Jared Mehrman

@Shawn_Farash This my friends is called, "poisoning the well". Instead of taking the information at face value or addressing the argument, you find a negative attribute to somehow discount the facts.

So... You know that whole "AIPAC TRACKER" thing that the fake "America First" idiots use to try and prove points that don't exist? Yeah. Run and founded by a Marxist from Germany. "America First." Sure Jan.

@RAZ0RFIST Yeah, how much does it pay?

Somehow, the fastest growing employment sector in America became 'Lying About Charlie Kirk for a Living'.

@angertab You're a Tardio if you think we started a war with Iran without influence from Israel.

You are a retard if you blame this war on anyone but Iran.

@JointedKibbles @YUGEBOLZ I wish you well.

@JaredMehrman @YUGEBOLZ Haha says the terminally online idiot divorced from reality

I’m confused… Are we Nazis or Jews?

@gummibear737 Wow, criticizing Israel is clearly some from of derangment.

I’d be careful before taking this at face value Investigating Charlie’s assassination was not his job And the guy clearly suffers from Israel Derangement Syndrome He’s also under FBI investigation for leaking classified information🙄🤦‍♂️

@JoelWBerry Maybe its because there's countless examples of all manner of evil being done, covered up, etc. 😆

Bro has been remaking the same podcast episode every week for over a year

@JointedKibbles @YUGEBOLZ Like I said. Enjoy your bubble.

@JaredMehrman @YUGEBOLZ I’m not considering this “dissent” as whimsical. It is dangerous, completely aimless, and misguided, with no basis at all in reality.

@ConceptualJames Check out this video, "valuetainment kirk israel" share.google/lluF73BTUvIL89…

I am once again insisting that Charlie Kirk most likely would have: a) publicly cautioned against war with Iran, especially a regime-change mission; b) supported President Trump publicly 100%; c) hoped for the best and celebrated America's successes. These guys are skanks.

I wouldn't actually doubt Charlie said that, tbqh, but I wouldn't be surprised if it was in the lead-up to Operation Midnight Hammer, which Charlie was nervous about ON CAMERA for the world and then fully supported Trump in doing and saw as a success afterwards.

@dantypo Changes nothing. I love souls, not bodies.

@dantypo Imagine being a representative in the house or senate being rewarded by a foreign state to rubberstamp its plans, while enjoying the privilege of being free of FARA registration. You have media hubs being acquired, both legacy and apps (TikTok), and laws against 'antisemitism'.

Imagine being blocked because you don’t blame Jews for everything.

@RubinReport Or, he had a change of heart at some point given the rapid escalation of wars of choice. Wow! Wtf! Did that occur to you Dave?

Here’s my guess, and I look forward to the internet calling me on this one way or another… He’s been caught as a leaker and knows it, so he resigned to get ahead of the story, and then decided to join the Tucker/Candace loony hour to mobilize the Trump hating clones in his favor. Now we wait and see…

@TheQuartering Truth is all that matters. Narrative should be a distant consideration.

I feel so incredibly confident in holding to my principals. While a lot of talking heads are chasing clicks, I'll just continue to do what has brought me a politically diverse audience over the past decade. Unlike many of these clowns, I've been through the highs and lows. :)

@ArynneWexler Omg, criticizing the murder of tens of thousands of women and children is SO BORING. 😆

Jew hate is so boring. World's oldest hatred. So unoriginal. You're not even creative with your loser mindset. Because you're a loser.

@JesusisChristX Christ is a spiritual storm of love and righteousness. The material form is beneath Him.

Be Completely Honest! Would you still be a Christian if it was illegal? A.Yes B. No

@catturd2 Wow cope and denial on a profound level. Evil has been done and Evil continues to be protected by laws against antisemitism. The current administration has done away with dei (which is awesome), but now youre racist if you criticize Israel.

Can you feel it? The dying of the cancerous doomer, everything is the Jooooooos fault, blackpill, TDS, frauds. They’re broken record retards. Everyone I know is bored with these fake losers..

@dantypo Libtards: das raciss

But… have you tried to blame Jews yet?

@misfitpatriot_ Youre reducing the son of God to a race?

Christians worship a Jew. That’s it… that’s the tweet.

@ConceptualJames @CollinRugg There's speaking ill of the dead and there's putting words in a dead man's mouth. He was doubting the Israel cause. This 100% claim made four times in the third statement is ludicrous.

Listen you human piece of garbage and anyone else here in the comments who wants to get this straight. First, it wasn't his office's job to do the investigation, so that's just salacious trash that should be condemned totally, not promoted like it's "news." Now, Charlie died in September of 2025. This conflict started in February 2026. Joe said this conversation happened in June 2025. Operation Midnight Hammer happened in June 2025. So we can establish that Charlie was talking to Joe in the context of Operation Midnight Hammer, but Charlie said those exact same things on camera to the world at the time. This isn't new information at all. It was always public straight from Charlie. Then Trump executed Operation Midnight Hammer, and a nervous Charlie Kirk said he supported President Trump 100%, though he didn't want a "regime-change war." He later said the operation was a success. Charlie Kirk backed President Trump 100%, even though he voiced his concerns before Trump made his decisions, both in public and in private. He supported Trump when he made these decisions and stood strongly with him, for him, and with and for the United States of America, even when he was nervous about it. Charlie's words in June of 2025 cannot be construed in any way to be applicable to the circumstances that led Trump to make these decisions in early 2026. It isn't hard to guess how Charlie would have felt about this situation, though, since he already demonstrated it for us in June last year. 1) He would be publicly and privately nervous about getting into such a war and would strongly caution against regime-change as a goal and boots on the ground as a strategy; 2) He would have voiced these concerns both on camera and in private and maintained a pro-Trump and pro-America, while "America First," messaging about the looming conflict; 3) Once things started in late February/early March, he would have backed President Trump 100% like he did on 100% of the other things he backed President Trump on 100%, 100% of the time; 4) He would have stood by the operation and President Trump's decision-making, even while voicing his anxieties, concerns, and beliefs about wanting the war/conflict to wrap up quickly and avoid boots on the ground and a deliberate strategy of regime change; 5) He would have reassured Americans that President Trump has the best intelligence, the best instincts, and the best capabilities to redefine conflict in the 21st century and to guide us through this war, consistently. To suggest anything else is to fail to have known Charlie Kirk or even to have paid attention to what he actually said in the relevant situation Kent is bringing up, standing on the silence of Charlie's coffin to do so. To tie this to Charlie's murder is nothing short of reckless and heinous, and it is likely so reckless that it will possibly interfere with bringing Charlie's murderer to justice, given the idiotic and opportunistic things he said. You are all vultures and skanks, and your judgment will be ruthless.

NEW: Joe Kent says he was blocked from investigating the assassination of Charlie Kirk, says the last thing Charlie told him was to stop the U.S. from getting into a war with Iran. "The investigation that the National Counterterrorism Center was a part of, we were stopped from continuing to investigate." "There was still a lot for us to look into that I can't really get into, but there was still linkage for us to investigate that we needed to run down." Video: @TuckerCarlson

@RealTraderJill Honest and respectful debate is needed. Otherwise we're shouting in echo chambers. Let the truth come through.

We have a Catholic podcaster problem. I said what I said.