rayie🩸🫧

Everyone in the world has to take a private vote by pressing a red or blue button. If more than 50% of people press the blue button, everyone survives. If less than 50% of people press the blue button, only people who pressed the red button survive. Which button would you press?

I tried to make butterless cheesecake and realized the butter is actually to glue down the cookie crumbs because they float 😭😭

すでに海賊版で作品が行き渡ってしまった国や地域への海外進出が有益であるかを公式は判断しなきゃならない。 企業は作家や従業員を養って守る義務がある。採算の合わない事業展開ができない面では海賊版は悪なんだよ。

I think what this position misses is: 1) Kids are gonna have a surname 2) Having the whole household share a surname really is useful for a whole lot of purposes and parents who don't share surnames with their kids often face administrative challenges 3) Making up a new surname for the whole household breaks ties with *both* sides of the family and also most people see it as kinda cringe 4) So it's either his or hers or hyphens 5) Hyphens are fine, many countries do that, but they do make it literally impossible to write your full surname on many documents for many name combos, so you're back at having a name that creates recurrent administrative problems 6) So the lowest-friction solution really is his or hers 7) There's no fundamental reason it has to be his, but either way somebody is gonna give. You can argue it should be the man, but the only argument for that is matriarchy, which is no more compelling than patriarchy. 8) On the other hand the argument for "this is just the convention, don't sweat it too much" is fairly strong

How would you answer this common Goldman Sachs interview question?

日本はゲームの事をその企業から生まれた子供だと思っててゲームが終わったのならそこで命は終わり。企業に委ねる 海外はゲームの事を作品･芸術だと思ってて良い作品なのに終わったのなら蘇らせてみんなに知って欲しい。残して欲しいと考える。 つまり、絶対に分かり合えない。