Fystack

Fystack is excited to announce the new Address Risk Check feature for withdrawals, powered by our partner @mywebacy ✅ Detect accidental transfers to smart contracts ✅ Block transfers to high-risk or sanctioned addresses ✅ Protect users from address poisoning scams Security-first custody powered by MPC wallets. fystack.io #MPC #Custody #Web3Security

The tradeoff between speed and decentralization is real, but users shouldn't have to think about it. At Fystack, we're building so you can move crypto seamlessly, regardless of the chain.

A standard TRON USDT transfer burns ~$5 in TRX fees. At 1K daily sweeps, platforms are bleeding $150K/year purely on gas. But that's just the tip of the iceberg. Managing native tokens manually across hundreds of wallets breaks automated workflows with "Out of Gas" errors everywhere. We built Fystack Gas Station to fix this bottleneck natively. A centralized "Gas Tank" pre-funds your deposit wallets precisely when needed across ETH, SOL, BNB, etc. To solve the TRON drain specifically, we integrated TronZap. Fystack intercepts TRON txs, natively rents Energy, and slashes fees by up to 60%. The architectural flow under the hood 👇

Most teams don’t need “a blockchain indexer". They need the right type of indexer. We broke down 5 approaches: 🔹 Decentralized data → The Graph 🔹 Wallet flow monitoring (CEX / Payments) → Fystack 🔹 Real-time UX → Envio 🔹 Historical analytics → Subsquid 🔹 No infra / managed pipeline → Goldsky Each solves a different problem. Full breakdown (with trade-offs): fystack.io/blog/top-5-alt….

Running USDT flows on #TRON? A single transfer can cost ~12–20 TRX without energy. At scale, that turns into real overhead. • Constant TRX top-ups • Failed transactions • Inefficient operations Today, Fystack fixes this at the infrastructure layer. We’ve integrated TronZap Energy Renting (TRON Builders League) directly into Gas Station. → Reduce costs by up to 60% → No need to hold excess TRX → No more "Out of Energy" failures → Fully automated gas management Energy is rented on-demand - exactly when transactions happen. Setup guide: #fee-saving-tron-energy-renting-with-tronzap" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">docs.fystack.io/product/gas-st…

@chatterpay That's the momentum your team has created. Soon, there will be another milestone. Congrats @

6,000 wallets created on ChatterPay 🏆 We celebrated 5,000 not long ago. Now we're here already. Every milestone has felt big. Every one has come faster than the last. We don't take that lightly, and we're not stopping here. More coming soon 🏎️

@surfcashx Congratulations @surfcashx Team. Keep the momentum.

see ya there! 🏄

@WorldFirstLtd World First, and the World Champion. Strong move. More to come.

WorldFirst, a brand of Ant International, is now an official sponsor of the Argentine National Football Team. Stay tuned as we channel the ambition, energy, and global spirit of Argentine football to inspire the businesses we serve worldwide. More to come.

@neuralunlock Agreed. But there's much more things to consider here, not just only stablecoins. We also have these terms: tokenized deposits, and CBDCs. It's worth sometimes to understand the differences between them and the role of banks here. fystack.io/blog/what-are-…

Stablecoins will not replace banks.  Banks that use stablecoins will replace banks that don’t.

@moonpay Let's prepare for this new, exciting future.

crypto and AI will be woven into the future of everything it’s inevitable and the sooner you accept that reality, the bigger your advantage will be act accordingly

We broke down all 5 differences about the two key MPC wallet infra providers including pricing, wallet types, apps, support, and deployment. Full comparison here: fystack.io/blog/fystack-v…

That said, Cobo has something Fystack does not: built-in Earn, Staking, and OTC inside their dashboard. If you want DeFi yields or institutional staking without building integrations, Cobo gets you there faster. If you are scaling wallets and want predictable costs, Fystack is more cost-effective, developer-friendly experience, and simple unified dashboards.

Why scaling to 10k wallets could cost you $78,000 more on Cobo. Cobo and Fystack both start at $299/mo for their #MPC plans. But at 10,000 #wallets and $500K monthly volume, the math changes completely. 🧵

Bitcoin (BTC) is now fully supported on Fystack! #BTC has been one of the most requested chains from teams building on Fystack, so we've integrated it directly into our infrastructure. You can now send, receive, and monitor BTC alongside your stablecoins - same policies, same approval steps. The auto-sweeping feature is also ready to go for better hot-to-cold liquidity management. No separate tooling. No different operational process. → Try it here: app.fystack.io

@Gaian_hq This is a game-changer for builders! Great work @Gaian_hq Team.

🌟NEW FEATURE🌟 Partners building on Gaian can now configure the fees they charge when using our payment infrastructure. This gives #wallets #fintechapps #neobanks the flexibility to design their own revenue models while building on Gaian.

@LiskSEA @Futrmarket Love the energy 👏 Always inspiring to see young, visionary founders pushing the boundaries of what’s possible on @Lisk. Definitely a project to watch in Southeast Asia!

Making prediction markets simple: A conversation with FUTR 🎙️ Meet Vince, the visionary behind @Futrmarket. FUTR is building the go-to prediction market for Southeast Asia and beyond, making it easy for anyone to participate in real-world events 🌍 Discover how FUTR is bridging the gap between crypto and the mainstream, and their experience in the SUCI x Lisk Incubator program. Watch the full interview to learn more 👇

The Banking Profit Pie in the Stablecoin Era: Who Owns the 60%? 🥧 As banks and fintechs race to adopt stablecoin payments, the profit structure of banking is shifting. It is no longer evenly distributed. Instead, it is split into three value layers. 1. Trust & Compliance (20%) Licenses and regulatory approval that allow institutions to legally handle stablecoin flows. 2. Client Experience (20%) The interface for moving money. Neobanks initially won here with better UX, but today a polished interface is simply the cost of entry. 3. Settlement Infrastructure (60%) The real profit engine of the stablecoin economy. This includes payment rails and digital asset custody. Whoever controls this layer controls the flow of funds and transaction data. Not long ago, the stablecoin banking opportunity looked like a neobank game. Today, that profit pie is being reclaimed and redistributed across the financial stack. 👉 Read the full breakdown: fystack.io/blog/stablecoi….

According to Chainalysis, illicit crypto transactions reached $154B in 2025, with #stablecoins accounting for 84%. Most RWA and stablecoin B2B payment projects follow the same pattern. The first 6 months are spent on fundraising, legal structuring, and refining the business model. But that is only 20% of the real challenge. Sooner or later, reality sets in: financial crime on blockchain. That is when many teams realize a hard truth. If your infrastructure still relies on centralized SaaS wallets, you are effectively running on rented rails. This means you cannot control transaction signing logic or stop risky transfers at the entry point. That is why the next generation of payment infrastructure is moving toward policy as code and self hosted architecture. 🔹 AML rules are enforced automatically through code 🔹 Risky wallets are blocked using real time data 🔹 Businesses retain ownership of their keys and operational data In 2026, the real competitive advantage will not come from slightly better UX. It will come from infrastructure sovereignty, the ability to fully control your own payment infrastructure. Learn more about AML risks in stablecoin payments and how Fystack helps businesses build safer infrastructure here: fystack.io/blog/stablecoi….

@solana Firedancer effectively addresses previous concerns around single-client dependency and prepares the network for global financial flows. Read our full research on Solana’s transition to institutional-grade infrastructure here: fystack.io/blog/why-solan…

@solana Reliability by the numbers in 2026: > 15% to 20% of network stake now operates through hybrid Firedancer deployments. > Multi-client diversity brings uptime standards in line with traditional banking. > Testing demonstrates capacity exceeding one million transactions per second.

Is @solana finally ready for global banking? In 2026, the introduction of #Firedancer marks a major transition for the network. It represents a shift from a high-performance experiment to institutional-grade infrastructure. 🧵