Chiss Protocol ❄️

0

1

81

neira@borjaneira_·1 Ara

The Monetary Hierarchy of On-Chain Liabilities The persistence of USD dominance (>95%) in stablecoin markets is not a behavioral preference, it is a structural derivative of collateral fungibility. My latest Research Note maps the balance sheet constraints of fiat-referenced tokens against the hierarchy of money: 1. The Collateral Constraint USD issuers operate with infinite scalability due to a unified, globally fungible outside asset (T-bills). Euro issuers, conversely, manage a "fragmented sovereign mosaic" (Bunds vs. OATs vs. BTPs) with divergent credit spreads and liquidity profiles. Without a unified Euro safe asset, the token cannot scale as pristine collateral. 2. The Transmission MechanismThe "crypto island" hypothesis is dead. Data confirms a direct transmission channel from on-chain redemptions to offshore funding markets, with stablecoin flows now impacting 3-month T-bill yields by ~2–8bps per shock. 3. The Survival Constraint Under MiCA, Euro tokens are effectively stripped of yield, forcing them to trade at a structural disadvantage to USD instruments. Meanwhile, EM stablecoins act as redundant "inside money" wrappers that bleed into tokenized USD during stress events (flight-to-quality). The on-chain ecosystem has evolved into a shadow-banking limb of the US Treasury market. Non-USD stablecoins remain valid settlement rails, but they are structurally capped as stores of value. FIND LINK TO RESEARCH NOTE BELOW👇

English

5

2

30

2.9K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·1 Ara

@aadith_gbd @0xcoconutt This won't be happening. One reason, why local stablecoins will blossom.

English

0

1

16

AadEth@aadith_gbd·30 Kas

@0xcoconutt This is so true And Brics would probably put up the best fight I can't imagine china saying yes to $

English

0

1

40

coco🔮 壳壳@0xcoconutt·30 Kas

no sovereign nation will let its currency die without a fight people that thinks non-USD stablecoin will not have adoption are missing the forest for the trees they are hyper-focused on economic efficiency (remittance cost, yields, spreads) but completely ignores the geopolitical reality. in 2024, nigeria restricted use of binance, because p2p market became the real forex market. people were dumping naira for USDT to exit the local system, funding foreign consumption (games, vices, imports) while the local economy bled out. banning crypto/ stablecoin usage was a sovereign defense mechanism against capital flight. this is why non-USD stablecoins will take off, not because the market demands them, but because governments will force them. they need a digital tool to compete with the dollar, just like how tech companies want to reach feature parity with competitors

nobody wants non-USD stablecoins Five years, dozens of new issuers, every major currency tried, and none have made any progress in dethroning the dollar.

English

12

0

24

2.6K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·1 Ara

@maybeltr @0xcoconutt Another important angle to consider. As non-USD stables grow, global USD stables would have to penetrate regulatory firewalls to find adoption in different regions.

English

16

LTR@maybeltr·30 Kas

@0xcoconutt Complete agree, China is already starting to get the Yuan adopted in more places like the Middle East via deals. I don't know why any large BRICS country would just "let" the USD gain even more dominance

English

0

1

106

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·1 Ara

@echulshin @0xcoconutt You make a good point ser. Very possible to start to see a pattern where local stablecoins depeg from the underlying fiat, as a result of more sell or buy pressure (if price is not anchored by FX oracle data).

English

31

echul@echulshin·1 Ara

@0xcoconutt ie. why would they want or promote their own stablecoin

English

0

46

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@artemis There's this Russian ruble-pegged stablecoin, that seems to be garnering massive supply, Ya heard?

English

Patrick Hansen@paddi_hansen

38

Artemis@artemis·28 Kas

Euro stablecoins are the lone non-USD bright spot, with $EURC climbing to €287M.

It is often pointed out here in Europe that euro-stablecoins still make up only a tiny slice of the overall stablecoin market - and that’s true. But if you zoom in on the non-USD segment, another fact emerges. Euro-stablecoins are essentially the only non-USD stablecoins showing consistent growth over the past year, driven primarily by EURC, which has now reached €287M in circulation. So while the euro’s share of the global stablecoin market remains small, euro-stablecoins - and especially EURC - are sending clear growth signals compared to other on-chain currencies. Source: @artemis

English

10

4

58

11.1K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@borjaneira_ @paddi_hansen Another interesting narrative. Users seem to not fancy regulated stablecoins or regions. USDT thrives over USDC, in value parking, because of this. Can non-USD Stables emerge without heavy regulation on it? This is a critical consideration.

English

49

neira@borjaneira_·28 Kas

Great data, Patrick, the divergence is structural The EM currencies bleed into USD because the utility function in the Global South is flight-to-quality (Long USD). The Euro survives because it’s a hard currency, serving as a settlement rail rather than a flight vehicle That said, the EURC growth signals institutional hedging for MiCA compliance, not organic DeFi velocity but it's not your problem, it's just the euro onchain is weak by design. Until the Eurozone solves the fragmented collateral issue (no unified Safe Asset vs. infinite T-Bills), EUR on-chain will likely remain a terminal settlement asset, while USD remains the ecosystem's numeraire

English

2

0

3

452

Patrick Hansen@paddi_hansen·28 Kas

It is often pointed out here in Europe that euro-stablecoins still make up only a tiny slice of the overall stablecoin market - and that’s true. But if you zoom in on the non-USD segment, another fact emerges. Euro-stablecoins are essentially the only non-USD stablecoins showing consistent growth over the past year, driven primarily by EURC, which has now reached €287M in circulation. So while the euro’s share of the global stablecoin market remains small, euro-stablecoins - and especially EURC - are sending clear growth signals compared to other on-chain currencies. Source: @artemis

English

12

8

71

27.8K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@basq0x Zoom out! 🔍

English

12

Basq@basq0x·28 Kas

This is about to change. The EU will enforce the use of only EUR or EURC. BRICS countries are already discussing high taxes on USD holdings, stable coins included. Sometimes data is useless without zooming out.

nobody wants non-USD stablecoins Five years, dozens of new issuers, every major currency tried, and none have made any progress in dethroning the dollar.

English

0

6

212

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@ajbanon Another angle. ❄️ Regulatory defence against dollarisation.

English

6

AJ@ajbanon·27 Kas

Nobody wants them today but international governments will regulate them into existence. If you think countries will just watch their customers deposits move freely into US dollars at scale, you don't know your history.

nobody wants non-USD stablecoins Five years, dozens of new issuers, every major currency tried, and none have made any progress in dethroning the dollar.

English

0

10

640

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@njokuScript Well, said. Inflation hedge, is just one Utility (and USD is not the best at it.) Cross-border payments are another.

English

3

njokuscript.um@njokuScript·27 Kas

In fact most people who send and receive money would indirectly be users of local stables. They just won’t know it.

English

0

6

514

njokuscript.um@njokuScript·27 Kas

This makes sense if the only use case for non-usd/local stablecoins were “holding” / “store of value” or “inflation protection”

I saw my families net worth drop 50% in one year. I'm super bullish USD denominated stablecoins not because I live in NYC now but because I grew up in Egypt. You can not imagine how much people hate their local currencies. USD is the global currency. Everyone would hold it if they could.

English

2

0

10

3.1K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@ilikesymmetry HODLing is just one utility. There are more.

English

11

conner.base.eth@ilikesymmetry·27 Kas

Bear case for local stablecoins. How many fiat currencies are worth holding today and how many in a few years?

I saw my families net worth drop 50% in one year. I'm super bullish USD denominated stablecoins not because I live in NYC now but because I grew up in Egypt. You can not imagine how much people hate their local currencies. USD is the global currency. Everyone would hold it if they could.

English

0

14

2K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@mannyornothing @drakeevans @kanishkkhurana People need currency freedom - Beyond USD.

English

1

41

manny@mannyornothing·26 Kas

Totally in Argentina the “save in USD, spend in pesos” pattern is real. But that pattern only works because users have access to both currencies. That’s the whole point: people need the ability to choose the currency they save in and the currency they spend in. USD for protection, local currency for life. On-chain money should mirror that flexibility globally not force everyone into USD or into their local currency. Choice is the feature

English

0

1

25

Kanishk.hl@kanishkkhurana·26 Kas

What's the point of non-USD stablecoins ? > you make a pesos or inr stablecoin. > These currencies themselves depreciate in value. > Your stablecoin is pegged to the value of the currency, it also loses value. " I can do onchain payments with it" " I can generate yield with it." Can you not do that with usdc/t ? Make it make sense.

English

9

0

13

1.2K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@mannyornothing @kanishkkhurana You see it. More people will start to see it. Soon.

English

2

12

manny@mannyornothing·26 Kas

@kanishkkhurana USD loses value too it just does it slower. Not everyone lives in the US, earns in USD, or wants FX exposure for daily expenses. Local currency stables matter because people live their financial lives locally, even if the money rails are global.

English

4

1

11

465

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

True winner takes all, but what defines the winner? - Liquidity? - Yield? - Friendly regulations? - Payment efficiency? For different people, "the winner" means different things. While USD stablecoins may currently win for most of these categories, non-USD stablecoins are emerging to sweep them off that position, especially in payment efficiency & regulatory buoyancy (instituted by countries).

English

7

Lex Sokolin | Generative Ventures@LexSokolin·27 Kas

Money follows the same winner take all dynamic as music, culture, search and so on There is a reserve option for everything Internet makes it that much more acute Only power, ie countries, can push against that gravity through coercion

nobody wants non-USD stablecoins Five years, dozens of new issuers, every major currency tried, and none have made any progress in dethroning the dollar.

English

6

0

11

448

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@0x_native @0xYusei Soon, more people will know.

English

0

2

26

𝙽𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚟𝚎@0x_native·27 Kas

@0xYusei That's it, the world is bigger than just USD

English

0

2

13

Yusei@0xYusei·27 Kas

I want EUR, I want CHF, I want NOK, I want JPY. I want precious metals index The world is bigger than just USD

nobody wants non-USD stablecoins

English

2

1

21

414

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@0xYusei 🌎 >>> 💲

1

16

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@kaycidot No truer words! 💯

English

8

Kaito@kaycidot·27 Kas

The purpose of local stablecoins is not to dethrone the dollar, but rather be backend infrastructure for FX, stablecoin enabled accounts, last mile off-ramps, etc

nobody wants non-USD stablecoins Five years, dozens of new issuers, every major currency tried, and none have made any progress in dethroning the dollar.

English

4

1

16

2K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@YeleBademosi @kaycidot Most people don't! 😎

English

5

Yele | Onboard 🌐@YeleBademosi·27 Kas

@kaycidot Most people don’t get this!

English

0

1

61

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@borjaneira_ 💯 Yet, combination of FX Lending + Spot market (together operating like FX swaps - forwards+spots) onchain would be a killer.

English

0

3

196

neira@borjaneira_·28 Kas

After syncing with several of you, I’m recalibrating. My core thesis remains: the endgame for on-chain FX is indeed the BIS vision of rewiring global collateral and credit. However, I was blinded by the macro scale, ignoring the inefficiencies that exist below the institutional threshold. The alpha right now isn't in competing for the G10 trillions yet but in servicing the corridors where incumbents are failing players today. These "marginal" volumes for the big players are literally hundreds of millions actively seeking a solution to operational friction that I hadn't accounted for in my macro model. Genuinely appreciate the insights. There are some incredibly sharp minds building out there.

neira@borjaneira_

Most “FX on-chain” pitches treat FX as a big spot market that should live in AMMs. The balance sheets tell a different story. Roughly half of global FX turnover is in short-dated FX swaps, not spot, and those swaps embed tens of trillions of off-balance-sheet dollar obligations for non-US banks, insurers and asset managers. Stress in 2008 and 2020 didn’t start in retail FX; it started in this dollar-funding machine and forced central banks to open swap lines to keep it running. This note starts from that machine, not from token prices. It looks at CLS vs non-CLS rails, PvP vs Herstatt risk, and the “hidden” dollar debt sitting in FX swaps and forwards, then asks a simple question: if we’re serious about tokenisation and 24/7 collateral, where does “on-chain” actually move the needle? The answer is deliberately narrow: • Turning FX swaps into explicit, margined and netted contracts with programmable collateral in tokenised bank money or T-bills • Extending PvP settlement to non-CLS currencies and tokenised fiat, collapsing correspondent chains • Giving treasurers and supervisors a real-time view of cross-currency funding gaps and maturity walls If you run digital assets, tokenisation or market structure, this is the lens that decides whether your “FX on-chain” roadmap becomes core funding infrastructure for dealers and central banks or just another trading venue sitting at the edge of someone else’s balance sheet. FIND THE LINK TO THE NOTE BELOW 👇

English

10

4

64

11.7K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@iamnotstatic Protect this man at all cost. He speaks great truth! 💯

English

32

Abdulfatai | Blockradar@iamnotstatic·27 Kas

the real value of local stablecoins isn’t in holding them, it’s in the efficiency they create. they make it easy to move in and out of any currency, something traditional systems still fail at. from my experience building stablecoin infrastructure, this flexibility is what actually empowers people: faster movement, cheaper transfers, and access to global liquidity when they need it.

I saw my families net worth drop 50% in one year. I'm super bullish USD denominated stablecoins not because I live in NYC now but because I grew up in Egypt. You can not imagine how much people hate their local currencies. USD is the global currency. Everyone would hold it if they could.

English

9

13

89

9K

Chiss Protocol ❄️@ChissProtocol·28 Kas

@zcserei @shafu0x USD stablecoins are not the only answer. 💯

English

25

Zoltán@zcserei·27 Kas

I live in Hungary and I saw tens of thousands of families wrecked because their loans were denominated in CHF. USD stablecoins are not the only answer. Imagine if crypto becomes mainstream and suddenly lots of people hold their money in USD / EUR + a couple other major currencies like RMB or JPY. What happens to the rest? What happens to e.g. random, average, hard working Egyptian families? We need structures that don’t destroy late adopters.

English