WJ

If you're on edge politically. If you're getting increasingly angry about what some major political figures are saying. If you're feeling that people who disagree with you are saying things so harmful they must be stopped, even with violence if necessary. Stop. Mass media is powerful. It plays to our frustrations and fears and causes and strongest emotions. Don't be a psychological victim of media. It's a terrible trick. The severity of news and articles and claims is lesser than it sounds 98% of the time. Step away from it. Interrupt the manipulation of your emotions, the escalation of your distress. The world is not the distorted picture media paints. Don't be fooled. Be well instead.

@newscientist Weight gain.

Women get gradually hotter from age 18 to 42, and no one really knows why. #Echobox=1780284018" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">newscientist.com/article/252731…

Good grief people stop offering this clown bigot reason. She's as tediously cliche as it gets. She hates men, count on that no matter what she claims. She will promote hurting a male human on any flimsy pretext. Simple as that. She's a dime a dozen, as are all too many men in reverse, AKA misogynists. Bigots gonna bigot. Give it up.

Men are hearing women say this is creepy and then arguing with women how it’s not. This is why you’re lonely.

@HPluckrose Amen.

They were won by insisting that the individual matters more than the category, that private life belongs to the person, and that a decent society protects freedom of conscience, speech and association. That remains the path forward.

"Why LGBT Rights Need Liberalism" My talk to an Italian LGBT organisation transcript in next post:

@iamlisakirk @DataRepublican @MattWalshBlog We see endless anti-Israel propaganda. We might see pro-Israel propaganda but for someone objective it's hard to tell. x.com/i/status/20550…

@WinJPR @DataRepublican @MattWalshBlog 2.6 billion Christians yet we see very little Christian propaganda

These fucking morons have one gear. All day, every day. “Does that include ISRAEL??? What about ISRAEL??? Have you thought about ISRAEL????? Gotcha!!” Yes it includes Israel. Everything I say about foreigners and foreign countries includes Israel. I’m not the one who treats Israel as some special case.

@mandyarthur @ConceptualJames @finn20142017 @grok Out-debated by a woman? Never mind whether or not that's true, it's idiotically demeaning to women. I mean yeesh.

@ConceptualJames @finn20142017 @grok You are an embarrassment to the Founding Fathers and everything this country stands for and fought for, James. Cucked to a foreign country and out-debated by a woman. Sit down before you embarrass yourself and your nation even more.

@ConceptualJames Hey @Grok, is it fair to say pro-israel groups were the primary funding in unseating Thomas Massie? Very concise.

@nypost Yo Hunter. Many of us saw that plainly not-AI video of you smoking crack with a hooker before your hired Internet consultants cleared it off the 'net. Give the BS a rest.

Hunter Biden claims Israeli intelligence is behind corruption allegations against him and Joe trib.al/TSJeWUb

@fredco1948 @lucio_tato @triggerpod @LLBiggers Damn clever reply mental stud.

@WinJPR @lucio_tato @triggerpod @LLBiggers 🤣🤣🤣 Cope harder, loser

“I thought being a climate activist would atone for being white.” Ex-climate activist Lucy Biggers (@LLBiggers) explains how newsroom culture, identity politics, and guilt-based ideology pulled her into believing she was inherently oppressive, and why she eventually rejected it. “This country is worth defending. Actually, I’m not racist.” Watch this clip before it disappears into the algorithm.

@ConceptualJames Kudos.

Some of you might have noticed that there have been repeated attempts to create a "two-state solution" in Eretz Israel (or "Palestine" if you want) and that it never works. The primary reason it never works is that the "Palestinian" side of it and its terror groups reject it. The reason they reject it can be found in the 1988 Hamas Charter explicitly, which declares that they recognize the entire region as having been set aside as Islamic Waqf since the seventh century. This is a doctrine within Islam and Sharia and, as you should expect, the Muslim Brotherhood and its derivatives take it extremely strictly and literally. The doctrine of waqf is probably 98% of the reason why the Middle East is the way that it is with regard to the (modern) state of Israel, but almost nobody ever actually seems to recognize this. The doctrine of Waqf is roughly an Islamic land trust, although the "owner" of that land is taken literally to be Allah once it has been declared waqf. Since Allah "owns" it, it is fully "Dar al-Islam" (land of Islam) in a fully irrevocable, permanent, and inalienable way. No one can have any ownership of the land, but certain Muslims in good standing can hold stewardship of it. No one else can. It cannot be sold. It cannot be traded. It doesn't matter if it is conquered by a thousand armies. The land is viewed under Sharia as inalienably Islamic and belonging to Allah. The doctrine sees land under waqf as having been subdued or purified under Islamic doctrine. The land has been returned to its pristine state, in some sense. It is therefore regarded as an unholy defilement for anyone to make any claim upon the land, no matter how legitimate, old, or under any circumstances. To sell the land as a Muslim steward, especially to a Jew, is to incur a fatwa against you and your family (a capital offense). To occupy the land is the same. People who believe this in the way the Muslim Brotherhood, Hamas, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, ISIS, ISIL, etc., believe it, believe these things literally. They believe they have a holy obligation to murder anyone involved in what they see as a desecration of Allah's pristine Dar al-Islam land, and they act upon it. There is no possibility of compromise, partition, sharing, or any other such thing with people who believe this doctrine in this way. None. Ever. Under any circumstances. Hamas, the Muslim Brotherhood, etc., believe that in the late 7th century when the Muslim Caliph conquered all of Syria-Palaestina ("Palestine") and declared it waqf (specifically in part so Jews could never return), that was final and irrevocable. The case is closed. There can never be so much as a serious discussion of any change. Therefore, when the Allies, particularly British and French forces, conquered the Ottomans in 1917 and issued the Balfour Declaration, effectively taking control of the land as conquered territory under their management ("British Mandate Palestine" and "French Mandate Syria"), they had absolutely no legal standing to do so under Sharia, from the Islamist perspective. They could conquer people but not Allah or his irrevocable claim on the land. When the League of Nations ratified the Mandates in the following years, the same. When the United Nations attempted to issue a partition in 1947, the same. When Israel declared independence in 1948, the same. When the Arab armies attacked and lost the next day, this did nothing to strengthen their case for legal occupation of the land. When a million attempted partition and two-state solutions were proposed only to be rejected by the Arab Palestinians every time, this is ultimately why. Almost all the rest is window dressing and taqiyyah. The issue is seeing the land as Islamic Waqf under Sharia, to which the Muslim Islamists have submitted. The Muslim Brotherhood (thus Hamas, etc.) doctrine on submission is that you fully accept all of this as I have stated it or you are not a real Muslim at all. You are apostate, and your life is in danger, if not forfeit, unless you will change your ways, perhaps under duress. Do you understand? Either you think this way, or the MB and its affiliate terror organizations do not recognize you as a Muslim to begin with, so your opinion is as irrelevant and moot as a Westerner, a Christian, an infidel, or a Jew. If you are taking the "Palestinian" side in these conflicts or see Israel as intrinsically the aggressor, provocateur, problem, etc., in the region, you are implicitly endorsing the Sharia and the doctrine of waqf that is the overwhelming primary reason for those beliefs. Full stop. You're supporting a view only intelligible under Sharia. Waqf, the idea of Allah owning land in religious trust, is a uniquely Sharia doctrine. It does not exist anywhere else. Israel obtained nearly all the land in Eretz Israel legally. The Allied Forces (that's us, fam) beat the Central Powers in WWI, including the Ottoman Empire, and took the entire region from them. All international law recognized it, including the League of Nations and later United Nations, and no serious challenge to that legal reality was ever made. Zionists bought land there, often from Ottoman landlords, and slowly moved in. Almost all immigration was legal with the only illegal immigration being during WWII when the British limited legal immigration in order to appease the Mufti. When Britain withdrew in 1947, the United Nations suggested the partition, and only the Arabs rejected it. Under every system of law that might apply except Sharia, the people we recognize as Israelis today moved in legally. It was not "settler occupation" except under Sharia. We are not under any obligation to recognize Sharia, or, therefore, waqf. We do not need to care what they believe about ownership of that land under their religious-political doctrine, especially since they try to hide the ball behind displacement, Arab nationalism, and some claimed right to self-determination (which they lost in wars that they always started, with the exception of WWI, which the Central Powers including the Ottomans started). The fig leaf they hide waqf behind here is this claim to self-determining pan-Arab nationalism, but what it actually means to have self-determination is to be able to determine the land is irrevocably theirs under Sharia because of waqf. If you don't recognize Sharia as legitimately binding international law, then you don't recognize the "Palestinian's" claim on the land of Eretz Israel, including Judea or Samaria (the "West Bank"), or Gaza for that matter (which was held by the Egyptians). Thank you for your attention to this matter!

@AnthonyinOC68 @ConceptualJames It might be a different story if his related concerns weren't furiously fixated on a single nation. With an adorably miniscule population of 9 million to boot.

@WinJPR @ConceptualJames Nope. He's just tired of seeing the people claiming America First selling out the country for foreign interests. He's not the only one tired of it either.

Oh no. Bruce, uh, something or another. He's pitching a little girl fit. We're done for.

@AnthonyinOC68 @ConceptualJames Good think AIPAC isn't one dude. Not claiming I can know this, but Fenton may be battling bipolar mania.

@WinJPR @ConceptualJames 120+ posts mentioning Israel is still far fewer than the # of AIPAC handlers assigned to Congress.

@Andy_Bloch @elonmusk @libsoftiktok The circumstances are extraordinary, even on a global basis. Police handcuff a stabbing victim as the culprit in an altercation where the assailant is fine and he dies? How many times have you heard that one before?

@elonmusk @libsoftiktok Something is deeply wrong, Reuters hasn’t reported on almost all of these, but you think they should report on a homicide in a foreign country.

Something is deeply wrong

@MarkMantis @elonmusk "Anyone," relatively speaking.

@elonmusk Why isn’t everyone talking about the WHITE KID?? He’s WHITE for crying out loud! Everyone should talk about him… Or, maybe your narrative is bullshit… maybe that’s why.

@elonmusk True. It's called critical pedagogy.

@libsoftiktok They do seem to be. x.com/i/status/20573…

The owner of the “Trump House” in Escondido, California with tonz of MAGA and American Flag decor, was just violently assaulted and is fighting for his life in the hospital. Conservatives are under attack!

@lucio_tato @triggerpod @LLBiggers Millions, and more being created by higher ed RIGHT NOW.

@triggerpod @LLBiggers There are hundreds of thousands infected by the same cult-like mind-virus she was. All of them vote.

@VinceDaoTV @RealKeriSmith Re. voters, spot-on. And I say that despite Israel having become one of my more major issues, particularly after the reality-warping lunatic reaction to 10/7/23. Fact of the matter is Israel is among the least significant issues for all but the tiniest proportion of U.S. voters.

AIPAC has fought Thomas Massie for years, actually. That’s a shock to his supporters who started following politics 2 seconds ago, but Google is free. Notice how he didn’t lose his primary until he voted against funding ICE, grandstanding against Trump, and cozying up to third-world leftists. But they insist he only lost because of the “Israel lobby.” Okay, and if the Israel lobby is omnipotent in politics, why didn’t he lose before? Only the Retard Right made the election about Israel. For voters, it was everything else. Unlike you, voters actually don’t have their minds consumed by a foreign country. Conservative voters — and even Trump himself — were happy to endorse him for years. He’s always opposed the aid. But it was only when he started acting like a retard that he alienated them. You guys will do anything but admit that your brand of politics is genuinely unviable with regular Americans. It’s all excuse-making.

@CelinedeRoany @johnarmstrong5 Ever expanding definitions of "hate speech" are being weaponized by malicious narcissist cultists whose obvious motivation is to silence expression they disagree with. You're unmistakably among them.

@johnarmstrong5 Free speech is protected in France. What is prohibited is the offence of public insult (injure publique), particularly in its aggravated form where the remarks target the victim on the basis of their gender identity. We welcome debate, but we do not tolerate hate speech.

This is truly horrifying suppression of free speech by a French court. Another reason why women are compelled to be wary of people with penises.

@johnarmstrong5 @HJoyceGender Remarkably idiotic commentary. The largest share of those who oppose free expression based on supposed offensiveness are the woke. And the largest share of the woke are women. They continue to set the global precedent for, "watch what say."

@ConceptualJames Must've been pretty sketchy to earn an X suspension.

Bro, this is literally what almost all of us did. You're so out of touch and sound like an entitled spoiled brat.