Stuart Harrower

In response, Greggs pledges to cut off Blackford from their pies, sausage rolls and steak bakes. Checkmate…. express.co.uk/news/politics/…

David Paulden changed his name to Zack Polanski, not because he wanted to reconnect with Jewish heritage, but to give him a strategic angle to be able to tear into Israel and its allies and have the perceived credibility of speaking ‘as a Jew’. He is a fraud.

@Telegraph @Rossac69_1 I want Keir Starmer to “empty HIS pockets” Let’s see what’s on his devices.

Labour MPs want Sir Keir Starmer to order his former chief of staff to “turn out his pockets” and hand over all handsets containing messages relating to the appointment of Lord Mandelson to be the UK ambassador to the US. 🔗: telegraph.co.uk/politics/2026/…

Oxford University researchers have discovered the densest element yet known to science... The new element, Governmentium (symbol=Gv), has one neutron, 25 assistant neutrons, 88 deputy neutrons and 198 assistant deputy neutrons, giving it an atomic mass of 312. These 312 particles are held together by forces called morons, which are surrounded by vast quantities of lepton-like particles called pillocks. Since Governmentium has no electrons, it is inert. However, it can be detected because it impedes every reaction with which it comes into contact. A tiny amount of Governmentium can cause a reaction that would normally take less than a second, to take from 4 days to 4 years to complete. Governmentium has a normal half-life of 2 to 6 years. It does not decay, but instead undergoes a reorganisation in which a portion of the assistant neutrons and deputy neutrons exchange places. In fact, Governmentium's mass will actually increase over time, since each reorganisation will cause more morons to become neutrons, forming isodopes. This characteristic of moron promotion leads some scientists to believe that Governmentium is formed whenever morons reach a critical concentration. This hypothetical quantity is referred to as a critical morass. When catalysed with money, Governmentium becomes Administratium (symbol=Ad), an element that radiates just as much energy as Governmentium, since it has half as many pillocks but twice as many morons.

Two months ago @JohnSwinney couldn't say if this evil killer was male or female and the SNP still believe these dangerous men should be housed in the female prison estate.

Daily Mail journalists aren’t going after your family (as you are aware, there is more we could write if we were). I’m a freelance journalist who spoke to your family members who are frightened by the Jew hate in your party. They are frightened by what you have given the green light to. While you once fought Jew hatred, now you indulge it because, as we both see, it is popular. Other political groups have discovered this in the past. Shame on you @ZackPolanski Shame on you.

Keep asking yourself this fundamental question... Why hasn't Keir Starmer proscribed the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) ? America did it. EU did it. Australia did it. Everyone has done it. Why not Britain?

I will speak more plainly than most Those Brits who peacock as left wing opponents of the far right are among the most disgusting people in humanity The fact that you march alongside the Islamic fundamentalist supporters of the ayatollahs - those who stabbed Salman Rushdie in the eye, who hang gays and butcher women, who fire rockets upon Israeli civilians and funded Hamas, who massacred thousands on the streets of Tehran - makes you champions of the most reactionary forces on earth The fact that our media is captured by idiots like you and thus you are never held to account does not change this You - the most pompous, the most self-aggrandising, the most preachy and hectoring - are the scum of Britain

If number 10 remotely wiped McSweeney’s phone, this confirms it had the standard government configuration on it, this configuration includes backups. Plus, WhatsApp accounts can be accessed on the new phone, the messages are stored on servers, not the phone.

MPs shouting about fighting British citizens in the streets, a Gay Jewish man leading a Muslim political party, grabbing his crutch and dancing on a stage with drag queens and dancers in bondage gear, whilst the SUTR mob wave Pride, Palestinian, Hezbollah and ISIS flags ! Oh and the deputy of the party’s wife is at home in a Burka … You couldn’t make this up !!! This country is literally going to implode! What on earth is happening? @RestoreBritain_

So let's get this straight. This is the deputy leader of the Green Party with his fully veiled wife, right? And the leader of the Green Party is the gay Jewish bloke who yesterday gyrated on stage with a load of men dressed in bondage gear. Which of these two loons is actually representative of the Green Party because it seems to me that, even at the top, they have absolutely no idea what they're about.

🚨 HOLY SMOKES. Iranian woman goes BERSERK on a smug white liberal who is supporting the Islamic regime "Convince me of WHAT? Of R*PE?! Of women not having rights?! I am Iranian, I've been imprisoned by that regime!" "Iranians are ASKING for the bombs! Iranian youth are asking to be bombed, and you are standing here SUPPORTING a terrorist regime! What are you DOING supporting a terrorist regime?!" *Lib spouts off about Palestine* "This has NOTHING to do with Palestine. This is about a terrorist regime in MY COUNTRY." "I can't even go see my father's grave!!" Mad props to this woman! White liberals are clueless, all over the world. H/t @patriot_apranik

@realMaalouf 💯

The Netherlands has banned the burqa in all public places. For security reasons, women wearing it won’t be allowed even in hospitals! Do you support this measure?

This is the (cough) "man" who wants to impose a digital ID system on 70 million people for their "convenience". It's the same person who's trying to convince the World that when a phone is stolen all the data on it is lost, FOREVER. Anyone smell a rat?

Starmer's Messages Are in Scope. Who Has the Courage to Compel Them? A report this evening in The Telegraph contains three words that tell you everything you need to know. Cabinet Office officials have requested that Morgan McSweeney hand over relevant messages from his private phone. The three words are: "if he complies". On those three words, the entire question of accountability for the most compromised appointment in modern British political history now turns. That distinction matters more than anything else in this story. A man who may be sitting on messages that implicate the Prime Minister of the United Kingdom has been invited to produce whatever he considers relevant. He retains the power to decide what falls within that definition. He retains the power to decline. And he retains, for now, whatever is on that phone. The Cabinet Office has not launched an investigation. It has opened a negotiation. The Cabinet Office's request follows weeks of insistence from Downing Street that the messages surrounding Lord Mandelson's appointment are unrecoverable. The government phone was wiped. The CCTV has been deleted. The evidence is gone. That position has now quietly collapsed. Officials have acknowledged that relevant communications may exist on McSweeney's personal device, on the devices of cabinet ministers, and on the devices of other former members of staff. The messages were never gone. They were simply on phones nobody had thought to ask about. Or had chosen not to. Buried in the third paragraph of this evening's report is the detail that should be dominating every political conversation in the country. If McSweeney complies, any communications he had on his personal phone, either with Lord Mandelson directly, or with others about his appointment, including the Prime Minister himself, could be published. Including the Prime Minister himself. That means Starmer's own words, his own instructions, whatever he privately said to McSweeney about the Mandelson appointment, are potentially sitting on that phone. Starmer's own messages are in scope. The private phone request is not pointed at a resigned chief of staff. It is pointed at Downing Street. There is a further question that the report raises but does not answer. It is not known whether McSweeney uses WhatsApp's disappearing messages function, which automatically deletes communications after 24 hours, seven days, or 90 days. If that function was active, the private phone may be as empty as the wiped one. The question is not difficult to state. Was the disappearing function active on McSweeney's personal phone? When was it activated? And who, if anyone, asked him that question before inviting him to hand over whatever remains? Voluntary disclosure is not transparency. It is the appearance of transparency, managed by the people with the most to lose. A genuinely transparent government would have moved immediately to compel production of all relevant devices under legal process, preserving whatever evidence remains before it disappears, deliberately or otherwise. Instead the Cabinet Office has written a polite letter and is waiting to see what comes back. Keir Starmer has spent months telling the country that Mandelson lied to him, that the vetting process failed him, that he bears no personal responsibility for what followed. His own messages may now tell a different story. The question is whether anyone with the power to compel their production has the courage to do so. So far, the answer has been a request. Politely worded. Patiently awaited. Entirely voluntary. "Starmer's own messages are in scope. The private phone request is not pointed at a resigned chief of staff. It is pointed at Downing Street."

@BANTBUK It’s worth checking out this lady discussing the Muslim brotherhood in America x.com/actbrigitte/st…

It’s a threat from within - and Britain can’t afford to ignore it. It’s time we ban the Muslim Brotherhood. 🔗 banthebrotherhood.uk

PAUL HOLDEN STATEMENT IN RESPONSE TO INTERVIEW WITH JOSH SIMONS ON BBC NEWSCAST Yesterday, BBC Newscast published a lengthy, forty-minute interview with former Cabinet Minister Josh Simons MP. The interview addressed how Simons, as a director of @LabourTogether, had appointed a firm called APCO Worldwide to investigate me and my colleagues. I was not told by the BBC ahead of the broadcast that the episode was being recorded or aired. I was not approached to respond to the lengthy comments made about me or the small anti-corruption organisation, @ShadowWorldInv1 , that I run with my colleague @andrewfeinstein. Andrew, who is also repeatedly mentioned, was also not approached for comment. I only found out last night, when a friend texted me, that the person who hired a major multinational reputation management firm that produced a despicable and defamatory report on me and my colleagues, and who reported me on the basis of these false and defamatory reports to the UK’s security services, was being given forty minutes to give his version of events on a major podcast published by our national broadcaster. To be clear, the BBC has NEVER - not once - approached me to comment on a story that is, ultimately, about me, my investigations, my family and my colleagues. They did not approach me when the story first broke, and they did not approach me for this episode. If the BBC had done so, I would have raised several issues with the way in which matters related to me were discussed. For example, Simons repeatedly stated in the interview that he instructed APCO to investigate whether my reporting or sourcing derived from a ‘hack’ of the Electoral Commission. The word ‘hack’ is used eight times in the interview. At no time was it acknowledged in this discussion that this allegation – that I might have received hacked materials – is entirely false, and I have repeatedly proven it to be false. Following the broadcast, I contacted the BBC to complain and to raise serious issues with the broadcast. I was contacted by the Newscast editor, Sam Bonham, to say the BBC would update the Newscast episode and further reporting to reflect some of my concerns. This has not yet happened with regards to the podcast, although I note some online reporting finally reflects a very small and limited sampling of my comments. I will wait to see if amendments and updates will follow. If they do not, I will be escalating this matter to OFCOM. In the interim, I have decided to share the full statement I provided to the BBC, which is produced below: I would like to put certain things on the record. First, my reporting on Labour Together and Morgan McSweeney was entirely factually accurate and based on impeccable, legal sourcing. My sourcing has been reviewed by multiple media outlets, who confirmed the authenticity and legal provenance of my sources. Revelations based on my book, The Fraud, has subsequently been covered widely across the mainstream media, including in multiple front-page scoops, in outlets such as The Times, Daily Mail, The Guardian, The National and ITV. The stories I produced in 2023 and 2024, and which prompted Labour Together's investigation into me, were subject to extensive editorial and legal checks. They were, I believe, entirely accurate reporting on matters of profound public interest, which included raising concerns about the character of powerful individuals like Morgan McSweeney. Considering the recent Mandelson affair, I believe I have been entirely vindicated in attempting to alert the public about McSweeney's past, including how McSweeney made use of £700,000 in funding that he unlawfully failed to declare to the Electoral Commission to procure power and influence for himself and Sir Keir Starmer. Second, Josh Simons states that he never intended for APCO Worldwide to investigate me or my journalistic colleagues. However, a copy of the contract between APCO Worldwide and Labour Together, addressed to Simons, has now been published. The contract sets out a scope of work written in plain English. It states that APCO will 'investigate the sourcing, funding, origins of a Sunday Times article as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi.' The contract then states that the aim of the APCO investigation will be to 'provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together.' The contract then sets out a range of potentially invasive investigative methods that will be used to generate this 'package', including 'financial investigations' and 'human intelligence investigations.' I provide the full text of this contract below. This contract is clear. APCO were hired to investigate me to produce materials that would 'proactively undermine' my factually accurate, public interest reporting. They would use a range of investigative techniques to do so. APCO then did exactly as was suggested in the contract, using these investigative methods to "investigate" me. This investigation has caused me and my family significant anxiety and distress. Third, Josh Simons was provided with a report called Operation Cannon. It is the result of a lengthy investigation into me and my colleagues by APCO Worldwide. I have seen a copy of this report. It makes a series of extremely defamatory and utterly false allegations against me. It identifies my home address and sets out private information about my family. I cannot express how profoundly shocking, outrageous and defamatory this report truly is. Simons may claim he never intended for APCO to investigate me, but on receipt of this despicable report, he then chose to use it. He submitted sections of the report to the National Cyber Security Centre to convince them to investigate me. The Guardian has published the email correspondence in which Simons repeated some of the substance of the allegations in the APCO reports. Fourth, multiple media freedom advocacy organisations, including the NUJ, have strongly criticised the APCO investigation and these related matters. They have all, to my mind correctly, strongly criticised Labour Together and APCO for investigating journalists producing factually accurate reporting in the public interest. Finally, I am still reviewing the Newscast interview. I will be responding in due course and I hope that the BBC will, this time, give me the platform to set out what really happened and why. Text of Contract Between Labour Together and APCO Worldwide, addressed to Josh Simons Dear Mr Simons We are pleased that you have selected APCO Worldwide Limited (“APCO”) to provide the following scope of work (“services”) during Term: APCO will devise a concise strategy to aid Labour Together. APCO will investigate the sourcing, funding and origins of a Sunday Times article about Labour Together, as well as upcoming works by authors Paul Holden and Matt Taibbi – to establish who and what are behind the coordinated attacks on Labour Together. The approach should provide a body of evidence that could be packaged up for use in the media in order to create narratives that would proactively undermine any future attacks on Labour Together. The material can also inform any future legal strategy that Labour Together might wish to pursue against any of these parties. The work will include: • Open Source Investigations (OSINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Human Intelligence Investigation (HUMINT): Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Financial Investigation: Forensic Accounting Focus • Digital Forensics Investigation: Recovery and Preservation of Evidence • Stakeholder Outreach • Media Packaging and Dissemination

To the women who are on this app, be honest Are you OKAY with a man claiming to be a woman using the ladies room if you're in there? 🤷🤔

The far left have gone from saying “all immigrants are welcome” to demanding Jewish Israelis “go back home”. The “anti-racist” and “anti-fascist” groups are now demanding Jews leave for no reason. Complete hypocrisy.