Engine Miller
21.2K posts

Engine Miller
@EngineMiller
Lived across the US, Europe & Caribbean. Experience in military, government, legal, engineering, organizational consulting. Student of history. Redeemed.
CA to TX Coast for the culture Se unió Haziran 2021
1.2K Siguiendo1.3K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Engine Miller retuiteado

Dr. Ben Carson insists we must not allow the lies of the Covid era to be "swept under the rug".
"Dr. Fauci... [eventually admitted] that there was no science behind any of what he was saying."
"We know that the side effects from Covid vaccinations far exceeded anything else in the last 30 years combined."
"It's important for us to lend our voices to that—not to just let it be swept under the rug."
Credit: @RealBenCarson @ChildrensHD
English
Engine Miller retuiteado

🚨 FINCHEM: “THERE IS EVIDENCE - THEY KEPT IT OUT OF COURT.”
Sen. @RealMarkFinchem pushed back on repeated claims of “no evidence” of election wrongdoing:
“That is pure gaslighting.”
He argues many cases were never fully heard:
“You did everything possible to keep these cases out of court so the evidence couldn’t be presented.”
Finchem also pointed to concerns around voting systems, citing past demonstrations showing potential vulnerabilities.
His broader warning:
“The ‘no evidence’ narrative is propaganda.”
English

@peterboghossian No. They want investigations of "suspected wrongdoers"- FOR A CHANGE, full protection of their rights, and when proven criminal, THEN vigilante justice for them.
Pay attention, get it right.
English
Engine Miller retuiteado

Charlie Munger: "If you're a pure socialist, you're a nutcase. An absolute nutcase. And not a modest nutcase — a real nutcase."
"You can be a perfect nut with a high IQ."
"If we want a productive society, we can't help but have these personal incentives to handle your own affairs — and if you do that, you get unequal wealth outcomes. The price of plenty is that you can't have socialism."
English

The London-dominated insurance industry. If they assume the risk of one explosive laiden speedboat or drone hitting one ship is too high they cancel coverage for all.
Then all stop transiting. It’s not about numbers of missiles or drones… politics.
John Fuller 1704@Fuller1704
@CreasonJana @TheEXECUTlONER_ What nobody seems able to explain: HOW does Iran “close the Strait”? If they have no ships, and no planes, and their missiles are ”knocked out”; how exactly do they prevent passage?
English

Engine Miller retuiteado

What do you think? As it stands now, I’m a yes.
Mike Lee@BasedMikeLee
Should the U.S. leave NATO?
English
Engine Miller retuiteado

People who want to disarm America cannot explain this graph.
Saul Sadka@Saul_Sadka
Per capita, this is the lowest homicide rate in U.S. history. The data for the 1800s is sparse, but it was apparently in the 5–10 range.
English

@NotHeImHim @charliesmirkley As in anything, it’s not the race/color… it’s the culture.
If you just do large cities (dominated North and South by Democrat governance) it’s STILL the culture and not race.
English

@charliesmirkley After adjusting for demographics which are unfortunately far worse in red states (black population wise) it looks even worse for democrats
English

@1Cor1613 @AriFleischer And what DO you expect if we are not allowed to operate from our bases in our own interests?
You are hearing what the American people expect…
English

@EngineMiller @AriFleischer Please, you aren't here just for our protection. The US doesn't do anything that isn't in its own interest.
English

When this is over, the western part of NATO will never be the same. Spain, England, France and Italy have sold us out, as they too often have a history of doing. Eastern European nations are the heart of NATO. They spend money on defense, know how to fight and love the US.
France particularly deserves fault and blame. From supporting China and Russia at the UN to denying Americans overflight rights, they’re doing what they’ve always done - showing weakness, while cutting deals with terrorists. (The reason the US has a Marine Corps and Navy is unlike France, we refused to pay a ransom to the Barbary Pirates. France is always happy to cut a deal.)
Wars have unintended consequences as nations show their true colors.
NATO will never be the same, and Western European weakness and acquiescence is the cause.
English

@BarnetBandit @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM.
Unforgivable.
English

@AriFleischer Western NATO didn't "sell out" the US
NATO is strictly a defensive alliance, hence why the UK sent our boys to die in Afghanistan when YOU invoked Article 5
There is absolutely no backing to do so for an offensive war
Article 5 is clear.

English

@rlucia @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM.
Unforgivable.
English

NATO is not a US puppet force.
US decided in its own (?) interest to start a war against Iran. US didn’t even bother to alert NATO allies. US didn’t even bother to appeal to UN for alleged Iran wrongdoing.
Which NATO article are NATO members not respecting to trigger US liver reaction?
It is simply FAFO time.
English

@_HenryBolton @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM.
Unforgivable.
English

People like @AriFleischer are either immensely stupid, appallingly badly informed or incredibly dishonest.
1) Anyone can read the North Atlantic Charter (NATO Treaty) - just google it - and see for themselves that NATO cannot be mobilised for this war.
2) When has the UK sold the United States out? Never. The US has sold us out though, a few times.
3) UK bases are being used daily for strikes on Iran.
4) If you wanted allied support in this war, perhaps it would have been wise to a) asked them b) involve them in the planning for it, rather than just start a war on your own and then demand we get involved.
Ari, you are doing the American people no favours by misleading them.
English

@1Cor1613 @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM.
Unforgivable.
English

When this administration is over, normal Americans will realise just how badly you have F’d up.
We have been incredibly consistent allies. It’s you that has treated us like dirt. In the Falklands, you gave us aviation fuel, Sidewinders, and intel. We lost hundreds of men. Our sovereign territory was invaded. We where thankful for the support you did give us. The UK has done far more for you in this war than you did for us then.
We will not be held accountable for this abomination of an administration. This is the biggest loss of American influence the world has ever seen and that saddens me greatly.
English

@LFried76 @AriFleischer The ire is not so much that they didn’t step up with troops or weapons. But they prevented us from overflight and use of the very runways we base and stage at IN OUR PROTECTION OF THEM.
Unforgivable.
English

Ari- Respectfully, unlike Bush, Trump did nothing to build support and make a case to our allies. He acted on his own, and then when it wasn’t a cake walk - he then asked others to help fix a problem he created. In addition he’s spent the past 10 years denigrating them.
I’m not anti-this war in theory, I would like to see regime change in Iran. And I wish the president made the case to get our allies on board. But he did nothing of the sort, and has treated our allies like enemies. It should surprise no one that they are less than eager to run to our aid in a war we started. NATO was formed to support countries when attacked. Not when they go to war of choice.
We should have gotten them on board to start. They have no incentive to help the US.
English
Engine Miller retuiteado
Engine Miller retuiteado

@AriFleischer NEVER KNEW WE GAVE
@NATO
THIS MUCH $$$$$$$ ?????
LEAVE NOW !!!!!!!!!!
@elonmusk
@realDonaldTrump
@DonaldJTrumpJr
@SecRubio
@JDVance

English

@ClimateAudit @AriFleischer It says they feared and wanted to be free of the Soviet Union.
And NATO now cements this.
Duh.
English

@AriFleischer Eastern European nations were the epicenter of Nazi collaboration and occupation in World War II. What does it say when they, together with USA, are now the "heart of NATO".
English

Thanks for the insight Ship. The retired leadership and org consultant in me agrees with your conclusion and why it was designed in.
Org design is the leadership that keeps on leading, after transfers, hires and retirements.
That’s why I know nothing will be permanently changed without a change in personnel BUT ALSO some redesign of structure and
process that supplies the incentives and identifies and applies consequences.
Before investigations are required… resort to management and leadership before legal process.
That appears lost at DOJ and FBI.
English

The Associate Attorney General (AAG), the No. 3 position in DOJ, is the hardest job in the Department. Here is why.
The AAG and Dep. Attorney General (DAG) have similar jobs in the two different branches of the Org Chart under the Attorney General, but the AAG does report to the DAG, hence No. 2 v. No. 3.
The DAG has direct supervision over: U.S. Attorneys (Criminal) Criminal Division, National Security Division, FBI, DEA, USMS, ATF, etc., BOP, Immigration, and a variety of lesser offices.
The AAG has direct supervision over: U.S. Attorneys (Civil), Civil Division, Tax Division, Anti-Trust Division, Civil Rights Division, Environment and Natural Resources Division, U.S. Trustees (Bankruptcy), Office of Information Policy (FOIA), and about 6-8 lesser offices.
Under the AAG there are 6 Senate Confirmed Assistant Attorneys General. They tend to have a level of subject-matter expertise -- legal backgrounds in Tax, Civil Rights, Anti-trust, Environmental Law, or Civil Litigation as the case may be. All civil appellate work below the Supreme Court -- where the Dept. is winning huge victories -- is in the Civil Division, Appellate Section.
The Associate AG will never have subject matter expertise in all 6 -- so he/she is always at a disadvantage in having high-level discussions with those 6 Assis. AGs on the subject matters where they are experts based on their careers in those fields -- that's why they were picked.
The result is that all 6 are generally after the AAG's job, and have a motivation to undermine the AAG up the chain.
It is a thankless position where there is little public glory in victories, but much criticism comes along when things go badly.
English





