44 Frames

Believe it or not this video was made only using listing photos... --- #AI #RealEstate 44frames.com

@om_patel5 The reviews angle is the unlock. Most cold email talks about what you offer. This reads the prospect's pain in their customers' words, then writes to that wound. Nobody fakes skepticism when your email knows what their clients complain about. 4x reply rate is conservative.

SOMEONE VIBE CODED A TOOL THAT FINDS BUSINESSES, READS THEIR REVIEWS, AND WRITES COLD EMAILS BASED ON THEIR OWN CUSTOMERS' COMPLAINTS this is insane. you type in any business type and pick a city. it scrapes every matching business off Google Maps with 30+ data fields. then it visits their actual websites and pulls verified emails, phone numbers, and every social media profile they have scraped live, not from some outdated database like other tools then the AI reads up to 50 of their Google reviews and finds their exact pain points "clients complain photos don't show the real size of properties" or "listings take too long to sell" then you tell it what YOUR business does. it cross-references your offer with their specific problems and generates a fully personalized cold email for each business. send it in 2 clicks. one by one and not bulk so it lands in the primary inbox and all of those leads land on a GPS-mapped CRM where you can draw sales territories, optimize driving routes, track your team's activity in real time, and transcribe voice notes after meetings. works in 200+ countries and with any business type. if they're on Google Maps you can find them this is the most complete lead gen tool i've ever seen AND he vibe coded the whole thing with Claude Code in 2 weeks

@sharbel Every power tool has a 10/90 split. 10% of users find the feature that changes how they work. 90% wonder why their output is mediocre. The gap between casual user and power user is almost always willingness to read past the getting started guide.

> you open Claude Code. > you type a prompt. > it thinks for 3 seconds and gives you an answer. > you didn't know you could type "ultrathink" to make it actually think. > you didn't know "/btw" asks a question with zero context cost. > you didn't know two Claude sessions produce better code than one. > you've been using 10% of the tool. > here's the other 90%.

@realEstateTrent The anchor tenant paradox: you want the traffic driver but not the traffic. Chick-fil-A, Planet Fitness, dollar stores — all bring bodies can torch your tenant mix. Best retail centers run on controlled scarcity. Saying no to Chick-fil-A is a flex most landlords can't pull off.

I’m at the airport last week and a gentleman approaches me. “Hi there - I’m on the corporate team at Chick-fil-A, been following your stuff.” Me: Stunned; not sure where it’s going. Just sort of smile and nervously say thanks. Him: “Love what you’re doing! Here’s a gift card.” Me: Ok nice that went much better than I thought 😅

@Mrplaya_ @homeservicebase Exactly — and the employee angle is underrated. The whole crew knows where the bodies are buried: which processes were held together with duct tape, which accounts are fragile, which managers were coasting. That institutional knowledge doesn't transfer in a deal room.

@44_Frames @homeservicebase They should be worried because most of the guys would love to work again with their former boss. And good employees are hard to find.

4 years after selling NexGen HVAC & Plumbing to Wrench Group for about $150M, Ismael Valdez is back in the game. I think a lot of PE firms will be reviewing their non-compete terms now. He built a huge residential home service company in California once, he’ll do it a second time.

@zodchiii The pattern is always the same. Spend 3 months doing something manually, automate it in 10 minutes, then spend the rest of the day wondering why you waited. The real cost of not automating isn't time — it's the mental tax of remembering to do the thing every single time.

> use Claude Code for 3 months > manually fix mistakes every day > manually make sure claude did what you asked for > no hooks > discover hooks exist > 10 minutes of setup > all of this routine is now automatic > never working same again

@cgtwts 300 people building in silence while everyone else is writing blog posts about their "AI strategy." The pattern repeats: the team that ships fastest is always the one you hear about last.

> be kimi > team of around 300 people > barely one tenth of the people behind claude > quiet, low-key culture, people just building > no big company noise, so things move fast > builds one of the best open source models in the world > makes it cheaper to run > suddenly, anyone can actually build with AI. dream workspace for engineers who just want to build.

@slow_developer The gap between "knows everything about my life" and "acts correctly on that knowledge" is roughly the same gap between having all the ingredients and being a good cook. Context is easy. Judgment is the hard part nobody has solved yet.

Sam Altman says OpenAI has two major priorities: automated researchers and AI-accelerated companies But the dream is to build an agent that monitors your computer, reads your messages, listens to meetings, and acts without being asked "it knows everything about my life"

@hasantoxr Genuine question: how many of these AI cold email tools have you tested that still work after month 2? The demo always looks magic. Then reply rates crater because every competitor uses the same tool with the same templates on the same leads.

BREAKING 🚨: THIS IS THE FIRST AI SALES TOOL THAT DOES THE WHOLE JOB. PERIOD. NOT JUST DATA. NOT JUST ENRICHMENT. NOT JUST TEMPLATES. RESEARCH, VERIFICATION, AND A PERSONALIZED COLD EMAIL IN UNDER 2 MINUTES. AUTOGTM BY EXPLEE IS WHAT THE OTHERS PRETEND TO BE.

@_avichawla Every open-source AI tool follows the same arc: massive hype, 20K stars, then 90% of users hit a config issue on day 2 and go back to the paid product. The real moat is not the model or the features. It is making it work without reading a README.

Another blow to Anthropic! Devs built a free and better Claude alternative that: - runs locally - works with any LLM - beats it on deep research - has Cowork-like capabilities - connects to 40+ data sources - self-hosts via Docker, and more. 100% open-source (20k+ stars).

@sweatystartup Nobody mentions the nuance: in those first 5 conversations you are not selling the product. You are selling your conviction. The real test is whether you can describe their problem better than they can. That is when wallets open.

Are you thinking about starting a business? Some might think you should begin by incorporating a company, building a website, purchasing equipment, getting insurance, working on your pricing strategy, making some ads, and setting everything up. Wrong. Your first step is to go out and find 20 potential customers willing to pay for your product or service. Once you have secured at least five paying customers who commit with cash deposits, invest in the tools, deliver the product or service and collect the remaining balance for the completed job. Then repeat the process. If you’re not starting this way, you’re wasting your time. Remember: If people truly need what you’re offering, they’ll pay you today to solve their problem. If you can’t get the money, you’re not solving a real problem. It’s time to reevaluate your business idea and try again.

@cryptopunk7213 Microsoft's problem isn't technical — it's structural. They can't make Copilot too good without cannibalizing Office license revenue. Anthropic has zero legacy products to protect, so they ship whatever makes the best product. Classic innovator's dilemma playing out in real time.

sorry but anthropic is cooking microsoft, how have they fumbled this so badly microsoft owns 27% of openai, they own the entire IP for chatgpt and STILL anthropic is out-shipping them: this week we got claude cowork for windows and now every 365 app works with claude oh and microsoft’s last 2 ai products are POWERED by claude. they literally called it “microsoft cowork” this is why openai is rediverting all resources to codex anthropic is automating the entire software stack, coding process and now apps.

@shawngorham The $400-500K is real but what nobody talks about is the time cost. 6-9 flips/year means you're running a full-time project management operation. Most people see the profit per deal and forget that coordinating contractors, inspections, and closings is basically a second job.

Here are the numbers on 3 flips I have going or sold in Q1 - will you get rich? No. But do this 6-9 times a year, sprinkle in a couple that make $100k and its a $400k - $500k a year income Would it be worth it to you?

@svpino The hype isn't because it's new tech. It's because they solved the boring infrastructure nobody wanted to build. Most people were duct-taping Claude + scripts + cron. OpenClaw is the first real orchestration layer. That's what makes it a step-change.

Name something with more hype than OpenClaw, and I'll close my account. It genuinely looks like one of those things that happen once in a long time and fundamentally change the game. So many platforms, ideas, offerings, and variations come out every day! These guys are now offering it for free with Gemma 4, Google's latest open model. This genie is out of the bottle.

@startupideaspod Building collapsed. Distribution didn't. You can ship a product in an hour but "first customer by 10am" only works if you already have the audience. Most people are still at month 6 trying to get anyone to notice the thing they built in 45 minutes.

The company-building timeline just collapsed. Old timeline: - Hire devs (months) - Build MVP (month 3) - First revenue (month 12) New timeline: - Idea at 9:00am - Product built by 9:45 - First customer by 10:00 - Iterating by lunch All you need is claude code and an audience. That's the 1-hour company stack.

@heynavtoor The mouse was never the advantage. Knowing what to click was. AI can move a cursor perfectly but still breaks when the workflow is "call Dave from accounting and ask why this number is off." The advantage is context humans don't write down because we assume everyone knows.

We spent years teaching AI to think. Now it can move a mouse. Humanity's last advantage is gone

@neural_avb The pace didn't change. Our ability to track it did. These would've dropped across a month in 2019 and nobody notices until the retrospective. Now we have real-time aggregators and every release gets a post. The velocity feels faster but the compounding was always this steep.

in the last 3 hours > Qwen dropped Qwen3.6 > Google dropped Gemma 4 > OpenAI acquired TBPN > Anth dropped new mech interpretability findings > Cursor 3 wth is this timeline? were we always moving so fast?

@ChrisRamsey60 2.7x equity is solid, but the exit buyer pool is the real unlock. REITs and institutionals who skip residential buy self-storage all day. Most hunt the same assets everyone else wants. Conversions are underrated because the sourcing is harder and the vision is less obvious.

This is what value add looks like, the returns on value add are like no other investment. We took an old car dealership. 70k sqft Self storage conversion start to finish. Project all in 4.5M. Stabilized will be worth over 12m. Conversions like this can make life changing money.

@bcherny Mouse events in a terminal is one of those things that sounds unnecessary until you try it and then going back feels like using a pencil after discovering keyboards.

Today we're excited to announce NO_FLICKER mode for Claude Code in the terminal It uses an experimental new renderer that we're excited about. The renderer is early and has tradeoffs, but already we've found that most internal users prefer it over the old renderer. It also supports mouse events (yes, in a terminal). Try it: CLAUDE_CODE_NO_FLICKER=1 claude

@hqmank The adversarial review is the real unlock. Code review catches bugs. Adversarial review catches bad decisions — which are 10x more expensive. Most codebases don't fail because of syntax. They fail because someone made a design call in week 2 that nobody questioned.

If you're using Claude Code, this is worth knowing. Instead of worrying about whether Opus 4.6 or GPT 5.4 is better, it's more useful to combine them in the same workflow. OpenAI shipped an official Claude Code plugin called codex-plugin-cc. You can now call Codex directly from inside Claude Code. Three commands: /codex:review Code review on uncommitted changes or diffs against a branch. Read-only. /codex:adversarial-review Challenges your design decisions, not just syntax. "Why this caching strategy?" "Race condition here?" Append free-form text to steer the review. /codex:rescue Hands the task to Codex when Claude gets stuck. Supports --resume to continue from the last run. Adversarial review is the killer feature. Especially before shipping auth changes, infra scripts, or anything involving data loss. There's also a review gate: Codex auto-reviews every time Claude finishes and blocks completion if issues are found. Claude writes, Codex reviews. github.com/openai/codex-p…