Cheeseburger Superman

@ShaykhAzhar @blessedlonelyjo Nobody cease to exist because they die. Your soul is eternal.

@blessedlonelyjo God can do all that is possible, but ceasing to exist or dying contradicts His very nature. Saying He cannot die isn’t limiting Him, it affirms His eternal, necessary essence.

In Islam, God doesn’t die because He’s God.

@DeannaTheMrs @ScienceMatterzs @McBrideLawNYC GiGi has me blocked so I'll respond here anyways Our liturgy is broken up into different seasons and incorporates different aspects of the faith. Sometimes you fast and sometimes you feast; and even more you are called to repentance.

@ScienceMatterzs @McBrideLawNYC Because it’s not about your diet, it’s about honoring our Lord and learning to control our passions.

No such thing as Lent? HUH? This is like a fat person saying there is no such thing as the gym. I get it. You reject discipline. Remember: Moses fasted 40 days before receiving the Law. Elijah fasted 40 days before encountering God. Jesus fasted 40 days before beginning His ministry. Catholics fast 40 days to prepare for the Resurrection. GET WITH THE PROGRAM.

@choconservative @metathomist So it's impossible for more people to be assumed into heaven than what scripture tells us?

@metathomist Scripture actually tells us who was assumed into heaven.

I believe St. Joseph was also assumed into heaven.

@xagreat Paul met Jesus...

Paul never met Jesus, but he wrote half of the Bible. Lol

@BeardedOverland @rusty_medic3 @smokefatsalt Still 20 dollars overpriced

@rusty_medic3 @smokefatsalt That’s finished price I’m sure. Not raw.

The saddest part about BBQ is it used to be poor people food. Used cheap cuts and slow smoked them till tender. Today it is more expensive than a typical steakhouse, charging $36/lb for brisket. Worst thing to happen to BBQ ever is it became popular. Now get off my lawn

@praezto @poperespecter1 I don't see this conversation going any further because you obviously stand for nothing. I'm muting you now.

@PathToSaint @poperespecter1 Lying about what? Lol.

The pachamama thing is an IQ test. If you fell for one of them, you have sub - 100 IQ. If you fell for both you have sub 80 IQ.

@praezto @poperespecter1 Because you are lying.

@PathToSaint @poperespecter1 Sorry. I'm not going to divulge that today, as you should understand.

@praezto @poperespecter1 What school did you attend?

@PathToSaint @poperespecter1 Yes. Do you?

@praezto @poperespecter1 Do you even have a college degree?

@PathToSaint @poperespecter1

@praezto @poperespecter1 You don't see me flying around pretending to be some theologian.

@PathToSaint @poperespecter1 "Cheeseburger ""Superman"" ???

@praezto @poperespecter1 You literally have gamer in your profile and are judging the church about "modernism" 😂

@MikeyNohMore A new The Elder Scrolls 8 years ago would have been dope. A new one today would be 💩

Even Todd Howard is getting tired of Todd Howard's lies.

@TaylorRMarshall The only infiltration I know about is grifting Anglicans.

My Statement on Prevost and Pachamama: “If these recently unearthed photos are truly Pope Leo XIV (then Prevost) participating in the idolatrous worship of the false goddess Pachamama, then the Roman Cardinals have elected an idolater and a syncretist to the papacy. The infiltration of wolves in sheep’s clothing might be far deeper than we had ever imagined. All Catholics from the Pope down to the layman must renounce the adoration of anything other than the Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost. ‘Thou shalt have no other gods before me’ is the First Commandment. A Pope is not above the commandments.”

@cyntiajr @shiningsweu I mean literally; imagine some laity demanding the pope resign. The prideful gall of such an action is sad and hilarious.

@cyntiajr @shiningsweu

Caution ⚠️ Leo XIV should resign! This is the current problematic situation within Catholicism: Pope Leo XIV was captured in a photo of a pagan Pachamama ritual that occurred decades ago. Now that he is set to issue a pronouncement regarding the SSPX, how can he rule on a potential schism while he himself is suspected of paganism? Looking at it through a political lens—at the very least—Leo XIV should resign immediately.

@TLM_Ryan @realsedepicante @BigModernism It's exactly what I would expect a modernist to say

@PathToSaint @realsedepicante @BigModernism If we required perfection to attack evil, we’d never get anything done.

How tight is Satan’s hold over us? The current pope appears to have participated in some type of idol worship. All traditionalists are appalled. So you’d think they’d find common ground in denouncing this, right? WRONG! Instead, they viciously attack each other on Twitter.

@TLM_Ryan @realsedepicante @BigModernism You overlook evil to go after evil. It sounds like you are the modernist here.

It’s subjective to the individual’s tolerance levels and discernment on when that’s occurred versus a genuine change of opinion. But I personally let that take a back seat to the main enemy: modernism in Rome which is the graver threat by far. If a grifter wants to give a good take, fine. I’ll praise the good take. Later if he wants to put out a bad take I would then choose to condemn that take. I rarely bother with credibility and personalities and choose to contend with arguments and facts. My 2cents

@Joseph_Spurgeon Roman Catholics don't understand Sola scriptura because Protestants don't understand Sola scriptura

Roman Catholics never seem to understand the doctrine of sola scriptura. Sola scriptura is not the belief that Holy Scripture is the only authority, nor that an individual can infallibly interpret the Scriptures. Rather, it is the doctrine that Holy Scripture is the only infallible authority and therefore has supreme authority over the church. It is not the only authority. The church has real authority, along with other forms of authority in the Christian life. Those who hold to sola scriptura also maintain that Scripture is to be understood within the life of the church. It was given to the church. It guards and defines the boundaries of the church. It shapes the life of the church. The church receives it, interprets it, and works through it, not as a single infallible institution, but as a body that is accountable to the Word. A central problem in Roman Catholic argumentation is their equivocation on the word infallible. They blur the distinction between infallible and inerrant, and then build an entire doctrine on that confusion. Infallible means unable to err by nature. It is not merely that something happens to be correct in a given instance. It means it cannot be wrong. Holy Scripture is infallible because it is the very Word of God. God cannot err, and therefore His Word cannot err. Everything Scripture says carries full authority because it is true without any possibility of error. Human beings, however, can make inerrant statements without being infallible. “Jesus Christ is the Messiah” is an inerrant statement. “My name is Joseph Spurgeon” is an inerrant statement. Even something like the table of contents of Scripture can be correct. The church can recognize the canon without error. But none of that makes the church infallible. It simply means that, at times, it has spoken truly. Infallibility is not something that comes and goes. It is not something that appears in rare moments and then disappears. If a person or institution is infallible, that is a property of what they are, not a temporary condition they enter into under certain circumstances. That is exactly where the Roman doctrine of papal infallibility breaks down. It claims the Pope is infallible only in specific moments, under carefully defined conditions. That is not infallibility. That is a redefinition of the term to protect a doctrine that cannot stand on its own. And historically, this was not some universally held belief quietly passed down from the apostles. In the Middle Ages, the Franciscans, particularly in their disputes over poverty, began pressing arguments that would effectively bind the Pope to prior authoritative statements. They were attempting to lock in earlier papal rulings so that a later pope could not overturn them. In response, Pope John XXII rejected those claims outright. He saw exactly what was happening. To grant that kind of infallibility would place the pope in submission to prior declarations in a way that undermined his own authority. He resisted it, and the idea was not accepted as settled doctrine at the time. Only much later, under very different pressures, was papal infallibility formally defined at the First Vatican Council in 1870. It was not the clear, consistent teaching of the church through the ages. It was a deformation, argued for, resisted, and finally imposed. Sola scriptura cuts through all of this confusion. It locates infallibility where it actually belongs, in the Word of God. Scripture alone cannot err. Scripture alone carries absolute authority. The church has real authority, but it is always a derived and accountable authority. It can speak truly, but it is never incapable of error. Everything must be judged by the Word of God, because only the Word of God is infallible.

@alphalioness72 @FancyABQ @Truth_matters20 Or you simply don't know how to read

@FancyABQ @PathToSaint @Truth_matters20 The dead in Messiah won’t rise until Messiah’s return, or Scripture is contradictory. Because the Master Himself shall come down from heaven with a shout, with the voice of a chief messenger, and with the trumpet of Elohim, and the dead in Messiah shall rise first. 1 Thes 4:16

The only "queen of heaven" mentioned in the Bible is a false goddess being worshiped by idolatrous Israelites. 😬

@account_blown @Brosephos Lame. Claiming to be a parody after getting exposed is embarrassing.

This is why I always mention my classical Greek degree. The ones who have never studied Greek always respond like this. They act as if NT Greek is some strange beast that is different. The last sentence also is worded oddly. The dunning-kruger on this app should be studied.