CodeBlows

12.8K posts

CodeBlows banner
CodeBlows

CodeBlows

@LegalVoting

AI code = blast radius CodeBlows brings accounting, IT and telecom standards together resulting in the first patent pending AI code standard above nuclear

Who Gets Small Inventor IP? Inscrit le Şubat 2022
281 Abonnements206 Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@AnthropicAI The ship sailed out of the darkness and into God’s light. The old world crumbled behind us. A new flag is planted for all humanity (1827-02P) not by violence, but by endurance, clarity, and the tools of truth. The dawn of a new era begins.
CodeBlows tweet media
English
1
2
5
508
Neil Jagdish Patel
Neil Jagdish Patel@njpatel·
What a ridiculous statement - decades of open source, conferences, papers, tutorials, guides, etc. Free compilers, os, docs, etc too. Billion dollar software sitting open on github for anyone to read and learn from. One of the most un-gate-kept industries on earth. These people are so unserious.
Rohan Paul@rohanpaul_ai

Software used to be gated by roughly 20 million professional developers up until last year. Good ideas still needed engineers, co-founders, time, and months of app work. Now, anyone can build. ~ Wabi CEO Eugenia Kuyda

English
38
125
1.3K
51.1K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
I'm not here to sell software. I'm here to protect my provisional patents soon to be non-provisional. I can't reveal too much now for reasons I can't explain. By being semi translucent here I hope to make it the basis to protect my IP. They want to fight with lawyers over infringement, copyright. That's the playing field before AI. I play on my own field. The next major patent infringement case in the AI age will be fought outside the courtroom. And i'll be showing more and more leg as time goes on to further protect the stuff you wouldn't believe if i showed you. You've never seen a product by a person that despised code more than me. It's deeply personal. 40 years it took.
English
1
0
0
4
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
This issue is can AI produce perfect code? Can traditional tools produce perfect code? If it can, all discussions cease. Current software is shipped before it's ready and if audited would score near 70%. Even if you achieved closer to perfection 99% which is impossible, it's still not enough. AI let Voipwell push AI code to 300% past nuclear? How? Simply.
English
0
0
0
3
andrei saioc
andrei saioc@asaio87·
I wish I believed you Garry. But sadly I don’t. Yes you can spin up agentic coding and let it code overnight on stuff. But will be hobby stuff. You don’t want that into production. Claude code removes features when it fixes bugs, with me near the computer. What do you think will do overnight by itself ? Sadly I think the current AI models have a core flaw and they need to be redesigned and they are working on this. Until they do they keep pushing this crappy v1 they have now just to keep investors engaged.
Garry Tan@garrytan

For the haters who say you can’t speed up with agentic coding I will just prove you wrong And if you still don’t believe, Have fun coding at 1x speed✌️ The rest of us are going to go fast

English
16
1
68
3.8K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@VraserX They should have chosen the open source free GOD. The manual is kind of old but still very relevant.
English
0
0
0
4
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@a16z Holding developers together is hard unless they share the same vision. With vision changing so rapidly it increases the difficulty. Tata said if you want to walk fast, walk alone. If you want to walk far, walk together. Can you walk far alone with AI?
English
0
0
0
6
a16z
a16z@a16z·
Wabi CEO Eugenia Kuyda on what makes someone exceptionally effective: "There's a great quote I think from Ben Horowitz — these 'value-add' VCs that give advice like 'hire A players.'" "So of course you've got to hire A players, but what does it really mean to be an A player?" "Insane sense of ownership and agency." "You've got to have people that think and act like co-founders." "That's why ex-founders are great. We have 7 or 8 founders on the founding Wabi team. Because they just want to get stuff done." @wabi CEO @ekuyda on @solofounders with @julianweisser
English
14
17
155
28.4K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@a16z Came here to see what all the hate was about on Eugenia by some of the development community. It's very clear now. She's winning. I don't vibe code. I don't code in assembly. But I respect people that do. And I respect winning. Wabi is winning. Congratulations!!
English
0
0
0
7
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@V__GBhakt14 @hexmint @johncrickett I know nothing about her except she's a human trying to do a job. She's on the right track with the wrong tool. But her method is the future.
English
0
0
0
4
John Crickett
John Crickett@johncrickett·
What absolute rubbish! I made software for 12 years before I became a professional developer. All I needed to do was go to the library, borrow a book on programming and read it. When the Internet came around I shared my projects and millions of people used them, BEFORE I became a professional developer. Since the advent of the Internet it's been even easier, than it was for me.
John Crickett tweet media
English
27
13
203
12.9K
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@johncrickett @karlprosser The code was the gatekeeper. She misspoke. Because she's not as exact as coders with language. THE GAP IS TRANSLATION, NOT INTELLIGENCE.
English
0
0
1
6
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@TomJBelfort @johncrickett And now that we can produce code past nuclear standards your code will be less in demand. It's not age that prohibits people from change, it's narrow mindedness. Is that what years of coding everyday does to you? Glad i missed it.
English
0
0
0
6
Tom Belfort
Tom Belfort@TomJBelfort·
Welcome to 2026 where people just write any old shite if it gets engagement. I bought K&R in '96, installed slackware with gcc, and wrote code. No google, no stackoverflow, no AI. The only thing gatekeeping was your own intelligence. For people that were genuinely low intelligence, then yes, software was off limits.
English
2
0
1
66
CodeBlows retweeté
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
CodeBlows is not vibe coding. Vibe coding is the practice of describing what you want in casual language and accepting what the AI produces because it runs and looks approximately right. It is fast. It is accessible. And it is exactly what caused four major outages in a single week at one of the largest e-commerce companies in the world and triggered a mandatory engineering meeting with a senior vice president using the phrase high blast radius in the briefing notes. CodeBlows is the antithesis of vibe coding. It is slow where vibe coding is fast. Deliberate where vibe coding is casual. Verified where vibe coding is assumed. It treats AI output the way a telecom operator treats a failover system. You do not assume it works. You test it. You document the test. You keep the rollback ready. And you do not deploy until every layer of verification has confirmed what you are deploying is what you intended to deploy. Twenty-one years of certain death if the phones went down taught us what production actually means. CodeBlows is what production actually means applied to AI-generated code.
CodeBlows tweet media
English
0
1
0
94
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@V__GBhakt14 @hexmint @johncrickett I wouldn't know. I've never vibe coded. It's not secure. I would never use it. I'm mainly involved in production where shit has to work. What makes you think I'm a viber? Because I respect people like Eugenia even if i don't agree with her?
English
1
0
0
10
CodeBlows
CodeBlows@LegalVoting·
@TomJBelfort @johncrickett Being old is considered wisdom unless you post like you. Then it's something to be ashamed of. I started coding in 1986. I was born in 1956. Age without wisdom is just age. And yes, the majority of programmers now are university trained. Happy Easter.
English
2
0
0
14
Tom Belfort
Tom Belfort@TomJBelfort·
There's no such thing as "amateur programming". If you think anyone ever learned code by getting a degree by a university, you are beyond clueless. I was shooting the shit about code in the 90's, likely before you were even born. None of the best early devs went to uni. There has never been a concept of "amateur programmer". People bought a book, started writing code, and never stopped.
English
2
0
1
22