simobis

161 posts

simobis

simobis

@simobis23

Obsessed with AI progress 🚀

Se unió Nisan 2023
4K Siguiendo9 Seguidores
Tweet fijado
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@GoodfireAI Mathematics is not just a human invention; sometimes it emerges spontaneously whenever a system tries to compress the world and understand its patterns in the most efficient way possible
English
0
0
1
212
Sebastien Bubeck
Sebastien Bubeck@SebastienBubeck·
We now know that with an appropriate harness both Mythos and GPT-5.5 can reproduce what our internal model did in one-shot for the unit distance problem. Clearly there is an insane overhang of capabilities with this generation of models, and no ceiling in sight for what scientific advances they can bring. You can go and try to discover new things with 5.5 right now!
Xiao Ma@MaXiao54704

The standard GPT-5.5 reproduced the proof ~ 👇 chatgpt.com/share/6a0e9e04… You don't need to wait for oai's internal model!

English
32
34
536
44.1K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
LLMs need a harness because they’re too general. The base model predicts across all domains in one latent space. Context, tools, memory, and verifiers temporarily specialize it. The harness is what turns a predictor into an agent.
English
0
0
1
9
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@ns123abc Grok 3/4 = 3 trillion parameter model.
English
0
0
0
733
NIK
NIK@ns123abc·
SpaceXAI has 1T and 10T training rn on GB300s Grok 4 was just a small 500B model OpenAI and Anthropic got an early lead hoarding compute via institutional ties and shipped ~1+T models first. xAI built its own. But we're still in early game, mid game hasnt even started yet, and then there's late game. Compute is king. Just wait.
NIK tweet mediaNIK tweet media
English
63
41
619
27K
Ethan Mollick
Ethan Mollick@emollick·
I found this Wired article on AI fact-checking frustrating. It could have been about why we continue to need human fact checkers (talk to people, use judgement, resolve conflict). Instead it is full of old info & stuff about free models GPT-5.5 Pro checked it (& I checked GPT)
Ethan Mollick tweet mediaEthan Mollick tweet media
English
27
13
274
25.7K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
AGI=ASI
Indonesia
0
0
2
14
Andrew Curran
Andrew Curran@AndrewCurran_·
We are on a new trajectory since November. The change was as clear as a bell. So much is going to happen over the next few years, and we have no idea how influential the prevailing narrative will be. It is increasingly dangerous to frame this moment as adversarial.
English
25
26
450
18.2K
Mo
Mo@atmoio·
I'm done. I'm f***ing done.
English
422
337
3.6K
736.3K
Dwarkesh Patel
Dwarkesh Patel@dwarkesh_sp·
Who should I interview on my podcast? Open to more AI, but also to random history/econ/etc professors that I might not have heard of before.
English
1.2K
42
1.9K
367.3K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@theinformation OpenAI generated about $5.7 billion in first-quarter revenue
English
0
0
1
34
The Information
The Information@theinformation·
SpaceX reported $4.7 billion in first-quarter revenue and a $4.3 billion loss. Its AI spending is reshaping the company’s financial story before it goes public. Full story: thein.fo/3RqVE8v
English
2
3
11
4K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
That did not age well.
simobis tweet media
English
0
0
2
43
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@ns123abc This video is ~4 months old. In AI years, that's basically a decade. A lot has changed since then. Original:youtu.be/SVgzQpDZjjY
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
0
4
840
NIK
NIK@ns123abc·
🚨 Google DeepMind CEO Sir Demis Hassabis: “Today’s systems, are nowhere near [AGI]. Doesn’t matter how many Erdős problems you solve… I think it’s far, far from what a true invention or someone like a Ramanujan would have been able to do” it’s over for the Erdős hype
English
169
394
4.2K
651.7K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@JosephJacks_ And Google will lose even more than that in its own stock. Being this far behind Anthropic in AI will cost them way more than any investment gain.
English
1
0
2
1K
JJ
JJ@JosephJacks_·
Google will own $300B worth of Anthropic and $100B of SpaceX … by the end of this year. Those stakes will be valued in the several trillions within 3 years.
English
34
50
887
47.7K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@ns123abc The method matters more than the result. In math, the real value isn’t just solving a problem, but revealing new connections across fields and creating tools that generalize beyond it. That’s exactly what happened in the latest Erdős problem solution.
English
0
0
6
1.4K
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
Erdős solves 5 GPT problems
Magyar
0
0
1
42
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@elonmusk 3/ The next paradigm may be “constitutional recommendation systems.” Humans define: - laws - ethics - safety boundaries - societal constraints - long-term objectives But AI explores the interaction strategies itself inside those boundaries. Less micromanagement. More emergence.
English
0
0
2
44
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
1/ After studying X’s open-sourced algorithm, one thing became very clear: Modern recommendation systems are still heavily dominated by heuristics, manual ranking rules, filtering layers, and short-term engagement optimization. Not truly emergent intelligence yet. @elonmusk
English
2
0
2
137
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@elonmusk 2/ Today’s platforms are essentially engineered around micro-optimizations: - maximize clicks - maximize watch time - maximize emotional engagement - minimize churn This creates systems optimized for short-term dopamine loops, not long-term human flourishing.
English
0
0
2
29
simobis
simobis@simobis23·
@bookwormengr Silicon Valley runs AI like a 100m sprint pure brute force. DeepSeek runs like a Kenyan miler: hug the rail, conserve oxygen (MLA/mHC), then unleash the RL kick when it counts. Same finish line. A fraction of the cost.
English
0
0
3
1.3K
leo 🐾
leo 🐾@synthwavedd·
i am absolutely THRILLED to announce that it appears they're beginning to make strides on UI de-slopification with GPT-5.6! 🥹 here's your first look on a prompt without any UI guidance ("default") - we're getting somewhere...
leo 🐾 tweet media
leo 🐾@synthwavedd

iris-alpha

English
90
29
1.1K
276.7K