Ken

248 posts

Ken

Ken

@Geauxtgrs66

Katılım Nisan 2026
30 Takip Edilen5 Takipçiler
Ken
Ken@Geauxtgrs66·
@letstalkliveytc You know where they were parked? Nowhere close to 34 Fairview
Ken tweet media
English
0
0
1
19
LTL Media
LTL Media@letstalkliveytc·
Still a head scratcher to me... After all this time...Let me get this straight, no one inside 34 Fairview woke up the night Canton PD and Fire responded to the 911 call for John O’Keefe. There was a full-sized firetruck, a fire rescue SUV, an ambulance on scene, and 2 Canton PD SUV's — lights fully strobing, engines running — and we’re supposed to believe that no one inside that house heard anything and the dog didn’t wake up or make any noise? Check out this clip from Sgt. Sean Goode’s dash cam. You can see just how visible and noticeable the emergency response was from a distance as he approached the scene.
English
24
2
63
3.8K
Dixie Normus
Dixie Normus@DixieNormu95224·
What if the photos found in Michael Proctor’s phone didn’t come from his personal life at all… …but from phone extractions he conducted while on duty? What if those images were originally obtained as evidence? What if the same material now being labeled “too sensitive” to review… is the exact material that shows how it was handled after it was collected? Because if that’s even partially true… Then this isn’t about “protecting privacy.” It’s about asking Who had access to that evidence? Where was it stored? And how did it end up being shared outside official channels? And here’s the part that doesn’t sit right, We’re being told to be careful because of the women in those images……but what if those women only became “part of this” because their private data was collected and then mishandled? So now the question isn’t “Why are these texts embarrassing?” It’s “What do these texts reveal about how evidence, and people were treated?” Just a “what if,” though… right?
English
16
8
165
3.5K
Emily See
Emily See@TheEmilySee·
The way @RosemaryScapicc clutched her heart when relaying Proctor’s n-word text almost made me cry. The world would be a better place if just half the people in power cared half as much about justice and fairness. I’m grateful that at least we have her 👑
Emily See tweet media
English
48
47
888
9.5K
Hold My Halo
Hold My Halo@holdmyhalo41sec·
Michael Proctors balloon knot must be puckering right now. How does one go from having it all (wife, kids, house, union job, pension) to pleading for discovery to refresh his memory on a single call. That’s all this was initially… a call he responded to, that was assigned to him as the on-call investigator. A cop will respond to thousands of calls in their careers. It would be foolish to think that they don’t discuss these calls with their buddies, say things that are inappropriate, and even make poor decisions throughout the life of the situation. But what we have here is a (former) MSP trooper with a gun, badge, and cruiser that let his ego and power go to his head. He made repeated errors in judgement, and through it all, probably just thought he was helping his second family out. The other troopers do it. What’s the harm? I imagine that he spoke to his witnesses/friends, and a picture was painted that they found themselves in a bit of a bind. Their good friend, and fellow LE, was found on their front lawn. How devastating, and relatable. They don’t know what happened. He was last seen with Karen! And the seed was planted. Gee it sucks that there isn’t really any physical evidence. Don’t worry friends, you won’t catch any shit. I know what to do. I don’t think for a second, Proctor had a conversation with the house defendants that included a confession of a drunken brawl gone wrong. Or that they informed Proctor that a fight had occurred and when the time came to make a decision to call 911 or try and make this all go away, they took the selfish path. Proctor may have been taking a crooked path to what he thought was justice for John, and then found himself in so deep, that there was no turning back. I bet they all regret Karen’s upcharge now. One incident number at the end of an on-call shift, and Proctor finds himself without a career, without a pension, presumably a fractured marriage, and the defendant in a lawsuit that he doesn’t have union representation for. While his life is being destroyed piece by piece, the McCabes, Alberts, and Higgins are carrying on with their propaganda campaign. Has anyone even reached out to him? I think it’s time to flip, Chip. You have nothing left to lose.
Hold My Halo tweet media
English
24
13
201
6.2K
Ken
Ken@Geauxtgrs66·
@DonutsBaga And the 911 call. Wild it was lumped in there LOL
English
0
0
2
88
JoeyBagaD🍩nuts
JoeyBagaD🍩nuts@DonutsBaga·
💥Jen McCabe claims she must have “butt dialed” John O’Keefe (6 TIMES), immediately after he stopped moving for ever. 💥Every single one of the alleged “butt dials” HUNG UP prior to voicemail picking up! 💥She also DELETED all of the alleged “butt dials.”
JoeyBagaD🍩nuts tweet media
English
38
75
443
12.2K
Dan Donovan🌺
Dan Donovan🌺@Dan_Donovan_17·
2:27 is still a thing. The forensic community and a billion dollar forensic company has spoken, it didn't happen.
Dan Donovan🌺 tweet media
KRISTIN KAY@benchslappedtv

Explain this without the name-calling, because no one has actually addressed the mechanics. You’re saying based on the testimony from these so called experts that the 2:27 a.m. entry didn’t reflect a real search and instead came from a tab that was opened earlier, with the actual searches happening at 6:23–6:24 a.m. But that explanation doesn’t hold up against the data in the report. First, the entries at 6:23:51 and 6:23:57 are spelled differently from the 2:27 entry, while the 6:24 entry does match it. If the 6:24 search is supposedly tied to that earlier 2:27 tab or input, why isn’t the 6:24 entry also marked as deleted the same way the 2:27 entry is? Second, the 2:27 source file is a Safari WAL file. That matters because a WAL file captures transient input, meaning text that was actually typed into the search bar, even if the search was never completed. So at a minimum, that data shows that at 2:27 a.m., that phrase was physically entered into the device and then deleted. So now you have two separate things….. At 2:27 a.m., text matching that phrase was typed and deleted. At 6:23–6:24 a.m., similar or identical searches were actively recorded across multiple artifacts. If the State’s explanation is that everything stems from a single 2:27 tab or session, then the artifacts should behave consistently. They don’t. The deletion flag appears only on the 2:27 entry, not on the later matching 6:24 entry. So the question is simple and not one person who claims to believe what these so-called experts said at trial will explain this How do you reconcile a deleted WAL entry at 2:27 showing typed input, with a later matching search at 6:24 that is not marked deleted, if both are supposedly the same underlying event?

English
9
1
22
1.8K
RubyD
RubyD@RubyD_JinaG·
On Samantha's show.....is this what John hit his head on?
RubyD tweet media
English
8
0
17
2.3K