
Pearl isn't calling out hypocrisy out of love for the church, she is doing so to demonstrate that, from the strictly utilitarian red pill perspective, the chruch/Christianity is obsolete in 2026 and has nothing to offer men.
The OP is correct, she constantly countersignals every aspect of Christian morality as regards sex and the relationship between men and women, apart from a vague appeal for men to lead women.
As an example she regularly says in her content that there is a hierarchy with God on top followed by Man, Woman and Children. Yet the thrust of her content is that because women have rebelled against male authority via feminism and other related developments (which is true), this means that men have license to respond by rebelling against God, by placing the self and its desires above all else.
She is effectively arguing that Adam was justified in following Eve into sin. It's ultimately subversive
English


























