ForcdNameChange

Me in a nutshell.

@CecilFoxhound @MoonshineDlight @THWOMPSQUAD @ksorbs How did you tunnel under the wall and get past the armed guards in the towers and escape the tracking dogs? You didn't?... What do you mean there's no armed guards tracking dogs and barbed wire topped wall? You left voluntarily?... Oh🫡

@ForcdNameChange @MoonshineDlight @THWOMPSQUAD @ksorbs Dark age cult, raised on one, keep getting letters from my 90 year old aunt begging for petty cash, She raised 4 mindless drone slaves for them but yet has to beg, you can't make a girl happy with a weird ass head cover and a broom

This is what communism does. This is Cuba:

In the end: The 13 soldiers represent real loss, but the alternative — standing by while the regime butchered thousands of its own civilians, armed terrorists who killed thousands more (including Americans), and raced toward nuclear weapons — would have guaranteed far greater suffering down the road, with far more dead and injured. Inaction has a body count too. Honoring our fallen means achieving the objectives so their sacrifice prevents the next massacre. America First demands strength against those who choose weakness as our policy. The numbers, the history (Pearl Harbor’s restraint vs. enabling interventions in France and Greece), and the public record all align: this was a necessary response to a regime that made itself our enemy.

Not every war ends with a formal surrender ceremony. That doesn't mean you win if you avoid that

Lots of self-flagellating stupidity like "if the Iranian regime survives, it wins." No it doesn't you idiots. It began the war with a senior leadership class, air defenses, a navy, an Air Force, and a defense industrial base. It no longer has those things. That's losing

The justifications were clear, consistent, and on the record — and so were realistic parameters for victory. Claims of “no reason” or vague goals are goalpost-moving. President Trump laid out the reasons publicly and directly. In January 2026, as nationwide protests erupted against the regime’s repression and economic collapse, the Iranian government unleashed one of the bloodiest crackdowns in its modern history. Security forces used live fire, snipers, and mass violence, killing thousands of Iranian civilians — estimates from human rights groups and activists range from over 6,000 confirmed to as high as 30,000+ (including reports of 5,000–36,500 depending on the source, far exceeding prior protest crackdowns). Internet blackouts tried to hide the scale. Trump warned explicitly: If Iran “shoots and violently kills peaceful protesters,” the United States would come to their rescue. “We are locked and loaded.” He urged Iranians to “KEEP PROTESTING — TAKE OVER YOUR INSTITUTIONS!!! HELP IS ON ITS WAY.” He canceled talks until the killing stopped and said those responsible “will pay a very big price.” The February strikes followed that pattern, tied to 47 years of Iranian aggression: imminent nuclear breakout (uranium enrichment near weapons-grade), ballistic missile programs threatening the region and U.S. forces, the proxy terror network killing civilians and Americans, and the regime’s massacre of its own people. Victory parameters were operational and achievable — not endless nation-building or occupation: Degrade key nuclear sites and ballistic missile infrastructure. Cripple naval assets and proxy support networks. Reduce the regime’s capacity to threaten the U.S., Israel, and Gulf allies. Strikes hit command centers, missile factories, oil export hubs, and facilitators. Reports show measurable degradation of these capabilities, with the door open to a deal if Iran permanently abandons its nuclear path. This is classic “peace through strength.” Demanding a detailed 10-year occupation blueprint or guaranteed democracy before any defensive action is the real dishonesty — it paralyzes any response to active, growing threats. The government provided reasons rooted in Iran’s own actions; pretending otherwise dodges the moral and strategic facts.

America First means protecting American lives and interests — not pretending threats vanish if we look away. “America First” is not “America Alone” or isolation at all costs. It means putting our security, our people, and our future first. The Iranian regime has waged a 47-year shadow war against us: “Death to America” is not rhetoric — it is policy executed through proxies that have repeatedly targeted and killed Americans. Ignoring that after decades of attacks is not prudent realism; it is denial that endangers us. History shows the deadly price of pure isolationism. At Pearl Harbor, waiting to be attacked cost 2,403 Americans killed and 1,178 wounded — a total of over 3,500 casualties in a single day, including unnecessary and preventable civilian casualties alongside military personnel. Had America taken a stronger, earlier stance against Japanese aggression, those lives and injuries would almost certainly have been spared or dramatically reduced, with military losses possibly shifted but unlikely to exceed the overall catastrophe that followed. “Don’t get involved until they hit us first” handed the initiative to the enemy and maximized innocent deaths and suffering. Without French intervention in the American Revolution — troops, navy, money, and direct combat support at Yorktown — the Continental Army likely collapses and the United States never emerges as a sovereign nation. (Similar intervention proved effective in Greece under the Truman Doctrine, where U.S. military equipment, training, and economic aid helped the Greek government defeat a communist insurgency without American combat deaths — though there are caveats to the success of both these examples, including limits on long-term reforms and the role of local factors.) Isolationism would have meant no America to put “America First.” Forward engagement and alliances have been essential to our survival and strength from the beginning. Threats like a nuclear-aspirant theocracy arming terrorists do not respect borders — they reach our people, our allies, and our homeland interests. True America First requires confronting them before they grow stronger.

“13 dead soldiers are 13 too many — but letting Iran’s regime and its proxies keep slaughtering civilians would have cost far more innocent lives, including American ones.” Every single American life lost is a tragedy that demands honor and mourning. The 13 U.S. service members killed during Operation Epic Fury (launched February 28, 2026) deserve our deepest respect — they stepped forward to protect this nation and its interests. Their sacrifice is not taken lightly. But the cold reality is that inaction against the Iranian regime was never a zero-cost option. It was a deliberate choice that allowed ongoing murder on a much larger scale. Iran’s proxy terror network — Hamas, Hezbollah, Houthis, Iraqi Shia militias, and others it funds, arms, trains, and directs — has deliberately killed thousands of innocent civilians globally over decades through suicide bombings, massacres, indiscriminate rockets, hostage-taking, and sectarian violence. One day alone, the October 7, 2023 Hamas attack murdered over 1,200 people (mostly civilians, including at a music festival and kibbutzim). Iranian proxies have added hundreds more Israeli civilians in waves of attacks since the 1990s, plus civilian deaths from Houthi campaigns in Yemen and Hezbollah’s cross-border barrages. These are not battlefield accidents — they are intentional terror tactics. For American civilians specifically, the toll includes dozens murdered in cold blood: approximately 30–46 Americans killed on October 7 alone (with more taken hostage and some murdered in captivity), plus earlier victims in Hamas/Islamic Jihad attacks in Israel (such as bus bombings and the Sbarro pizzeria attack) and incidents tied to Iranian-supported groups like the 1998 embassy bombings. When you include U.S. service members killed by Iranian-supplied weapons in Iraq (~600+), the 1983 Beirut barracks bombing (241 Americans), and other proxy strikes, the total American deaths linked to this regime exceed 1,000. The 13 fallen in Epic Fury are heartbreaking, but pretending restraint prevents all casualties ignores the blood already on the regime’s hands — and the blood that would have continued flowing. “How many is too many?” applies to every life: the dead, the wounded, and the traumatized who survive attacks only to carry lifelong injuries and scars.

@willchamberlain I hope you will find my arguments compelling your voice is far greater than mine and I think my arguments are worthy of a voice like the one you wield. These are the three most common arguments against the Iranian situation I see. -No dead soldiers -America first -No reason for being there or parameters for victory. These are what I would consider well grounded counters to each of those...

@TimRunsHisMouth I've never been a fan of basketball but I'm definitely a fan of this. God bless. 🙏

Not all heroes wear capes.

💯 @ksorbs Not only is Trump finally doing something about it—he’s been warning that Iran is a problem since the 1980 hostage crisis (a point he has consistently reiterated for the past 46 years). In that old interview that’s going viral again, young Trump said the regime needed to be dealt with and that if it were up to him, strong action would’ve been taken long ago. At least someone in power is finally following through. I’m disappointed how quickly some of his former supporters are turning on him. Equally disappointing are the well-reasoned, intelligent folks I respect suddenly jumping on the fence, scared to get their hands dirty one way or the other. They’re demanding he lay out a perfect public agenda or “parameters for victory” before they’ll support (or denounce) him. There are plenty of reasons not to disclose every motivation or move in real time. The nuclear rhetoric is mostly political theater for the politicians and lamestream media (not the smartest play, but you work with what you’ve got). Read between the lines: his actual agenda is regime elimination. That’s how politics works—we all know it. To the America First anti-interventionists out there whingeing: Remember, Yankees—if it weren’t for the intervention of the French (and others), you’d all be singing God Save the King, saluting the Union Jack, and sipping your tea. Strength isn’t always isolation when your enemies have been actively working against you for decades. I do find comfort in the fact that people like you (and a few others) can step back, see the forest for the trees, and say “holy f***, there it is.” ✌️Herc

The man gets it and says it.

@RusselltheRed1 @BrandonStraka I keep saying that too. Laws are only effective and obeyed so long as the people the laws govern maintain faith in the justice system.

@BrandonStraka When you have judges like this people are just going to start taking the law into their own hands, and who could blame them?

San Francisco Judge Linda Colfax gave Antoine Watson probation after he fatally assaulted an 84-year-old. After release, he killed an elderly man. This kind of people doesn’t deserve to be called human.

@thevivafrei @WabKinew He's like a real life Brocket 99 character.

Hey asshole, @WabKinew other than being a total fucking idiot in terms of what you’re saying, didn’t you get drunk and beat your girlfriend?

@justinaug09 @Gob_Engineer @Fat_Electrician @PaulRieckhoff

@Gob_Engineer @ForcdNameChange @Fat_Electrician @PaulRieckhoff One

Does everyone realize how wrong and unAmerican this is to come from a government account??

@Gob_Engineer @Fat_Electrician @justinaug09 @PaulRieckhoff Me troll. me not bot. me think 9+10 probably higher than you IQ.

@ForcdNameChange @Fat_Electrician @justinaug09 @PaulRieckhoff Bot check, what's 9+10.

@RusselltheRed1 @eu_eeas They called it a "grave" step??... Bwahahahahahaha!!

@eu_eeas Capital punishment needs to make a massive comeback. You're completely wrong on this. Can you imagine not executing the Bataclan theater killers for instance? There's so many cases out there it's absolutely warranted.

The approval of the Death Penalty Bill by the Israeli Parliament would be a grave step backward. The EU opposes capital punishment in all cases and under all circumstances. We encourage Israel to abide by its previous principled position. Read more: link.europa.eu/FFYKp3

@CyberGreen09 Those are the kind of people who s*** on your beaches and you're worried about them pouring milk into the water?

Chhat Puja in Denton, Texas Pouring milk straight into the lake is not okay. This pollutes our local waterways and harms fish and aquatic life. Protect Texas waters

@pureMetatron I named my boy Alexander. Named my daughter Boudica.

As you know I'm having a son and the wife and I are still reviewing names. Which of these sounds better for a first name?

@elon If X continues to just fail to send every single post or reply I make I'm just going to stop paying X. I pay you for a service I expect it to be provided.

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and *Religious* people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams Adams was emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution relies on internal restraints; virtue, self-control, and a sense of moral and religious accountability. 🤡 🧌🧂

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams Adams was emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution relies on internal restraints; virtue, self-control, and a sense of moral and religious accountability.✌️

@justinaug09 @PaulRieckhoff No…. If u call out the government constantly on stupid bullshit that isnt issue. One listens the actual issues. Which is a fucking problem.

"Our Constitution was made only for a moral and *Religious* people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other." John Adams Adams was emphasizing that the U.S. Constitution relies on internal restraints; virtue, self-control, and a sense of moral and religious accountability. 🤡 🧌🧂