
FedMarrux 🇮🇹🇪🇺
1.1K posts

FedMarrux 🇮🇹🇪🇺
@FedMarrux
Italian in Europe 🇮🇹🇪🇺| authoritarianism is bad
Germania Inscrit le Nisan 2019
134 Abonnements26 Abonnés

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger But you are, if you insist the sky is green it doesn’t make it true. Scientific consensus is that climate change exist, and is human driven. You could say that you disagree with 97% of scientist and whatever, but you’re just lying by saying that it’s not the consensus.
English

Saying I'm wrong over and over doesn't make me wrong nor does it make you right.
You have fallen for propaganda from the climate cult. There is no empirical scientific evidence that proves CO2 and man made CO2 specifically causes what little warming we have seen since 1880.
None of your links can be considered empirical scientific evidence.
Have a nice day,
English

@DeplorableGreg1 @washingtonpost But he doesn’t, instead he starts a war and struggles to return to the status pre-war.
English

@washingtonpost Trump could get world peace...and you losers would say it cost too much and won't last. You people are sick.
English

The Reflecting Pool on the National Mall has been refilled following President Trump’s renovations.
The project ultimately took six weeks and cost more than $10 million, far more than Trump initially projected. wapo.st/4uspV4H

English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger You’re just wrong. If you say it and it’s wrong it doesn’t make it true. There’s hundreds of studies confirming it. I showed you a link with references and you just ignore it. goodreads.com/quotes/1142753…
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Except it is the absolute value. You cannot docuent anywhere on earth where sea level has risen because of climate change. You also cannot show any significant negative effects of recent climate change that have been observed or measured.
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger That’s why you’re retarded, the problem is not the absolute value, but the derivative of the trend
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger REALLY??? A temp chart that shows less than 1 degree over 100 years? You can't even mearure world average temperature that precisely.
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger WRONG. “the number of skeptical qualified scientists has been growing steadily; I would guess it is about 40% now.” nas.org/press-release/…
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Lol, article from 2011 and this source might as well be the coal mine owners themselves. Even though it has scholars in the name it’s not a scientific association at all. Like I said, you’re cattle.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_…
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger It’s not just a graph retard, it’s connected to studies. Demonstrating you don’t even know how scientific papers work. Wasted energy talking to you
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Based on what evidence? Posting a graph that shows sea level rose means nothing. Instruments don't exist that can measure sea level around the world this precisely and the are multiple reasons for sea level rise besides climate change.
English

No, I have a basis in science and I have studied this for a long time. I read your link and it is just as wrong as much of the rest of the propaganda you Climate Change zealots have been spouting for 30 years. You have no basis for your claims of climate catastrophe, none of your claims have come true for 50 years , you have forced us to spend $ Trillions to mitigate CO2 and yet CO2 continues to increase and No significant negative effects of recent climate change have been observed or measured. Prove me wrong. Show me anywhere in the world that sea level has changed. Show me how you arrive at a worldwide average temperature without estimating 99% of the measurements.
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger I mean, you’re just saying “your wrong I’m right” without providing evidence or disproving mine. You haven’t even read my link
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger I don't need to provide sources because all of yours have been bogus.
Climate Change is a hoax and everyone knows it.
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger You’re just saying bullshit, and have provided no sources for your dumbass claims
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Yes you did. I don't need to make stuff up. I have science on my side.
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Nice try. Variations in the greenhouse effect are predominantly modulated by water vapor and cloud cover. CO2’s role in the greenhouse effect is so minor it cannot be discerned.
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger You haven’t read the link, you can’t live in a 5% oxygen atmosphere, percentages matter
English

@ALesserPaul @jamesetta_w What laws? If it helps republican do that?
English

@FedMarrux @jamesetta_w Florida has laws that dictate how the judiciary functions. Our courts follow them.
English

The Florida state constitution explicitly bans this type of gerrymandering. And yet there was no question whatsoever that the court would uphold the maps to benefit Republicans. It was so foregone the media has barely covered it. What would we call this in another country?
InteractivePolls@IAPolls2022
🚨The Florida Supreme Court has upheld the state’s newly enacted congressional map for the 2026 elections. The map is projected to deliver a 24R-4D split across Florida’s 28 districts
English

@DickBonnet @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Man, stop. You’re a dumbass who doesn’t know shit. Just because plants breathe CO2 during the day doesn’t you can emit as much as you want with no consequences, especially when there’s also deforestation. You are ignorant, read a bit moretrees.eco/blogs/why-is-c…
English

@FedMarrux @CarrieLCNH @AdamKinzinger Except the emissions they are trying to stop are CO2. CO2 is plant food. The source of life on earth
English

@ALesserPaul @jamesetta_w And that’s a bullshit excuse to allow the maps for 2026. Of course they have jurisdiction, they’re the FL SC
English

@jamesetta_w Are you not able to read? They literally don't have jurisdiction right now. The lower court is still working on it. That's it. That's all they said
English

@TheKJofTikTok @paperboyarchive @atrupar Except that he was condemned and he’s a 34xfelon. And are you telling me he wasn’t refusing to give back for a year the us documents that he was hiding in maralago? Had to invent some bullshit about retroactive declassification after he was in trouble
English

@paperboyarchive @atrupar You mean like all of the cases that were brought against Trump?
English

@TronVTron @ProfNickStephan What rule in the constitution did the WI judges blatantly ignore? You’re such a hack
English

@ProfNickStephan You and I both know that this isn't comparable with the Virginia ruling. DeSantis appointed those Justices and Virginia Supreme Court Justices follow a different process.
Also you're suing Wisconsin which has similar Justices that rule for partisan reasons so enough.
English

Will the defenders of the Virginia supreme court’s redistricting decision now denounce this ruling?
Here the Florida supreme court fails to lift a finger against a blatant violation of the FL constitution, which prohibits partisan intent in redistricting.
Democracy Docket@DemocracyDocket
BREAKING: The Florida Supreme Court greenlights the GOP's newly enacted gerrymander for use in the 2026 midterms, despite the state's voter-approved ban on partisan gerrymandering. With the new map, Republicans could gain up to four more seats in Congress. democracydocket.com/news-alerts/fl…
English

