X Handala - Commentary with sources

It's almost always Neo Hanbalis takfiring & causing divisions. They say Abu Hanifa & Shia Layman are Kuffar

This Jahmite is one of the most disgusting people that exists. The salaf didn’t like people with huge disgusting unkept beards/ in that context they would say the longer your beard the less intelligence Forget his support for the Kuffar/ and best friend who’s an enemy of Islam

That smile 😀 alone is enough to unsettle the Rāfiḍah, Ikhwānī, and Ṣūfī. May Allah ﷻ preserve it, prolong it, and keep it a source of strength and dignity.

Adnan Rashid logic: Pakistan is a greater threat than Israel because they have killed more Muslims

Muslim Lantern speaks positively about Ibn Abdul-Wahhab and Wahhabism 🤔 "People who don't like him, they say he believed everyone isn't Muslim and murdered Muslims. That's their worldview. When they call someone a [Wahhabi], they're trying to call you extreme."

Another Wahabi claiming to be neutral while: 1. Hosting Epstein military bases 2. Intercepting Irani missiles from targeting Epstein clients 3. Allowing Epstein clients to launch attacks towards Iran 3. Sending trillions of dollars to Epstein as Jizya

Faris curse sufi but the official madahab of UAE govt is maliki sufi.

STOP DISHONOURING EACH OTHER! Muslims will debate theology for centuries. Free will vs. divine decree. The attributes of Allah. Profound disagreement. Tolerated. And in some cases, celebrated as scholarly rigor. But dare to read a geopolitical situation differently, and suddenly you are a traitor. The name calling crosses sacred redlines: The honour of a believer. There is ikhtilaf (valid differences) in matters of eternal consequence. And there is supposedly no room for it in probabilistic political judgments made on: Incomplete data, fragmented narratives, and competing claims. Someone explain the logic. Because theology concerns ultimate reality. Politics, in most cases, concerns contingent assessment. Limited information. Many variables. Sincere people, valid reasoning, different conclusions. If difference is legitimate in the more foundational domain, how does it become betrayal in the more uncertain one? What this usually reveals is not principled Islamic epistemology. It is ego dressed as conviction. Partisanship performing as certainty. The inability to distinguish between holding a position firmly and treating all other positions as kufr-adjacent. Yes, theology shapes politics. Creed informs how we read the world. Acknowledged fully. But there is still a distinction between foundational theological truth and probabilistic political judgment made under conditions of uncertainty. Collapsing that distinction is not strength. It is an epistemological error. The inconsistency is telling. Ikhtilaf in aqidah: scholarly tradition. Ikhtilaf in geopolitics: betrayal of the ummah. That asymmetry deserves serious reflection. Because what drives it is rarely love of truth. P.s. For those with poor comprehension skills, this obviously cannot be applied to Israel’s and Zionism’s evil. I thought I’d mention this just in case.

Make no mistake, Adnan Rashid supports Israel against Iran. How? He's consistently maintained the position that Iran is a bigger threat to Sunnis than Israel. Anyone with that position would want the bigger threat to lose the war. Ergo, he supports Israel and wishes they win

Du'at need to spend more time teaching Muslims about Tawheed, instead of fully focusing on bringing non-Muslims to Islam. I've seen the most appalling justification of polytheism by Muslims recently. It is like they don't know why the Prophet (peace be upon him) was sent.

We asked our readers and viewers if they approve or disapprove of Syrian Presdident Ahmed Al-Sharaa. Based on around 1,000 responses, 66% said they disapprove of Al-Sharaa, whilst 34% approve.

This is what other people label us We never associate ourselves with these labels, that's the difference

@AbdullaAndalusi @MrAdnanRashid

Very serious question @MrAdnanRashid I hope you are brave enough to give your true belief and answer: Who is the greater threat to the Muslims, Israel or Iran? I heard from sources close to you that you answer one way in private. Could we all hear that answer publicly?

@AlDonFodio He was probably detained because of Fatwas like this

We’re cooked guys I predicted this Madkhalism has truly won in Saudi Sh Saleh Fawzan’s fatawa & lectures were more takfiri & khariji than even Sayyid Qutb’s works

One of the reasons I left Salafism is their shallow, inflationary approach, that only panders to the layman and ignorant, because once you start defining terms, carefully examining matters, without rhetoric, their arguments collapses. Salafism hates rigor, only appears to be.

A sect is emerging that will make the Madhkalees look like the Khawarij. They will include amongst them those that claim to be Salafi and Sufi.

The Muslim world also has religious speakers who praise rulers and justify their evil with religious texts. We say, if you see a scholar in the company of rulers, accuse them in their Deen (religion).

@yusefren It maybe due to this fatwa

مفتي عام المملكة الفوزان يحذف جميع فتاويه و مواقعه وحساباته الرسمية من الانترنت alfawzan.af.org.sa حسابه ومتابعيه كان مقارب المليون في تويتر وتجاوز المليون في قناة يوتيوب تم حذفها جميعاً ١١٧٨٣ فتوى ١٩٤٤ درس ١٨٤ خطبة جمعة ٥٧٨ محاضرة

George Galloway: Right and Wrong, not Left and Right 00:00:00 – Iraq vs Iran Déjà Vu “Is this a repeat of the Iraq War?” — Comparing WMD lies then vs Iran narrative now 00:00:50 – Epstein & Elite Blackmail Theory Claim that Epstein’s network was used to entrap and control powerful figures 00:03:00 – Personal Cost of Political Views Galloway describes being attacked in London and the scars he carries 00:04:13 – Origins of the Palestine Conflict From Lebanon in the 70s to today — historical perspective before Hamas/Hezbollah 00:07:41 – Arrested Under Terror Laws Detained by armed police — “That’s how insane things have become” 00:12:17 – Israel & Nazi Comparisons Controversial parallels drawn between modern conflict and WWII-era oppression 00:19:23 – Divide & Conquer Politics How culture wars distract from power, wealth, and real control systems 00:26:24 – What “Socialism” Actually Means Free healthcare, education, and basic needs — explained in simple terms 00:43:33 – Iraq War Lies vs Iran Today “No WMDs then, no nukes now” — repeating the same justification pattern 00:53:22 – How to Build a Populist Movement Winning people over: authenticity, culture alignment, and simple messaging

📌 Famous Arab Scholar: The Ummah is Ashʿarī 🎙 Shaykh Yūsuf al-Qaraḍāwī, Founder and President of the International Union for Muslim Scholars (IUMS) 📹 Watch how one of the most prominent Arab scholars of recent times explains that the majority of the Ummah has been Ashʿarī, even until now. 💭 The Salafī/Ahle-Hadith methodology is a new and recently created one. While it calls people towards the methodology of the Salaf, it itself is against the majority of the Ummah in most issues of ʿAqīdah as well as Fiqh. Naive and innocent people don't realize this because they have no broad knowledge on ʿAqīdah and Fiqh. When one really enters the field of ʿAqīdah and Fiqh and analyzes all the evidence present, one will easily realize how the Salafī/Ahle-Hadith methodology is against the opinion of the majority of the scholars since who have come in 1400 years! 🎞️ Credits: The Ḥanafī Fiqh Channel (YouTube) ⚡ Please Share, Make Aware, and Educate