Nicky Rew
2.7K posts

Nicky Rew
@NeuralMed
trying to balance iconoclasticism, relationality and spelling..

QatarEnergy Statement on Missile Attacks on Ras Laffan Industrial City QatarEnergy confirms that Ras Laffan Industrial City this evening has been the subject of missile attacks. Emergency response teams were deployed immediately to contain the resulting fires, as extensive damage has been caused. All personnel have been accounted for and no casualties have been reported at this time. QatarEnergy will continue to communicate the latest available information. #Qatar


Dr. Russell Barkley shatters parenting myths: After age 21, home parenting has ZERO influence on core traits like personality or behavior—twin studies prove it. Peak impact? Before 7. Drops to ~6% by teens (15+). Genetics rules first, then peers/schools/neighborhoods take over. In 2026's "gentle parenting" era (trending amid debates on over-involvement vs. heritability), this frees you: Nail early years with stability/exposure, then trust the blueprint. Not guilt—empowerment. Grok can even help analyze family traits for smarter guidance. 59-sec clip on the data 👇 Parents/kids: Relief or rethink? What's your take on genetics vs. nurture wars?






Mass formation is definitely going on, and the blank looks on the faces of so many leftists are part of that process -- their reactive behavior provides the thrust block against which the new dynamic is taking shape. Kirk's murder has become a rallying point not merely for the right, but for everyone on the center and center-left who was desperately sick of the antics and abuses of the extreme left but hadn't yet done anything about that. This is the kind of thing that leads to sudden shifts in the political and cultural zeitgeist -- and sometimes, to witch hunts and crusades.


TIM DILLON: “Is Iran the reason that no one can afford a house? Is Iran the reason that there's fentanyl everywhere? … When your insurance won't cover a knee operation … is your main concern Iran? This is the craziest sh*t I've ever heard.”

This is one of the most thought-provoking critiques I've heard on the current thinking around climate change and CO2. This is Olivier Hamant, Research Director at France's National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE). Hamant explains that it's actually a counterproductive trap to laser focus on CO2 reduction, and even on climate, as we create "solutions" that actually "worsen the penury of resources, worsen global pollution and worsen the collapse of biodiversity." It's a bit like the story we often hear about the danger of AI, where an AI tasked with "eliminating cancer" decides the most efficient solution is to eliminate all humans. We've given our economic and political systems the narrow goal of "reducing atmospheric CO2," and these systems actually end up destroying the living world that actually regulates our climate. Hamant's alternative is elegantly simple: start with life, with biodiversity, which he says is "the most systemic lever" with positive impacts on climate, pollution and resource shortage. I've often been struck with the collapse of biodiversity and the lack of public attention on the topic. For instance a recent survey in the UK found that, in just the last 3 years alone, the insect population in the UK had collapsed by an astounding 63% (x.com/RnaudBertrand/…). Yet if you look at it, the UK is actually doing an extremely good job in terms of CO2 emissions, they've more than halved them since the 1970s (ourworldindata.org/co2/country/un…). So what gives? What's the point of reducing CO2 emissions if they're simultaneously literally destroying the very foundation of life in the country - the insects, plants, and ecosystems that sustain everything? It sounds like madness. Hamant is right that at the end of the day life is the litmus test, it all starts and ends with it. Maybe we need to start asking ourselves if we're not treating a symptom and killing the patient.














