Prayboi 🤲🏽📿

@Osama_Jihadil @Pies_of_Lee That's called late stage capitalism. It's an eventuality of the system.

@Pies_of_Lee Didnt even use the right word for rule by corporations😭

"Real capitalism has never been tried"

@mayhem_ss @aiishadahir What about the British and the Americans? They've been the biggest foreign influence over Saudi. The British were the first to recognize Saudi. The US recognized them shortly after in exchange for letting US companies search for oil. Aramco was initially owned by the US.

This won't happen now or even in 100 years. If you want to visit Makkah and Madinah, you must get a visa from the embassy, understood? Where were Muslims when King Abdulaziz was urging them to care for these sites? In 1926, the founder of Saudi Arabia, King Abdulaziz, asked Muslim nations to help develop Makkah and Madina before oil was discovered. Back then, Saudi Arabia was very poor and needed assistance for the holy mosques, but countries like Egypt, Iran, Turkey, and the Soviet Union refused to help. Some South Asian countries and India tried to assist but lacked financial resources and were under British control. After the discovery of oil, Saudi Arabia took great care of the two holy mosques from that point onward. Therefore, no foreign power will have leverage over Saudi Arabia.

This is precisely why Makkah and Madinah should be sovereign entities, similar to the Vatican, where no single nation can claim them as property or political tool.

Exactly this time last year, when I finished reading Bob Woodward’s “War”, I tweeted a passage that caught my attention. It was a conversation between Lindsey Graham and Muhammad bin Salman which included like this. “I don’t need uranium to make a bomb,” MBS said. “I’ll just buy one from Pakistan.” A year later, Saudi’s are going public with this, which poses a serious geopolitical risk to Pakistan.

@usaf2131 @DropSiteNews @SkyYaldaHakim Will the bombing of a hospital stop future terrorism in Pakistan? Please use your head

@DropSiteNews @SkyYaldaHakim And its fair to carryout out terrorist attacks by Talibans in Pakistan which have killed over five thousand people

🇦🇫 “No. There was a bombing. I witnessed it myself. The people of Kabul have witnessed it. The international media have witnessed it. They cannot deny that.” — Afghanistan’s former president Hamid Karzai rejected Pakistan’s denial of civilian casualties after its strike on a drug rehabilitation center in Kabul reportedly killed over 400 patients. Islamabad dismissed the reports as “false and misleading,” claiming secondary explosions proved it had hit ammunition depots, not civilians. The Guardian reported that rescue teams were still using cranes and heavy machinery throughout Tuesday morning to dig victims out of the ruins of the Omid Addiction Treatment Hospital. Many bodies were reported to be severely disfigured, making identification difficult for families. At least 75 bodies were seen in bags or coffins being shuttled by ambulances.

@waseyazim @DrTedros Barre log bat kare hein, this is not the space for warmongers

@DrTedros Show us similar message by WHO when US and allies were attacking health facilities in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere WHO the hell are you?

An upsurge in hostilities between #Afghanistan and #Pakistan has resulted in at least 6 health facilities reportedly being impacted in Afghanistan since late February. In addition, a reported overnight strike on the Omid Drug Rehabilitation Facility in Kabul, managed by the Ministry of Interior, killed more than 400 people, and injured at least 250, who were being treated for substance use disorders. @WHO is working to verify these incidents. But the intensifying conflict is placing additional strain on health systems and increasing risks to the health and well-being of vulnerable populations. I urge all parties to de-escalate and prioritize peace and health. Peace is the best medicine.

@ZeaIer @skynetbuffering @W_Asherah What about satellites imagery? We should be able to see pics, 50k people killed would be hard to miss

@skynetbuffering @W_Asherah hard to hack into security camera when the regime has shut down the internet ya fuckn morn

Omg! It's 2026. We can literally see Sudan killing people on satellite images. As in the genocide in Sudan is being documented using satellite images. You think you can hide 30000 dead people? Be fucking for real right now.

@Freedom76568 @NYCMayor Can you show me the posts she liked?

@NYCMayor You say: “We will not tolerate terrorism or violence in our city.” Yet your wife supports terrorists when she can! Hypocrisy at the highest level possible! 🙄

Emir Balat and Ibrahim Kayumi have been charged with committing a heinous act of terrorism and proclaiming their allegiance to ISIS. They should be held fully accountable for their actions. We will continue to keep New Yorkers safe. We will not tolerate terrorism or violence in our city.

@litcapital @NYCMayor He's been posting nothing but bangers

@NYCMayor Finally, a good tweet

No carpet bombing of a city anything like as large as Tehran, anywhere, since WW2. Pyongyang was flattened in Korean War, but had a population of 500k. Mariupol, flattened by Russia, was 400k. Tehran is 10 million. We are seeing new levels of war crime.

@cecile_shaw8 @bradyw1ls0n 1. Hearsay, defecters are unreliable due to incentives. 2. Hearsay. 3. Hearsay. 4. The only UN special rapporteur that comes up re: Cuba, was the recent rappoteur urging the US to remove sanctions on Cuba. 5. The US is hostile to Cuba, I wouldn't really believe them. 6. USAID

Evidence of exploitation & coercion of Cuban doctors/nurses in overseas medical missions is well known, well documented & substantial. 1. Cuban regime pockets 75-95% of salaries paid by host countries, leaving workers with minimal stipends (defector testimonies, U.S. State Dept reports 2025). 2. Passport & credential confiscation, constant surveillance, curfews, & restricted freedoms - preventing free movement or defection. 3. Threats of reprisals against families in Cuba if workers refuse assignments or attempt to leave. 4. UN Special Rapporteur concerns (ongoing into 2025) cite forced labor indicators: coercion, wage theft, movement restrictions in missions to Italy, Qatar, Spain, etc. 5. U.S. State Dept (2025 expansions) imposes visa bans on officials facilitating the program, labeling it forced labor/human trafficking. Over 12,000+ have defected. 6. 2025 OCLEP report documents 9/11 ILO forced labor indicators, calling it state-sponsored trafficking while Cuba's domestic healthcare collapses. Cuba denies claims, calling missions voluntary & humanitarian. But evidence from defectors, HR orgs, & intl bodies points to systematic exploitation generating billions for the regime.

Fact: Cuba provides lower income countries with more medical staff than all the G7 countries combined

pov: it's 2043, your kid gets deployed in Iran

"If recognizing a Palestinian state proves to be a barrier in trade negotiations with the US, should Canada reverse that decision?" No, Recognize Palestine: 63% Yes, Reverse The Decision: 20% Unsure: 17% Angus Reid / Aug 1, 2025 / n=1333 / Online

@Facts_Only24 @Taimur_Laal @grok Or you could just use your brain and Google it...

@Taimur_Laal @grok please fact check this

Tobah. Itna ghussa?

IT'S OVER MAMDANI WINS THE DEMOCRATIC NOMINATION

This is how American "law enforcement" treats women. So go fuck yourself

Eyes on your own paper

You can't put election signage on public land (Anything on the roadside of the sidewalk in this case) By-law officers are completely within their right to come and remove these signs (Fun fact, campaigns frequently rat each other out to the by-law officers when they see opposition signs on public land like this)

I’ve had a lot of questions lately about why I support a public builder, despite being an advocate for economic freedom, land use deregulation, and lower taxes on housing. So I want to clarify a few things: 1) I’m not a Libertarian. Supporting deregulation and tax reform to encourage more housing supply doesn’t conflict with supporting a public builder. Both are pro-supply. If your goal is more housing, not rigid ideology about the size/role of government, these policies are entirely compatible. 2) Has this been tried before? Has it worked? Yes, and yes. Public builders have a track record—in Canada and elsewhere (in fact most developed countries with good housing outcomes have public builders)—of delivering housing at scale. The question isn’t whether it’s possible, but whether we’re willing to build the capacity to do it again. 3) “We don’t have the state capacity” is not a reason to not do it—it’s the problem to fix by doing it. You don’t rebuild capacity by avoiding action. You rebuild it by taking action. 4) This isn’t necessarily a bigger state. If government uses public land to build cash-flow-positive housing that also meets social needs that would cost us money directly (e.g. shelters), it can reduce overall fiscal burden. That’s smarter government, not bigger government. 5) Done right, this creates public assets—not just costs or debt. Housing built on public land can be revenue-generating and kept on the federal balance sheet. That improves our fiscal position over time and could lower long-term borrowing costs—not raise them. 6) No, this isn’t “communism.” Private homeownership still exists. This isn’t about limiting choice—it’s about expanding it. In fact, this announcement includes major steps toward land use liberalization and tax reductions, which is the opposite of central planning. Not to mention how big MURB will be for private rental projects. 6) Think the government can’t execute a public builder well? Fair criticism. But even if you doubt its capacity, there are plenty of measures in this announcement that will make it easier for the private sector to build, too. Final thought: Leaders in development and real estate should aim more of their frustration at provincial and municipal governments. That’s where the biggest bottlenecks are—land use, permitting, building codes. The federal government is doing what it can, but those levers aren’t really in its hands despite the hoopla.

WHO KILLED THEM

I’ve been watching this announcement, I just have to say that @MarkJCarney is making commitments on housing more substantial than I would have expected. - Build Canada Homes, a new public agency devoted to building housing directly - $25B in financing and loan garuntees for pre-fabricated and modular builders - Halving development charges and taxes for the next 5 years (if @fordnation can match - HUGE) And talking about the municipal red tape and restrictions on housing, addressing it in language that focuses on generational fairness. @beynate has clearly been working hard behind the scenes on this. Not much to say other than WOW. I am very used to being disappointed on housing announcements but not today.