Maydu

"Les États-Unis étaient un modèle pour les nazis" - R-S-T-U ➡️ youtu.be/MPerJMpyjEg Cinquième opus du désormais célèbre abécédaire de Johann Chapoutot, nous allons en compagnie de l’historien voyager en Europe, en Asie et pousser par une instructive escale aux USA, histoire de mesurer l’influence des nazis et leurs sources d’inspiration du côté des lois raciales américaines.

🦏 Nouvelle France : la peur bleue des médias blancs ➡️ youtu.be/uMm5tb1MOzQ "Aujourd'hui, on va faire le bilan des municipales. Il s'est passé plein de trucs et évidemment nos journalistes politiques préférés ont produit beaucoup de commentaires. Les élections municipales, c'est compliqué. Il y a plein de villes, plein de configurations et évidemment, à la fin, les partis veulent mettre en avant leur victoire et minimiser les défaites. C'est pour ça qu'on a besoin de tous ces commentateurs, ces politologues, ces sondeurs, ces éditorialistes. Sauf que le dimanche 15 mars, au soir du premier tour, ils étaient un peu perdus nos experts. La France Insoumise s'en était très bien sorti et ça, c'était pas du tout prévu." Nouvel épisode de Rhinocéros, par Usul et Lumi.

Iran in the Current Conflict: Key Strategic Assessments(10 Key Facts About Iran Today) 1. Perception of Strategic Momentum Iranian leadership assesses that it is operating from a position of relative strength. Under current conditions, Tehran is more likely to absorb costs and continue the conflict than accept U.S.-led terms perceived as capitulation. 2. Absence of a Decisive Military Lever There is no single operational movewhether targeting Kharg Island, the Strait of Hormuz, or disputed Gulf islands, that would decisively degrade Iran’s strategic position. Such actions would more likely expand the conflict domain and duration. 3. Ceasefire Conditionality Iran is not primarily seeking de-escalation. Instead, it views the conflict as an opportunity to renegotiate its strategic environment. Absent credible guarantees against future military action, Tehran is unlikely to accept a ceasefire framework. 4. Functional Command and Control Iran’s command-and-control systems remain operational and adaptive. Retaliatory strike patterns indicate centralized coordination and maintained escalation management capabilities. 5. Regime Stability in Wartime Conditions There are currently no indicators of imminent internal destabilization. The regime retains coercive control, and the lack of a viable opposition limits prospects for near-term political disruption. 6. Nuclear Threshold Dynamics Iran’s stockpile of approximately 440 kg of uranium enriched to 60% represents a significant latent capability. A conflict end-state that preserves this stockpile may shorten Tehran’s timeline for a political decision on weaponization. 7. Sustained Strike Capacity Despite operational attrition, Iran retains the ability to conduct sustained strikes against Israel and Gulf targets in the near term, suggesting resilience in its missile and UAV infrastructure. 8. War Economy Effects Contrary to expectations, Iran may be experiencing increased oil revenue during the conflict due to market pressures and uneven sanctions enforcement. This mitigates some immediate economic constraints. 9. Strategic Centrality of the Strait of Hormuz Control and influence over the Strait of Hormuz remain core Iranian strategic interests. Tehran is unlikely to compromise on this issue without substantial economic and political concessions. 10. Structural Economic Vulnerability Iran’s economy remains fundamentally weak. While wartime conditions may provide short-term relief, long-term stability will depend on sanctions relief and structural reforms, neither of which are guaranteed. Bottom Line is that Iran enters this phase of conflict with strategic patience, internal stability, and no immediate incentive to de-escalate. #IranWar

A moral direction like you, @RoKhanna, embracing someone who says America deserved 9/11 and compares Zionists to neo-Nazis?