. Peter calls believers living stones built into a spiritual house. So when American Christian Zionists cheer on wars to rebuild a physical temple, they are funding the theological rejection of their own Saviour. A rebuilt temple doesn’t prepare for Christ’s return. It denies his first coming. It says the sacrifice wasn’t enough. The resurrection didn’t count. Zionist Christianity isn’t a fusion of two faiths. It’s the abandonment of one in slavery to another. And it’s currently armed, funded, and flying messianic combat missions. Netanyahu just told you what he thinks of your Jesus. Believe him.
THE ISLANDER@IslanderWORLD

🇮🇱🇺🇸🇮🇷 Netanyahu... "America is not fighting for Israel." Tell that to the grieving families in Ohio their sons died to fight Israel's Messianic war and you dragged your apprentice Trump into fighting this war for you. Funny as Haifa refinery comes offline, after Tel Aviv looks like an orange (poetic) zombie apocalypse you start talking about the war ending sooner than people think as Iran has never hit harder. That may be true and a tell that you'll be capitulating soon.

English
70
216
516
57.7K
Maximusure
Maximusure@MaximuSure·
@MJTruthUltra Deuteronomy 28:20 "The Lord will send on you curses, confusion and rebuke in everything you put your hand to, until you are destroyed and come to sudden ruin because of the evil you have done in forsaking him."
Maximusure tweet media
English
0
0
0
1