Paramount Tactical - Gary Melton

Undeniable proof that @RealCandaceO lied. She didn’t just get it wrong — she knowingly lied to her audience, treating them like idiots. This is also clear evidence of reckless disregard for the truth and actual malice in her defamation of Brian Harpole and Erika Kirk. I break down exactly why she’s going to lose the Harpole defamation case. Watch below 👇 *Uploaded the directly to X bc I know some don't like switching platforms to view videos. This one's important for people to see. Please share! @dhillonlaw

Candace Owens, Tucker Carlson & The War Against Trump: Natalie Beisner & Outspoken Samantha x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

Starting Now! Let's go!

Manipulation Tactics of Candace Owens - A Series Bandwagon/Consensus Fallacy "Everyone Knows that Tyler Robinson didn't do it" Dismissal by Incredulity "It's a waste of time to even keep explaining" Any reasonable position is supported by facts and evidence. When you pretend that is the unreasonable position you're either intentionally gaslighting or suffering from delusion. Her grift depends on you believing, in spite of all the evidence, that Tyler Robinson wasn't the shooter.

It’s time to expose the Charlie Kirk conspiracy machine that makes $ by lying about his murder. I’ve had enough and Charlie deserves better. Unlike them, any monetization from this will go to his kids (if his team can arrange) or a cause that Charlie loved. Here’s the truth ⬇️

@SBaysden @RealCandaceO @GrahamAllen Did you miss the part about a "military operation". Accusing countless men and women in the military of murdering Charlie Kirk with... ZERO EVIDENCE. 😂

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO @GrahamAllen It was not about military veterans, it was about you. The fact that you choose to frame it in that way is interesting.

@RealCandaceO is now accusing both me and @GrahamAllen of being part of a DOD/DOW conspiracy to cover up the assassination of Charlie Kirk. Her contempt for military veterans is unmistakable. Most of us serve with integrity and stand up for what is right without needing to be paid. You are weaponizing your massive platform to smear and oppress Erika Kirk along with many other innocent people. De Oppresso Liber - you might want to look that up. This is starting to sound a lot like the Brian Harpole lawsuit.

SuperGrok analysis: No, Candace Owens' "investigation" into the Charlie Kirk assassination should not be taken seriously as rigorous journalism or fact-finding. It has consistently prioritized narrative-driven speculation over evidence, and by mid-2026 court proceedings, it has been repeatedly contradicted by forensic, video, and testimonial evidence. Key Issues with Credibility: Here's a breakdown based on public records, court filings, and her own statements: Core Claims vs. Evidence — Owens has repeatedly claimed Tyler Robinson was a "patsy," not even on campus, didn't match the height/build in footage, and that the shooting involved broader conspiracies (e.g., Israel, Erika Kirk, TPUSA insiders, exploding microphone, multiple decoys). Prosecutors have presented:DNA on the rifle and casings (overwhelming statistical matches). Surveillance video placing him at the scene (casing the area, on the roof). Text messages and confessions to his roommate/parents. Premeditation evidence (engraved bullets). Ballistics and autopsy confirming a gunshot wound. These have held up in preliminary hearings. Her height/footage objections and "never on campus" claims were directly challenged by video and on-site analysis. Factual Errors and Shifting Narratives — She has mixed up texts vs. Discord messages, admitted not reading key documents (like the indictment), and pivoted when challenged (e.g., on CNN). Early "Spiderman roof climb" skepticism was undermined by evidence of accessible stairs and video. Later episodes reframed to "blurry pixels" or untested items while downplaying stronger evidence. Ethics and Honesty —Not reasonable: Skepticism of official narratives can be healthy, but persisting with extraordinary claims (multiple shooters, foreign plots, widow involvement) without producing verifiable evidence — while court evidence mounts against them — crosses into motivated reasoning. She offers "sources" and "leaks" that rarely materialize publicly. Not fully honest: She has faced defamation lawsuits (e.g., from Kirk's former security chief) for specific accusations she continued after contradictory evidence (flight records, etc.). Critics across the spectrum, including former allies, describe it as grift-driven content that harms the victim's family and spreads division.nytimes.comAudience impact: Her large platform amplifies unproven theories to millions, often framing dissent as "Zionist" or establishment cover-ups. This pattern (seen in other topics too) prioritizes engagement over correction.

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO What has Candace lied about and what definitive accusations has she made and to whom?

Actually Candace Owens should face trial for lying and defrauding her supporters out of tens of millions of dollars while accusing innocent people of horrific crimes with zero evidence. @RealCandaceO has knowingly deceived millions of Americans for profit. Her grift is no different from Enron or any other major scam in our nation’s history. She has enriched herself through fraud. Period.

@Maga091123 @RealCandaceO Jokes on you loser. I had a good friend who worked for Enron when it all went down. LMAO

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO Lmfao gary was today years old when chatgpt/grok taught him about Enron.

@SYDNEY663511 @RealCandaceO @grok should Candace Owens' investigation be taken seriously? Has she acted honestly, reasonably, or ethically? Are her accusations putting real people at risk?

@xismadtoxic @RealCandaceO List my lies then Bot.

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO Gary. We all see you’re lying to everyone for money. It’s been proven. The pay out happened right when you changed your mind from what Candace believes. You are irrelevant and I pray for you

Did I "threaten" @RealCandaceO ? - No Is Candace Owens inciting violence toward Erika Kirk and TPUSA staff and associates? - Yes

@DrexelGlen19289 @sophaller Sophie is a badass. Not into basketball but that gal is a true American.

@sophaller @paramounttactcl Gary, she's one of the few athletes in this day and time that stands up for veterans

we LOVE our veterans!

@DoDguys Now do Candace regarding Erika.

Gary only has Candace with out her Gary has no views. She should stocking charges on you .

@grok has anything I said about Candace Owens a threat of violence? Is it reasonable to assume the false accusations that Candace has launched at Erika regarding being involved in Charlie Kirk's death and being involved in child sex trafficking/Epstein, also with no evidence would incite people to violence against Erika and other TPUSA members and putting them in danger?

@paramounttactcl @ShawnRyanShow @RealCandaceO PROJECTION She didn't have a melt down. Seems you did. You got destroyed in the comments after your dangerous post calling for violence. The fed sloppers are losing the narrative, and you personal are losing self control. Anything happens to EK or CO, you fed sloppers helped

Given her unhinged meltdown last night and her lies on the @ShawnRyanShow, it is clear that @RealCandaceO is desperate to convince her audience that Brian Harpole is suing her because she called him incompetent. She is frantic to hide the real reason for the lawsuit: her accusation that he conspired to kill Charlie Kirk. She now realizes Mitch Snow completely fooled her. But her narcissism will not let her admit it. She also can’t admit to her audience that she sold them a complete fabrication. Worst of all, she can’t admit that @paramounttactcl, the obscure YouTuber, was right all along. Facts: Candace isn’t being sued because she’s highlighting the failures of Charlie’s security team. She’s being sued because she used Mitch Snow’s lies to accuse Harpole of conspiring to assassinate Charlie Kirk during a meeting at Ft Huachuca, a meeting that never happened and a place Harpole has never been.

@RealSweetNSassy @ShawnRyanShow @RealCandaceO *Your And no one is my employer. But again, where did I threaten her?

@paramounttactcl @ShawnRyanShow @RealCandaceO Yes, you threatened her and it's not OK. It shows weekness on your part. You're employers are losing this battle and you're struggling to put out their b******* and it tells, i'm still praying for you though there's still hope for a sliver of Common Sense from you

@RealSweetNSassy @ShawnRyanShow @RealCandaceO Where did I threaten her?

@Petty_Pundit @TimmyG_60610 I've known for months.

@TimmyG_60610 @paramounttactcl fyi. Mel crazylady knows kent.

Joe Kent is her ex-husband's best friend??? This chick is suss AF !!!

@beirbuatal32 @RealCandaceO Aww muffin... Candace simps are so cute.

@paramounttactcl @RealCandaceO Stfu goy boy. You are such a bitch for Israel. Just fucking move there. American traitor should be you profile. Cuck

Mitch Snow is an insane, woman abusing con artist and pathological liar that @RealCandaceO used to accuse Brian Harpole and Erika Kirk of conspiracy to assassinate Charlie Kirk. Even Candace's biggest supporters are waking up! Maybe it's time for you to do the same.

@Lynnpell33 @RyanCMullally @Iwendtster @JennTheProducer Let's go.

@RyanCMullally @Iwendtster He won't. He's a coward. I'd love for @JennTheProducer to book this 🤡 on the @paramounttactcl debate. Gary would bury him but at least he'd be gentlemanly about it and not a jerk. Ian, plz step up....

Is Candace Owens on trial? I must have completely missed that…. But the way these people are talking about her 24/7 like it’s their job is what makes me wonder WHO is actually on trial here? Candace or Tyler?