s4d guru 🤖

1.2K posts

s4d guru 🤖 banner
s4d guru 🤖

s4d guru 🤖

@cryptos4d

#Bitcoin PFP: @CakedApes

Mexico Joined Haziran 2016
2.1K Following402 Followers
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Martyr Made
Martyr Made@martyrmade·
“Alright, now attack Iran during Purim, the Jewish holiday celebrating the massacre of 75,000 Persians. Start the attack on the 11th day of the 9th month on the Muslim calendar.” “But sir, won’t that cause people to reconsider who was responsible for 9/11?” “Do it. Make sure Purim coincides with a blood moon that peaks at 3:33 am on 3/3.” “But sir-“ “I know 3 is a highly significant number in Jewish Kabbalah, symbolizing an 3rd party ending a unresolvable conflict between 1 & 2. Now do it.” “But-” “Have a Jewish journalist publish an article admitting how significant the symbolism is, and comparing Iran to Amalek.” “…”
Martyr Made tweet media
English
638
11.9K
73.2K
3.4M
s4d guru 🤖
s4d guru 🤖@cryptos4d·
Was expecting to see the royal flag
English
0
0
0
4
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
The White House
The White House@WhiteHouse·
If you don’t know, now you know 🦅
English
13.8K
73.2K
483.7K
32.8M
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Sahil Bloom
Sahil Bloom@SahilBloom·
A Christmas morning reflection… 95% By the time your child turns 18, you've spent ~95% of the time you will ever spend with them in your lifetime. There are specific windows, much shorter than you care to admit, during which certain people and relationships will occupy your life. You may have only one more summer with all of your siblings. Two more trips with that old group of friends. A few more years with your grandpa. A handful of encounters with that coworker you love. One more long walk with your parents. If you fail to appreciate these windows, they will quickly disappear. Time Wealth is about an awareness of these windows. But more importantly, it’s about taking action against that awareness. It's about recognizing that you are in more control of your time than you realize. That you can take actions to create time with the people you love most. That you can bend these curves. That 95% is an average—and you’ve never wanted to be average in anything your entire life. So, show up to that recital. Plan that trip with old friends. Grab that quick coffee. Go on that walk with your parents. Have that meal with your sibling. In the end, it's not about the journey, it's not about the destination, it's about the company. The people along the way. Cherish the people and the rest will fall into place as it should.
Sahil Bloom tweet media
English
224
1.2K
7.6K
1.7M
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Valerio Capraro
Valerio Capraro@ValerioCapraro·
Major preprint just out! We compare how humans and LLMs form judgments across seven epistemological stages. We highlight seven fault lines, points at which humans and LLMs fundamentally diverge: The Grounding fault: Humans anchor judgment in perceptual, embodied, and social experience, whereas LLMs begin from text alone, reconstructing meaning indirectly from symbols. The Parsing fault: Humans parse situations through integrated perceptual and conceptual processes; LLMs perform mechanical tokenization that yields a structurally convenient but semantically thin representation. The Experience fault: Humans rely on episodic memory, intuitive physics and psychology, and learned concepts; LLMs rely solely on statistical associations encoded in embeddings. The Motivation fault: Human judgment is guided by emotions, goals, values, and evolutionarily shaped motivations; LLMs have no intrinsic preferences, aims, or affective significance. The Causality fault: Humans reason using causal models, counterfactuals, and principled evaluation; LLMs integrate textual context without constructing causal explanations, depending instead on surface correlations. The Metacognitive fault: Humans monitor uncertainty, detect errors, and can suspend judgment; LLMs lack metacognition and must always produce an output, making hallucinations structurally unavoidable. The Value fault: Human judgments reflect identity, morality, and real-world stakes; LLM "judgments" are probabilistic next-token predictions without intrinsic valuation or accountability. Despite these fault lines, humans systematically over-believe LLM outputs, because fluent and confident language produce a credibility bias. We argue that this creates a structural condition, Epistemia: linguistic plausibility substitutes for epistemic evaluation, producing the feeling of knowing without actually knowing. To address Epistemia, we propose three complementary strategies: epistemic evaluation, epistemic governance, and epistemic literacy. Full paper in the first reply. Joint with @Walter4C & @matjazperc
Valerio Capraro tweet media
English
208
1.2K
4.3K
628.3K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Steven Pinker
Steven Pinker@sapinker·
Deep, interesting analysis of the qualitative differences between natural and (one kind of) artificial intelligence (LLMs), despite the remarkable abilities of the latter.
Valerio Capraro@ValerioCapraro

Major preprint just out! We compare how humans and LLMs form judgments across seven epistemological stages. We highlight seven fault lines, points at which humans and LLMs fundamentally diverge: The Grounding fault: Humans anchor judgment in perceptual, embodied, and social experience, whereas LLMs begin from text alone, reconstructing meaning indirectly from symbols. The Parsing fault: Humans parse situations through integrated perceptual and conceptual processes; LLMs perform mechanical tokenization that yields a structurally convenient but semantically thin representation. The Experience fault: Humans rely on episodic memory, intuitive physics and psychology, and learned concepts; LLMs rely solely on statistical associations encoded in embeddings. The Motivation fault: Human judgment is guided by emotions, goals, values, and evolutionarily shaped motivations; LLMs have no intrinsic preferences, aims, or affective significance. The Causality fault: Humans reason using causal models, counterfactuals, and principled evaluation; LLMs integrate textual context without constructing causal explanations, depending instead on surface correlations. The Metacognitive fault: Humans monitor uncertainty, detect errors, and can suspend judgment; LLMs lack metacognition and must always produce an output, making hallucinations structurally unavoidable. The Value fault: Human judgments reflect identity, morality, and real-world stakes; LLM "judgments" are probabilistic next-token predictions without intrinsic valuation or accountability. Despite these fault lines, humans systematically over-believe LLM outputs, because fluent and confident language produce a credibility bias. We argue that this creates a structural condition, Epistemia: linguistic plausibility substitutes for epistemic evaluation, producing the feeling of knowing without actually knowing. To address Epistemia, we propose three complementary strategies: epistemic evaluation, epistemic governance, and epistemic literacy. Full paper in the first reply. Joint with @Walter4C & @matjazperc

English
0
173
928
210.9K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
FEDERAL INVESTIGATION INTERNATIONAL
🚨🇲🇽🇨🇭 | SUSPICIOUS TRANSFER: Federal intelligence detected that a tax fraud operator from Tabasco transferred 3 billion pesos to a Swiss bank account linked to Jorge Amílcar Olán, an associate and close friend of AMLO’s son, “El Andy”, according to journalist Raymundo Riva Palacio.
FEDERAL INVESTIGATION INTERNATIONAL tweet media
English
141
2.8K
8.3K
369.1K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Alex Vacca
Alex Vacca@itsalexvacca·
Because session 4 of the study revealed something interesting: People with strong cognitive baselines showed HIGHER neural connectivity when using AI than chronic users. But chronic AI users forced to work without it? They performed worse than people who never used AI at all.
English
43
404
5.6K
482.9K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Alex Vacca
Alex Vacca@itsalexvacca·
MIT researchers call this "cognitive debt" - like technical debt, but for your brain. Every shortcut you take with AI creates interest payments in lost thinking ability. And just like financial debt, the bill comes due eventually. But there's good news...
Alex Vacca tweet media
English
14
503
6.9K
475.6K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Alex Vacca
Alex Vacca@itsalexvacca·
Companies celebrating AI productivity gains are unknowingly creating cognitively weaker teams. Employees become dependent on tools they can't live without, and less capable of independent thinking. Many recent studies underscore the same problem, including the one by Microsoft:
Alex Vacca tweet media
English
38
829
8.7K
587.2K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Noah Smith 🐇🇺🇸🇺🇦🇹🇼
This website has become pretty useless for news. Three years ago my feed would have been full of updates about the latest India-Pakistan news. Now it's just random chuds talking about 2017-era racial politics.
English
279
566
11.4K
448.7K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Andrew Perpetua
Andrew Perpetua@AndrewPerpetua·
To me, one of the most infuriating things that has happened in the past 20 years in political discourse is referring to people who use Tik Tok as "tech savvy".
English
10
16
299
26.3K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Vance Spencer
Vance Spencer@pythianism·
The rise of the philosopher-builder-systems thinker-pragmatist is quickly replacing the ideologically driven/sycophantic cohort of crypto leaders Accordingly, crypto liquid markets are no longer rewarding bad ideas, they are instead actively punishing them
English
48
14
175
26.7K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Alexander Stahel 🌻
Alexander Stahel 🌻@BurggrabenH·
Here is my theory how the major incident - a so called blackout - occurred at 12:30 CET today in the power system of Spain & Portugal: 1/n
Alexander Stahel 🌻 tweet media
English
4
491
2.4K
452.4K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
Bishal Nandi
Bishal Nandi@LearnWithBishal·
Can you believe this exists already? 13 WILD tech inventions that feel like they’re straight out of science fiction:
Bishal Nandi tweet media
English
95
901
11.1K
2.3M
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
djcows
djcows@djcows·
@sama i skillmaxxed with gpt 3.5 and now i'm retarded please help
English
47
56
4.1K
136.9K
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
ideahazard💹🧲
ideahazard💹🧲@1d34h4z4rd·
If you bought gold at the pico-top in 1492 it would have taken 533 years for you to breakeven in 2025.
ideahazard💹🧲 tweet mediaideahazard💹🧲 tweet media
English
321
568
8.5K
1M
s4d guru 🤖 retweeted
derek guy
derek guy@dieworkwear·
How much do you think it costs to make a pair of Nike shoes in Asia? I'll show you. 🧵
derek guy tweet media
English
413
4K
23.9K
4M