Bob Smith

51.6K posts

Bob Smith

Bob Smith

@robeman2014

Hello

Se unió Mayıs 2014
1.9K Siguiendo1.7K Seguidores
Bob Smith
Bob Smith@robeman2014·
@SagerPhillip How about going back to reality and make a fucking deal with Trump and dump the shit bag Carney and all will be great again in Canada
English
0
0
0
1
Phillip (Canada)🇨🇦 🇺🇦
Fellow Canadians, it is time for us to buckle down and renew our efforts to buy Canadian. Our country is under attack from extreme right wing agencies, both at home but mostly from south of the border. Our efforts have helped the country greatly but we need to double our efforts.
English
768
179
682
19.1K
Bob Smith retuiteado
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 HOLY CRAP! JD Vance just WENT HARD against the European Union, slamming tyrannical bureaucrats for trying to destroy Hungary because nationalist Viktor Orban leads them "Foreign election interference! The bureaucrats in Brussels have tried to DESTROY the economy of Hungary. They have tried to make Hungary less energy independent!" "They have tried to drive up costs for Hungarian consumers. And they've done it all because they hate THIS GUY [Orban]." "We think the amount of interference that's come from the bureaucracy in Brussels has been truly DISGRACEFUL!" "I won't tell the people of Hungary how to vote. I would encourage the bureaucrats in Brussels to do the EXACT same thing." 🔥🔥 The EU are TYRANTS
English
2K
4.8K
14K
360.5K
Bob Smith retuiteado
Charlie Smirkley
Charlie Smirkley@charliesmirkley·
Canada increased the Industrial Carbon Tax to &110/ton ($80 USD) this April. 🇺🇸 USA: $0.00 🇨🇳 China: $13.30 🇨🇦 Canada: $80.00 Note: Canada has had no GDP per capita growth in this period. China and the US have both had double digit growth.
Charlie Smirkley tweet media
English
59
551
1.2K
32.5K
Bob Smith retuiteado
Dr Jennine Morgan
Dr Jennine Morgan@jemmm85517813·
Energy from wind turbines only happens because of huge taxpayer & bill-payer subsidies to wind farm owners & even then gives us the most expensive electricity in the world.
🅿︎🅷 ★★★★☆ 🕊🩸🗝️@PeterHebly

Geweldige uiteenzetting van @lidewij_devos over de (negatieve) rentabiliteit van windmolens. De energietransitie heeft een giga-prijsopdrijvend effect. Maar hier komt het: Dat is precies het doel. Ons financiële systeem verdraagt geen lage energiekosten.

English
5
36
70
1.1K
Bob Smith retuiteado
Mario Zelaya
Mario Zelaya@mario4thenorth·
🚨 BREAKING: Finance Minister François-Philippe Champagne just quietly recused himself from the $90 BILLION Alto high-speed rail project. Why? His wife, Anne-Marie Gaudet, is a Vice President at Alto. The Crown corporation building the train. The Ethics Commissioner has NO public record of this conflict. The same Champagne who: -Just flew to Beijing with the Bank of Canada governor -Owns 2 rental properties in London, England -Is the beneficiary of multiple trust funds -Whose brother got a “negotiated acquittal” in a Hells Angels meth lab bust right before he entered politics Pierre Poilievre called Alto a $90 billion boondoggle. $700 million spent. Zero track laid. Now you know why. The Finance Minister’s wife works for the company about to receive the biggest infrastructure cheque in Canadian history.
English
239
2.5K
5.7K
79.1K
Mads About You
Mads About You@hackagibson·
notice how you never graduated? because anyone who finished high school biology knows that carbon dioxide is essential for life, in the right amount. too much of it traps heat and warms the planet. that's not complicated. it's literally grade 10 science. lol don't you get a free education?
English
3
0
0
9
Scott Robertson
Scott Robertson@sarobertsonca·
Robert Benzie: “I spoke to some Tories last week who say [Pierre Poilievre’s] a 15-point drag on them and they're worried about losing their seats. So when MPs start worrying about losing their seats because of the leader, that's when the leader is in jeopardy."
English
204
279
1K
59.6K
Bob Smith
Bob Smith@robeman2014·
M.A. Rothman@MichaelARothman

𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐄𝐍𝐓𝐈𝐑𝐄 𝐂𝐋𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐓𝐄 𝐀𝐆𝐄𝐍𝐃𝐀 𝐑𝐄𝐒𝐓𝐒 𝐎𝐍 𝐎𝐍𝐄 𝐋𝐈𝐄 Alex Newman laid out the argument in ninety seconds. The entire environmental regulatory apparatus depends on a single premise: 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐜𝐚𝐫𝐛𝐨𝐧 𝐝𝐢𝐨𝐱𝐢𝐝𝐞 𝐢𝐬 𝐩𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. “𝘛𝘩𝘦 𝘯𝘰𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘊𝘖2 𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘪𝘴 𝘢𝘣𝘴𝘰𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘦𝘭𝘺 𝘱𝘳𝘦𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵𝘦𝘳𝘰𝘶𝘴.” We exhale about 𝐭𝐰𝐨 𝐩𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐝𝐬 𝐨𝐟 𝐢𝐭 𝐞𝐯𝐞𝐫𝐲 𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠𝐥𝐞 𝐝𝐚𝐲. The proportion of greenhouse gases made up of human CO2 emissions is “𝘢 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘢 𝘧𝘳𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯 𝘰𝘧 𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘤𝘦𝘯𝘵.” But here’s the part that matters: “𝘍𝘳𝘰𝘮 𝘢 𝘵𝘰𝘵𝘢𝘭𝘪𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘢𝘯 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦, 𝘪𝘧 𝘺𝘰𝘶 𝘤𝘢𝘯 𝘤𝘰𝘯𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘱𝘦𝘰𝘱𝘭𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘊𝘖2 𝘪𝘴 𝘱𝘰𝘭𝘭𝘶𝘵𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘳𝘦’𝘴 𝘯𝘰 𝘩𝘶𝘮𝘢𝘯 𝘢𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘵𝘺 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵 𝘥𝘰𝘦𝘴𝘯’𝘵 𝘳𝘦𝘴𝘶𝘭𝘵 𝘪𝘯 𝘊𝘖2 𝘦𝘮𝘪𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘭𝘪𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘪𝘯𝘤𝘭𝘶𝘥𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘥𝘺𝘪𝘯𝘨, 𝘵𝘶𝘳𝘯𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘰𝘯 𝘢 𝘭𝘪𝘨𝘩𝘵 𝘴𝘸𝘪𝘵𝘤𝘩.” Every single aspect of your life then comes under 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐫𝐞𝐠𝐮𝐥𝐚𝐭𝐨𝐫𝐲 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐨𝐟 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐞𝐨𝐩𝐥𝐞 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐜𝐥𝐚𝐢𝐦 𝐭𝐨 𝐛𝐞 𝐬𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐲𝐨𝐮. Newman cited Trump’s climate advisor, Dr. William Happer — a 𝐩𝐡𝐲𝐬𝐢𝐜𝐬 𝐩𝐫𝐨𝐟𝐞𝐬𝐬𝐨𝐫 𝐚𝐭 𝐏𝐫𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐞𝐭𝐨𝐧 — who said the Earth is “𝘴𝘵𝘢𝘳𝘷𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘧𝘰𝘳 𝘮𝘰𝘳𝘦 𝘊𝘖2.” Since atmospheric CO2 has increased over the last century, plants have gotten greener. Agricultural yields have improved. The gas they’re calling a pollutant is 𝐟𝐞𝐫𝐭𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐳𝐞𝐫 𝐟𝐨𝐫 𝐭𝐡𝐞 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐧𝐞𝐭. The framework is simple. If CO2 is pollution, then every human activity requires permission. If it’s not, then the entire regulatory structure built on that claim is fiction. The question was never about the climate. It was about 𝐰𝐡𝐨 𝐠𝐞𝐭𝐬 𝐭𝐨 𝐜𝐨𝐧𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐥 𝐡𝐮𝐦𝐚𝐧 𝐛𝐞𝐡𝐚𝐯𝐢𝐨𝐫. 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐋 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐃𝐄𝐅𝐈𝐍𝐈𝐓𝐈𝐎𝐍 𝐀𝐍𝐃 𝐘𝐎𝐔 𝐂𝐎𝐍𝐓𝐑𝐎𝐋 𝐄𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐘𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐆

QME
0
0
0
4
Bob Smith
Bob Smith@robeman2014·
@hackagibson @mcfargey @sarobertsonca 97 percent of carbon dioxide is naturally occurring..the few parts per million that are man made do nothing. The planet is actually at near record low carbon dioxide levels. In the past times it was much higher
English
1
0
0
2
Rose Smith
Rose Smith@itsrosesm·
Where should she go?
Rose Smith tweet media
English
1.8K
22
149
27.1K
Bob Smith retuiteado
Retard Finder
Retard Finder@IfindRetards·
Which is more retarded?
English
885
261
1.3K
86.3K
Mads About You
Mads About You@hackagibson·
what's your endgame here? you think tweeting enough will make carney hand the country to poilievre? carney's numbers are up. mps are crossing. you're screaming into a void that doesn't care. yeah, carney talked about a carbon border tax. the eu just started theirs. it's a trade strategy, not a plot. the federal carbon price was supposed to hit $170 by 2030. alberta froze theirs at $95. carney can't force them without a fight. he's respecting jurisdiction. smith is playing politics. you're not exposing a conspiracy. you're panicking because your guy is losing.
English
1
0
0
29
Bob Smith retuiteado
Daniel Turner
Daniel Turner@DanielTurnerPTF·
There is no “net zero”. There is no “clean” or “green” or “renewable” energy. There’s no “carbon neutral”. Speak the left’s language, play the left’s game where you 100% will lose. These are made up, political terms, for a political agenda with ever-changing goalposts.
ClarksonsFarm@ClarksonsFarm1

Well said! End the Net-Zero lunacy.

English
22
229
584
13.8K
Bob Smith retuiteado
Dr Jennine Morgan
Dr Jennine Morgan@jemmm85517813·
Germans & Dutch are both very worried about damaging netzero policies in their countries. Sensible experts know that it is causing deindustrialisation & will lead to poverty for all ( except the multimillionaires & billionaires who can buy their way out of it all)
Henk Otten@hendrikotten3

@HammersteinO @OneOfUsAll1 Duitsland heeft economische zelfmoord gepleegd. Nederland wil dit idiote recept kopiëren: beton storten in de gasputten, hypermoderne kolencentrales sluiten en nog meer onrendabele wiebelstroom-windmolens op zee bouwen die €250 MILJARD investering in stroomnet vergen. Gestoord!

English
2
9
18
254
Marina
Marina@TheRealMarina0·
At what age?
Marina tweet media
English
3.9K
75
1.1K
124.3K
Mads About You
Mads About You@hackagibson·
@mcfargey @robeman2014 @sarobertsonca yeah they did. and they owned their mistake. and look what happened, they beat your guy. carney took a bad situation, corrected it, and now he's looking at a majority government while poilievre is a 15-point drag on his own mps. seems like they thought it through after all. lol
English
2
0
0
16
Bob Smith
Bob Smith@robeman2014·
@hackagibson @sarobertsonca The PBO already noted a tiny percentage got back more than they paid..with a vast majority paying far more than they got back as a rebate.
English
1
0
0
7
Mads About You
Mads About You@hackagibson·
hey scatter brain, say what you're going to say in a single tweet. and "almost no one got back more than they paid with the rebates"? what kind of rock are you smoking? that's not true. the parliamentary budget officer found that for the vast majority of households, rebates exceeded carbon tax costs. low and middle-income families got back more than they paid. only higher-income households paid more. you're just wrong. next. and make it good.
English
1
0
0
14
Bob Smith
Bob Smith@robeman2014·
@hackagibson @sarobertsonca Oh and please tell me how a carbon tax is saving the planet as carbon dioxide does ZERO to impact the planet other than make life possible to exist
English
1
0
0
9
Mads About You
Mads About You@hackagibson·
first it was "axe the tax." the consumer carbon tax got axed. so now you've quietly rebranded to "actually the industrial carbon tax is still there." cool. nobody said it wasn't. but you spent two years screaming about the consumer tax hurting families, and now that it's gone, you're pretending that was never the real issue. you little greasy bugger. carney wants alberta to increase it by a factor of 6" yes, because the federal carbon price schedule has been clear for years. carney is following the plan that's been in place. that's carney doing his job. you moved the goalposts because you couldn't admit the consumer tax is dead. lol bitch move.
English
2
0
0
24