Easy

@Iamnotjiao The infamous “EЯ JE P ETH” exit sign on that one highway strikes again

@Rightanglenews That is a very honorable woman

BREAKING - A Baltimore mom is receiving massive praise after returning to the same food stand her son robbed just days before to reconcile with the owner, return the money, and apologize for her son’s actions, confirming she placed him in a treatment facility.

@dieselumaru I mean just stay home that day

He thought he lost his wife 🍿

@PopBase How long until the stolen ones start showing up on eBay as a kind of weird collectors item?

KitKat has launched a Stolen KitKat tracker. Users can enter the batch number found on the back of their KitKat to see if they have been sold one of the missing KitKats.

@fvckfemi_ I mean that’s literally what “years old” means. If you had a piece of pizza in the fridge that was “1 week old”, it’s not fresh right out the oven starting week 1, it’s existed for an elapsed time of one week.

when you realize that the age u turn on ur birthday is the age u just completed, not the age you're starting

@petersterne @AOC The fact that they characterize things like iron dome as “so-called” defensive is insane

BREAKING: At tonight’s NYC-DSA electoral forum, @AOC committed to voting against “any spending on arms for Israel, including so-called defensive capabilities.”

@Dashytwo Infsct, if your knees showed then you were weird. Showing knees felt like wearing the short shorts from the Larry Bird era

Cannot emphasize enough that we all thought this looked fine at the time. Fashion is wild like that 😭

@pmaclaughlin @mikesright76 @ATLWill_ In middle school I had a friend who was from Montreal and spoke French so I asked him what “ello” meant and he looked at me like I was crazy

@mikesright76 @EasyMode476 @ATLWill_ I thought the same thing for the longest time. Thought it was something in French maybe?

An all timer was posted in the hawks subreddit today

@tequilaislife69 @ATLWill_ It a a robot reading a book on a table

@ATLWill_ Next you'll tell me the Bulls logo upside down is an alien banging a crab.

@JoshSmithmuse @LangfordNukes @Hicks45J They kinda go together. This one was a bigger emotional release though because the whole game it felt like it would get close to happening, but not quite. Once this happened, Garcia’s felt inevitable, like an act of fate. This one gave us hope, Garcia’s fulfilled that hope.

@LangfordNukes @Hicks45J You could argue for Garcias but this one is way more important

@TheZignal I’ll admit that their chocolate shake is legit

2nd time at In-n-Out. This time in Texas. Yup, in-n-out is consistent..ly mediocre. The Coke was the best part of the meal. WAAAAY down the list. Won’t be jumping at it again anytime soon. SUPER over rated.

@jmccrae35 @yosoymoii @Fanatics @End_Fanatics @BabzOnTheMic Sometimes that’s the only way to get their customer service to do something useful

@yosoymoii @Fanatics @End_Fanatics @BabzOnTheMic Instead of contacting customer service let’s send a tweet out for likes

@_EngendroDelMal @JuderachL87164 @Mr_Andrew_Fox Because that’s standard once it was established that the case would proceed. Don’t just take my word for it, here it is from the ICJ president at the time herself: youtu.be/T44DebmlvNs The case isn’t expected to be decided until late 2027. Until then, there is no ruling.

If the Court only ruled on standing, why did it order Israel to take all measures within its power to prevent the commission of acts under Article II of the Genocide Convention? Does the Court usually issue conduct-restricting orders to sovereign states based merely on a party's 'right to bring a case', or does it require the rights at stake to be plausible first?

My new article “Why is Sky News doing PR for Hezbollah?” spiked-online.com/2026/03/30/why…

@CollegeFBPortal @SEMOfootball @Matukewicz36268 @coachrcoon959 @CoachBoylan13 @_CoachDes @BristerCade @Coach_MacSEMO @ColeDobbinsSEMO They’re trying to collect injuries like pokemkons

NEW: SEMO football showcased a drill that is complete stupidity. This is EXACTLY how players end up getting hurt for no reason… 🤦‍♂️

@bendreyfuss @Claire_V0ltaire This is a sick mind

It’s so funny clicking on a tweet about virtually anything and finding a reply from Briana Joy Gray being like “Zionism”

@_EngendroDelMal @JuderachL87164 @Mr_Andrew_Fox The court very clearly did not rule on *if* a genocide was occurring, but rather only if a case could be brought. The distinction between ruling if a case can be brought and ruling on the outcome of the case cannot be more stark. They *only* ruled that the case could be brought.

Equating the Order solely to a ruling on standing is a legal fallacy. Standing (locus standi) only grants a party the right to bring a claim. However, the Court’s decision to grant Provisional Measures requires a separate finding: the plausibility of the rights at risk (Paragraph 54). If there were no plausible threat of genocide, the Court would have recognized standing but denied the measures. By issuing the Order, the Court explicitly confirmed that the alleged acts meet the threshold of plausibility required for emergency protection, independent of the final determination on the merits. Furthermore, if as you claim, the standard of plausibility was not met regarding the acts of genocide, why did the Court not dismiss the request for provisional measures for lack of object, as it has done in previous cases where standing was clear but the right was not plausible? Why did Judge Donoghue vote in favor of the measures if, according to your interpretation of the interview, the threshold of plausibility for the acts was not satisfied?

@_EngendroDelMal @JuderachL87164 @Mr_Andrew_Fox It was effectively only a ruling on standing, not a decision on guilt or the merits of the case. The fact that they ruled that a party has standing to bring a case says nothing about the merits of the case itself, and certainly says nothing about innocence or guilt either.

"In the Court’s view, the facts and circumstances mentioned above are sufficient to conclude that at least some of the rights claimed by South Africa and for which it is seeking protection are plausible." The personal interpretation of an emeritus judge has no legal effect on the operative part of a binding Order. Paragraph 54 establishes the plausibility of the rights. If the right to be protected from genocide is plausible, it is because the acts threatening it are, by definition, plausible within the framework of the Convention. The opposite would be a logical absurdity: one cannot protect rights against a non-existent or implausible threat.

@HeDontMakeNoise What the fuck is wrong with that dad??

When a father abandoned his 6 year old son in the middle of the river and a kayaker passing by rescued him.

@JuderachL87164 @_EngendroDelMal @Mr_Andrew_Fox Yes, this was even confirmed by the president who presided over the case herself, but people love to conveniently leave that part out and replace it with their own invented reality

@_EngendroDelMal @Mr_Andrew_Fox Wasn’t the plausibility to do with the plausible rights of the South Africans to bring the claim about a possible genocide?