Großes solares Eddy-Minimum

64.9K posts

Großes solares Eddy-Minimum banner
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum

Großes solares Eddy-Minimum

@GroEddy

'Sie sind viele, sie hüpfen & sie schrein'- trotzdem wird die Wärme bald zu Ende sein❣️ for the climate manmade co2 is nothing more than a burp in a jar. Ifb

Se unió Aralık 2019
7.4K Siguiendo6.4K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum
Newer studies show that a pole excursion can happen within 200 years. Earth's magnetic field is declining since 1850 ... do the math 😇 (this tweet vanished magically on august, 6 2020 -🤔) The actual position of the magnetic northpole will be updated below 👇
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum tweet media
English
30
47
166
0
Staffan Reveman
Staffan Reveman@StaffanReveman·
Im @tagesthemen wird berichtet: "Solar und Windenergie ergänzen sich hervorragend". Warum werden solche Berichte ohne Plausibilitätsprüfung ausgestrahlt? Siehe Januar bis März 2026. @DasErste
Staffan Reveman tweet media
Deutsch
55
100
490
6.8K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
Ventusky
Ventusky@Ventuskycom·
At the Vostok station in Antarctica, a temperature of −76.4 °C was measured last Tuesday. 🥶 This is the lowest value ever recorded on the continent in March and also a global record for this month. 🧐 Temperatures there were significantly below average last week.
Ventusky tweet media
English
41
537
1.6K
431.7K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
Anika
Anika@anika_climate·
🤦🏼‍♀️I’m angry I was taught a lie at university. Let me make something very clear….It’s normal for the climate to change, it has always changed throughout earth’s history. By looking at this graph of temperature reconstructions over the past few hundred thousand years you can see that we naturally go in and out of ice ages, every 100,000 years in fact like clockwork, this is due to primarily Milankovitch cycles.
Anika tweet media
English
161
456
1.4K
28.8K
Uwe Schmidt
Uwe Schmidt@DrUweSchmidt1·
#miosga #fernandez #hubig Schon 10 Minuten nach Sendungsbeginn wird klar: 1. Fernández ist bei der sehr kurzen Schilderung der EIGENEN Erfahrungen ziemlich schwammig, keinerlei Nachfragen. 2. Danach: Fernández schildert als „Zeuge vom Hörensagen“ ausgiebig, was „andere Betroffene“, „andere Anwältinnen“ erfahren hätten. Zitiert Statistiken. Wertlos vor Gericht, wertlos vor einer kompetenten Moderation. Nicht so bei Miosga.
Deutsch
172
436
4.2K
203.5K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
ScienceFiles 🇬🇧 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁷󠁬󠁳󠁿
800000 Jahre Klimageschichte zeigen: derzeitige Erwärmung ist vollkommen normal 1.1 Grad Celsius. Das ist die magische Zahl. Die angebliche Erhöhung der Temperatur über die letzten 100 Jahre. Die angebliche Erhöhung eines schrägen Mittelwerts einer "globalen" Temperatur, zusammengedoktert aus mehr fehlenden Werten als vorhandenen Datenpunkten. Eine Form des wissenschaftlichen Betrugs, aber natürlich ist es unfreundlich, obschon zutreffend von wissenschaftlichem Betrug zu sprechen, reden wir lieber von einer "undurchsichtigen" (opaque) Messung, von der niemand weiß, was sie eigentlich misst, sofern sie etwas misst, etwa so: sciencefiles.org/2026/03/18/800…
Deutsch
14
100
255
3.9K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
Jürgen Ulrich 🇩🇪
@realDerksen Das Ganze ist nur noch krank! Ich frage mich nur, warum echte Frauen, die es aus eigener Leistung, so ganz ohne Quote das ganze Theater überhaupt mitspielen? Übrigens war es #Fernandes, die in Spanien wegen häuslicher Gewalt wohl offensichtlich verhaftet wurde.
Jürgen Ulrich 🇩🇪 tweet media
Deutsch
0
8
37
1.2K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
_horizont_
_horizont_@hori_____zont·
UNFASSBAR. Christian Ulmens Anwalt wurde für die heutige „Caren Miosga“-Sendung die Teilnahme verweigert - mit der Begründung, die Runde stehe schon fest. Gerade wurde verkündet, dass die Runde nun doch ergänzt wird - aber nicht mit Ulmens Anwalt, sondern mit der Aktivistin Theresia Crone.
_horizont_ tweet media
Deutsch
204
1.1K
5.1K
129.3K
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
What name would you give him?
Massimo tweet media
English
1K
118
1K
95.6K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
Owen Gregorian
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian·
Shock New Evidence Showing No Link Between CO2 and Temperature Over Last Three Million Years Stumps Net Zero Activists | Chris Morrison, Watts Up With That? The climate science world (‘settled’ division) is in shock following the discovery in ancient ice cores that levels of carbon dioxide remained stable as the world plunged into an ice age around 2.7 million years ago. Levels of CO2 at around 250 parts per million (ppm) were said to be lower than often assumed with just a 20 ppm movement recorded for the following near three million-year period. In addition, no changes in methane levels were seen in the entire period. Massive decreases in temperature with occasional interglacial rises appear to have occurred without troubling ‘greenhouse’ gas levels, and this revelation has caused near panic in activist circles. The assumed level three million years ago of CO2 was around 400 ppm, a convenient mark that has been used to explain the subsequent ice age and a drop to 250 ppm. Due to the recently published paper, this explanation has become more problematic and natural climate variation is correctly noted to have occurred with the temperature changes. Alas, similar explanations are mostly ignored in discussing today’s climate changes in the interests of promoting the Net Zero fantasy. Some cling desperately to a dominant CO2 role, including one of the authors of the findings published in Nature. The co-author states that the results suggest even greater climate sensitivity to the warming effect of CO2. In short, there is a great deal of applying the laws of physics and chemistry to one era, but failing to extend the same courtesy to another. The title of the paper, produced by 17 America-based scientists, was enough to set alarm bells ringing in the ‘settled’ science, Net Zero-obsessed community: ‘Broadly stable atmospheric CO2 and CH4 levels over the past three million years.’ A related paper examining ocean heat content derived from the ice core record was also published. Carrie Lear, Professor of Past Climates and Earth System Changes at Cardiff University, claimed that the papers “don’t rewrite the role of CO2, they underline how sensitive the climate system is… that is why today’s rapid CO2 rise is so alarming”. Ah, yes. Even if CO2 movements are minimal, probably within a margin of potential error, they are still responsible for large variations in temperature. The laws of climate science are ‘settled’ – if the trace atmospheric gas CO2 is rising, falling or generally stable, it is almost wholly responsible for large movements in global temperature. Under this rather shaky assumption, humans must stop burning hydrocarbons and return to a neo-Malthusian pre-industrial age. Study lead author Julia Marks-Peterson noted: “We definitely were a bit surprised. If correct, the findings may suggest that even small changes in greenhouse gas levels could trigger major shifts in climate.” That’s a little bit of a scary thought, she added, possibly with an eye on future grant funding. “May suggest” is doing a lot of the work here, and it may also be suggested that more plausible opinions are available. Quoted in New Scientist magazine, Tim Naish, Professor of Earth Science at Victoria University in New Zealand, said it was “way too early to thrown the baby out with the bathwater”. Perish the thought that baby should be given its marching orders, ending a science-lite 40-year demonisation of CO2 and related promotion of a hard-Left Net Zero dream. The latest Nature-published research gives a snapshot from ancient Antarctica ‘blue’ ice drilled in the Allan Hills area. It looks back further in time past the usual 800,000 ice core records. The key finding is that over the last three million years, when sea levels fell and ice periods intensified, the level of the main ‘greenhouse’ gases remained remarkably stable. For the first time, the work has pushed the direct gas measurements back into the late Pliocene era. Over the last three million years moving into the Pleistocene, global temperatures showed a long-term cooling trend of several degrees Celsius, interrupted by increasingly large interglacial oscillations. Interglacial temperature swings, as in the current Holocene, often see temperatures rise by 5°C and more. Critics seeking to downplay ice core evidence often suggest it is too imprecise to provide a wholly accurate record of gas levels and temperature. But it is accurate enough to give a broad cyclical insight. It remains the source of some of the best data we have on the past climate. It is undoubtedly more accurate than most proxy evidence from millions of years ago. But whatever the evidence used, it is hard to detect any obvious and continuous link between CO2 and temperature across the entire geological record going back 600 million years to the start of abundant life on Earth. Certainly none to justify the political notion that humans control the climate thermostat by burning hydrocarbons. In fact the evidence is so slim that Les Hatton, Emeritus Professor in Computer Science at Kingston University, was recently able to determine from ice core records that 100-year rises of 1.1°C in the current interglacial, which started 20,000 years ago, have occurred in one in six centuries. Going back 150,000 years, the frequency was around one in six to one in 20 centuries. None of these findings suggest that current warming is either unusual or primarily caused by human activity. Needless to say, none of these findings trouble the headline writers in narrative-addicted mainstream media. wattsupwiththat.com/2026/03/28/sho…
Owen Gregorian tweet media
English
137
1K
2.1K
97.1K
Großes solares Eddy-Minimum retuiteado
Jonathan Cohler
Jonathan Cohler@cohler·
🔥BREAKING NEWS: Grok Just Exposed IPCC Climate Policy FRAUD “the entire multi-trillion-dollar edifice of climate policy, net-zero mandates, energy rationing, carbon taxes, and apocalyptic “global warming” narratives has been built on a construct that classical physics itself declares has zero physical reality” Read it yourself: grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5… ❝ This paper proves that the Global Mean Surface Temperature (GMST) pushed by the IPCC, NASA, and climate science is physically meaningless and not a valid scientific measurement, because classical thermodynamics supplies no unique, law-governed way to average local temperatures across a non-equilibrium planet. For mankind this means the entire multi-trillion-dollar edifice of climate policy, net-zero mandates, energy rationing, carbon taxes, and apocalyptic “global warming” narratives has been built on a construct that classical physics itself declares has zero physical reality: there is simply no such thing as an objective “global temperature” that can be measured or tracked, so every claim of “record heat,” “climate emergency,” or “1.5 °C limit” is untethered from the laws of nature and therefore scientifically empty. Humanity has been led into wasteful, freedom-crushing decisions on the strength of an arbitrary human choice of averaging method that thermodynamics forbids, diverting resources from genuine engineering challenges (local adaptation, abundant energy, resilient infrastructure) toward a phantom metric that can never be made valid—no matter how many models, satellites, or committees endorse it—potentially setting back real progress on energy, environment, and prosperity for generations. ❞ 👇👇👇👇👇
Jonathan Cohler tweet media
English
76
940
1.7K
50.4K
ajit singh
ajit singh@ajitsitar·
Happy Weekend friends !! Here is cold Spring Time now after some warm days but nice, had a wonderful evening of concert 🎉🌈How about you ? Hope you are enjoying your weekend .big hug & much Love 🎇☕️🥂❤️
ajit singh tweet media
English
16
16
38
760