GG Killzz

@LalixTH_VibeS เหนื่อยที่จะคุยกับพวกมันละ ไอ้คนในประเทศเขมรมันไร้สมองกันหรอวะมันถึงไม่เข้าใจอะไรเลยขนาดเป็นหลักฐานมันกก็ยังแถแบบหน้าด้านๆ หัวจาาาปวดดดดดดดด

มันสู้มือ มั่นหน้า มั่นโหนก มั่นอก มั่นใจ ว่าจุฬาทำไรมันไม่ได้ เอาซิ๊ๆๆๆๆ เลี่ยป่ะล่ะ

@PongPongnhat @SuperCat_777 @anna_nunaa @FAT_Peterrr @Nuponia291 @sagimiya_ @pong You're the one who lost @pongpongnhat because I tried to search on google as you said but I couldn't find it. So what? You're a loser day and night + I've asked AI and AI can't find it either. AI is smarter than you.😜😜😜🫵🫵🫵🤣🤣🤣🤫🤫🤫

@KillzzGG @SuperCat_777 @anna_nunaa @FAT_Peterrr @Nuponia291 @sagimiya_ @pong 中身のある反論できてないね。 議論に負けたから罵倒に転じる、典型的な負けパターンじゃん。

こんばんは🌟 これはต้นไม้เงินต้นไม้ทอง（トンマーイングントンマーイトーン）といって、従属国の王がアユタヤ王に捧げたものです。 しかしそれはタイ側の伝統的解釈にすぎません。マレーでは「Bunga Masは友好・互恵関係を示す儀礼的贈答品であり、政治的従属を意味しない」と解釈されています。

@PongPongnhat @SuperCat_777 @anna_nunaa @FAT_Peterrr @Nuponia291 @sagimiya_ @pong @PongPongnhat you are hypocrisy.

@KillzzGG @SuperCat_777 @anna_nunaa @FAT_Peterrr @Nuponia291 @sagimiya_ @pong もしTai語話者が当時中国南部でもベトナム北部でもなくシャムにいたというなら、同じくシャムにいたモーン族のモーン語が漢語からほとんど語彙を借用してないのにどうしてTai語だけ漢語から語彙を大量に借用してるのかその理由を説明できるの？

@SuperCat_777 @PongPongnhat @anna_nunaa @FAT_Peterrr @Nuponia291 @sagimiya_ จริงนะ การยืมคำไม่ได้หมายความว่าอพยพมาตากชาตินั้นแต่ได้มาจากการติดต่อ ค้าขาย,หรืออื่นๆ ไอ้เขมร@pongแม-งไม่เข้าใจอะไรเลย

@PongPongnhat @anna_nunaa @FAT_Peterrr @Nuponia291 @sagimiya_ อย่าสรุปแบบนั้น อักษรไทย มาจากอินเดีย การอ่านตัวเลขมาจากจีน บางคำยืมมาจากฝรั่งเศส เปอร์เซีย การยืมคำ ไม่ได้หมายความว่าคนไทยอพยพมาจากชาตินั้น แต่เพราะสยามเป็นเมืองท่าที่มีการติดต่อค้าขาย ทำให้ต้องยืมคำเหล่านั้นมาใช้

@iosif_lazaridis European UP and IUP😂

A corollary: a European and East Asian hunter-gatherer 10000 years ago.

@biw09812345 ดีครับ

ดีค่ะ

@Tatsuya9JP @LazulAdventure @WilliamTomosEd1 @Sulkalmakh 55555 true

@LazulAdventure @WilliamTomosEd1 @Sulkalmakh The only one losing something is you: respect, time and accuracy.

Facial reconstruction of a 2,700-year-old man from Japan The Jōmon period (c. 14,000–300 BC) in Japan was marked by a population of hunter-gatherers and early agriculturalists connected by a shared culture, which developed significant sedentism and social complexity. The culture is known for its pottery with cord impressions, as well as bone, stone, shell, and antler tools, figurines, and lacquerware. The period is divided into several phases. By the Final Jōmon (around 900 BC), western Japan experienced increasing contact with settlers from the Korean Peninsula, who introduced wet rice farming, bronze and iron technology, and new pottery styles. After 300 BC, the Yayoi culture spread across most of Japan, while the Jōmon tradition persisted in Hokkaido. The Ainu are considered direct descendants of the Jōmon, retaining the highest level of Jōmon ancestry, while modern Japanese populations also carry some Jōmon genetic legacy. Morphologically and genetically, the Jōmon people were distinct from surrounding Mongolid populations, having diverged earlier.

@LazulAdventure @Tatsuya9JP @WilliamTomosEd1 @Sulkalmakh Nasir you loses .Australoid is a descendant of their short ancestors. And think that australiod can become Europeans. What a retard.so stupid brainlesss

@Tatsuya9JP @WilliamTomosEd1 @Sulkalmakh I never said that "Australasians are Europeans". You made that up. You got so mad at losing this argument you scrolled through my profile LMAO.

@Tatsuya9JP @Ugra___ I think their agency likely have a Cambodian anthropologist who is crazy about the nation that he owns everything and not one person for sure.

@Ugra___ This pseudo-scientific revisionism is such waste of time... again and again. It is enough. If it turns out everything is "Indian": cool and than? What will it help you. You are imprisoned in an everlasting circle of suffering and low ego. You will not archive anything.

Timmerman and Friedrich (2016) show a hypothesized global population density model based on climate variability and sea ice formation. This snap at 29 kya shows the pop hotspots at the time of diversification of the y-haplos R1 (M173) and R2 (M479). A consistent airgap around the Zagros mountain ranges starts appearing around 29 kya that only closes around 18 kya. This is linked to a suboptimal Dansgaard–Oeschger event that caused localised drying and rainfall deficits for a period of 10 ky.

@Tatsuya9JP @Ugra___ It's true, psudo science. It only makes up stories with only the ancestors of modern humans from SEA and they think that Indian is the source of the beginning and the passage is really stupid. Where did they get that idea from?

@NotFrodo @Fabrici69669103 @LoveeofLatinas @arcticinstincts Yes you are right.

@Fabrici69669103 @LoveeofLatinas @arcticinstincts Agreed the Andamanese have a very early "Mongolid" phenotype. There seem to have been two early East Eurasian types - gracile with early "Mongolid" traits like the Andamanese and more robust and hairier groups like Australasians and Jomon.

Jomon are not Caucasian, they are a basal East Asian lineage that diverged 38-25kya before the basal East Asian split into north/south East Asian Japanese are also on avg 12% Jomon/ 20% max

@Ugra___ @Tatsuya9JP WTF! family R DNA including P, Q from SEA??. This looks super stupid and retarded. I suspect that the map should be a Cambodian anthropologist and he has created a false article for you. OMG, it doesn't sound impossible.

@Tatsuya9JP ANE's bearing on this topic is irrelevant. Here is a direct comparison of the phylogeny. South Asia is light blue while SE Asia is dark blue. The likelihood of the R branches reaching India via the northeast corridor is very high.

@dragonskillinit @Tatsuya9JP @LazulAdventure @WilliamTomosEd1 @Sulkalmakh Nasir you psudoscience5555

@dragonskillinit @Tatsuya9JP @LazulAdventure @WilliamTomosEd1 @Sulkalmakh 555 I agree. These guys are probably Cambodian, Indian, or Indonesian anthropologists/psudo-scientists. Especially the Khmer ones, they always have inferiority complexes and act like southern orangutans, ever since they insulted Thai people like me.🤣🤣🤣🤣🫵🫵👄

@Tatsuya9JP @nrken19 It true

@nrken19 There seem to be certain flaws in their approach. If I understand correctly, they argue for an affilation of AA languages with Hoabinhian, rather than with CentralYunnan (Xingyi_LN), and a more recent shared ancestry between Hoabinhians & ASI (?). Interesting, but speculative.

Reconstruction of the genetic history of the Austro-Asiatic and Dravidian speaking tribal populations of South Asia. Highlights • Tribal Dravidian and Austro-Asiatic ancestries in South Asia diverged just after LGM

• South and Southeast Asian Austro-Asiatic ancestries diverged earlier during the LGM

• Notable genetic-linguistic discordance in Central India
 sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

@pronoy2108_np90 @Tatsuya9JP @yajnadevam Your map is outdated and clearly pseudoscience.555🤦

@Tatsuya9JP @yajnadevam Are all your replies supposed to be baseless ad hominems disguised as scientific knowledge and "um akshually" takes?

Lol this is proof of OIT adjusted for timeline

@VibudhSridhar @Tatsuya9JP @yajnadevam I think you're more of a self-righteous douche.😅

@Tatsuya9JP @yajnadevam All of these were responses to trolling initiated from the other side. My responses in serious discussions like this always have a very different tone Using my responses to unrelated posts as an ad hominem and being self-righteous douche is not really a legitimate argument

@yajnadevam @Tatsuya9JP Idiot of the centuryyyyy5555

@Tatsuya9JP @rawbloodenjoyer Blue eyes alleles were in IVC. Light skin in Afghan/Iran. Whenever a European starts LARPing I remind them that they are glorified Pakistanis.

@LucreSnooker @Tatsuya9JP Sorry

@Tatsuya9JP something like this was actually contemplated on the basis of the Y tree in link.springer.com/article/10.100…

Rather unlikely, mitogenomes alone, (and in contradiction with other data) is hardly convincing. – If true, it would mean that the West/East split was shortly after OoA (c. 70kya); and the main EEC hub was in Sundaland (backflow from there into South and East Asia [Önge-like]).