imagine

8.5K posts

imagine banner
imagine

imagine

@imaginarytec

memetic alchemist @gizmoimaginary

Joined Şubat 2023
1.3K Following27.2K Followers
Pinned Tweet
imagine
imagine@imaginarytec·
Arch Network is turning every UTXO into programmable yield. Bridgeless DeFi on L1. • @Saturn_btc: Runes trading in real time - the same sat that bought your coffee now earns 8% APY in a pool. • ArchVM: Smart contracts on Bitcoin, no L2, no wrappers. • Titan Indexer: Runes hit 70% of BTC tx volume, then choked on indexing & UX. Titan + pre-confirmations = sub-second finality on L1. Runes now become liquid. • FROST+ROAST: Bridges are the original sin of DeFi. $3B+ hacked since 2021. Arch’s FROST+ROAST multisig keeps assets on L1, verifiers only sign execution, not custody. Bridge hacks? Solved. Bitcoin is no longer just digital gold. It’s about to become yield bearing programmable collateral. lfg @ArchNtwrk $GIZMO $PUPS
imagine tweet media
English
28
35
192
9.4K
Sunny River
Sunny River@sunnyriverr·
You can now live on Bitcoin in one of Europe’s wealthiest cities. In Switzerland, 400+ merchants now accept it in “The Bitcoin City.” Here’s why Lugano is still one of the world’s best-kept Bitcoin secrets 👇🏽
English
29
113
662
42K
imagine retweeted
Sunny River
Sunny River@sunnyriverr·
This is Alexander Karp. The Stanford lawyer and PhD who helped build the most powerful AI defense company in the world. Here’s the untold story of the billionaire CEO of Palantir: 🧵
Sunny River tweet media
Palantir@PalantirTech

Because we get asked a lot. The Technological Republic, in brief. 1. Silicon Valley owes a moral debt to the country that made its rise possible. The engineering elite of Silicon Valley has an affirmative obligation to participate in the defense of the nation. 2. We must rebel against the tyranny of the apps. Is the iPhone our greatest creative if not crowning achievement as a civilization? The object has changed our lives, but it may also now be limiting and constraining our sense of the possible. 3. Free email is not enough. The decadence of a culture or civilization, and indeed its ruling class, will be forgiven only if that culture is capable of delivering economic growth and security for the public. 4. The limits of soft power, of soaring rhetoric alone, have been exposed. The ability of free and democratic societies to prevail requires something more than moral appeal. It requires hard power, and hard power in this century will be built on software. 5. The question is not whether A.I. weapons will be built; it is who will build them and for what purpose. Our adversaries will not pause to indulge in theatrical debates about the merits of developing technologies with critical military and national security applications. They will proceed. 6. National service should be a universal duty. We should, as a society, seriously consider moving away from an all-volunteer force and only fight the next war if everyone shares in the risk and the cost. 7. If a U.S. Marine asks for a better rifle, we should build it; and the same goes for software. We should as a country be capable of continuing a debate about the appropriateness of military action abroad while remaining unflinching in our commitment to those we have asked to step into harm’s way. 8. Public servants need not be our priests. Any business that compensated its employees in the way that the federal government compensates public servants would struggle to survive. 9. We should show far more grace towards those who have subjected themselves to public life. The eradication of any space for forgiveness—a jettisoning of any tolerance for the complexities and contradictions of the human psyche—may leave us with a cast of characters at the helm we will grow to regret. 10. The psychologization of modern politics is leading us astray. Those who look to the political arena to nourish their soul and sense of self, who rely too heavily on their internal life finding expression in people they may never meet, will be left disappointed. 11. Our society has grown too eager to hasten, and is often gleeful at, the demise of its enemies. The vanquishing of an opponent is a moment to pause, not rejoice. 12. The atomic age is ending. One age of deterrence, the atomic age, is ending, and a new era of deterrence built on A.I. is set to begin. 13. No other country in the history of the world has advanced progressive values more than this one. The United States is far from perfect. But it is easy to forget how much more opportunity exists in this country for those who are not hereditary elites than in any other nation on the planet. 14. American power has made possible an extraordinarily long peace. Too many have forgotten or perhaps take for granted that nearly a century of some version of peace has prevailed in the world without a great power military conflict. At least three generations — billions of people and their children and now grandchildren — have never known a world war. 15. The postwar neutering of Germany and Japan must be undone. The defanging of Germany was an overcorrection for which Europe is now paying a heavy price. A similar and highly theatrical commitment to Japanese pacifism will, if maintained, also threaten to shift the balance of power in Asia. 16. We should applaud those who attempt to build where the market has failed to act. The culture almost snickers at Musk’s interest in grand narrative, as if billionaires ought to simply stay in their lane of enriching themselves . . . . Any curiosity or genuine interest in the value of what he has created is essentially dismissed, or perhaps lurks from beneath a thinly veiled scorn. 17. Silicon Valley must play a role in addressing violent crime. Many politicians across the United States have essentially shrugged when it comes to violent crime, abandoning any serious efforts to address the problem or take on any risk with their constituencies or donors in coming up with solutions and experiments in what should be a desperate bid to save lives. 18. The ruthless exposure of the private lives of public figures drives far too much talent away from government service. The public arena—and the shallow and petty assaults against those who dare to do something other than enrich themselves—has become so unforgiving that the republic is left with a significant roster of ineffectual, empty vessels whose ambition one would forgive if there were any genuine belief structure lurking within. 19. The caution in public life that we unwittingly encourage is corrosive. Those who say nothing wrong often say nothing much at all. 20. The pervasive intolerance of religious belief in certain circles must be resisted. The elite’s intolerance of religious belief is perhaps one of the most telling signs that its political project constitutes a less open intellectual movement than many within it would claim. 21. Some cultures have produced vital advances; others remain dysfunctional and regressive. All cultures are now equal. Criticism and value judgments are forbidden. Yet this new dogma glosses over the fact that certain cultures and indeed subcultures . . . have produced wonders. Others have proven middling, and worse, regressive and harmful. 22. We must resist the shallow temptation of a vacant and hollow pluralism. We, in America and more broadly the West, have for the past half century resisted defining national cultures in the name of inclusivity. But inclusion into what? Excerpts from the #1 New York Times Bestseller The Technological Republic: Hard Power, Soft Belief, and the Future of the West, by Alexander C. Karp & Nicholas W. Zamiska techrepublicbook.com

English
3
20
48
10.7K
imagine
imagine@imaginarytec·
This Chinese humanoid robot just smashed the half-marathon world record in a wild 50:26. That’s nearly 7 minutes faster than the human record (57:20). The star? “Lightning” from Honor (Huawei spin-off). Honor swept the entire podium at Beijing E-Town 😂
English
0
1
4
723
imagine retweeted
TheBetterPath
TheBetterPath@TheBetterPath_·
There is this guy who is my neighbor. He has featured in some p0rn videos. So I asked him straight: "Bro, what do you guys do off camera to last long during scenes?" He laughed and said it's not magic pills or tricks like most think. Here’s what he told me.....
TheBetterPath tweet media
English
4
19
67
47.7K
imagine retweeted
Realms - Authority & Conviction Markets
curation, investor rights, and rejecting low-quality deals is the true moat and @fairdotclub is spearheading this
FAIR.CLUB@fairdotclub

The next winners in this category will not be the platforms that list the most worthless tokens. They will be the ones investors trust to filter the hardest and give them the most rights. That is why curation is the moat. In a market flooded with opportunities, more supply is not the product. Judgment is. Anyone can build a surface that makes deals visible. The harder job is deciding: • what deserves to be there • what rights investors get • what incentives do not hold up • what should be rejected instead of promoted That is curation. Not aesthetics. Not branding. Not taste as 'performance.' Actual filtration. And filtration matters because every market eventually reveals who it is built for. If your platform lists almost anything, you are optimizing for throughput not trust. That can look good for a while. More activity. More announcements. More things moving. But it usually comes at a cost. Standards fall. Explanation gets thinner. Bad incentives hide inside momentum. And investors are left doing their own underwriting in a market that pretends the platform already did it for them. That is not curation. We think the strongest platforms in this category will win differently. Not by listing the most. By making it clear that getting featured actually means something. That requires standards. It requires saying no. It requires treating explanation as part of the product, not just distribution. It requires making rights, structure, and incentives legible before attention does what attention does best, which is amplify whatever is already in motion. This is the part people miss: curation is not downstream of trust. Curation is how trust gets built in the first place. Because when everything is available, the scarce asset is credible selection. The market starts asking better questions: Why this project? Why now? Under what standards? With what structure? With what rights clarity? Those are healthy questions. And a platform that can answer them well becomes a filter people can rely on. That is the lane we care about. Not more deal volume for its own sake. A higher-trust market where selection means something, explanation is taken seriously, and quality has to survive scrutiny before it earns distribution. That is why we think curation is the moat.

English
1
3
10
955
imagine retweeted
Sunny River
Sunny River@sunnyriverr·
The internet made opportunity abundant. It also made bullshit easier to dress up as quality. So access isn’t the edge now. Judgment is. The best capital formation platforms won’t win by listing the most. They’ll win by curating the best.
FAIR.CLUB@fairdotclub

The internet made deals easier to distribute. It did not make them easier to trust. That is the gap FAIR is building for. People can find an opportunity in seconds. That does not mean they can tell: • what legal rights exist • what is actually being offered • what stage the project is really in • what is live versus what is narrative • how trust is supposed to work once capital moves That is the gap FAIR cares about. We are not here to push more deals. We are building a curated internet capital formation platform. Or another way to frame it: we are building a trust shell for internet capital markets. That means the job is not just surfacing opportunities. The job is making them: • easier to understand • easier to compare • easier to scrutinize • harder to misrepresent Because the internet improves distribution much faster than it improves judgment. Anyone can make a project visible. Far fewer can make it legible. And when legibility is weak, the same pattern keeps repeating: attention comes in confidence gets manufactured language gets sloppy rights get blurred governance gets overstated trust breaks after the raise instead of before it It is a market design problem we are solving for. So our view is simple: better capital formation needs better filters. Not just more access. Better selection. Not just more content. Better explanation. Not just more participation. Better structure. Not just more visibility. Better trust conditions. That is why FAIR is selective by design. Curation is not a layer we add on top. Curation is part of the product. Explanation is part of the product. Standards are part of the product. Language discipline is part of the product. If a project cannot explain itself precisely, it should not be amplified more aggressively. It should be understood more carefully, or not surfaced at all. That is the difference between a serious capital formation platform and an attention marketplace pretending to be one. We think the next important platforms in this category will not win by listing the most. They will win by doing four things better: • selecting better • explaining better • structuring better • earning trust better That is what FAIR is really building. Not just a place where deals appear. A place where quality has to survive scrutiny before it earns distribution.

English
3
4
6
911
imagine retweeted
FAIR.CLUB
FAIR.CLUB@fairdotclub·
The next winners in this category will not be the platforms that list the most worthless tokens. They will be the ones investors trust to filter the hardest and give them the most rights. That is why curation is the moat. In a market flooded with opportunities, more supply is not the product. Judgment is. Anyone can build a surface that makes deals visible. The harder job is deciding: • what deserves to be there • what rights investors get • what incentives do not hold up • what should be rejected instead of promoted That is curation. Not aesthetics. Not branding. Not taste as 'performance.' Actual filtration. And filtration matters because every market eventually reveals who it is built for. If your platform lists almost anything, you are optimizing for throughput not trust. That can look good for a while. More activity. More announcements. More things moving. But it usually comes at a cost. Standards fall. Explanation gets thinner. Bad incentives hide inside momentum. And investors are left doing their own underwriting in a market that pretends the platform already did it for them. That is not curation. We think the strongest platforms in this category will win differently. Not by listing the most. By making it clear that getting featured actually means something. That requires standards. It requires saying no. It requires treating explanation as part of the product, not just distribution. It requires making rights, structure, and incentives legible before attention does what attention does best, which is amplify whatever is already in motion. This is the part people miss: curation is not downstream of trust. Curation is how trust gets built in the first place. Because when everything is available, the scarce asset is credible selection. The market starts asking better questions: Why this project? Why now? Under what standards? With what structure? With what rights clarity? Those are healthy questions. And a platform that can answer them well becomes a filter people can rely on. That is the lane we care about. Not more deal volume for its own sake. A higher-trust market where selection means something, explanation is taken seriously, and quality has to survive scrutiny before it earns distribution. That is why we think curation is the moat.
FAIR.CLUB tweet media
English
4
3
12
1.5K
imagine retweeted
BTC MACHINE🤖 - BTC VIRUS🦠
We are the first to have burned 100 000 ordinals. We sent them to Kraken This means the hunt for 144 Machines and tens of thousands of other epic assets has now started! During the next years, people will be finding BTCM lore and assets in their transactions Making us the most widespread bitcoin ordinal project on earth We now own ZERO of our assets. We cannot dump or control floors. BTC MACHINES to 1 BTC
GIF
English
44
39
183
9.9K
Jan
Jan@janbtc·
I haven’t said this for a while but I’m bullish on all the builders who are still here even after most who already given up or were forced to leave/pivot
English
34
16
157
4.2K
imagine retweeted
FAIR.CLUB
FAIR.CLUB@fairdotclub·
The internet made deals easier to distribute. It did not make them easier to trust. That is the gap FAIR is building for. People can find an opportunity in seconds. That does not mean they can tell: • what legal rights exist • what is actually being offered • what stage the project is really in • what is live versus what is narrative • how trust is supposed to work once capital moves That is the gap FAIR cares about. We are not here to push more deals. We are building a curated internet capital formation platform. Or another way to frame it: we are building a trust shell for internet capital markets. That means the job is not just surfacing opportunities. The job is making them: • easier to understand • easier to compare • easier to scrutinize • harder to misrepresent Because the internet improves distribution much faster than it improves judgment. Anyone can make a project visible. Far fewer can make it legible. And when legibility is weak, the same pattern keeps repeating: attention comes in confidence gets manufactured language gets sloppy rights get blurred governance gets overstated trust breaks after the raise instead of before it It is a market design problem we are solving for. So our view is simple: better capital formation needs better filters. Not just more access. Better selection. Not just more content. Better explanation. Not just more participation. Better structure. Not just more visibility. Better trust conditions. That is why FAIR is selective by design. Curation is not a layer we add on top. Curation is part of the product. Explanation is part of the product. Standards are part of the product. Language discipline is part of the product. If a project cannot explain itself precisely, it should not be amplified more aggressively. It should be understood more carefully, or not surfaced at all. That is the difference between a serious capital formation platform and an attention marketplace pretending to be one. We think the next important platforms in this category will not win by listing the most. They will win by doing four things better: • selecting better • explaining better • structuring better • earning trust better That is what FAIR is really building. Not just a place where deals appear. A place where quality has to survive scrutiny before it earns distribution.
FAIR.CLUB tweet media
English
5
10
20
2.1K
imagine retweeted
KiD LorΞm
KiD LorΞm@dolor3m·
I just built an entire - fully functional - website including some tailor made retro games just by using @grok... ... and @suno for music production! gizmokitten.io/?v=20260415
English
1
6
15
641