Tweet épinglé
Blessyn #WID
3.5K posts
Blessyn #WID
@Blessyn___
COMMUNITY CONTRIBUTOR | DEGEN| I AM NOTHING WITHOUT GOD| MEMBER @Womenindefi. https://t.co/5b6Ord2Po1
In profit Inscrit le Kasım 2020
874 Abonnements981 Abonnés
Blessyn #WID retweeté
Have you been thinking of what to eat and end up taking coffee for dinner
English
Just officially reached 500 points in @arc Arc House.
I’ve been actively involved since the early testnet days — testing flows, exploring the ecosystem, building dApps, and learning more about how Arc can support real on-chain use cases.
For me, points are not just a number. They represent consistency, contribution, and the process of improving as a builder.
"Still learning. Still building. Still shipping".
Excited for what’s ahead 🚀
Profile me: linkedin.com/in/hoa-tran-83…
RomRom@HoaTranRom
The real value you bring to @arc is not just points. It’s building something useful, something real, and something people can actually use. 413 points may be only the beginning — but keep pushing, keep improving, and give it everything you’ve got. #builderarc
English
English
Every scam begins with trust placed in the wrong place. Now imagine an AI agent moving value for you without knowing who to TRUST.
This is a problem I can't stop thinking about. @arc is built for an economy where AI agents move real money autonomously, settling in under a second, with no reversing it.
But on-chain, trust is invisible, a scam wallet and an honest one look identical until it's too late.
A human can pause and have a bad feeling about a counterparty. An autonomous agent can not. It needs a number.
So I built @CREDENCE_intel a trust intelligence layer for the Arc ecosystem.
You pass it any wallet, agent, or contract address, and it answers one question.
Can this be trusted?
• With a trust score from 0 to 100
• Risk level
• A confidence score
• Actual reasons behind the verdict
• Recommended action.
The hard part was not producing a score. It was being honest about one. A brand new wallet with no history isn't "trustworthy". it's unknown, and most systems quietly paper over that distinction.
CREDENCE does not, It keeps trust and confidence separate on purpose, so it never hands you a confident verdict built on thin data. Absence of red flags is not the same as safety, and the score tells you which one you're looking at.
Because Arc is built for agents, I integrated ERC-8004 built by arc. It is the on-chain agent identity and reputation standard so agents can register, find work, and get paid autonomously directly into CREDENCE.
So it can read and reason about agent reputation, not just wallet activity. And that's where it got interesting.
Digging into the ERC-8004 reputation data, I found out a lot of it was farmed. The same handful of accounts rating each other in loops to inflate scores.
So instead of trusting raw reputation, CREDENCE weighs rater diversity: a score you can't simply buy.
Under the hood it runs an unsupervised anomaly model alongside transparent, auditable rules, and deliberately no faked training labels, because no honest ground truth for "trustworthy" exists on-chain yet.
Every verdict is explainable, and it scores any address live, not just a fixed dataset.
CREDENCE is live now : credence-intelligence.netlify.app
A web app, a public Trust API, and SDKs for Python and JavaScript so other builders can plug it into their own Arc apps.
This is the kind of work I love, taking a vague, important problem and turning it into something real, careful, and usable.
If you're building on Arc or you just want to see what the trust layer for an agentic economy looks like, I would genuinely value your eyes on it.
English
Good evening, Architects 👋
What did you build on @arc today?
Drop your projects in the comments.
I’d love to test them out and share some feedback.
English
Good night 🌙
one thing caught me by surprise today
I assumed adding extra transaction information would mean changing smart contract
turns out transaction memos on @arc work with existing contracts , including USDC
what stood out even more is that a memo is only recorded when the transaction actually succeeds
it might seem like a small detail , but for builders, that's the kind of reliability that makes a real difference
time to call it a day.
Sleep Well Everyone
Ɲimøx@Nimox219
Good morning ☀️ another sunrise another chance to make today a little better than yesterday Happy Thursday
English
Arc has been quietly building toward something bigger than faster transactions or cheaper fees.
Over the past few months, a recurring theme has emerged:
Long-term financial infrastructure requires long-term security.
We've seen discussions around stablecoin infrastructure, transaction memos, institutional-grade payments, validator architecture, private execution environments, and post-quantum security.
Each update points in the same direction:
Building systems designed to last.
Not because quantum computers are breaking blockchains today, but because financial systems built today may still be securing assets decades from now.
Planning cannot wait for the threat to arrive.
The roadmap explores how Arc approaches resilience across multiple layers:
• Wallet signatures
• Smart contracts
• Validators
• Infrastructure cryptography
• Private execution environments
• Recovery and migration systems
Security is a stack problem, not a single feature.
One important takeaway:
Post-quantum readiness is not a one-time upgrade.
Different components move at different speeds depending on standards, vendor support, hardware constraints, and operational requirements.
Arc's approach reflects that reality.
The roadmap outlines a phased path:
→ Quantum-secure signatures
→ Private EVM state protection
→ Validator hardening
→ PQ-safe infrastructure migration
→ Long-term account recovery planning
A practical migration strategy instead of a rushed transition.
For my fellow builders, this is a reminder that infrastructure decisions made today have long-term consequences.
Applications handling stablecoins, RWAs, payments, identity, and institutional workflows need architectures that can evolve as security assumptions change.
Looking back at recent developments across Arc, a common thread becomes clear:
The focus has not been on short-term narratives.
The focus has been on building financial infrastructure that remains reliable, interoperable, and secure over the long run.
That's what makes these conversations important.
The future of onchain finance won't depend only on adoption.
It will depend on whether the underlying infrastructure can survive the next decade of technological change.
@arc is preparing for that future today.
@samconnerone
@bobbilee
English
working on adding three more community run @arc meetups in Arc House today 👀🔥
English