Ricky Robbie

@Furriskey2 Corrupt AF. And the McAlberts are guilty AF.

Set aside Proctor’s vile texts. Multiple ppl in 34F drove past the spot where JOK was found, and Proctor didn’t interview them FOR MONTHS. That alone proves he’s corrupt.

@MichaelWelshLaw Awful

It's concerning that Michael Morrissey chose to continue having Michael Proctor lead "investigations" for so many years. Taking away people's civil liberties. There's no way he was oblivious to his biases, in my opinion. Very bad.

@Furriskey2 Then cuts the interview short.

Leave all of Jen McCabe’s OTHER lies aside… FBI shows up. You lie about WHO YOU ARE…say you need to brush your teeth…then you lie about who you just called. No innocent witness/regular mom does that.

@Furriskey2 Liars are going lie.

Waiting for Treveyon Henderson to tweet out the Seventh Commandment

@masslivenews Poor Chip.

Lawyers question secrecy of fired trooper’s texts as Karen Read preps new lawsuit masslive.com/news/2026/04/l…

@Bederowlaw It would be fun to drop Chip off on Blue Hill Avenue tonight at midnight and leave him there.

Do you think a racist goon with a gun, badge and the power to arrest (alternatively known as "probably the most vetted cop in history," who is reckless enough to text his buddies to announce celebrating a "holiday" in Canton for the killing of Black people (among his other vile texts), is reckless enough to try to frame an innocent woman for murder by planting evidence and perjuring himself?

I thought he only let his emotions get the best of him in the Karen Read case….

@Bederowlaw Ab-so-fuck-ing-tute-ly

“It’s kill an (N-word) day in Canton today.” - Michael Proctor We just learned Michael Proctor sent this text message to other troopers while working under candidate Greg Connor’s DAs office. #KarenRead #FreeTurtleboy

@fancypantsck The McAlberts are trash.

🚨🚨🚨🚨🚨 The Hos Defendants know exactly what happed to John O’Keefe!!!! #JusticeForJohnOkeefe

@suspiciousauce @KyleSharkey8 @BoozeyBeauty @BrotherCounsel @AttorneyMyers @trialchannel_ @JusticeServedTV @GrantSmithEllis @GlammaSooz Proctor. POS.

Karen Read v Everybody As expected... Judge Casper denies Proctors motion

@Geauxtgrs66 @factsdontlie10 @SperanzoDiane When you have Coleen Crawford editing every single video and image, it doesn’t matter either way.

@factsdontlie10 @SperanzoDiane @cop13175 Black is white when snowing

A FORD EDGE WAS PARKED ON THE STREET AT 3:30am RIGHT NEXT TO WHERE JOHNS BODY WAS FOUND AT 6am. WHO WAS DRIVING THE FORD EDGE? #KarenReadCivilCase

@holdmyhalo41sec The anti’s coordinated attacks only confirm that coordinating a cover up is 2nd nature to them.

The anti’s are out in full force lately (with their ten accounts each). Let’s clear something up… Karen read was acquitted when you claimed she was going to jail. Aidan Kearney is living his best life after you swore he was going back to jail. Karen will win the civil suits. Aidan will win the intimidation suit. And both of them will win the defamation suit. None of your lies, tricks, or other bullshit has been successful thus far. And you’re out numbered. I hope this helps at least one of you goofballs move on and stop wasting your life. We ain’t got no quit.

@PatsPlanet_ He’s a great 4th or 5th receiver.

This is Kayshon MF Boutte.

@benchslappedtv @mabbe_8 It absolutely happened.

Explain this without the name-calling, because no one has actually addressed the mechanics. You’re saying based on the testimony from these so called experts that the 2:27 a.m. entry didn’t reflect a real search and instead came from a tab that was opened earlier, with the actual searches happening at 6:23–6:24 a.m. But that explanation doesn’t hold up against the data in the report. First, the entries at 6:23:51 and 6:23:57 are spelled differently from the 2:27 entry, while the 6:24 entry does match it. If the 6:24 search is supposedly tied to that earlier 2:27 tab or input, why isn’t the 6:24 entry also marked as deleted the same way the 2:27 entry is? Second, the 2:27 source file is a Safari WAL file. That matters because a WAL file captures transient input, meaning text that was actually typed into the search bar, even if the search was never completed. So at a minimum, that data shows that at 2:27 a.m., that phrase was physically entered into the device and then deleted. So now you have two separate things….. At 2:27 a.m., text matching that phrase was typed and deleted. At 6:23–6:24 a.m., similar or identical searches were actively recorded across multiple artifacts. If the State’s explanation is that everything stems from a single 2:27 tab or session, then the artifacts should behave consistently. They don’t. The deletion flag appears only on the 2:27 entry, not on the later matching 6:24 entry. So the question is simple and not one person who claims to believe what these so-called experts said at trial will explain this How do you reconcile a deleted WAL entry at 2:27 showing typed input, with a later matching search at 6:24 that is not marked deleted, if both are supposedly the same underlying event?

I'm seeing Aidan Kearney bring back 2:27 am, and frankly, he should be embarrassed. That claim, one he pushed for years and years, and used as the cornerstone of the #FKR "movement," has been thoroughly debunked by every digital forensics expert who has reviewed it. There isn't a single digital phone expert who will go on record to say it was a Google search. Notta one! Even Karen's own expert, Richard Green, refused to go on the record for fear of perjury. To be clear... It wasn’t a search. It was a WAL file of a tab session and stored in the BrowserState.db. A WAL file is a temporary system log that users can’t access or delete. More importantly, it was a browser refocus event, not a search. If it were real, it would appear in the History or Knowledge C databases. It doesn’t. Full stop. This should end the discussion, but here we are. You know what's not debatable but gets no traction: the GPS and phone data John O’Keefe’s phone: • Arrives at Fairview ~12:24am • John steps out of the Lexus at 12:31:55 am • John begins to take 36 steps at 12:32 am • Karen’s Lexus Telemetry records high-speed reverse event at 12:32:09 am • John’s phone records his final movement at 12:32:16 • John never moves again until 6:15 am • His phone battery temperature NEVER warms, proving he didn’t enter a warmer environment To believe the “inside the house” theory, you have to believe: the phone stopped tracking movement the moment he entered, recorded no steps inside, showed no temperature fluctuations, and somehow ended up back outside without logging movement during an attack and dog mauling event. That’s not how these systems work. And the data is crystal clear: 2:27 am is a misdirection, John NEVER entered the house, and not one piece of data points to anyone other than #KarenRead. To be honest, this is the weakest narrative, and the fact that it still holds your attention after all these years says more about you at this point than it does about Karen and Aidan.

We need mass deportations until the wheels fall off. We’ve been invaded by a hostile foreign enemy.

Each. Dot. Represents. 100. Migrants. This is what an invasion looks like:

I just voted for an amendment that would help get the SAVE America Act across the finish line. Unfortunately, Democrats once again blocked this common sense legislation. Americans overwhelmingly support secure elections, which is why I’ll keep fighting for the SAVE America Act and for the American People!

@1_and_only_Wade Jen was the most pathetic witness with her faux emotion. Sickening.

Did the McAlberts really think people were going to buy their bullshit stories and over rehearsed testimony? Yes, in fact they did. They exposed themselves for the liars they are and now they have to sue bc their lies have been exposed. Sucks to be them! #KarenRead