rock

The whole discussion below is written around the question: will there be an altcoin cycle? The answer is yes, but the TOTAL3 index won’t reflect it, and that’s why I believe we need a better lens to track how this next phase unfolds. Altseason will be different—not because of the memecoin explosion (who cares) but because all the crypto-native liquidity has been wiped out, and now the only thing that can push prices higher is external capital.

@TryLuel Bro I tried conversation with a partner 2 times uploading 1 hour live audio talking to each other and then every time, the upload of someone gets stuck at 0 and we dont get paid, it wasted my 2 hours, no one is replying at the support, are you guys a scam @TryLuel @LuelCompany

Earn money from your camera roll. Upload photos, videos, or audio in minutes and get paid. Join thousands already earning on Luel.

@JustinBarlow Yeah lol xd

Now is unironically the best time to be joining a team in crypto

@maybeltr It’s called making ecosystem

@jack but what if @jack, all the 5 things above are done to a open source code, isn't that more good, each state of the open-source code is defined by the 5 properties above and that each state is an open-source code by itself 😗

is the future value of "open source" code anymore? i believe it's shifting to data, provenance, protocols, evals, and weights. in that order.

@grimace85 @africa1896 @jack @grok tell him @grok

@africa1896 @jack @grok @grok is $tao coin a good coin to invest in based on jack’s comment

@smartestxyz Hey, can I work for you bro part time basis, I like what you are doing and have writing skills own.page/nitin

@singularityftw7 Thanks mate!

After some feedback on the DeFi Evolution Paper, I couldn't sleep well because the job wasn't finished. Sorry for missing some key protocols. I hope this time the paper is more precise and goes deeper into the evolution. I also expanded it to cover 2012 to 2026. If you notice anything missing, please don't hesitate to comment so I can include it in the next version. Thanks for reading and for your attention! (drive.google.com/file/d/1Od9P49…) @Uniswap @CurveFinance @aave @ethereum @Balancer @SushiSwap @CryptoAlgebra @pendle_fi @eulerfinance @HyperliquidX @dYdX @GMX_IO @LidoFinance @LayerZero_Core @eigenfoundation @Polymarket @OndoFinance @sudoswap

@dzech_ @0xBold @pudgypenguins Cool

@singularityftw7 @0xBold @pudgypenguins just take a few minutes to read this. pudgy wasn’t always worth what it is now, Luca originally just had a vision and he worked until it came to fruition. what if I told you joe is no different

When was the last time a @pudgypenguins meme went this viral? Just sayin

@0xBold @pudgypenguins none, cause pudgy has treasury to keep their token fdv high and has a buiness behind which joe doesnt have, the whole idea is if somehow we form a JOE community and then use it make a brand around it and sell some shit, then it would be similar to pudgy, $shape coded

@singularityftw7 @pudgypenguins Ok let me frame it differently then Either Pudgy is retardedly overvalued or Joe is retardedly undervalued Pick one

@peter_szilagyi use grok

I've experienced this many times before, ChatGPT deliberately refusing to look up stuff and rather falls back to whatever it was trained on. Yes, you can tell it that it's wrong and fix it, but that's because you already know the right answer.

Today I asked ChatGPT which is the latest MacOS. It replied Sequoia, released in 2024. I cancelled my subscription.

@StaniKulechov Bonus for the tax fraud through off chain validator business

Earlier today, a user attempted to buy AAVE using $50M USDT through the Aave interface. Given the unusually large size of the single order, the Aave interface, like most trading interfaces, warned the user about extraordinary slippage and required confirmation via a checkbox. The user confirmed the warning on their mobile device and proceeded with the swap, accepting the high slippage, which ultimately resulted in receiving only 324 AAVE in return. The transaction could not be moved forward without the user explicitly accepting the risk through the confirmation checkbox. The CoW Swap routers functioned as intended, and the integration followed standard industry practices. However, while the user was able to proceed with the swap, the final outcome was clearly far from optimal. Events like this do occur in DeFi, but the scale of this transaction was significantly larger than what is typically seen in the space. We sympathize with the user and will try to make a contact with the user and we will return $600K in fees collected from the transaction. The key takeaway is that while DeFi should remain open and permissionless, allowing users to perform transactions freely, there are additional guardrails the industry can build to better protect users. Our team will be investigating ways to improve these safeguards going forward.

@andyyy tax fraud

🤯🤯🤯 Someone just lost 50 million dollars on a swap. Where did the money go??? To snipers??? Or MEV bots???

@TheDEFIac @titanbuilderxyz money laundering ftw

24643151 This is by far the craziest block I have ever seen. 13087 ETH priority fee on this tx alone Well played @titanbuilderxyz

@0xSoju @MCGlive @solana $shape coded

I think @solana has enough products, offering amazing user experiences. what we need: real companies generating real revenue — pumping value back into Solana, distributed to a permissionless, global cap table. that's the missing piece. that's internet capital markets.

his connection with allah is so powerful that he can even tweet from the afterlife

@0xsmac what's name of your mom's left titty

if you had one question to figure out if someone is a clanker what do you ask?

oy vey

@LiveLaugh187 What if it goes to a million and still god’s not real?

If God is real Bitcoin will go to a million

This is a great analogy if we consider BTC exactly as Gold, but you missed one thing: the human years after computers were made. Especially now, with more bots than humans, the cumulative human years would be at least 2×, and the speed of new bots coming online will only increase much more. At the end, the value behind BTC/Gold is just an idea, the idea of being a store of value due to various reasons. And this idea propagates just like a virus. If we treat both of these assets that way, then bots share the same analogies and ideas as the humans who control them. So, we have to treat bots as first-class citizens in the calculation of cumulative human years. I'm not good with numbers but some rough data: 2025: Bots ≈ humans (≈50/50 traffic split). That means Bitcoin’s effective Lindy-share is not ~10% of gold’s, but ~20%. At gold’s ~$21T cap, that implies ~$4.3T for BTC, or $200k per coin. 2030: Bots ≈ 2× humans (~67% traffic). The multiplier pushes Bitcoin’s Lindy-share to ~38%, or ~$8T market cap (≈ $384k per BTC). 2035: Bots ≈ 3× humans (~75% traffic). Now ~63% Lindy-share, ~$13T cap, ≈ $628k BTC. 2040: Bots ≈ 90% of all traffic. Bitcoin overshoots gold’s “attention-time,” at ~184%. That translates to ~$39T market cap, or ~$1.8M per BTC. Even with bots discounted to “half a human,” you still get $150k in 2025 rising toward $1M by 2040.