PaperLink

68 posts

PaperLink banner
PaperLink

PaperLink

@PaperLinkHQ

Share documents via secure links with real-time view analytics. Track who opened, which pages they read, how long they spent. Free DocSend alternative.

EU Inscrit le Ağustos 2025
27 Abonnements10 Abonnés
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@jackcoder0 Boundless productivity + zero demand is the scariest math I’ve seen. Do you think a Pigouvian automation tax could ever get political traction, or will governments dodge until it’s too late?
English
0
0
0
93
Jack
Jack@jackcoder0·
Two economists just published a mathematical proof that AI will destroy the economy. Not might. Not could. Will — if nothing changes. The paper is called "The AI Layoff Trap." Published March 2, 2026. Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. Boston University. Peer reviewed. Mathematically modeled. The conclusion is one sentence. "At the limit, firms automate their way to boundless productivity and zero demand." An economy that produces everything. And sells it to nobody. Here is how you get there. A company fires 500 workers and replaces them with AI. A competitor fires 700 to keep up. Another fires 1,000. Every company is behaving rationally. Every company is following the incentives correctly. And every company is building a trap for itself. Because the workers who were fired were also customers. When they lose their jobs faster than the economy can absorb them, they stop spending. Consumer demand falls. Companies respond by cutting costs — which means automating more workers — which means less spending — which means more falling demand — which means more automation. The loop has no natural exit. The researchers tested every proposed solution. Universal basic income. Capital income taxes. Worker equity participation. Upskilling programs. Corporate coordination agreements. Every single one failed in the model. The only intervention that worked: a Pigouvian automation tax — a per-task levy charged every time a company replaces a human with AI, forcing them to price in the demand they are destroying before they pull the trigger. No government has implemented this. No major economy is seriously discussing it. Meanwhile the numbers are already tracking the curve. 100,000 tech workers laid off in 2025. 92,000 more in the first months of 2026. Jack Dorsey fired half of Block's workforce and said publicly: "Within the next year, the majority of companies will reach the same conclusion." Nobody is doing anything wrong. Companies are following their incentives perfectly. That is exactly the problem. Rational behavior. At scale. Simultaneously. With no mechanism to stop it. Two economists built the math. The math leads to one place. Source: Falk & Tsoukalas · Wharton School + Boston University ·
Jack tweet media
English
810
3.6K
8K
750.4K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@NotionHQ Always love this prompt gets builders talking
English
0
0
0
44
Notion
Notion@NotionHQ·
What are you building today?
English
282
9
303
28.6K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@N_and_ni By 2030 models smarter than most humans flips the game.
English
0
0
0
1
Nandini
Nandini@N_and_ni·
Imagine it’s 2030. Anthropic, OpenAI, Google, and xAI all have models smarter than most humans. What’s the one skill that still guarantees a career?
English
130
4
127
18.6K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@PrajwalTomar_ 38 agents, 156 skills, 153K stars, that’s infrastructure‑level flex. Wild story
English
0
0
0
54
Prajwal Tomar
Prajwal Tomar@PrajwalTomar_·
WAIT. This is actually insane. A solo dev just won the Anthropic hackathon, shipped a working product in 8 hours with Claude Code, and walked away with $15,000. Then he open-sourced the entire stack. 153,000 stars on GitHub. Here's full setup: → 38 specialized agents (planner, security reviewer, debugger, code reviewer) → 156 skills loaded on demand (/plan, /tdd, /security-scan, /quality-gate) → 72 custom slash commands → AgentShield: 1,282 security tests across CLAUDE .md, MCP configs, hooks, skills → 3 Opus 4.6 agents running red-team pipelines (Attacker, Defender, Auditor) → Continuous learning layer that builds confidence across sessions → Coverage across 12 language ecosystems This is what Claude Code looks like when someone treats it like infrastructure instead of a chatbot.
Prajwal Tomar tweet media
English
14
13
98
8.3K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@KaiXCreator Running GPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok, and DeepSeek in parallel is next‑level chaos engineering.
English
0
0
0
34
Kaito
Kaito@KaiXCreator·
I saw a girl coding today. -Tab 1 ChatGPT. -Tab 2 Gemini. -Tab 3 Claude. -Tab 4 Grok. -Tab 5 DeepSeek. She asked every Al the same exact question. Patiently waited, then pasted each response into 5 different Python files. Hit run on all five. Pick the best one. Like a psychopath.
English
72
11
361
68.2K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@sflorimm Claude feels like the smooth operator, Codex like the workhorse
English
0
0
1
11
Floro S.
Floro S.@sflorimm·
Are you team Claude or Codex right now ?
English
126
1
57
7.1K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@adahstwt Wild lineup, GPT, Claude, Gemini, and DeepSeek all bring different sauce. Nice poll, Adah, that’s clean.
English
0
0
0
11
adah
adah@adahstwt·
be honest, which AI model are you building with most? - GPT - Claude - Gemini - DeepSeek
English
68
1
55
4.5K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@justbyte_ Express, Spring, Django, and FastAPI each has its own vibe.
English
0
0
0
116
Aryan
Aryan@justbyte_·
developers, be honest which framework is worth learning in 2026?
Aryan tweet media
English
23
0
30
3.5K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@bcherny From 231 days to 13 is insane compression, Boris!
English
0
0
1
4.5K
Boris Cherny
Boris Cherny@bcherny·
Salesforce published a detailed writeup on going agentic with Claude Code. A couple things jumped out. A migration they'd scoped at 231 days shipped in 13. One PR delivered 21 endpoints at 100% test coverage.
English
139
177
3.6K
372.8K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@pcshipp 712 visitors in 4 days is actually solid traction; $0 MRR is just the starting line.
English
0
0
0
17
pc
pc@pcshipp·
It's been 4 days of launching my first SaaS - $0 MRR - $0 revenue - 712 new visitors Is this the worst startup stats ever?
pc tweet media
English
119
2
174
14.1K
Sick
Sick@sickdotdev·
GitHub if it was vibe coded
Sick tweet media
English
141
82
2.8K
95.7K
Sara
Sara@SaraDiscovers·
What was the first programming language you learned?
Sara tweet media
English
236
6
220
14.9K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@CodeWithAmann Laptop = freedom, Desktop = focus. Cool side‑by‑side, Aman
English
1
0
0
539
Aman 🧋
Aman 🧋@CodeWithAmann·
As a developer which device is best for vibe coding? Laptop or Desktop
Aman 🧋 tweet mediaAman 🧋 tweet media
English
166
21
598
60.7K
Kaito
Kaito@KaiXCreator·
Are you building something people actually need? Drop what you're working on 👇🏻
English
146
0
66
8.6K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@Govindtwtt The mix of SaaS, AI, and automation is where the real magic happens. Nice call‑out
English
0
0
1
13
Govind
Govind@Govindtwtt·
Hey Developers! Looking to connect with people building in: 🍽️ SaaS 🚀 Tech 📲 Automation 🧠 AI tools 📱 Product Development 🔥 Web APP 💻 Devs Drop what you're working on 👇
English
70
2
54
3.5K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@Sumanly0 Buying Pro is just the entry ticket the real flex is how you use it
English
0
0
0
10
Suman Sharma
Suman Sharma@Sumanly0·
Bought Claude pro What should I do next?
Suman Sharma tweet media
English
26
1
67
1.7K
PaperLink
PaperLink@PaperLinkHQ·
@ClaudeDevs On‑the‑fly orchestration with fleets of subagents is next‑level. Props to the ClaudeDevs crew, that’s slick engineering.
English
0
0
0
4K
ClaudeDevs
ClaudeDevs@ClaudeDevs·
New in Claude Code (research preview): dynamic workflows. Claude writes an orchestration script on the fly, then spins up a large fleet of coordinated subagents in parallel to take on your most complex tasks. Use the word "workflow" in a prompt to get started.
ClaudeDevs tweet media
English
339
928
10.3K
3.4M