Web3 Angels

Dead projects: - Monad - Starknet - Zksync - Srcoll - Aleo - Mina - Linea - Boba network - Wormhole - Movement - Polygon zkEVM - Berachain - Story - Kinto - Celestia - Blast - PIN AI - Midas - Kinto - Metis - 0G or dying

an all in one app with: - instant stablecoin payments - smooth IBAN <> crypto rails - a card that works everywhere - direct access to defi yields - self custody goes mainstream this year, 100%

Vitalik meant “L2 is over.” 🚨 That’s NOT what he said 🚨 1. What Vitalik is really poking at is the gap between Ethereum’s values and how some L2s operate in practice. Ethereum’s “rollup-centric / branded shards” story assumed L2s would steadily level up to stronger trust-minimization (aka moving toward Stage 2). Reality: Stage 2 progress across major L2s has been slower and harder than expected, and the ecosystem keeps hand-waving it away. Meanwhile, some builders are basically saying “Stage 2 is a distraction” because their users are already trusting a regulated org anyway. That’s a valid business constraint… but it’s also not the same promise as “inherits Ethereum security.” 2. So Vitalik’s critique is simple: let ETHEREUM's brand and decentralization alone Don’t borrow Ethereum’s “decentralized + safe” brand if your system still depends on governance training wheels and trusted escape hatches. Also: Ethereum L1 is scaling and will continue to scale. That changes the calculus. But it doesn’t delete L2s. 3. L2s still make sense when they offer unique value beyond “Ethereum but cheaper,” like: → different MEV/ordering models → privacy features → custom VM / app-specific execution environment → ultra-low latency / aggressive throughput configs ✅ Basically: specialization, not copy-paste scaling. And no, this isn’t the moment where L2s “leave Ethereum.” Ethereum is still the best base for liquidity, composability, and minimizing consensus cost for experiments on top. If anything, the bigger graveyard right now is “new L1 of the week” energy: lots of attention, then thin activity, forked ecosystems, and token incentives that get uglier as price falls. You can feel the zombie vibes without even opening a dashboard when no more infoFi guys gave you Gmonad every day. ✈️ Takeaway: Vitalik isn’t ending L2s. He’s ending the lazy version of L2s - the ones that market Ethereum-grade trust while building something closer to “hosted chain with extra steps.”

Vitalik meant “L2 is over.” 🚨 That’s NOT what he said 🚨 1. What Vitalik is really poking at is the gap between Ethereum’s values and how some L2s operate in practice. Ethereum’s “rollup-centric / branded shards” story assumed L2s would steadily level up to stronger trust-minimization (aka moving toward Stage 2). Reality: Stage 2 progress across major L2s has been slower and harder than expected, and the ecosystem keeps hand-waving it away. Meanwhile, some builders are basically saying “Stage 2 is a distraction” because their users are already trusting a regulated org anyway. That’s a valid business constraint… but it’s also not the same promise as “inherits Ethereum security.” 2. So Vitalik’s critique is simple: let ETHEREUM's brand and decentralization alone Don’t borrow Ethereum’s “decentralized + safe” brand if your system still depends on governance training wheels and trusted escape hatches. Also: Ethereum L1 is scaling and will continue to scale. That changes the calculus. But it doesn’t delete L2s. 3. L2s still make sense when they offer unique value beyond “Ethereum but cheaper,” like: → different MEV/ordering models → privacy features → custom VM / app-specific execution environment → ultra-low latency / aggressive throughput configs ✅ Basically: specialization, not copy-paste scaling. And no, this isn’t the moment where L2s “leave Ethereum.” Ethereum is still the best base for liquidity, composability, and minimizing consensus cost for experiments on top. If anything, the bigger graveyard right now is “new L1 of the week” energy: lots of attention, then thin activity, forked ecosystems, and token incentives that get uglier as price falls. You can feel the zombie vibes without even opening a dashboard when no more infoFi guys gave you Gmonad every day. ✈️ Takeaway: Vitalik isn’t ending L2s. He’s ending the lazy version of L2s - the ones that market Ethereum-grade trust while building something closer to “hosted chain with extra steps.”

Vitalik meant “L2 is over.” 🚨 That’s NOT what he said 🚨 1. What Vitalik is really poking at is the gap between Ethereum’s values and how some L2s operate in practice. Ethereum’s “rollup-centric / branded shards” story assumed L2s would steadily level up to stronger trust-minimization (aka moving toward Stage 2). Reality: Stage 2 progress across major L2s has been slower and harder than expected, and the ecosystem keeps hand-waving it away. Meanwhile, some builders are basically saying “Stage 2 is a distraction” because their users are already trusting a regulated org anyway. That’s a valid business constraint… but it’s also not the same promise as “inherits Ethereum security.” 2. So Vitalik’s critique is simple: let ETHEREUM's brand and decentralization alone Don’t borrow Ethereum’s “decentralized + safe” brand if your system still depends on governance training wheels and trusted escape hatches. Also: Ethereum L1 is scaling and will continue to scale. That changes the calculus. But it doesn’t delete L2s. 3. L2s still make sense when they offer unique value beyond “Ethereum but cheaper,” like: → different MEV/ordering models → privacy features → custom VM / app-specific execution environment → ultra-low latency / aggressive throughput configs ✅ Basically: specialization, not copy-paste scaling. And no, this isn’t the moment where L2s “leave Ethereum.” Ethereum is still the best base for liquidity, composability, and minimizing consensus cost for experiments on top. If anything, the bigger graveyard right now is “new L1 of the week” energy: lots of attention, then thin activity, forked ecosystems, and token incentives that get uglier as price falls. You can feel the zombie vibes without even opening a dashboard when no more infoFi guys gave you Gmonad every day. ✈️ Takeaway: Vitalik isn’t ending L2s. He’s ending the lazy version of L2s - the ones that market Ethereum-grade trust while building something closer to “hosted chain with extra steps.”