G34510

518 posts

G34510

G34510

@JS45LC

retired 19D, PH recipient, homesteader

rural Oklahoma Inscrit le Eylül 2025
278 Abonnements44 Abonnés
Regina Phalangie
Regina Phalangie@RegPhal01·
@JS45LC @paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO 😂 bro her and @baroncoleman literally listed like 20 extremely consequential things if y’all would quit acting like toddlers and just listen to what she actually says. Take the tampon out and click on her damn channel ffs it’s all right there 😂. You don’t even have to tell any1
English
1
0
0
6
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton
Bookmark this account that’s saying the Harpole lawsuit is fake (notice @RealCandaceO isn’t even saying this… you know bc she’s been served her own copy), and when it goes to court, this account should be made fun of every day. Denying reality is a common theme among these retards.
Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton tweet media
English
44
40
228
5.8K
ELIZABETH LANE
ELIZABETH LANE@imelizabethlane·
Dear @MrsErikaKirk Honestly, I didn’t feel the need to make a big post or comment about your attendance at the correspondents’ dinner. Where you go or what you do isn’t really something I focus on unless it has a direct impact on things I care about. That said, there’s a pattern that’s hard to ignore, whenever you’re called out for something people perceive as inappropriate, your response tends to be to insult your critics or position yourself as above them, while dismissing others as malicious. At some point, it may be worth recognizing a simpler reality. Many people just don’t like you. And that’s their right. People are free to form their own opinions, even when those opinions aren’t favorable. Maybe you genuinely don’t see what you’re doing wrong and maybe the criticism you receive feels completely unfair. But have you ever taken a moment to ask yourself, - What part am I playing in this? If you truly aren’t doing anything wrong, then why do the reactions you get seem so consistently at odds with what you expect? Guess what, there could be a hundred Candaces in the world criticizing you and it still wouldn’t move people unless what they’re saying actually resonates. People don’t just fall for narratives that easily especially today. You cannot force someone to see something they fundamentally don’t see or don’t believe. That kind of influence is incredibly difficult to manufacture just ask the CIA they will tell you all about it. Quick history lesson, even organizations like the CIA with billions in funding, massive infrastructure, coordinated networks and thousands of operatives have had to invest enormous effort over long periods to shape public perception in any meaningful way. And even then, results are never guaranteed. So the idea that one commentator (Or two or three) no matter how skilled, can single-handedly turn people against you just doesn’t hold up. The reaction you’re getting isn’t because of Candace, it’s because of you. Your own actions are what people respond to. That’s the uncomfortable reality, wake up to it already, I say this with no hate. At some point, you have to stop deflecting and ask yourself an honest question: why does this keep happening to me? Why do people consistently react this way? We’re not living in North Korea, people are allowed to form and express opinions freely and as long as America is America they will do just that, it is their right, just like it is yours to be unhappy about it. Dismissing all criticism as manipulation avoids the real issue here. And let’s be clear: you’re not some untouchable public figure in the mold of Jacqueline Kennedy. That comparison doesn’t land the way you think it does. Whoever told you, you could be her is not your friend, get rid of him/her. Curve your own path. Again I don’t say this to be disrespectful. This isn’t coming from a place of hate, not at all, it’s frustration. A lot of people are tired of the constant back-and-forth, the blame-shifting and the refusal to reflect. You are clearly bothered by all of this, but I don’t see you saying, ''Oh, you know what? These people don’t like me no matter what I do. It’s so unfair, but maybe I should step out of the limelight for a while and see if things change. So it doesn’t hurt the company.'' No, instead, you come out and you have no problem attending parties, dinners and opening events with Nicki Minaj, holding hands, even though your husband clearly didn’t like her. I’m guessing he didn’t like her because most of her songs start with a dick and end with a pussy, or one inside the other (should I tag the songs?). I’m sorry for the expression, but it’s not mine, it is the woman’s you chose to have on stage next to you. Then, at that same event, you’re going to mention the Lord like 50 times and have a literal former stripper speaking in front of students about how they should live. Then you go ahead and criticize the students and everyone else who judge you for this. Do you see the problem? As Leo Tolstoy wrote, ''All happy families are alike, each unhappy family is unhappy in its own way.'' And while you can understand it as - everyone grieves differently, the point he made was actually much simpler, dysfunction is usually self-generated and unique in its causes. And if Tolstoy were around today, he might put it even more bluntly: no one creates their own problems quite like you do… I assume you’ve seen my post, most people have, so you’re aware that my opinion of you is far from favorable. That said, in my capacity as a journalist, I haven’t made a habit of targeting you or spending weeks analyzing your every move, event, or speech. I only comment on matters where you have influence over issues I care deeply about. Quite frankly, I’m not extremely interested in you, especially when our country is facing serious challenges. But what’s actually concerning to me is watching you come out and double down on claims that are demonstrably false. Saying things like, ''Candace Owens is accusing me of murdering my husband,'' or that people who criticize you are evil or something similar, this is simply not accurate. She has not accused you of murder. Not publicly anyway. So why say it? Because you're reframing the criticism into something more extreme than it is. You’re acting as if anyone who questions you must believe you were involved in your husband’s death and that they must be all evil, while you must be a constant victim of this supposed malice. That’s not what’s being said here at all. Let’s be clear: The issue people have with you is different, it’s behavioral, not criminal. I’ve described you as a person exhibiting traits of psychopathy and I stand by that as my opinion. Again I’m allowed to have one, just like you are allowed to disrespect it. I’m not saying this to be cruel, I mean it seriously. Psychopathy reflect something deeply complex and very difficult to deal with in life, not something trivial so trust me when I say, I do not say this with hate at all. It ’s a simple observation. You may disagree, that is your right. And it is my right to expressing my opinion on a public figure that has made herself a target by refusing to leave the spotlight and cameras even when she gets a negative feedback constantly. Constantly! And to be precise, if you go back to what @RealCandaceO actually said, her claim was that she intends to prove that something is off about you. She did not say she intends to prove you killed your husband. Those are two completely different arguments and conflating them only distorts what’s actually being discussed. It also should be noted that Charlie Kirk’s investigation is ongoing for Candace and for most of us, and the “Charlie’s Bride” series Candace produced is separate from that ongoing investigation. That is why it is placed separately as an 8-episode series on her YouTube. It is a standalone thing. I kindly invite you to check it out. So to put it plainly, someone could lose a spouse in a completely unrelated event, like a car accident and still face criticism if their behavior afterward appears detached, performative, or inconsistent with what most people understand as grief. Being criticized for how you act is not the same as being accused of murder. And if Charlie had died in a car accident and you behaved the way you are behaving now, the reaction would be the same (I can speak for myself her). So no, this is not about Charlie or Candace, it’s about you. People are questioning your behavior and what it suggests about your character. That’s the real issue, not murder. You can keep saying that everyone grieves differently, but apparently this nation and others as well has never seen anyone grieve the way you do that is why they keep talking about it. So maybe you should take a step back and reflect. When millions of people (And they are in millions, this is why it got to the point where it bothers you and your organization) are telling you something feels off, you don’t lash out. You take time to ask yourself why people perceive you that way, especially if you believe that perception is absolutely incorrect. That’s the mature response. Rolling your eyes at people and calling them names isn’t the answer, especially if you want a public career or hope to lead others. And if you don’t want that scrutiny, then walk away. The spotlight is not for everybody. Or take an example from your husband, who was a warrior, he handled it perfectly. He faced being hated all the time and he still engaged them and accepted them he didn’t tell them to shut up. If he thought people who criticized him were evil, he wouldn’t be sitting in front of them trying to understand their point and help them. You have the money, you’re taken care of thanks to Charlie. If the spotlight is a burden, step aside and let someone else take on the role, someone the public will accept. If you do that, you’ll likely be forgotten in six months and you won’t have to deal with criticism anymore. You will be able to finally live privately, attend events all day long and no one will care. But when you say that 'evil people won’t stop you from having it all or what your husband built for you or whatever idea is driving your actions and you say you’ll continue regardless of what people think, great, good for you - but then you should expect people to do exactly that: THINK. And their opinions may not align with what you want. That’s life. Get over it. You claimed you attended the dinner not to mingle with influential people or enjoy the spotlight, but to meet some journalists who have written negatively about you, to put faces to names. Well, let’s put a face to the name. I’m ready to sit down with you any day, at your convenience, even in your own studio if you prefer. You’re not the only one who values being direct. So here I am, willing to have a genuine conversation. The offer stands. No hate, no disrespect. Just a difference of opinion. Let’s see if what you say is true. And if you can’t handle an interview with someone who disagrees with you and doesn’t like you,then that’s fine. I totally understand that. Not everyone can do what Charlie did - engaging directly with critics instead of avoiding them. In that case, you can always put a face to a name in Utah court. Come see me in court, where your husband’s supposed killer is on trial, I'm always there. I suggest you bring a pre-prepared lunch, it can be an absolutely grueling ordeal. Sometimes it goes on for 6+ hours with only 15-minute breaks, with no time to go out and eat. But we sit through it because it’s important. It’s Charlie Kirk! We are interested in who killed Charlie Kirk and whether we have the right guy and if we do, we want to see that the process goes exactly how it should. So yes, you can find me there. I haven’t seen you even once, not once attending the hearing. Maybe one day you can show up. I bet it will help with the criticism part of things :)). You said you like directness, so do I. So here you go. I’ll leave my invitation open for you to sit down with me.
English
941
961
5.7K
168.1K
G34510
G34510@JS45LC·
I am amazed at the pushback I get when telling someone to read a book. It’s a foreign concept and people act as if I’m telling them to do drugs or get a tattoo. This is Penelope. She’s a 12 week old Katahdin X Barbados Black Belly ewe. She and her six sisters are the newest farm babies.
G34510 tweet media
English
0
0
0
11
G34510
G34510@JS45LC·
I didn’t say that, did I? I said read a book, implying that you would gain knowledge on topics you are uninformed about. It would help expand your knowledge base. I’m amazed at the push back I get for telling people to read a book. It’s like I’m asking someone to do drugs or get a tattoo.
English
0
0
0
17
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
When Dave Chappelle did a skit mocking me during BLM, I responded that I was flattered that he even knew my name. When South Park did an episode mocking Charlie Kirk, he played it on repeat on his show. Were Charlie alive and the subject of the Druski skit, he would have laughed. Whether regarding Jimmy Kimmel, South Park, Chappelle or otherwise— any person attempting to criminalize jokes is the enemy of free speech. Not one inch.
English
1.6K
5.1K
58.8K
2.1M
G34510
G34510@JS45LC·
Dangerously ignorant? Because of a X post. Erica, I’m retired from the army, have a masters degree, and farm for a living. We homeschool and go to church weekly. We have weekly at home Bible study. I am a strong parent and lead my family - and I don’t need advice from you on how to do that. My head is not in some online algorithm. My comments are about the constitution and how amendments are passed. I asked a question and told someone to read a book.
English
0
0
0
7
EricaComeWhatMay
EricaComeWhatMay@ericahornick1·
@JS45LC @Matt_Keefer @RealCandaceO Then you're downright DANGEROUSLY ignorant. Its dangerous for your children for you to be uninformed right now. Get your family's heads in the bible and get your head out of your current algorithm. Be a strong parent. Your kids do not deserve the HELL that IS coming.
English
1
0
0
8
James Lindsay, anti-Communist
James Lindsay, anti-Communist@ConceptualJames·
If you are against Erika Kirk now, or even if you're "deeply skeptical" of her, or if you want her to "just step down" or leave public life for whatever reason, you are undeniably the victim of one of the most malicious Leftist psyops ever deployed on us. There's no denying it.
English
534
638
5.4K
85K
G34510
G34510@JS45LC·
@SuperBenJman @21milkman @ConceptualJames Candace is jealous that a pretty white blonde haired blue eyed (maybe) woman is CEO and not her. She’s an expert manipulator and great at spotting an opportunity to make a dollar. She’s also off her rocker and has cluster B personality traits.
English
1
0
1
17
Down's Semite
Down's Semite@SuperBenJman·
@21milkman @ConceptualJames Candace was on Erikas side at first until she lied to her face. She is not the reason people are suspicious and frankly creeped out by Erikas bizarre behavior. Erika has brought this whole thing on herself.
English
2
0
9
72
Mollie Malon
Mollie Malon@MollieMalon319·
@ConceptualJames If anything is a psyop its putting her in the CEO position. She comes across as not genuine whether deserved or not. Charlie was genuine and drew people in, this whole controversy proves she cannot do that. People go by gut instinct, forcing people to like someone is never works.
English
1
0
4
51
EricaComeWhatMay
EricaComeWhatMay@ericahornick1·
@JS45LC @Matt_Keefer @RealCandaceO Just skip the digital currency line and go to the front to collect your mark of the beast. Wake. Up. Your mindset is KILLING this country for my generation and my children's.
English
1
0
0
54
CommieKiller5000
CommieKiller5000@CountDiaz·
@JS45LC @Matt_Keefer @RealCandaceO As you are extremely low IQ I'll try to help: Constitutional Amendments need to past 3/4 of the states and some high percentage of congress from memory. Which is exactly what a couple of false flags, run by our "greatest alley" with hooked noses, will try to accomplish.
English
1
0
0
48
G34510
G34510@JS45LC·
@b_cmaggie @Matt_Keefer @RealCandaceO We have 27 amendments. Thousands proposed over the centuries our nation has existed. It’s not as simple as coercing congress members to vote.
English
1
0
3
144
CmaggieB
CmaggieB@b_cmaggie·
@JS45LC @Matt_Keefer @RealCandaceO Maybe you missed the just passed bill that destroys our privacy- 4th amendment. Nowadays they just have to coerce Congress folk to get them to vote a certain way.
English
1
0
4
163
G34510
G34510@JS45LC·
@Com4Pro @Matt_Keefer @RealCandaceO Constitutional amendments can’t be passed via executive order, and can be rescinded by future administrations. Not the same process.
English
0
0
5
165
Matt Keefer
Matt Keefer@Matt_Keefer·
We are moments away from a new constitutionalal amendment. It will strip free speech away and they will say its bc the 1st amendment didn't account for social media. It is obvious what "they" are doing. They are ramping up the crazy conspiracy podcasters and blaming everything on them. The stage is set. We just need 1 or 2 BIG false flags so they can feel comfortable enough implementing the new amendment to the constitution in the name of peace and safety.
English
206
528
3.1K
786.3K
Dee
Dee@DeedKuk·
@JS45LC @littlehouseblu @MarkJHerman Eww Zionist alert! I’d💯 happily accept living my life as Retard than billionaire Zionist!All Zionists are responsible massacring & slaughtering hundreds-thousands of babies & other human beings!Zionism is Literally mass murderers death cult! I’ll forever wait for its extinction!
English
1
0
0
15
Mark Herman
Mark Herman@MarkJHerman·
Erica Kirk breaks down in tears while being escorted out after shots were fired at the White House dinner. But one moment in the clip stood out to me.
English
343
200
2.6K
62.8K