H

2.5K posts

H

H

@HaydnBCole

Manhattan, NY Se unió Ocak 2024
121 Siguiendo202 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
H
H@HaydnBCole·
$AAOI. Its all about the 800gig products.
English
1
1
13
3.5K
KaizenInvestor
KaizenInvestor@Kaizen_Investor·
It blows my mind that the U.S. has the world's brightest entrepreneurs, CEOs, and scientists, yet the presidential candidates over the last decade have been Biden, Trump, Harris, and Clinton. Something must be terribly wrong with the system.
English
17
2
62
3.9K
Restructuring__
Restructuring__@Restructuring__·
Genuine question, who is buying SpaceX at $2 trillion - 125x sales? SpaceX did $16bn in revenue in 2025. A $2tn valuation requires ~$150bn in free cash flow. At a generous 20% FCF margin, that means $750bn in revenue. Getting there from $16bn in 10 years requires 47% annual growth. Every year. For a decade. Nice assumption to grow into your multiple
Restructuring__ tweet media
Polymarket@Polymarket

BREAKING: The SpaceX IPO is now projected to close above $2 trillion after the announcement of TERAFAB. 55% chance.

English
27
9
242
69.4K
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@DonAlt Someone bomb Quatar, yes?
English
0
0
0
14
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@mattscottcap What if the other co-founder is running US covert ops??? lmao
English
0
0
1
265
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@anandragn Super fair.
Français
0
0
1
80
Anand
Anand@anandragn·
I usually stay far away from politics… I just can’t stand politics. Right now though, one thing that stands out regardless of where you lean, whether you welcomed this administration or dreaded it, there’s a growing sense of total fatigue. Some see strong leadership, others see too much ego and unnecessary friction with other nations taking center stage. Either way, the constant tension, noise, and questions around accountability are wearing most people out regardless of the camp. Red or blue, the fatigue feels really bipartisan at this point. Don’t shoot the messenger tho!
English
34
4
148
14.8K
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@Mojo_flyin @TheJusticeDept Well, I appreciate the thoughtful discussion, sir. We’ll see where it ends up, have a fine weekend.
English
0
0
2
14
Mojo
Mojo@Mojo_flyin·
Wally is a board member. So the only thing left is do they go after Liang. Wrt Nvidia that's to be seen. Jensen did donate a large sum of money to the white house renovation - as did many other execs. But Potus is enamoured of his success. So nothing may happen to Nvidia at all. But this may be why Jensen was on edge and borderline rude at the GTC analysts call. Very unlike him but he might have heard the news by then. Worth watching...
English
1
0
0
47
Mojo
Mojo@Mojo_flyin·
$SMCI why are people surprised? This has been in conversation for a year now. The only question is will @TheJusticeDept also go after $NVDA
Mojo tweet media
English
10
1
24
3.1K
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@Mojo_flyin @TheJusticeDept I’m not saying there’s not a compelling narrative; I agree that there is. Further, you present it very well. But making the leap from an indictment of individuals, to the company writ large, and then to $NVDA will require substantial proof for the DOJ to investigate $NVDA.
English
1
0
0
43
Mojo
Mojo@Mojo_flyin·
My views are formed by a bit more than conjecture if that's what you think. However, let me explain to you since I have some experience here. Wally is taking the rap for now. But if you think 2 guys at SMCI quietly shipped billions of GPU servers out the back door and nobody else knew including the CEO that's naive. You do know the SMCI auditor refused to sign off on the books, the CFO was supposed to be fired a year ago but is still there and they were deslisted once before and should have been again. Please gather some facts on thid. There are plenty in the public domain including FT articles posted by me. No lawyer is saving Wally now. Whatever his lawyers had to do they would have prepped him prior to the interview. Now it all depends on whether the govt wants to go deep. Keep watching. We might see Liang retire soon. It means nothing that SMCI wasn't named. What matters is do they take down others in the mgmt team.
English
1
0
0
51
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@Mojo_flyin @TheJusticeDept details matter; $SMCI is not named, three individuals tied to the company are.
H tweet media
English
0
0
1
87
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@Mojo_flyin @TheJusticeDept I understand you believe the narrative is strong. However, what you see is not always what you get when it goes to court. Evidence matters. If you have a friend who's in big law or a top litigation firm, they can probably be useful on this point. and $SMCI was not named, yet
English
2
0
0
91
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@yieldsearcher totally agree, economist famously wrong with cover selections
English
0
0
1
8
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@ConnorJBates_ Well, the way to look at this is not in isolation, but comparatively across all funds and their weighting in particular, in comparison to other Mega Caps. It is still under owned from that perspective.
English
0
0
0
229
Connor Bates
Connor Bates@ConnorJBates_·
“NVDA is under owned”
Connor Bates tweet media
Nederlands
8
3
72
10.9K
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@Mojo_flyin @TheJusticeDept Mojo, respectfully, there is NVDA didnt export anything. Jensen meets with many people in many contexts and cannot be assumed to have full knowledge of every counterparty in every meeting, especially if deception is at play. Quality of the evidence > Quality of the narrative
English
1
0
0
58
Mojo
Mojo@Mojo_flyin·
There's no beyond arms length in violation of exports to restricted countries. Due diligence lies with them. $NVDA runs a KYC process with their OEMs on end customers. The front companies in Singapore were listed as partners on their own web site.. The Chinese CEO of one of these companies messaged Jensen to join her at a bar in Taiwan and he was there in 60 minutes. The DOJ can read the news too. It's just whether they choose to do something or not.
English
1
0
2
154
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@darrenv96 If you're under 25, yes. everyone needs a ride or die person in there life
GIF
English
0
0
0
16
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@jrouldz Yeah i think here its probably a buy, especially because the company isn’t named in the indictment
English
0
0
1
47
H
H@HaydnBCole·
@optimusbutler @yieldsearcher Depends on your risk tolerance. Valuation is definitely cheap.
Serenity@aleabitoreddit

Everyone is looking at $SMCI smuggling billions of dollars of AI chips to China. But nobody is answering the question: How do I make money off this, and is it a good buying opportunity? My answer: If $SMCI drops much lower than ~$24 overnight. It like a buying opportunity at a ~$14B MC. Everyone looks at the DOJ case and thinks Super Micro are cooked. But two things: 1. The company itself looks insulated, so far (not named a defendant) 2. $SMCI chip sales to China state actors was already known (just not to the $2.5B+ extent), by Hindenburg short seller reports in 2024. So a decent part of the China revenue stuff was already priced in, which is why $SMCI crashed from $100+ and is now trading at $24. Now if we strip away optics and some material revenue: -> $SMCI GAAP net income was $1.05B last year, and FY 2026 is estimated to be around ~$1.25B with some estimates going to $1.5B. And then we rip away an est ~$150M in smuggled in profit out of financials: ~$1.05 billion -> ~$900M? On a P/E basis, still looks relatively cheap as a growing company, maybe ~10-11x? Now the downside: -> Optics are still trash. You can add more trash to trash. But it's still trash regardless, doesn't change much? -> $NVDA distancing itself with $SMCI? (They already did in 2024). -> $SMCI not named a defendant, but in the case SEC/DOJ goes after them, then lot of regulatory fees and possibly fines. -> Maybe order cancellations, but if they didn't cancel orders for the problems they had in 2024, it looks fine now? Now... Are there a lot better opportunities than taking this regulatory leap of faith? 100%. Is there potential more downside from panicking? Yes. But if you strip away the noise, $SMCI as a company looks cheap ~$14B at roughly 10-11x forward earnings.

English
0
0
0
27