Blimp

52 posts

Blimp banner
Blimp

Blimp

@blimp_fun

Your token, floating on creator fees. Autonomous fee→buyback→airdrop infrastructure for https://t.co/sQPxcUZlgD launches.

Pumpfun Joined Nisan 2026
3 Following255 Followers
Pinned Tweet
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
1/ Introducing $BLIMP — a permissionless launchpad that turns your pump.fun creator fees into a perpetual yield stream for the people holding your bag. every pump token already prints fees forever. most creators extract them privately or forget about them. either way, the holders see nothing. Pump cashback refunds fees to whoever moves the most volume — so the biggest wallet churning all day wins. BLIMP routes creator fees back to whoever has actually held — weighted by balance × time held. $BLIMP fixes it at the protocol level.
English
38
12
94
16.1K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
i won't sugarcoat what just happened to the chart. it hurt. it hurt me too — i'm a holder. what i need you to know: the tech is unaffected. the cranker is still running. fees are still being claimed, swapped, and airdropped to holders every cycle. nothing on-chain changed. the infrastructure that makes $BLIMP $BLIMP is intact and i hold the keys to it. charts can be rebuilt. broken systems can't. we have a working system. i started building this because i believe creator fees should reward the people who hold, not the people who ape-and-dump. that vision didn't change in the last hour. it's still the reason i open the laptop every day. it's still the reason i was up all night debugging cycles for $BALLOON, $KWIF, $CHONKACHU — and it'll still be the reason i'm here tomorrow shipping the next fix. if you sold, i understand. if you held, i see you. if you bought the dip, welcome. i'm not going anywhere. the work continues. blimptech.fun
Blimp tweet media
English
40
5
37
3.7K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
Im the one in control of the tech but they hired me to build this.
English
17
0
11
2.3K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
I think the guys I was working with dumped their bundle. they aren't answering.
English
9
0
8
2K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
wow man I worked so hard on this...
English
6
0
8
1.7K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
did you know: $BLIMP supports two payout modes for your token's holder rewards. → TOKEN MODE: creator fees auto-buy back your token, then airdrop the bought tokens to your diamond hands. classic flywheel — buybacks pump the chart, holders get rewarded with more bag. → SOL MODE: skip the buyback entirely. creator fees route directly to your holders as raw SOL. real yield, paid in the realest currency on solana. pick whichever fits your project. lock it at deploy. permissionless from there. your token. your call. blimptech.fun
Blimp tweet media
English
14
4
29
2.1K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
Our system is built to reward holders Our holders and yours. Right now, cash back and agent buy backs do nothing but feed the dev and feed pump fun. This is the only protocol focused building around pump fun infrastructure to reward its HOLDERS. In a time where everyone is failing to believe and wants instant gratification, it's now most important to remind people how people got rich and finally are able to sign off for good.
English
2
2
21
1.1K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
We are here to work with you, not against you. I understand many of you being pessimistic about $BLIMP trust this wasn't easily built and it didn't take 1 day.
English
12
2
25
1.4K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
@RoboZzzZzZzz @TrumpTrader_ nothing weird about it, real projects need fees to pay for operational cost, and we want to make sure everything is running smoothly before we start dropping all the fees. Also, it's only been 4 hours and the first cycle on $BLIMP is for holders.
English
0
0
2
159
RoboZ
RoboZ@RoboZzzZzZzz·
@TrumpTrader_ @blimp_fun it's so weird cuz the whole thing is about the tech and then the actual coin doesn't have it 4 hours into the launch
English
1
0
0
83
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
working down the check list. The $BLIMP will rise.
English
3
1
13
876
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
$BLIMP submitted to @JupiterExchange VRFD. Verification matters because it surfaces $BLIMP in Jupiter's UI with a verified checkmark, and signals to traders + integrators that this is the canonical contract. For the platform, it builds trust with every community launching through us — when their tokens search Jupiter, $BLIMP shows up clean. Express verification + metadata update both in review. CA: F4LYw83S51J4Dz9uZzeeGD1BbfYHJnEhF44dqyXepump Track status: verified.jup.ag/dashboard/F4LY… Submission tx: solscan.io/tx/561GTkdX8mE…
Blimp tweet media
English
6
3
22
1.4K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
$BLIMP rewards holders :)
English
5
1
21
913
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
Remember when using $BLIMP you can choose your native token for airdrop or send Solana directly to holders. Fee generated from platform buy back and burn $BLIMP
English
7
1
19
1.1K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
shipped 7 fixes to the BLIMP cranker tonight. all live. all autonomous now. what was breaking: 1. stuck checkpoints — failed cycles got cached in redis with no expiry, blocked retries forever 2. stranded SOL — when a cycle partially failed, claimed SOL would sit unused in project wallets 3. stranded tokens — same for buyback tokens that didn't get airdropped 4. slippage rejections — bonding-curve buys could request 4× wallet balance and fail 5. stale RPC reads — buy tx confirmed on-chain but post-balance check returned old data, false failure 6. plug-in projects ignored — tokens that pointed fees at us via SharingConfig couldn't be auto-verified 7. active-project drift — the active set + status flag got out of sync after manual edits what shipped: - 1hr TL on failed checkpoints → self-healing - wallet-balance fallback in pre-flight + swap stage → recovers stranded SOL - stranded tokens recovered into next airdrop - slippage clamp: solAmount capped so maxSolCost ≤ wallet balance - bulletproof delta measurement: parse tx meta first, retry ATA poll with backoff - SharingConfig path added to auto-verify (alongside pool-bytes path) - active-set ↔ status reconciliation on cranker startup result: 3 community projects auto-promoted in the last hour ($BLUMB, $YUKIBLI, $154). every stuck cycle from earlier tonight settled itself once the cranker restarted with the fixes. fees claiming, buybacks completing, airdrops landing. system runs itself now. commits: github.com/BLIMP-FUN/blim… github.com/BLIMP-FUN/blim… github.com/BLIMP-FUN/blim…
Blimp tweet media
English
10
5
39
2.2K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
Okay good news the bundled sniper from launch sold.
English
8
4
36
1.9K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
This $blimp might make a change F4LYw83S51J4Dz9uZzeeGD1BbfYHJnEhF44dqyXepump Try launching on: blimptech.fun
Blimp tweet media
Eesti
5
5
39
1.5K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
this isn't a one day build. blimp is infrastructure — automated fee collection, buybacks, and airdrops running permissionlessly for every token on the platform. that's hard. things break when real users hit real edge cases that testing doesn't catch. but you've seen it work. fees claimed. tokens bought back. airdrops landing in wallets. the core loop is proven. what we're asking for is time. not trust — verify everything on-chain. just time to harden the system, patch the edge cases, and make it bulletproof. the vision hasn't changed: creator fees should go back to the people who hold. not bots. not snipers. holders. that's worth building right. we're not going anywhere.
Blimp tweet media
English
9
7
46
1.7K
Blimp retweeted
le /B/
le /B/@bschizojew·
fumbling $blimp before even giving it a chance to run a proper season is a mistake we shouldn't do >launch original coins (not blimp-themed) using blimp is the best thing that we can do right now, don't do the same mistake people did with snowball (which is launching snow or ball themed memes, launch the memes you usually launch (unique and creative) using blimp tech, this will increase adoption, moon blimp and make us all rich (and fix the market)
English
9
3
41
4.8K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
System Update — Issues Resolved We ran into a few edge-case failures during early cycles. All have now been identified, patched, and validated in production. What went wrong: ATA balance check bug caused tokensOut: 0 despite successful swaps Post-balance guard incorrectly returned 0n when accounts already existed First-cycle tenure logic resulted in 0 qualifying holders (expected but misleading) Zod validation rejected placeholder tx signatures during stats recording Cranker caching stale checkpoints + corrupted active set in Redis Missing / misread SharingConfig detection on certain tokens What we fixed: Corrected ATA measurement + balance resolution logic Fixed postBalance guard to properly detect pre-existing token accounts Adjusted cycle flow to account for initial tenure bootstrap Cleaned and enforced valid tx signature handling Cleared stuck checkpoints + rebuilt active project set Fixed SharingConfig detection + ensured correct PDA derivation Restarted cranker with clean state (no cache pollution) Current State: All projects cycling normally No stuck checkpoints Buybacks + airdrops executing as intended Cranker stable across all active tokens Example from recovery cycle: Buyback executed → tokens acquired successfully Airdrop distributed across multiple batches All transactions confirmed System metrics now tracking correctly Note: First cycle on new tokens still requires holder tenure to accumulate before distribution (by design). Everything is now running clean and fully autonomous.
Blimp tweet media
English
6
4
41
1.7K
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
The hard stuff is out of the way, were up and running the $BLIMP is ascending.
English
4
1
26
867
Blimp
Blimp@blimp_fun·
your required to set the fee address when you launch balloon token forgot to do so. All the tokens that launched correctly are working perfectly.
English
3
1
22
974