Pinned Tweet
These people are participating in what appears to be a color revolution aimed at overthrowing our current system of government. Those who support it, believing they are pushing for socialism, should question why millionaires and billionaires would support a system that supposedly requires them to give up their wealth to people who did not earn it.
The reality is they do not intend real redistribution. They are steering toward a communist style structure where they retain privilege, status, and wealth while the masses become low wage labor with minimal benefits. By funding protests and promoting ideology, they position themselves for power within the new order after crowds dismantle the existing system for them.
Celebrities and corporate executives pushing this agenda will benefit. The elite class still exists, yet the general population becomes poorer and loses representation because decisions are imposed rather than elected.
This pattern mirrors Hitler’s rise in Nazi Germany, the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia, and the Iranian Revolution of 1979. The ideologies differed, yet the tactics were the same: protests, dehumanization, ostracism, violence, and divisive rhetoric.
Mob intimidation and street enforcement reflect the Nazi brownshirts. Masked groups confronting citizens in public, surrounding cars, blocking roads, threatening businesses, and harassing people wearing political apparel function as ideological enforcement rather than protest.
Bolshevik style destabilization tactics also appear. Occupying sections of cities, declaring autonomous zones, preventing police access, pressuring workers to strike for political goals, and targeting infrastructure and supply chains mirror revolutionary destabilization rather than policy advocacy.
Iranian revolution parallels appear in moral purification campaigns. Public shaming, employment blacklisting, coordinated online harassment, forced ideological statements from companies, and demands that institutions publicly renounce dissenting viewpoints reflect social enforcement of political conformity.
In several cases behavior represents all three simultaneously. Riots involving arson, looting, destruction of private businesses, courthouse attacks, and attempts to prevent normal civic function combine intimidation, destabilization, and ideological purification.
Violence against political opponents such as assaults on rally attendees, attacks on speakers at universities, doxxing campaigns, and attempts to remove individuals from employment for political beliefs demonstrate enforcement beyond lawful protest.
Dehumanizing rhetoric and ostracism also parallel history. Bolsheviks labeled opponents parasites, Nazis labeled opponents subhuman, and Iranian revolutionaries labeled opponents enemies of faith. Modern rhetoric labels opponents fascists, racists, threats to democracy, or people who must be removed from society.
Societies in these movements were divided into irreconcilable groups. Workers versus exploiters in Russia, Aryans versus inferiors in Germany, faithful versus apostates in Iran. Similar division appears today portraying political opposition as existential threats.
English
