EB73

4.6K posts

EB73 banner
EB73

EB73

@EBagnatori

Not understanding a thing is not evidence against it. Making the cost of lying in public worth more than than the engagement clicks.

On the Globe Se unió Şubat 2011
119 Siguiendo123 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
I agree with almost all of that, but I’ll push back on why, at least I think, they invoke things like MMX and CTX. They get slaughtered on everyday observations, sunrise, sunset, inability to measure consistent heights over a flat plane, tides, gravity, the southern celestial pole, star trails, etc. So they pivot to things like taking MMX out of context or cooking numbers in CTX to justify having a seat at the table. There is no debate. FE is inane, ridiculous, and easily shown to be impossible. But they hunt for narrow technical niches that require a disproportionate amount of effort to unpack, hoping complexity buys them legitimacy. They just want attention. Best not to give it to them.
English
4
0
7
1.2K
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@newbsharp @Inspired7525441 In all fairness, the OP calls into question your “unusually intelligent…” claim.
English
0
0
0
43
B Sharp
B Sharp@newbsharp·
@Inspired7525441 Moving the goal posts? Humans are apes. We're an unusually intelligent, advanced tool using, widely moral apes. So, yes, we necessarily evolved from apes and most recently share ancestry with modern chimps.
English
1
0
2
50
Inspired
Inspired@Inspired7525441·
On his death bed, Charles Darwin refuted,disowned the theory of evolution. He claimed it as a false science. Mahn never evolved He was created by God
English
7
1
10
333
FLAT OUT TRUTH
FLAT OUT TRUTH@TheFlatEartherr·
If you think the sun is 93 million miles away, you definitely failed geometry class!😆
FLAT OUT TRUTH tweet media
English
27
45
350
12.1K
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
i - it’s not, we checked ii - that’s ridiculous. It is really big though, so imperceptible with just our senses at local levels. iii - level is defined by earth’s equipotential surface. No one said level is flat. iv - space doesn’t exist? Then where did you wrote this from? Lunatic asylums occupy space too. Space is everywhere. What a silly thing to say. This seems to have been written by a phucking phourth grader.
English
1
0
4
96
Brock Riddick
Brock Riddick@BrockRiddickIFB·
Some Phun Phakts [i] If the earth is larger than what they claim, then the entire cosmological theory collapses... INCLUDING the theories of gravity... (nothing of current cosmology can remain) [ii] Unless Earth is a sphere with an INFINITE diameter, curvature would be detected if it exists. [iii] Water always finds its level. A sphere can ONLY give a level if its radius is infinite. Nothing less. [iv] All of the above will still require that space exists. (Which is unproven.) Stay tuned for more Phun Phakts.
English
14
12
39
2.3K
The Dread Bunny 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️
The Dread Bunny 🏳️‍🌈🏳️‍⚧️@jpvanhoy·
@escapefrommelos I bet you one billion dollars that if I took you to a movie and bought you a tub of popcorn, you would not eat it with a fork. Have you ever heard the old saw "correlation does not prove causation"? Can you think of any confounding factors to the overlay of your two maps?
English
4
0
12
870
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@Demenonetme @FlatEarthZone Some of them are definitely trolling, but there are way more true believers than you think. Sad really
English
0
0
0
25
Steve Goodin
Steve Goodin@Demenonetme·
@EBagnatori @FlatEarthZone Exactly! It’s all perspective, if you take a pencil and you look down the pencil from the pint to the eraser. The pencil looks like the pendulum gets thinner the farther away it is to your eye. I feel like flat earthers are just trolling everyone at this point. No way they belive
English
1
0
1
9
Flat Earth Zone
Flat Earth Zone@FlatEarthZone·
Sometimes real-world geometry says more than institutional theory ever could.
Flat Earth Zone tweet media
English
78
65
309
8.2K
Flat Earth Dave
Flat Earth Dave@FlatEarthDaveX·
#flatearth is the reality and the sooner everyone wakes up the sooner we will be free from the heliosatanic system and all the garbage that comes with it.
Flat Earth Dave tweet media
English
87
99
419
9.2K
Randy912
Randy912@Randy912541093·
Hubble Telescope....HOAX of a LIFETIME ?????
Randy912 tweet media
English
25
6
31
1.5K
Randy912
Randy912@Randy912541093·
@EBagnatori OK...We rated you as a No. 6 or 11 . Which do you prefer ...
Randy912 tweet media
English
1
0
0
14
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@Randy912541093 Out of context quotes from one of the guys who walked on the moon…k. Where’s your question?
English
2
0
0
15
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@Randy912541093 I accept your surrender on satellite images of the Earth. Now tell me what you don’t understand about the moon missions pumpkin.
English
1
0
1
17
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@Ozonex7 Really?! How far then? How big is the sun and moon? We’re all waiting with rapt attention! At least you got the part about it not being a ball of fire right.
English
0
0
0
61
Ozonex
Ozonex@Ozonex7·
Le soleil n’est pas une boule de feu, n’est pas à 149 597 870 km de notre royaume 💊 il est proche et a exactement la même taille que la lune, j’observe toujours la même face avec différentes inclinaisons (rotation axiale) selon l’heure de la journée,bizarre🤔#nikonp1000 #psyops
Ozonex tweet mediaOzonex tweet media
Français
85
111
696
30.5K
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
He doesn’t seem to understand the moon is also influenced by the sun’s gravity. He thinks, in his feeble little flerf mind, that the sun has to speed up to catch Earth in its orbit around the sun. For him to say Newton lucked into his equations is hilarious. The narcissism is next level.
English
0
0
1
16
Hap Rho
Hap Rho@haprho·
Seriously? Once upon a time you acted as if you understood F=GMm/r² @ken_caudle, just because the Moon's motion looks different when viewed from different reference frames (like stationary vs 5mph car) doesn't mean F=GMm/r² is wrong. In fact, F=GMm/r² EXACTLY predicts the pva of every solar system object ever seen in all humanity's history.
Hap Rho tweet mediaHap Rho tweet media
English
2
1
7
146
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@DisculpemeCock @BobWhencer So you have no idea why our atmosphere is blue then. How can someone make it to adulthood (probably a wild assumption on my part) without knowing such basic facts about the world you live in? I actually pity you.
English
0
0
2
27
Scorpion King
Scorpion King@DisculpemeCock·
Anyone who has accepts the truth of: * The shape of the world * The structure of the Universe * The story of where you live Because "NASA said so" should understand the foundation of everything you were ever taught and the proof for all of it is a photo built on a computer.
Scorpion King tweet mediaScorpion King tweet media
English
7
1
10
9.3K
truthache
truthache@truthache68·
If Earth is spinning 1,040 mph, orbiting the Sun at 67,000 mph, and the whole system is flying through the galaxy at over 500,000 mph… why don’t we feel any of it?
English
156
116
473
13.4K
₿en Wehrman
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman·
NASA gives us all sorts of dazzling pictures of nebulas and galaxies that are supposedly millions of light years away...yet there is not one single raw photograph of planet Earth in existence. All of these picturesque "blue marble" images we see in the movies, science textbooks, cell phone backgrounds, etc. are actually "composites", or created completely in photoshop. This should cause you to ask questions.
₿en Wehrman@benwehrman

"It is photoshop, but it has to be." - Robert Simmon, NASA's creator of the "Blue Marble" computer-generated Earth image, which to this day is used as the bonafide "Planet Earth" visualization across all science textbooks, movies/documentaries, TV shows, magazines, computer/phone wallpapers, Wikipedia, NASA's own website, etc. etc.... Did you know that there isn't a single raw photograph of planet Earth in existence? This seems crazy to me, because if you pull up NASA's Instagram page, they give us all sorts of dazzling pictures of stars & planets that are billions and trillions of miles away...but they have NEVER given us a single unedited picture of our own Earth? 🤔 Why is that?

English
35
43
170
9.3K
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@Keetb999k Wait a minute. So now you’re using the Mercator projection and not the Gleason map? Lmao! So the North Star is now in the middle of the Atlantic. And I guess you guys cut Australia because it caused too many problems for your non model? Brilliant!
English
0
0
1
48
EB73
EB73@EBagnatori·
@hefdiddy @wedietz This is the dumbest thing I’ve read in quite some time. I didn’t know words, strung together and forming actual sentences, could be so nonsensical. I’m not even mad, I’m kind of impressed.
English
0
0
4
60
Unvaxxed
Unvaxxed@hefdiddy·
@wedietz And retards like yourself think that’s where the sun starts to rise or set as well. Imagine thinking the sun starts to disappear from you 3 miles away while standing at water’s edge on something with an alleged circumference of about 25k miles. How many boosters did you take?
English
15
0
5
451
Sapient Hominid
Sapient Hominid@wedietz·
Do flat earthers ever wonder why a horizon even exists on a flat earth? If the earth were flat, wouldn't we just see the ocean extend forever, until it fades away into the atmospheric haze? And yet it doesn't. There is a sharp delineation in the ocean, the horizon, coincidentally at a distance predicted if we lived on an 8000 mile diameter globe. I'm sure they have some handwaving explanation for this.
English
67
2
62
5.1K

Descubrir

@newbsharp @Inspired7525441 @TheFlatEartherr @jpvanhoy @escapefrommelos @Demenonetme @FlatEarthZone @BrockRiddickIFB