Daniel Roland Anderson

This is the most ruthless post I have and probably will ever do. This is the intellectual skeleton key to turning the west around. There are a few posts will change your perception of the world, this is one of them. There is no such thing as migrant crime. There is no such thing as migrant rapes, thefts, scams or murders. Crime is when someone within your tribe or in-group violates the rules that your own tribe has created. These are not universals, rather idealized preferences that you have as a westerner in a western country. These are not "real", they are preferences to how you want your society to function. Humans are tribal, we are not "individuals", we operate and require groups to function and succeed. That's why we have tribal instincts and tribal loyalties. Modern businesses hijack this with things like sports teams. But tribal loyalty and nationalism, which is its end derivative is the most powerful force in the world, because it quite literally is our survival mechanism. Without a tribe we cannot survive, so tribal instincts, after personal survival are our most powerful drivers. Question is what is a "tribe". Look at your hand, that's your tribe. We are concentrically loyal. Family, race, religion, region, in that order and ideally homogenized. Liberalism is a belief and an attempt to universalize the western tribe to everyone. And if everyone is subject to the standard, they are subject to both access and protection within that standard. White westerners are not exempt from this. This underlying fact is the one thing everyone tries to gloss over. But it is the underlying truth about how the world really is. The world is anarchic, what that means is there is no higher authority in the system. We form governments as a result of our tribal loyalties, to represent and organize ourselves as a tribe. That's what a "nation" is. It's the formalized structure of a tribe of people. Survival is our highest goal, and violence is a very effective way of getting resources for yourself and tribe. It's literally Cain vs Abel in the bible. Because the world is anarchic, the underlying structure behind the resolution of tribal disputes is to be resolved by violence. "Migrants", or people who are not from your tribe, are not subject to your standards or ideals. They have no responsibility to adhere to your standards, ideals or values. Their goal is to maximize their own and their tribe's resources and power. With whatever means possible, including violence. When a Pakistani clan drugs and invites everyone over to have sex with a young white girl. This is not rape. It's not gang rape. Rape, and gang rape are crimes done within your own tribe. This is inter-tribal violence. There are no rules in inter-tribal violence. This is the outcome of losing an ideological war and not understanding the primal structure of the world correctly. THEY ARE NOT YOUR TRIBE. They are not subject to your standards. When they kill 20 people in an attack at an event. This is not murder. Murder is an intra-tribal crime. This is inter-tribal conflict where they have been given access, by our own leaders to do this to you. They are predators, this is how the real world really is. These are the monsters behind the walls we worked many generations to construct. When a foreigner scams you out of money. This is not stealing. This is inter-tribal resource acquisition. They are taking resources from rival tribes. It's only fraud and theft if you believe they are apart of your tribe. THEY DO NOT THINK THIS. They do not want to be apart of your tribe, they seek to dominate, abuse and exploit you for the benefit of theirs. Western culture has universalized our system of ethics and protection to everyone. When they have not done the same to you. And here is the line I repeat to everyone. "Those who are not subject to ethics, are not subject to the protection of ethics.". Read that line as many times as you need, internalize it. Free yourself from the constrains of the propaganda levied upon you, that is what will free you. They are rival tribes, and in inter-tribal conflict. There are no rules except victory.

BREAKING: Nikki Haley’s Indian son “Nalin” is expected to replace Nick Fuentes, according to the Bari Weiss-owned Free Press.

Be Like Poland 🇵🇱

🚨إغلاق مضيق هرمز من قبل الغرب تجربة تُدرس الآن وستستمر حتى يرون النتائج كاملة... والقادم أعظم! 🚨ظننا أن إدارة العالم من خلال سياسات التغير المناخي ستكون قاسيا على الناس، ثم ظننا أن كورونا ستكون قاسية على الناس، ثم جاء إغلاق مضيق هرمز... والله يعين! 🚨لو خلع أفراد النظام الإيراني جلدهم واعطوه لترمب لحصل ما حصل على كل الحالات!

🚨إغلاق مضيق هرمز من قبل الغرب تجربة تُدرس الآن وستستمر حتى يرون النتائج كاملة... والقادم أعظم! 🚨ظننا أن إدارة العالم من خلال سياسات التغير المناخي ستكون قاسيا على الناس، ثم ظننا أن كورونا ستكون قاسية على الناس، ثم جاء إغلاق مضيق هرمز... والله يعين! 🚨لو خلع أفراد النظام الإيراني جلدهم واعطوه لترمب لحصل ما حصل على كل الحالات!

Some art tells you where the culture is heading. The boys are back, and woke is in retreat.

Be Like Poland 🇵🇱

The El Niño Index and Shifting Baseline Syndrome The background warming effect is additive. The Oceanic Niño Index (ONI) is calculated against a rolling 30-year climatological baseline, which is updated every 5 years. This means rising background SSTs are partially subtracted out of the anomaly — so the raw warming signal is actually being suppressed in the index. The “true” intensity of future events relative to a fixed historical baseline would be even larger than the ONI suggests. How the baseline works The ONI measures the SST anomaly in the Niño 3.4 region relative to a 30-year climatological mean, currently 1991–2020. Every 5 years NOAA updates that baseline to incorporate the most recent 30-year period. The next update will shift to 1996–2025 as the reference period. The suppression effect Because background tropical Pacific SSTs are rising due to anthropogenic warming, each successive baseline period is warmer than the last. When you calculate an anomaly against a warmer baseline, the resulting anomaly is smaller than it would have been against an older, cooler baseline. Consider a simplified illustration: • A future El Niño peaks at an absolute Niño 3.4 SST of, say, 30.0°C • Against the 1991–2020 baseline mean of 27.0°C → anomaly = +3.0°C • Against the 1996–2025 baseline mean of 27.3°C → anomaly = +2.7°C • Against a hypothetical 2001–2030 baseline of 27.6°C → anomaly = +2.4°C Same absolute ocean temperature, meaningfully different ONI values depending on which baseline you use. The index is effectively a moving target. Why this matters for the shifting baseline trend Looking back at the last four “Super” events: Season Peak ONI Approx Baseline Era 1972–73 +2.12°C 1941–1970 1982–83 +2.23°C 1951–1980 1997–98 +2.40°C 1961–1990 2015–16 +2.75°C 1981–2010 Each event was measured against a progressively warmer baseline. So the apparent upward trend in ONI values is actually conservative — it understates the true intensification because each successive event is being penalized by a warmer reference period. If you recalculated all four events against the original fixed 1941–1970 baseline, the later events would look even more anomalous than the ONI record suggests. The practical implication A future event that registers, say, +3.2°C ONI against the 2001–2030 baseline might represent the same or greater absolute ocean heat content anomaly as a hypothetical +3.8°C event measured against the 1941–1970 baseline. This means: • The ONI is becoming a less sensitive detector of extreme El Niño intensity over time • Real-world impacts — which respond to absolute SSTs, not anomalies — will increasingly outpace what the index implies • The path to a possible +4.0°C ONI event is actually harder to reach than it would have been historically, even if the underlying physical intensity is getting there This is somewhat analogous to the challenge in global mean surface temperature tracking — the warming signal is real, but the metrics used to capture it are themselves embedded in a shifting baseline that can obscure the full magnitude of change. It’s one of the quieter but more important tensions in operational climate monitoring. Below: The “true” absolute intensity of El Niño as of April 30, 2026. Credit: Craig Tindale