One Squirrel Army

2.7K posts

One Squirrel Army banner
One Squirrel Army

One Squirrel Army

@OneSquirrelArmy

If they came for Peanut, they’ll come for you. Never Forget.

Holt county, Nebraska Inscrit le Mayıs 2024
764 Abonnements222 Abonnés
Tweet épinglé
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
If your view of the world relies on blaming the Joos, AIPAC, Israel or any other buzzword, flavor of the day term, move along. You’re not going to find agreement with me.
English
0
1
2
90
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
Looking at you Nebraska Unicameral
One Squirrel Army tweet media
English
3
1
34
1.6K
Mountainman birk
Mountainman birk@BirkMountainman·
@OneSquirrelArmy A few years back the people of nebraska voted with i think 70% ish in favor of medical marijauna. Still old people cant get it. We do not have a govt for the people!! We have fatcats taking bribes.
English
1
0
0
36
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
If one could magically snap their fingers and eliminate the desire for pornography worldwide, sex trafficking would be next to eliminated. Porn is not a victimless crime. It’s an insidious cancer that ALWAYS leads to ruin, disaster, pain and suffering. Always.
English
0
0
1
88
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
@Rach4Patriarchy Interesting. I thought it was the correct word to use. I’m not MAGA and I’m not “republican” though that’s who I vote for. I’m certainly not libertarian. I thought conservative was the right label. You say no. What word should I use?
English
0
0
0
22
Rachel Wilson
Rachel Wilson@Rach4Patriarchy·
The Overton window has shifted so much in the last 25 years that most classical liberals think they are conservatives. It’s one of a few reasons I don’t use the term conservative to describe myself. It doesn’t tell anybody anything about what you believe. People will fully support a liberal agenda and just because they are not extreme woke left, they will label themselves conservative. Happens all the time.
English
87
64
1K
15.5K
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
@SlumRNA_Dog I personally know of a woman experiencing this. First hand knowledge. She thought she was getting better, then ate some of the cleanest locally sourced lamb for Easter and her gut took her to town.
English
1
0
2
1.2K
Slumdog_Chillionaire
Slumdog_Chillionaire@SlumRNA_Dog·
The lone star tick alpha gal syndrome thing is legitimately the only thing that keeps me up at night. Like I can probably deal with anything else bad happening but a bug bite turning me into a vegan faggot is an absolute nightmare scenario.
LUKEY ✣@VERYKOOLLUKEY

Apparently there is a new tick disease going around that make people completely allergic to any mammalian product (meat, dairy.. ect) I spoke to a local ecologist about it and he said that the number of tick species in our area have gone from 3 to 9 within the past 5 years

English
153
670
11.4K
375.3K
Shelby
Shelby@inchcreekjr·
The other day a couple guys picking up bulls with me were bugging me for having such a clean cattle trailer. I just can't stand leaving it all dirty it's so shiny when you clean it. What about you? Clean it once a year? Clean it never?
Shelby tweet media
English
16
1
48
3.2K
Jacob Reinecker
Jacob Reinecker@jsreinecker·
Headed to church Saw some antelope Hattie: Dad is that a deer? Me: Antelope Hattie: …..so when you kill it, it turns into the fruit? Me: That’s cantaloupe Hattie: Oh. Well, when you kill a cow it turns into meat
Jacob Reinecker tweet media
English
20
19
374
10.1K
Gator Gar
Gator Gar@gatorgar·
DOUBLE rock post. What do you think? Big rock or little rock? 🤔
Gator Gar tweet media
English
54
7
105
2.7K
One Squirrel Army retweeté
Seth Dillon
Seth Dillon@SethDillon·
The moral problem with gay adoption/surrogacy is very similar to the moral problem with abortion — both put the desires and choices of adults above the needs, rights, and well-being of children. It's not any more complicated than that.
English
259
1.5K
11.8K
144.4K
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
@DavidFischer Yes. Two women cannot create a child just like two men can’t. Therefore they should be excluded from the adoption process
English
0
0
3
62
David Fischer
David Fischer@DavidFischer·
Should it be illegal for two gay women to adopt a baby?
English
848
55
1.4K
53.1K
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
This Tennessee Gay couple abusing their son thing is a direct result of the pro-choice movement. When we say an infant in the womb is just a clump of cells, we ignore the significance of the attachment a child is forming with their mother for 9 months. This evil, corrupt and diabolical. Homosexual couples should not be allowed to adopt because they cannot biologically EVER create children. Healthy children need a mother and father. Anything other than that is a loss.
English
0
0
0
38
One Squirrel Army retweeté
Matt Walsh
Matt Walsh@MattWalshBlog·
Gay surrogacy and gay adoption are predicated on the idea that gay men (or women) have a “right” to become parents. This idea is not only morally insane but also logically incoherent. It’s exactly like jumping off a building and claiming that you have the right to fly. Nobody has the right to defy the laws of nature. Where would such a right even originate? Two men cannot be parents. It’s impossible. Doesn’t matter how they feel or what they want. It cannot be. The only “right” at issue here is the right of the child. And the child has a right to be raised by a mother and a father, not two men masquerading as mother and father.
English
1.6K
6.7K
48.4K
1.2M
One Squirrel Army retweeté
𝕊𝕠𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕙𝕒𝕕 🎚️
Babies wait 9 months to meet the person they think is the center of the universe … 9 months to feel her touch, see her face, embrace her kiss. When we take babies away from their mothers and sell them to sodomites, this is what we take them away from.
English
315
3.9K
40K
862.7K
One Squirrel Army
One Squirrel Army@OneSquirrelArmy·
@AB84 Define worked. Maybe the reason prayer doesn’t “work” for some is because they misunderstand what prayer is for.
English
0
0
0
81
AB
AB@AB84·
Be totally honest. Has prayer ever truly worked in your life?
English
1.7K
118
3.8K
267.5K
One Squirrel Army retweeté
Defiant L’s
Defiant L’s@DefiantLs·
Rep. Crane: "Republicans are not the solution to all of your problems, but Democrats are pretty much the cause of all of your problems..."
English
250
3.3K
26.6K
319.2K
One Squirrel Army retweeté
Sama Hoole
Sama Hoole@SamaHoole·
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry. The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine. The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true. The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either. The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought. The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to. The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer. Now it is today. Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus. He is confident. He has always been confident. The confidence has never been the problem. The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Sama Hoole tweet media
English
986
11.4K
33.2K
1.9M