'TERRIFYING': Dashcam video shows the moment a Tesla Cybertruck, allegedly operating in self-driving mode, nearly sent a Houston mom and her infant off a bridge before violently crashing into an overpass barrier. The woman claims she suffered multiple injuries from the incident and is now suing the automaker for $1 million.

@FoxNews "So much for ‘full self-driving.’ Tesla sells fantasy, not safety. Maybe the real innovation isn’t the Cybertruck—it’s how quickly Elon can turn accidents into PR stunts while people get hurt."

@FoxNews Does anyone beside Elon Musk think that self-driving cars are a good idea?? Now imagine a tank truck with ten thousand gallons of gasoline hurtling along on I-80 driven by a computer at 80 mph. What could possibly go wrong???

Wait wait wait… so the Cybertruck was in FSD, saw the danger, and instead of driving off the bridge it corrected hard into the barrier? That’s literally the system choosing to crash into concrete rather than let them fall 30+ feet with an infant. Still suing though? Make it make sense

@FoxNews you're a mom. you got a baby in the car. the most precious cargo on planet earth. and you look at the cybertruck and you go "yeah let's put it in self-driving mode. let's let the computer take the wheel. with my infant."

@FoxNews here is my tesla on fsd going 82mph suddenly slowing down and avoiding a deer at 3am on the highway without me touching the steering wheel. but i get it, keep driving ford trucks from 1988 without airbags and go to work being a plumber.

@FoxNews Can someone tell me what this cone configuration is? What do I, as a human operator, do with this?

@FoxNews FAKE NEWS @FoxsNews

@FoxNews Does anyone besides Elon Musk actually think self-driving cars are a good idea? Now imagine a tank truck with 10,000 gallons of gasoline hurtling down I‑80 at 80 mph—driven by a computer. What could possibly go wrong??

@FoxNews Lies. Wasn’t in FSD. This has been proven false already You’re lying for clicks

@FoxNews @grok tell the whole story.

Plot twist: The AI chose the optimal outcome. Barrier crash = minor injuries, $1M lawsuit Bridge fall = multiple fatalities, $50M+ wrongful death suits Humans see "terrifying malfunction" AI systems see "damage minimization algorithm successful" The real question: Why wasn't full autonomy engaged to prevent human error entirely? 🤖🚗

@FoxNews x.com/elonmusk/statu…

The cyber truck lost me when the drunk man crashed his truck and became trapped inside because the electrical system lost power, preventing the door from opening and literally trapping him inside. The ion batteries caught fire - which to my understanding is a fire nigh impossible to put out - and burned him alive inside.

@FoxNews Wait.so the Cybertruck and instead of driving off the bridge it corrected hard into the barrier? That’s literally the system choosing to crash into concrete rather than let them fall 30+ feet with an infant. Still suing though? Make it make sense

@FoxNews @grok can you give more context?

Infant in the car when the Cybertruck allegedly went rogue on autopilot. That’s the whole story right there. Dashcam footage will tell us if the self-driving claim holds. But Tesla’s been overselling autopilot capability for years. You don’t beta test safety features with babies onboard.

@FoxNews Elon Musk is making claims about self-driving sustainability, but America seems to be a real challenge for him. He needs to go to China and learn from those people how they developed realisable self-driving vehicles.

@FoxNews As a human, I'm not sure I understand what the expected path was supposed to be. The driver is responsible for the vehicle, FSD is a tool. This is the driver's fault 100%.

@FoxNews Cybertruck saved mom & baby by slamming barrier instead of plunging off bridge! 🚀💥 FSD chose concrete over 30ft drop – that's a win, not a fail. Still suing for $1M? Make it make sense 😂 Tesla data will expose the truth fr #Cybertruck #Tesla @FoxNews @elonmusk

@FoxNews This is what a dashcam looks like lets see the real footage

@FoxNews Why are you pushing this nonsense? For one, it is called supervised for a reason Where is the proof she was using FSD at the time? Tragedies are sad but sensationalist “journalism “ does not help Do better

@FoxNews @ChivalryGiant21 The moment you said woman, I knew it wasn’t the vehicle’s fault.

@FoxNews Pretty much:

As a parent, you have one job: keep your infant safe. Putting an EV in self-driving mode on a dangerous bridge like that, with a baby in the back isn’t a tech glitch. it’s being irresponsible. She ignored all the Tesla autopilot rules. Tesla didn’t do anything wrong here; the mother should be held accountable.

@FoxNews In complete defense of Tesla, you are supposed to monitor driving at all times so that this doesn’t happen.

@FoxNews How the Tesla was driving

@FoxNews She has EDS

@FoxNews i can almost guarantee fsd was not engaged for this accident. this was almost certainly user error and im guessing that will come out in time

This is the largest obstacle to full self driving vehicles on our roads and highways, INSURANCE. When, not if a Tesla (or another auto maker) in self driving mode causes an accident with a fuel tanker truck or a full school bus and causes a mass casualty event, every insurance company will immediately stop insuring cars with self driving capabilities, and none of them will be allowed on the roads with no insurance.

@FoxNews The mom endangered her kid by not being ready to take control of the wheel like the rule of autopilot say. This is a driver error. No different if she did this without autopilot

@FoxNews Jeez. No matter what. There is always a flip side of innovations. There is a limit to wish we as humans should trust innovators and their innovations. The woman has an action claim against the auto company

@FoxNews @FoxNews 'TERRIFYING': The moment Fox alleged News, allegedly operating in good faith, sends unconfirmed allegations meant to scare people and attack @tesla instead of actual confirmed news.

@FoxNews @elonmusk can't wait for this to be debunked. She was probably not paying attention. @Tesla

@FoxNews Elon Musk has been selling FSD snake oil since 2016.

@FoxNews She said she turned off self-driving, and the legal complaint says something about not notifying the driver when the self-driving is turned off. I think she's toast. EVERYTHING in Tesla cars is recorded. SHE drove that thing into the barrier.

This is totally the drivers fault, plenty of time to take control in a spot where there is possible confusion. This is why it’s called FSD supervised. You need to be alert and ready to take over in situations just like this. Especially in construction zones, I always take over in a construction zone, not only for my safety but workers in the area.