Eggman

2.2K posts

Eggman banner
Eggman

Eggman

@abcdlights

Se unió Eylül 2021
706 Siguiendo47 Seguidores
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@leighkeystone @ChiefScrobbler There's barely any difference in taste and the only noticeable difference is the flake is a bit more smaller. It's a perfectly acceptable substitute as long as the customer is aware of what they are buying and they don't charge cod prices for Pollock which I'm sure goes on.
English
0
0
2
28
Leigh
Leigh@leighkeystone·
The guy who owns our local chippy told me yesterday there’s no cod on the menu because wholesale prices are so high customers wouldn’t pay what he’d have to charge. What a country we now live in — a pint at the pub and even fish and chips are too expensive.
English
91
205
2.7K
66.5K
Mylan Giberson
Mylan Giberson@trequor_·
@revenant_MMXX It's not a psyop. British people will put plain potatoes on plain bread and call it a sandwich
English
4
0
3
2.9K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@no_dystopia @maxtempers Just get them to bike to you then lick their arms for easier digestible human salt.
English
0
0
1
15
No_Dystopia
No_Dystopia@no_dystopia·
@maxtempers Salt is also available from licking bricks, and was a key source of sodium during the Stalingrad seige. Deliveroo could offer salt-as-a-service using their spare riders, who could collect the salt and deliver it to people in receipt of benefits under a large government contract.
English
1
0
1
354
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@davejoh27309582 @LeftwaffenWatch They're not fit for purpose then, the manufacturers have to take some responsibility with their easily defeated stock locks and things sidings.
English
1
0
0
10
dave johnson
dave johnson@davejoh27309582·
@abcdlights @LeftwaffenWatch It does when you don't need an angle grinder as you can stab the thin gauge with a screwdriver to get started then use an oldskool can opener for the rest of the cut and then pull the sheet down like the pic. i work on fleet vans and know how easy they are
English
1
0
0
13
Leftwaffen-Watch ⬜️
Leftwaffen-Watch ⬜️@LeftwaffenWatch·
Tradesman have had to resort to putting all sorts of deadlocks and guard plates on their vans to stop their tools being stolen Now the thieves are just cutting holes in the sides of the vans 5 years minimum for scumbags who steal workman’s tools.
Leftwaffen-Watch ⬜️ tweet media
English
88
198
1.3K
21.8K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@davejoh27309582 @LeftwaffenWatch It wouldn't matter how thin the gauge is, any half decent metal disc in a 4 inch grinder will be through it in no time.
English
1
0
0
18
dave johnson
dave johnson@davejoh27309582·
@LeftwaffenWatch Peugeot Experts are really easy the metal gauge is so thin. It's why vans are so crap today when comparing them to a good old mk6 transit side by side. Proper solid van unlike the foldable Expert
English
1
0
0
347
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@RollingHedge That's not including the 1400 year or so gap between his Roman invaders and an African court oddity in the Tudor times.
English
1
0
2
104
Anglo Futurism Capital LP 🇬🇧🐿️
The history here is broadly accurate. Africans on Hadrian’s Wall, Black individuals in Tudor England, Lascar sailors in the ports, Windrush recruitment after the war. All documented, all real. Nobody serious disputes any of it. What I do dispute is the very obvious trick being played with it. The author lists these facts in rapid sequence across two millennia and the rhetorical effect is to make British diversity feel continuous and substantial throughout history. It was absolutely not. The African soldiers numbered in the hundreds across the entire province. The Black population of Tudor England was perhaps a few hundred in a country of millions. The port communities were geographically concentrated and nationally tiny. Britain was ethnically homogeneous by any honest measure for most of its recorded history. Acknowledging scattered historical presence is not the same as proving the country was always a “crossroads.” The plural of anecdote is not demographic data. The Windrush argument is the author’s strongest ground. Commonwealth citizens were recruited, did essential work, and were treated badly. The 2018 scandal was an institutional betrayal. No argument there. He should have built the entire post around this rather than diluting it. Instead he pivots to the claim that all contemporary immigration concern is billionaire-funded propaganda designed to divide the working class. This is where it falls apart as Zack Polanski adjacent illiterate nonsense. Net migration hit 906,000 in the year to June 2023. That is not a Murdoch editorial. It is ONS data. And it underreports sizably as we all know. Housing completions have not kept pace with population growth for thirty years. GP lists have grown faster than GP numbers. These are lived realities, not culture war talking points. Telling people their concerns are a psyop is not solidarity. It is contempt and lies. His follow-up clarification is the giveaway. Original post: “Britain was never pure, never untouched, never theirs to take back.” Follow-up: “I never said Britain was majority non-white.” Classic motte-and-bailey. Make the bold emotional claim, harvest the shares, then retreat to a position nobody was arguing against when challenged. The audience remembers the rhetoric. The critics get told they cannot read. Boring. The post also conflates fundamentally different things. Roman military deployment, Tudor-era individuals, Victorian port communities, post-war Commonwealth recruitment, and modern migration measured in the hundreds of thousands per year are not the same phenomenon. They have different causes, scales, and policy implications. Calling them all “immigration” and saying “see, we have always done this” flattens every distinction that matters. And the conclusion offers a false binary. Either aim your anger at billionaires or you are a thick pleb. But you CAN oppose elite capture of politics AND think migration policy has been badly managed. You CAN want higher wages AND question whether unlimited labour supply at the lower end helps. The young couple priced out of their town are allowed to ask whether population growth is one factor among many, even if foreign capital and underbuilding are also to blame. The author needs you to pick one enemy. Reality does not work like that. Obviously. The great irony is that by dismissing every concern as manufactured and every critic as manipulated, this kind of post pushes people toward the very extremists it claims to oppose. When you tell someone their lived experience is a lie, they do not thank you for the education. They go and find someone who will take them seriously. See Hillary Clinton’s “deplorables” remark and Trump’s 2016 win. Those same people, scorned, may be pushed somewhere Sam here wouldn’t like. Ironically.
Sam@SamCKx

I can no longer hold my tongue seeing the utter lies being spread about Britain, our history of migration, and how this country was built into what it is today. For those so deeply buried in fake news, manufactured outrage and billionaire‑funded propaganda, I’m going to lay out the truth – and exactly why you’re being fed all this poison. Britain was never a sealed white island. From Roman times there were African soldiers stationed on Hadrian’s Wall and living in British towns, people from across the empire walking these roads nearly 2,000 years ago. Through the Middle Ages and Tudor England you still find Black people in the records – sailors, craftsmen, servants, musicians – even Black musicians at the royal court and Africans being baptised, marrying and being buried in English parishes like anyone else. This isn’t some modern experiment; it’s older than half the castles people visit on their bank‑holiday tours. As Britain went out into the world, the world came here. Sailors and traders from India, Yemen and beyond were arriving in British ports from the 1600s. Some of those men were practising a new faith to most Britons at the time, praying quietly in boarding houses near the docks while they worked brutal shifts in the engine rooms of British ships. Over the centuries, more people from North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia passed through and settled, bringing their languages, foods and beliefs into port cities that were far more mixed than today’s nostalgia merchants like to admit. After two world wars, the truth is simple: this country asked the Commonwealth to come and rebuild it. People from the Caribbean, Africa and South Asia didn’t sneak in; they were recruited. They came to drive buses and trains, staff the NHS, work in mills and foundries, clean offices, run corner shops, open takeaways and small businesses, and yes, build prayer spaces and community centres alongside churches and temples in the neighbourhoods everyone now pretends were always “traditional” and “unchanged”. They did the work that kept Britain going while being told to go home, refused housing, and treated as permanent outsiders. And what have they been paid back with? Scandals where people who’ve lived, worked and paid taxes here for decades get told they don’t belong. Policies designed to make life so hostile that some give up and leave. A media that uses their names, accents, clothes or places of worship as props in endless scare stories. The message is always the same: you might toil for this country, but you will never fully be of it. So when you hear that “Britain was white until recently” or that the country has been “overrun”, understand that you don’t arrive at that belief by accident. You get there because your history has been deliberately ripped out and replaced with a comforting myth: that “real” Britain is white, homogenous, and constantly under siege from people who look, speak or pray differently. Now look at when this myth has been turned up to max volume. Wages frozen. Housing a sick joke. Energy and food prices out of control. Public services hacked to pieces. At the same time, the number of people hoarding unimaginable wealth at the top has exploded. Funny, isn’t it, how every front page is about boats and “swarms” and “our culture”, and almost never about the landlords, hedge funds, private equity and offshore trusts quietly buying up your city and your future. That’s because this isn’t just prejudice; it’s a strategy. If you’re sitting on a mountain of wealth, the last thing you want is ordinary people – of every colour and background – realising they have the same problems and the same enemy. Much safer if the factory worker is furious at the new family down the road. Much safer if the person who can’t see a doctor blames the nurse with an accent instead of the minister who cut the funding. Much safer if a man who can’t afford his rent spends his rage on the woman in a headscarf at the bus stop instead of the billionaire who owns half his city. Racist rhetoric, religious dog‑whistling, all of it, exists to break solidarity. It turns neighbours into enemies and stops people seeing that Black, brown and white working‑class communities have far more in common with each other than any of them will ever have with the people flying in on private jets. It keeps you so busy policing skin colour, passports and prayer mats that you never get round to asking why your kids can’t afford a home, why your parents can’t get a hospital bed, why you’re working harder and standing still. The real story of Britain is this: a crossroads, not a fortress. Africans on Hadrian’s Wall. Black people in Tudor courts and city streets. Sailors, traders and workers from South Asia, the Middle East and beyond in the ports. Caribbean, African and Asian workers rebuilding the country after the war, staffing surgeries and hospitals, driving cabs, running shops, cooking food, teaching kids. Today’s multi‑ethnic, multi‑faith working class is not a glitch; it is Britain. It built this place and it keeps it running. If you’re genuinely angry about what’s happening to this country, good. You should be. But aim it where it belongs. Britain was never pure, never untouched, never “theirs” to take back. The people ruining your standard of living are not the ones risking their lives to get here, or the ones whose names you struggle to pronounce. They’re the ones buying politicians, owning media outlets, writing the story of this country so you never learn your own – and never realise who is standing beside you.

English
78
164
1.1K
78.2K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@Bitofhonesty @RaySand17710097 If you are drawing power whilst the PV is generating your system will take priority before going back to the grid. It's the same electronic principles of any batteryless PV system.
English
0
0
0
55
The new guy
The new guy@Bitofhonesty·
I don’t get it. Even if it didn’t burn the house down how would the electricity being generated be used first vs import from the grid? I have a controller in my solar setup that can decide whether to send anything generated to the house to be used, to the battery to be stored or to the grid if the other two are not required.
English
1
0
0
1.2K
Ray Sanders
Ray Sanders@RaySand17710097·
I have just heard that "plug in" solar is to be authorised in the UK. FFS the lunatics really have taken over the assylum. How many politicians/civil servants know the difference between a ring main and a radial spur circuit? My Advice? Invest in undertakers
English
60
32
235
37.3K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@mj22781955159 @StickToFact @P_Taker_70 @thepdviking They are not charities that they donate to, they are islamic causes that directly fund terrorism. A proportion of that money they "donate" will be derived from benefits that have been scrounged off the British tax payer.
English
1
0
0
11
Vish
Vish@mj22781955159·
@StickToFact @P_Taker_70 @thepdviking The British category means black brown and white. Christian Muslim and Jew. The others are non Brits who have come to this country. They don't record crime by religion. So even if it says Afghan it doesn't mean all afghans are Muslims. You see how I've proven you wrong.
English
2
0
0
55
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@GWHayduke97 You go to the pub with a log fire and a shaggy dog roaming around, you have to make yourself leave your house on the scarce non rainy days. It does become depressing and I've noticed it more as I've gotten older. A holiday in Spain keeps the darkness away but only for so long.
English
0
0
0
21
Hayduke ⏹️
Hayduke ⏹️@GWHayduke97·
It genuinely breaks my brain to imagine what 1400 hours of annual sunshine must be like to live in. When going to college in Chicago, I really struggled with the seemingly endless gray of the winters. Chicago gets 2500 sunshine hours!
Hayduke ⏹️ tweet media
English
708
227
6.8K
1.6M
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@ManOfKent15 Because of their concentrated ghettos of once white working class areas. They may only be 6%(doubtful) but winning them over is a sure win in those areas helping them consolidate a base, whilst we are dispersed.
English
0
0
0
23
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@NWordBiden The same with the Irish Navvies in Britain. There were a lot more Englishmen digging the canals and laying the railways but the Irish take all the credit.
English
0
0
2
551
The City Dissident
The City Dissident@EC2man·
It’s so indicative of the spiteful, grasping attitude of TfL that it is now charging a flat fare of £15.50 to take the Elizabeth Line to Heathrow, and also now charging all fares to/from the airport via the Piccadilly line as a peak fare, if you start, finish or go through Zone 1. I can’t think of any other city that behaves like this towards its public transport users.
English
46
86
1.4K
171.6K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@WorldByWolf This is how you know all the figures are a load of bollocks. There isn't anywhere near 15% women on site, these figures, including the nationalities are counting secretaries, sales reps, cleaners, human traffic lights and gate openers. It's all bullshit. (20yrs in the game)
English
0
0
0
41
Wolf 🐺
Wolf 🐺@WorldByWolf·
We’re told that the construction industry would topple over without an endless stream of third world immigrants. Turns out 94% of the construction workforce in Britain is white and 80-90% are white men. We also wouldn’t need such a big construction industry if we weren’t ripping up the green belt for foreigners.
Wolf 🐺 tweet media
English
42
290
1.1K
13.5K
Cal
Cal@Cal_III·
@joshpriv0 @ZoeJardiniere It’s only really in the big cities where you see a lot of foreigners in the industry, but even then it’s overwhelmingly native.
English
6
2
1.1K
27.7K
Alexandra
Alexandra@Alexandr4Denman·
Mothers are getting tired of their children being attacked! This seems to be a new trend happening to white English children, being set upon and it sounds like no help was given??
English
220
1.9K
8.2K
341.9K
Active Patriot
Active Patriot@ActivePatriotUK·
The most exciting thing to happen in Devon for a long time
English
28
12
109
20.1K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@an_dy_moo_dy @HhJuza @TomG1989 Using any sort of weapon is reasonable if it is deemed to be proportional to the threat. You could stab someone to death if there was no other option. Idiot.
English
0
0
0
68
Tom
Tom@TomG1989·
We all know Joey Barton can be a gobshite, but surely if that’s true and someone’s got a bat out to hit him with and he’s took it off him and weighed him in then surely that’s fair game
English
179
98
6.9K
886.5K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@DHKITCH @Mike_Fabricant You are either using AI or you have a very low level/inhuman standards of reading comprehension
English
1
0
0
11
Kitch
Kitch@DHKITCH·
You’re confusing share with growth rate. MI5: ~75% of current counter-terrorism investigations relate to Islamist extremism. At the same time, extreme right-wing cases are growing fastest from a smaller base. Both can be true simultaneously. That’s statistics. Not “AI bollocks”.
English
2
0
0
37
Michael Fabricant 🇬🇧🇺🇸🇮🇱🇺🇦
The Spectator says a report coming out on Monday will say that Islamists are responsible for 75% of the police’s counter-terror workload and 94% of all terror-related deaths in the past 25 years. The plan also rejects calls, predominantly from Muslims, for blasphemy laws in the UK. Following the case of a religious studies teacher at Batley Grammar School, who was forced into hiding after showing children caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad, the document promises to ‘stand against those who try to intimidate, threaten and harass others because they are offended by so-called “blasphemy”. We do not recognise blasphemy law in the UK.’
English
121
1.6K
7.4K
175.7K
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@DHKITCH @Mike_Fabricant I'm not confusing anything. Your little fact sheet stated that right wing terrorism is increasing at the fastest rate, I stated that the rate of increase means nothing if it comes from a hugely lower percentage base. I'm well aware Islamic terrorism is and will be the majority.
English
1
0
1
28
Eggman
Eggman@abcdlights·
@DHKITCH @Mike_Fabricant AI Bot garbage, your statement has absolutely nothing to do with what I have said. In fact it's the opposite of the "fact check" you originally posted. AI BOLLOCKS .
English
1
0
4
59
Kitch
Kitch@DHKITCH·
That argument only works if you ignore the absolute numbers. MI5 and Home Office briefings have repeatedly said roughly ¾ of the counter-terrorism caseload relates to Islamist extremism. So this isn’t just a “percentage trick”. It reflects the largest share of active investigations. Yes, other threats exist and are taken seriously. But dismissing the majority of the caseload as “statistical manipulation” isn’t analysis. It’s avoidance. Evidence matters.
English
2
0
1
150